gary.miller12@comcast.net wrote:
> i am being advised that i should use viagra or cialis after my surgery
> on oct 31st. i am not clear about it's benefit. i think it is to help
> and speed up the healing process as well as to minimize the side effect
> of ed. what is the mechanisim on how it works to help the healing and
> ed? also, what is the dosage i should take for healing? is it
> measured by the amount it would take to facilitate an erection for
> intercourse ?
> if thats true and it doesn't create an erection right after the
> surgery, how do i know how much to take? i noticed currently that
> about 15 mg of cialis was not adequate to give me an erection whereas
> about 75 mg of viagra is. it seems that viagra is more potent. it's
> also possible that cialis affected my nervous system since my nerves
> seemed to be painfully sensitive to it unless it was coincidently due
> to something else.
> is there a way to get medicare to help pay for it? would it be
> effective enough to take about 50mg of viagra so i could cut the pills
> in half, even though 50mg currently does not quite give me a full
> erection for intercourse?
>
> gary
Dear gary,
I am going to limit myself to the issue of ther effects of PDE-5
inhibitors (viagra, etc) and other treatments on "rehab" of the penis,
eg.. restoration of erectile function in the long term. I just did some
research on this on behalf of my husband who is just at his 1-yr.
post-op mark.
>From what i have found the only therapy with a proven record of
improving EF in the long-run is the use of injections, preferably
starting as early as possible. (my husb's doctor just got around to it
after 8 mos. and i wish he had gotten his act tog. sooner).
i don't know if there is any reliable evidence showing that pills can
improve long-term prognosis. The best I've read is that it does so in
maybe 30% of cases. My husband's ED doctor, Arnold Melman, who is one
of the top doctors in this field, does not beliefe pde5's do anything
in this case. Acc. to an article I just pulled up, "patients who have
undergone rrp are among the most refractory to treatment with PDE5'
inhibitors." However, some improvements were seen after 18-24 mos it
said (see medscape.com/viewarticle/532406 by mccullough, most recent i
found). (The article cited to on cancerpages.com is based on a study by
Viagra's maker, Pfizer, therefore I would not rely on it.)
There IS a lot of anecdotal evidence by men supporting the view that
pills do enhance performance (maybe not just in the short term).
Because of this my husband decided he would like to take some because
he took vitamin v for a short time after surgery and it had no adverse
effects so he thinks there's nothing to lose by trying it again. I
agree. These pills are expensive so we used foreign pharmacies to
acquire them at a fraction of the cost. We used rxoverseasdrugs.com
but I hear a lot of good things about alldaychemist.com. Incidentally,
it seems people report the best results with
tadalafil (cialis) so we
are going to ask the dr. for a script for that one.
Pumps i don't know much about. Supposedly they bring blood to the
genital area which is good, but it is not "fresh blood" as is the case
with shots.
My husband and I incidentally have been very happy with trimix
(injections) and aside from any long-term benefits it allows you to
have good sex in the short term.
(I got most of the info cited here from an article by somebody at
tulane u. -- i don't know the exact cite bec. my husband has the
article at work. Do a google on phrophylactic (prevention) radical
prostatectomy and ed and i believe you will retrieve it.)
Best of luck,
Leah