Prostate cancer wiped out by antibody: study

[pedanticky]

http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2...section=justin

[JayTKR]

I just did a Google search for "F77 prostate" (without the quotation marks)
and it came up with a lot of hits -- basically all news articles about F77
that are only hours old, and from all around the world. So, it looks like
there is a press blitz going on about this. There was also an article from
November 8, 2009, and there is a patent proposal from 1998 for the same
monoclonal antibody, I think.

It will be interesting to see what this is all about.


"pedanticky" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]..
> http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2...section=justin

[Ronju99]

On Dec 29, 3:27*am, "JayTKR" <Jay...@eytiohgf.ghj> wrote:
> I just did a Google search for "F77 prostate" (without the quotation marks)
> and it came up with a lot of hits -- basically all news articles about F77
> that are only hours old, and from all around the world. *So, it looks like
> there is a press blitz going on about this. *There was also an article from
> November 8, 2009, and there is a patent proposal from 1998 for the same
> monoclonal antibody, I think.
>
> It will be interesting to see what this is all about.
>
> "pedanticky" <pedanti...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:[email protected]..
>
>
>
> >http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2...ection=justin- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science...a5f06003858192
Maybe this is what it's all about. Notice the date.

Ron S.

[ChuckP]

"Ronju99" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
On Dec 29, 3:27 am, "JayTKR" <Jay...@eytiohgf.ghj> wrote:
> I just did a Google search for "F77 prostate" (without the quotation
> marks)
> and it came up with a lot of hits -- basically all news articles about F77
> that are only hours old, and from all around the world. So, it looks like
> there is a press blitz going on about this. There was also an article from
> November 8, 2009, and there is a patent proposal from 1998 for the same
> monoclonal antibody, I think.
>
> It will be interesting to see what this is all about.
>
> "pedanticky" <pedanti...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:[email protected]..
>
>
>
> >http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2...ection=justin-
> >Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science...a5f06003858192
Maybe this is what it's all about. Notice the date.

Ron S.



Published in December 2009 Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Abstract available at ..

http://www.pnas.org/content/early/20...c-7cacadbfa2d1

Chuck

[Steve Kramer]

Wow! This is almost in the "too good to be true" category.




"pedanticky" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]..
> http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2...section=justin

PSA 16 10/17/2000 @ 46
Biopsy 11/01/2000 G7 (3+4), T2c
RRP 12/15/2000 G7 (3+4), T3cN0M0 Neg margins
PSA <.1 <.1 <.1 .27 .37 .75 PSAD 0.19 years
EBRT 05-07/2002 @ 47
PSA .34 .22 .15 .21 .32 PSAD .056 years
Lupron 07/03 (1 mo) 8/03 and every 4 months there after
PSA .07 .05 .06 .09 .08 .132 .145 PSAD 1.4 years
Casodex added daily 07/06
PSA undetectable since. Next Assay 02/02/10
Illegitimati non carborundum

[Jay-T]

"pedanticky" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]..
> http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2...section=justin

Someone just sent me this link which provides a little more balanced
perspective:

http://prostatecancerinfolink.net/20...dia-over-hype/

But it still looks interesting to me.