<Mari@net.ac> wrote in message
news:qh9g631iqunv45avb43jvhkip08t9qnefm@4ax.com...
> When I started taking Arimidex 4.5 years ago I was told it would be for
> five years. I've been wondering if that was still the standard or if I
> would be continuing to take it after December. The doctor I saw
> yesterday said I should stop at the end of the five years and could even
> stop a few weeks earlier if my prescription runs out. I'm estrogen
> positive too.
As of my last visit a couple of months ago, my onco doc was saying he'd keep
me on Arimidex indefinitely. I took
Tamoxifen for about 2.5 years, then
switched to Arimidex (long story, nothing to do with effectiveness or side
effects of either drug). I've been on Arimidex now for getting on 4 years.
My understanding was that the onco was waiting for more definitive evidence
from long-term studies. Tamoxifen had already been shown to provide its
benefits after one takes it for 5 years -- more time didn't improve survival
stats and did have some side effects. There wasn't enough evidence to say
whether Arimidex behaved the same, or not.
> I don't know if I will ever think I'm completely cured, even in twenty
> years.
Unfortunately, BC can recur (or metastasize) after any arbitrary number of
years. It just gets less & less likely that will happen, as time passes.
The "knee in the curve" -- the point at which our survival odds make their
most noticeable improvement -- is around the 2 or 3 year mark, or
thereabouts, as I understand it.
Ann T.
Remove 'dontsendspam' from address to reply by email