ear candle effective? See picture, judge for yourself

ear candle effective? See picture, judge for yourself-
Candle A in the photo at the following link was used in the ear...
Candle B in the photo never touched an ear. The residue looks the
same to me. I kept both candle A and B in as close to the same angle
as possible. The substance inside the candle cannot be ear wax in
candle B as it never came close to an ear...

http://waitingtowakeup.angelfire.com/earcandle.JPG

On 23 Apr, 16:41, mindy <UsRc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> ear candle effective? See picture, judge for yourself-
> Candle A in the photo at the following link was used in the ear...
> Candle B in the photo never touched an ear. The residue looks the
> same to me. I kept both candle A and B in as close to the same angle
> as possible. The substance inside the candle cannot be ear wax in
> candle B as it never came close to an ear...
>
> http://waitingtowakeup.angelfire.com/earcandle.JPG

Link no worky :-)

mindy wrote:
> ear candle effective? See picture, judge for yourself-
> Candle A in the photo at the following link was used in the ear...
> Candle B in the photo never touched an ear. The residue looks the
> same to me. I kept both candle A and B in as close to the same angle
> as possible. The substance inside the candle cannot be ear wax in
> candle B as it never came close to an ear...
>
> http://waitingtowakeup.angelfire.com/earcandle.JPG

well at least he had a link

On Apr 23, 8:50*am, Joe.P.Mann...@googlemail.com wrote:
> On 23 Apr, 16:41, mindy <UsRc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >earcandleeffective? See picture, judge for yourself-
> >CandleA in the photo at the following link was used in theear...
> >CandleB in the photo never touched anear. *The residue looks the
> > same to me. *I kept bothcandleA and B in as close to the same angle
> > as possible. *The substance inside thecandlecannot beearwax in
> >candleB as it never came close to anear...
>
> >http://waitingtowakeup.angelfire.com/earcandle.JPG
>
> Link no worky :-)

I just tried the link and it worked for me....

On Apr 23, 9:37*am, "humble.life" <g...@t.com> wrote:
> mindy wrote:
> >earcandleeffective? See picture, judge for yourself-
> >CandleA in the photo at the following link was used in theear...
> >CandleB in the photo never touched anear. *The residue looks the
> > same to me. *I kept bothcandleA and B in as close to the same angle
> > as possible. *The substance inside thecandlecannot beearwax in
> >candleB as it never came close to anear...
>
> >http://waitingtowakeup.angelfire.com/earcandle.JPG
>
> well at least he had a link

The link is right above your...well at least he had a link.... it
works too

On 26 Apr, 05:23, mindy <UsRc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Apr 23, 9:37 am, "humble.life" <g...@t.com> wrote:
>
> > mindy wrote:
> > >earcandleeffective? See picture, judge for yourself-
> > >CandleA in the photo at the following link was used in theear...
> > >CandleB in the photo never touched anear. The residue looks the
> > > same to me. I kept bothcandleA and B in as close to the same angle
> > > as possible. The substance inside thecandlecannot beearwax in
> > >candleB as it never came close to anear...
>
> > >http://waitingtowakeup.angelfire.com/earcandle.JPG
>
> > well at least he had a link
>
> The link is right above your...well at least he had a link.... it
> works too

All that comes up as an image telling me that it is hosted by
angelfire. You can see it because your logged in. Angelfire dont allow
hotlinking or direct links to images.
Try uploading it to photobucket.

-Joe

mindy wrote:
> On Apr 23, 9:37 am, "humble.life" <g...@t.com> wrote:
>> mindy wrote:
>>> earcandleeffective? See picture, judge for yourself-
>>> CandleA in the photo at the following link was used in theear...
>>> CandleB in the photo never touched anear. The residue looks the
>>> same to me. I kept bothcandleA and B in as close to the same angle
>>> as possible. The substance inside thecandlecannot beearwax in
>>> candleB as it never came close to anear...
>>> http://waitingtowakeup.angelfire.com/earcandle.JPG
>> well at least he had a link
>
> The link is right above your...well at least he had a link.... it
> works too

i knew about that link,

what i want is the other link from bruce