"Greg Louis" <glouis@dynamicro.ca> wrote in message
news:g35vk1014hs@news2.newsguy.com...
> Update to the data in the signature below: at 3 yr 6 mo 26 da, the PSA
> level was 0.93. Hangin' in there...
>
> Prostate is "a bit big" say both the uro and the rad onc, but I'm off
> FloMax now and function seems close to normal; just a bit dribbly at the
> end of voiding. No ED (beyond what one might expect at age 61, that is 
>
> --
> Greg Louis
> Biopsy 2004-06-22 (age 58), Gleason 3+3, T1c, volume 27 cc. Monotherapy,
> 55 I-125 seeds 2004-11-16. Lowest PSA yet 0.59 (8 mo); then 0.62, 0.85,
> 0.75, 1.7, 3.29, 1.29 (whew!) 28.5 mo, 1.41, 0.78, 0.91 at 3 yr.
As I understand the treatment, and if that 3.29 in DEC 2006 was a 'bump',
you are doing extremely well. Congratulations, Greg.
--
PSA 16 10/17/2000 @ 46
Biopsy 11/01/2000 G7 (3+4), T2c
RRP 12/15/2000 G7 (3+4), T3cN0M0 Neg margins
PSA <.1 <.1 <.1 .27 .37 .75 PSAD 0.19 years
EBRT 05-07/2002 @ 47
PSA .34 .22 .15 .21 .32 PSAD .056 years
Lupron 07/03 (1 mo) 8/03 and every 4 months there after
PSA .07 .05 .06 .09 .08 .132 .145 PSAD 1.4 years
Casodex added daily 07/06
PSA <0.04, <0.05, <0.04, <0.04, <0.1 2/12/08
Illegitimati non carborundum