Who's keeping score?

Who is keeping score, in how the current cancer treatments work & don't
work, the harm they do or don't do?

No survey-taker is asking me questions about it.

The docs bend over backwards, trying to ignore adverse reactions, the
major harm done & deaths from treatments, .... trying to delay or
completely avoid testing that will show harm done, like heart damage
(echocardiograms, ultrasound of heart).

So, who's keeping score on the effectiveness or lack thereof, of cancer
treatments? When we're Not the ones contributing the info, our
experiences.


Susan Wms, Su_Texas my opinions