<!-- google_ad_section_start -->Elizabeth Edwards update<!-- google_ad_section_end -->
Health Forums

Go Back   Health Forums > Cancer > Breast Cancer > alt.support.cancer.breast

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-04-2007, 06:13 PM
Mari@net.ac
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Elizabeth Edwards update

http://www.people.com/people/article...033635,00.html

Elizabeth Edwards Gets a 'Good Sign'
WEDNESDAY APRIL 04, 2007 09:45 AM EDT
By Stephen M. Silverman

Elizabeth Edwards has received some upbeat news regarding her battle
with cancer - that it can likely be treated with anti-estrogen drugs,
she says.

Rather than having the most aggressive "triple-negative" cancer, as her
doctors had originally feared, testing proved that she had two of the
three key hormonal receptors estrogen and progesterone.

The initial diagnosis was "slightly estrogen heavy," she said, but this
time it's a strong marker and she also has the second marker.

"I consider that a good sign. It means there are more medications which
I can expect to be responsive," Elizabeth, 57, told the Associated Press
during a campaign stop with her husband, Democratic presidential
candidate John Edwards, in Cedar Rapids, Iowa, on Tuesday.

Elizabeth also voiced her frustration with the speculation by others
about her potential lifespan and reports that she's likely to die within
five years.

"I don't care. I'm going to fight exactly as hard if they tell me that
I've got 15 years or if I've got 30 years," she said. "I'm still going
to fight to get rid of this if they tell me I've got 15 minutes... It
doesn't matter what the prognosis is. So it's not an important piece of
information to me."

On March 22, the Edwardses announced that Elizabeth had had a recurrence
of cancer, this time incurable and in her bone. Having previously
suffered from breast cancer that was believed to be in remission, the
disease had "moved from the breast to the bone" and she is "no longer
curable," said her husband.

Despite the setback, the couple said they had no intention of ending his
presidential bid because doctors told her that the campaign would not
interfere with her treatment.

On Friday, the AP reports, Elizabeth had her first post-diagnosis visit
with the doctor, from which she emerged encouraged.

Pointing out a large bruise on the back of her hand and another on her
forearm from her IV, Elizabeth said she received an initial course of a
bone-building drug. In addition, she's taking the aromatase inhibitor
Femara and is not having to undergo chemotherapy.

Besides, Elizabeth said, the development of drugs like Femara is one of
the many reasons why she dismisses the discussions about her life
expectancy.

"Femara didn't exist five years ago," she noted. "I don't expect to get
yesterday's medicine. If I can help it, I'd like to get tomorrow's
medicine."

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-04-2007, 06:56 PM
fortunata
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Elizabeth Edwards update

hooray!

She is a warrior queen!






Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-07-2007, 10:44 AM
R. Fizek
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Elizabeth Edwards update

We are ALL warrior queens!!!


"fortunata" <pacifist@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:JaRQh.244166$5j1.194705@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> hooray!
>
> She is a warrior queen!
>
>
>
>
>
>



Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-07-2007, 10:44 AM
x{yz}enophil44@hotmail.com
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Elizabeth Edwards update

On Fri, 06 Apr 2007 07:23:49 GMT, "R. Fizek" <fizkowie1@verizon.net>
wrote:

>We are ALL warrior queens!!!


Specially me. I'm now an Amazon, except I have to learn how to be
left-handed next.
--
It's easier to get forgiveness than permission. - Banksy
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-07-2007, 10:44 AM
Mary Fisher
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Elizabeth Edwards update


<x{yz}enophil44@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:dt7c13dr44us63drnjkf9sg9ak7phaf26n@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 06 Apr 2007 07:23:49 GMT, "R. Fizek" <fizkowie1@verizon.net>
> wrote:
>
>>We are ALL warrior queens!!!

>
> Specially me. I'm now an Amazon, except I have to learn how to be
> left-handed next.


What do you mean? You haven't had your arm amputated, surely?

I'm worried ...

Mary


Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-07-2007, 10:44 AM
x{yz}enophil44@hotmail.com
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Elizabeth Edwards update

On Fri, 6 Apr 2007 11:47:39 +0100, "Mary Fisher"
<mary.fisher@zetnet.co.uk> wrote:
><x{yz}enophil44@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:dt7c13dr44us63drnjkf9sg9ak7phaf26n@4ax.com.. .
>> On Fri, 06 Apr 2007 07:23:49 GMT, "R. Fizek" <fizkowie1@verizon.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>We are ALL warrior queens!!!

>>
>> Specially me. I'm now an Amazon, except I have to learn how to be
>> left-handed next.

>
>What do you mean? You haven't had your arm amputated, surely?
>
>I'm worried ...
>

No, but I had my left breast removed. As a right-handed person I would
normally use a bow with my left hand on the bow and my right hand on the
string, so my remaining breast would still get in the way.

I believe that using a bow efficiently is the reason the fabled Amazons
were alleged to remove a breast.
--
It's easier to get forgiveness than permission. - Banksy
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-07-2007, 10:44 AM
allan
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Elizabeth Edwards update

On Apr 6, 7:08 am, x{yz}enophi...@hotmail.com wrote:

> I believe that using a bow efficiently is the reason the fabled Amazons
> were alleged to remove a breast.


Now that's fascinating. I'd never heard that before so I did some
research and apparently the jury's still out. There are no depictions
of Amazon women missing their right breast but some think that
'Amazon' translates to 'without breast'. Another school of thought
says that Amazon women bound their breasts instead of removing them so
that they could throw spears or shoot arrows more efficiently.

Thanks for the morning research project ;-)

Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-07-2007, 10:44 AM
Mary Fisher
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Elizabeth Edwards update


<x{yz}enophil44@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:8dac135gfpmv654f2g5vi94r1bmm8ckdgf@4ax.com...
>>>
>>> Specially me. I'm now an Amazon, except I have to learn how to be
>>> left-handed next.

>>
>>What do you mean? You haven't had your arm amputated, surely?
>>
>>I'm worried ...
>>

> No, but I had my left breast removed. As a right-handed person I would
> normally use a bow with my left hand on the bow and my right hand on the
> string, so my remaining breast would still get in the way.


Phew!
>
> I believe that using a bow efficiently is the reason the fabled Amazons
> were alleged to remove a breast.


When I was diagnosed I wanted an all-off but did consider that if I had the
offending part removed (right breast) I could found a new re-enactment
group - the Amazonian Archers. We'd have been in great demand! I know I'm
not the only woman in the living history movement with only one breast.

As it is I only had the lump out and what with the slight lympho, loss of
strength in my right arm and still a bit painful breast I've lost my
confidence in drawing a longbow. I'll do it ocasionally but only to teach
(and impress) grandchildren :-) And with VERY great care :-)

A friend of mine lost teeth by loosing with a pipe in his mouth ...

Mary


Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-07-2007, 10:44 AM
Mary Fisher
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Elizabeth Edwards update


"allan" <wizard10000@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1175858167.062321.45910@n76g2000hsh.googlegro ups.com...
> On Apr 6, 7:08 am, x{yz}enophi...@hotmail.com wrote:
>
>> I believe that using a bow efficiently is the reason the fabled Amazons
>> were alleged to remove a breast.

>
> Now that's fascinating. I'd never heard that before so I did some
> research and apparently the jury's still out. There are no depictions
> of Amazon women missing their right breast but some think that
> 'Amazon' translates to 'without breast'. Another school of thought
> says that Amazon women bound their breasts instead of removing them so
> that they could throw spears or shoot arrows more efficiently.


Oh yes, we know that it's not proven but it's an appealing story which is
perpetuated by people who like a 'good' story - like red-top (tabloid)
readers and tv programme makers. And in fact breasts don't get in the way of
a bow - if the stance is right. If they did some men would be vulnerable :-)

Mary


Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Elizabeth Edwards and me Eva alt.support.cancer.breast 50 04-03-2007 08:07 PM
Mrs Edwards and Stage V BC alex alt.support.cancer.breast 0 03-30-2007 02:32 AM
More on Elizabeth Edwards deb alt.support.cancer.breast 2 03-28-2007 05:03 AM
Not OT--Eliz. Edwards' Cancer Claude alt.support.cancer.prostate 19 03-28-2007 05:03 AM
attn: elizabeth - very high quality finances - nic - (1/1) ravid alt.support.anxiety-panic 0 01-30-2007 10:25 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:58 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0
     
   
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41