<!-- google_ad_section_start -->CANCER IN IRAQ VETS RAISES POSSIBILITY OF TOXIC EXPOSURE<!-- google_ad_section_end -->
Health Forums

Go Back   Health Forums > Cancer > Cancers > alt.support.cancer

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-30-2007, 12:15 PM
Dr. Jai Maharaj
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default CANCER IN IRAQ VETS RAISES POSSIBILITY OF TOXIC EXPOSURE

Cancer in Iraq vets raises possibility of toxic exposure

By Carla McClain
ARIZONA DAILY STAR
Tucson, Arizona
Sunday, August 26, 2007

After serving in Vietnam nearly 40 years ago -- and
receiving the Bronze Star for it -- the Tucson soldier was
called back to active duty in Iraq.

While there, he awoke one morning with a sore throat.
Eighteen months later, Army Sgt. James Lauderdale was dead,
of a bizarrely aggressive cancer rarely seen by the doctors
who tried to treat it.

As a result, his stunned and heartbroken family has joined
growing ranks of sickened and dying Iraq war vets and their
families who believe exposures to toxic poisons in the war
zone are behind their illnesses -- mostly cancers, striking
the young, taking them down with alarming speed.

The number of these cancers remains undisclosed, with
military officials citing patient privacy issues, as well
as lack of evidence the cases are linked to conditions in
the war zone. The U.S. Congress has ordered a probe of
suspect toxins and may soon begin widespread testing of our
armed forces.

"He got so sick, so fast"

Jim Lauderdale was 58 when his National Guard unit was
deployed to the Iraq-Kuwait border, where he helped
transport arriving soldiers and Marines into combat areas.
He was a strong man, say relatives, who can't remember him
ever missing a day of work for illness. And he developed a
cancer of the mouth, which overwhelmingly strikes smokers,
drinkers and tobacco chewers. He was none of those.

"Jim's doctors didn't know why he would get this kind of
cancer -- they had no answers for us," said his wife,
Dixie.

"He got so sick, so fast. We really think it had to be
something he was exposed to over there. So many of the
soldiers we met with cancer at Walter Reed (Army Medical
Center) complained about the polluted air they lived in,
the brown water they had to use, the dust they breathed
from exploded munitions. It was very toxic."

As a mining engineer, Lauderdale knew exactly what it meant
when he saw the thick black smoke pouring nonstop out of
the smokestacks that line the Iraq/Kuwait border area where
he was stationed for three months in 2005.

"He wrote to me that everyone was complaining about their
stinging eyes and sore throats and headaches," Dixie said.
"For Jim to say something like that, to complain, was very
unusual.

"One of the mothers on the cancer ward had pictures of her
son bathing in the brown water," she said. "He died of
kidney cancer."

Stationed in roughly the same area as Lauderdale, yet
another soldier -- now fighting terminal colon cancer --
described the scene there, of oil refineries, a cement
factory, a chlorine factory and a sulfuric acid factory,
all spewing unfiltered and uncontrolled substances into the
air.

"One day, we were walking toward the port and they had
sulfuric acid exploding out of the stacks. We were covered
with it, everything was burning on us, and we had to turn
around and get to the medics," said Army Staff Sgt. Frank
Valentin, 35.

Not long after, he developed intense rectal pain, which
doctors told him for months was hemorrhoids. Finally
diagnosed with aggressive colorectal cancer -- requiring
extensive surgery, resulting in a colostomy bag -- he was
given fewer than two years to live by his Walter Reed
physicians.

He is now a couple of months past that death sentence, but
his chemo drugs are starting to fail, and the cancer is
eating into his liver and lungs. He spends his days with
his wife and three children at their Florida home.

"I don't know how much time I have," he said. Suspect:
depleted uranium

None of these soldiers know for sure what's killing them.
But they suspect it's a cascade of multiple toxic
exposures, coupled with the intense stress of daily life in
a war zone weakening their immune systems.

"There's so much pollution from so many sources, your body
can't fight what's coming at it," Valentin said. "And you
don't eat well or sleep well, ever. That weakens you, too.
There's no chance to gather your strength. These are kids
19, 20 and 21 getting all kinds of cancers. The Walter Reed
cancer ward is packed full with them."

The prime suspect in all this, in the minds of many victims
-- and some scientists -- is what's known as depleted
uranium -- the radioactive chemical prized by the military
for its ability to penetrate armored vehicles. When
munitions explode, the substance hits the air as fine dust,
easily inhaled. Last month, the Iraqi environment minister
blamed the tons of the chemical dropped during the war's
"shock and awe" campaign for a surge of cancer cases across
the country. However, the Pentagon and U.S. State
Department strongly deny this, citing four studies,
including one by the World Health Organization, that found
levels in war zones not harmful to civilians or soldiers. A
U.N. Environmental Program study concurs, but only if spent
munitions are cleared away.

Returning solders have said that isn't happening.

"When tanks exploded, I would handle those tanks, and there
was DU everywhere," said Valentin. "This is a big issue."
The fierce Iraq winds carry desert sand and dust for miles,
said Dixie Lauderdale, who suspects her husband was exposed
to at least some depleted uranium. Many vets from the Gulf
War blame the chemical used in that conflict for their Gulf
War syndrome illnesses. Congress orders study

As the controversy rages, Congress has ordered a
comprehensive independent study, due in October, of the
health effects of depleted uranium exposure on U.S.
soldiers and their children. And a "DU bill" -- ordering
all members of the U.S. military exposed to it be
identified and tested -- is working its way through
Congress.

"Basically, we want to get ahead of this curve, and not go
through the years of painful denial we went through with
Agent Orange that was the legacy of Vietnam," said Rep.
Raśl Grijalva, D-Ariz., a co-sponsor of the bill.

"We want an independent agency to do independent testing of
our soldiers, and find out what's really going on. These
incidents of cancer and illness that all of us are hearing
about back in our districts are not just anecdotal -- there
is a pattern here. And yes, I do suspect DU may be at the
bottom of it."

What's happening today -- growing numbers of sickened
soldiers who say they were exposed to it amid firm denials
of harm from military brass -- almost mirrors the early
stages of the Agent Orange aftermath. It took the U.S.
military almost two decades to admit the powerful chemical
defoliant killed and disabled U.S. troops in the jungles of
Vietnam, and to begin compensating them for it. Doctors
flabbergasted

Whatever it was that struck Jim Lauderdale did a terrifying
job of it.

Sent to Walter Reed with oral cancer in April 2005, he
underwent his first extensive and disfiguring surgery,
removing half his tongue to get to tumors in the mouth and
throat. A second surgery followed a month later to clear
out more of those areas.

Five months later, another surgery removed a new neck
tumor. Then came heavy chemotherapy and radiation. Shortly
after, he had a massive heart attack, undergoing another
surgery to place stents in his arteries. Two weeks later,
the cancer was back and growing rapidly, forcing a fourth
surgery in January 2006.

By this time, much of his neck and shoulder tissue was
gone, and doctors tried to reconstruct a tongue, using
tissue from his wrist. He couldn't swallow, so was fed
through a tube into his stomach.

Just weeks later, four external tumors appeared on his neck
-- "literally overnight," his wife said.

Suffering severe complications from the chemo drugs,
Lauderdale endured 39 radiation treatments, waking up one
night bleeding profusely through his burned skin. The day
after his radiation ended, new external tumors erupted at
the edge of the radiation field, flabbergasting his
doctors.

"As this aggressive disease grew though chemoradiation, it
was determined at this point there was no chance for cure,"
his oncologist wrote then.

By then, the cancer had spread to his lungs and spine and,
most frightening of all, "hundreds and thousands" of tumors
were erupting all over his upper body, his wife said. "The
doctors said they'd never seen anything like it -- that
this happens in only 1 percent of cases," she said.

Efforts to contact his doctors at Walter Reed were
unsuccessful, but a leading head-and-neck cancer specialist
at the Arizona Cancer Center reviewed the course of
Lauderdale's disease.

"This a a very wrenching case," said Dr. Harinder Garewal.
"This is unusually aggressive behavior for an oral cancer.
I would agree it happens in only 1 percent of cases."

When oral cancer occurs in nonsmokers and non-drinkers, it
tends to be more aggressive, he said.

"My feeling is the immune system for some reason can't
handle the cancer," he said.

Jim Lauderdale died on July 14, 2006, and was buried in
Arlington National Cemetery.

Dixie and their two grown children still feel the raw grief
of loss, but not anger, she said.

"But I am convinced something very wrong is happening over
there. Is anyone paying attention to this? Is the cancer
ward still full?" she asked. "I would hate to see another
whole generation affected like this, but I'm very afraid it
will be."

Find more resources about cancer and other diseases in our
searchable database at azstarnet.com/health

More at:
http://www.azstarnet.com/metro/198240.php

Jai Maharaj
http://tinyurl.com/24fq83
http://www.mantra.com/jai
http://www.mantra.com/jyotish
Om Shanti

Hindu Holocaust Museum
http://www.mantra.com/holocaust

Hindu life, principles, spirituality and philosophy
http://www.hindu.org
http://www.hindunet.org

The truth about Islam and Muslims
http://www.flex.com/~jai/satyamevajayate

o Not for commercial use. Solely to be fairly used for the educational
purposes of research and open discussion. The contents of this post may not
have been authored by, and do not necessarily represent the opinion of the
poster. The contents are protected by copyright law and the exemption for
fair use of copyrighted works.
o If you send private e-mail to me, it will likely not be read,
considered or answered if it does not contain your full legal name, current
e-mail and postal addresses, and live-voice telephone number.
o Posted for information and discussion. Views expressed by others are
not necessarily those of the poster who may or may not have read the article.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This article may contain copyrighted material the use of
which may or may not have been specifically authorized by the copyright
owner. This material is being made available in efforts to advance the
understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic,
democratic, scientific, social, and cultural, etc., issues. It is believed
that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as
provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title
17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without
profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included
information for research, comment, discussion and educational purposes by
subscribing to USENET newsgroups or visiting web sites. For more information
go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
If you wish to use copyrighted material from this article for purposes of
your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the
copyright owner.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-05-2008, 11:35 PM
Shadow
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: CANCER IN IRAQ VETS RAISES POSSIBILITY OF TOXIC EXPOSURE

On Thu, 30 Aug 2007 08:14:37 GMT, usenet@mantra.com and/or
www.mantra.com/jai (Dr. Jai Maharaj) wrote:

>Cancer in Iraq vets raises possibility of toxic exposure

And the hundreds of thousands of Iraqi children must be dying
from the same stuff.
I call it genocide
[]'s
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
THERE'S A GOOD POSSIBILITY % alt.support.diabetes 5 07-06-2007 07:48 PM
Lifetime exposure to low doses of aspartame beginning during prenatal life increases cancer effects in rats, Morando Soffritti et al, European Ramazzini Foundation, USA EPA Environmental Health Perspectives 2007.06.13 free full text 24 pages: Murray Rich Murray alt.support.diabetes 2 06-19-2007 08:42 AM
Possibility!! George Orwell alt.support.anxiety-panic 0 02-09-2007 08:06 PM
Possibility!! ~*LiveLoveLaugh*~ alt.support.anxiety-panic 2 02-09-2007 08:06 PM
Shafting the Vets Anonymous alt.support.anxiety-panic 2 11-26-2006 06:24 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:51 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0
     
   
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41