Laetrile: a Success Story.

This case is not recent; it is about a patient who was
diagnosed with Myeloma in 1973,and was published
on the International Myeloma Foundation website
many years later.

This website is sponsored by Celgene Corporation,
Millenium Pharmaceuticals,Inc., and Ortho Biotech,
three pharmaceutical firms engaged in the manufacture
of cancer medications.You can read the report if you
click on this link:-

http://tinyurl.com/yvvygf

It is well-worth copying it to disc and printing off for
perusal again later.

There are three noteworthy points arising from the report:

Firstly,the patient received the standard chemotherapy of
mainstream medicine until all that was left was palliative
treatment to make death easier.She commenced
laetrile therapy because she had nothing to lose and
everything to gain.

Secondly, she achieved remission,which lasted for 3 years.
When the Myeloma eventually returned she repeated the
therapy,and once again went into remission.

Thirdly,when she died 22 years after diagnosis, the cause of
death was not cyanide poisoning, nor was it Myeloma, the
disease which about 20 years earlier her doctors said would
shortly kill her.

Old Bill.

Old Bill wrote:

> There are three noteworthy points arising from the report:
>
> Firstly,the patient received the standard chemotherapy of
> mainstream medicine until all that was left was palliative
> treatment to make death easier.She commenced
> laetrile therapy because she had nothing to lose and
> everything to gain.
>
> Secondly, she achieved remission,which lasted for 3 years.
> When the Myeloma eventually returned she repeated the
> therapy,and once again went into remission.
>
> Thirdly,when she died 22 years after diagnosis, the cause of
> death was not cyanide poisoning, nor was it Myeloma, the
> disease which about 20 years earlier her doctors said would
> shortly kill her.

Go ehead if that's your wish.
Of course the most important fact is that most of the posters here have
the epithelial type of cancer (mother, daughter cells, wild tumors).
Different from (your) myeloma.
Suggest you discuss it on the ACOR myeloma mail list.
J

"J" <nswex@nalid;"no> wrote in message
news:47EDB2B7.D48E8880@execulink.com...
| Old Bill wrote:
|
| > There are three noteworthy points arising from the report:
| >
| > Firstly,the patient received the standard chemotherapy of
| > mainstream medicine until all that was left was palliative
| > treatment to make death easier.She commenced
| > laetrile therapy because she had nothing to lose and
| > everything to gain.
| >
| > Secondly, she achieved remission,which lasted for 3 years.
| > When the Myeloma eventually returned she repeated the
| > therapy,and once again went into remission.
| >
| > Thirdly,when she died 22 years after diagnosis, the cause of
| > death was not cyanide poisoning, nor was it Myeloma, the
| > disease which about 20 years earlier her doctors said would
| > shortly kill her.


|
| Go ehead if that's your wish.

What makes you think I have not?
I did not send this message to obtain
permission to take it from anyone,
least of all a "non-doc" like you.
I wrote it to show that laetrile is not
the dangerous quack remedy that it is
made out to be by certain dubious
characters on this news group.



| Of course the most important fact is that most of the posters here have
| the epithelial type of cancer (mother, daughter cells, wild tumors).


That is of no importance whatsoever.
Cancer is cancer is cancer.


| Different from (your) myeloma.


thank you, but I am already aware of that,
and so is everyone else,I believe.


| Suggest you discuss it on the ACOR myeloma mail list.
| J

Suggest away,I shall discuss it where I please.|

Old Bill

Old Bill wrote:


-------- Original Message --------
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 20:30:28 -0000
From: "Old Bill" <matbeta@yahoo.com>
Organization: Datemas.de http://www.datemas.de
Newsgroups: alt.support.cancer

Here is a link to what Cancer Research Uk has to say about Laetrile.

http://tinyurl.com/2eenqg
[Excerpt]
Many internet sites advertise and promote laetrile as a treatment to cure
cancer. But no reputable scientific cancer organisations support any of
these claims. Our advice is to be very cautious about believing this type of
information or paying for any alternative cancer therapy over the internet.

Whenever we put up information on alternative treatments that have not been
properly tested, we receive angry emails that say we are trying to prevent
people with cancer from getting effective treatment. This is not what we want
to do. We are concerned that products are marketed as potential cures, and
often sold for a great deal of money, when they lack scientific evidence to
prove they help. It is not in the interests of drug companies or research
organisations such as ours to ignore potential new treatments. Thousands and
thousands of compounds are screened every year to try to find those that
might be the basis of effective treatments. If laetrile or amygdalin had any
therapeutic benefit, drug companies would have developed it into a potential
treatment long ago.