>>calvin27@world.com wrote:
I see we have an agenda to push here.<<
A transferrin index of over .. over .. over .. o-v-e-r .. "greater than
/ > 55% can be a very useful indication of possible iron overload" ..
Now .. you believe that a marker of 31% - 37% is indicative of .. iron
overload .. do ya .. calvin ..
Now WHY would you be attempting to tell people with .. cancer .. that
the normal marker 31% - 37% .. mentioned above .. IS .. iron overload
... when in FACT .. 'they' consider it .. normal .. ?
Wouldn't be because YOU have an .. agenda .. ?
You will .. lie .. to someone with cancer ..
Or .. you are just .. stupid ..
Take your .. pick .. you are a lying piece of crap with no regards for
your fellow man .. or you are .. stupid ..
You HAVE to pick .. one ..
Heh .. heh ..
http://www.ironpanel.org.au/AIS/AISd...aboratory.html
<<snip>>
Transferrin saturation
As an index of iron transport rather than storage, this measure
(calculated from serum iron and TIBC) is an alternative to serum
ferritin. However, as it is affected by the same confounding factors it
will not add much additional information in iron deficiency if a serum
ferritin has already been ordered. A serum transferrin saturation of
>55% can be a very useful indication of possible iron overload. On the other hand, if serum ferritin is elevated but transferrin saturation is low, the patient is unlikely to have iron overload.
<<snip>>
Either way .. calvin .. you are useless .. buddieee .
Stay out of the medical newsgroups ..
See reason .. above ..
I'll snip it for stupid people .. "you are useless "
Who loves ya.
Tom
Jesus Was A Vegetarian!
http://jesuswasavegetarian.7h.com
Man Is A Herbivore!
http://tinyurl.com/a3cc3
DEAD PEOPLE WALKING
http://tinyurl.com/zk9fk