"Colophony" <colophony2002@yahoo.it> wrote in message
news:b1eqm.28413$Tq6.26081@tornado.fastwebnet.it.. .
: Steve
: do you mean that I could get a better figure next psa test?
Your results are so low that the answer really depends on the assay your lab
is using. Successful radiation treatment usually results in slowly
declining PSA until it becomes a straight horizontal line on a graph. My
experience (mostly from this ng) is that if it straight-lines under 1.5,
you're doing well. If under 0.10, even better.
Your PSA was 1.7 when you started RT. By January it was down to 0.21.
March it was down 66+%. June it was down 33% from March. Now it's down
another 25% from June. So, yes, it could go down even more, but your assay
may not be able to detect the difference or even the PSA.
--
PSA 16 10/17/2000 @ 46
Biopsy 11/01/2000 G7 (3+4), T2c
RRP 12/15/2000 G7 (3+4), T3cN0M0 Neg margins
PSA <.1 <.1 <.1 .27 .37 .75 PSAD 0.19 years
EBRT 05-07/2002 @ 47
PSA .34 .22 .15 .21 .32 PSAD .056 years
Lupron 07/03 (1 mo) 8/03 and every 4 months there after
PSA .07 .05 .06 .09 .08 .132 .145 PSAD 1.4 years
Casodex added daily 07/06
PSA undetectable since; last checked on 06/04/09
Illegitimati non carborundum: Colophony