Sorry to hear of your wife's situation. I've interspersed some comments
below.
Smitty88 wrote:
> My wife has advanced BC (mets to liver and nodes). Has been on taxol
> and Avastin for 4-5 months and has had it with side effects although
> numbers stable ('down' from 159 to 153) and is debating whether to stop
> treatment or to try something else. Onc recommended Xeloda (mentioned
> another option but my notes are not clear - maybe Genzar? spelling
> uncertain).
That would be
Gemzar, a chemotherapy drug which can be combined with
taxanes for metastatic bc. The combination on average delays the
disease progression by a couple of months.
But he said nothing about
Tykerb. FDA sheet on Tykerb shows
> it with the same side effects as Xeloda. Is the combo more brutal or
> something?
As far as the cancer is concerned, yes. I don't think it particularly
adds to the Xeloda side effects. But of course it is experimental, and
no-one really knows yet. As I understand, to be effective Tykerb has to
be used in conjunction with a traditional chemotherapy agent, and Xeloda
is the one it has been tested with and proved to work with.
You could ask the doctor about clinical trials, and mention Tykerb. Is
the Avastin part of a trial?
> Neuropathy in fingers and toes worse.
That would suggest Gemzar isn't such a good idea then, because is means
continuing the Taxol, which is driving the neuropathy.
> She feels very tired most of
> the time and her appetite is down, although she hasn't lost much weight.
Hmm, that could be the Taxol or it could be the liver mets or other
occult mets. Probably both. Either should be reflected somewhat in the
blood tests. If blood counts are down, then it seems to me that "stop
all" could be a sensible treatment at this stage. We are counting the
potential gains with any treatment in months on the fingers of one hand,
and the loss of life quality from the chemo is chewing up most of that.
> We take shorter walks. When she was 'cancer-free' for 5 years we felt
> relieved and when it became 7 we almost forgot about it. Well, once you
> have it you are NEVER really free.
Once you are *born* you are never really free. Life is a terminal
disease. You can view it that she got cancer, got cured, lived free of
disease for 7 years, then got it again. (Unlike many infectious
diseases there is nothing to stop cancer getting two bites of the
cherry.) Or you can view it as spending seven years waiting for the
other shoe to drop.
> Any tips out there about how to help
> boost her energy?
I don't suppose this will come across as very helpful, but my advice
would be to live with whatever energy state she has. I spent a lot of
time trying to keep my wife nourished and hydrated as the disease
progressed, and mostly I was banging my head against a wall. Current
thinking is that pushing the patient to eat or drink isn't really doing
them any good, it's just denial of what is happening. Of course if you
(or the medics) can identify a cause of energy loss apart from the
obvious, then treating that can be a great help. I'm not saying you
shouldn't look for a solution, but I am saying that sooner or later you
will come to this situation and there will be no solution.
> Tiny nibble of Marijuanna cookie sometimes helps
> appetite and mild nausea but she doesn't want the high.
But does getting the munchies actually boost her energy? I suspect it
probably doesn't. It doesn't seem to work that way. If it does, than
that would be an indication that there is something else to look for.
Tim Jackson