<!-- google_ad_section_start -->March 2007 follow up: "Is melanoma simply a vitamin D deficiency cancer?"<!-- google_ad_section_end -->
Health Forums

Go Back   Health Forums > Cancer > Cancers > alt.support.cancer

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-13-2007, 08:13 PM
James Semmel
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default March 2007 follow up: "Is melanoma simply a vitamin D deficiency cancer?"

TO: All melanoma researchers, doctors, and patients.


It is high time we filled in details to sharpen the picture and
eliminate any remaining doubt that melanoma is a vitamin D deficiency
cancer. The 1981 discovery (1) found that the active vitamin D
metabolite 1,25D (1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3) inhibits the growth of
human melanoma cells, and although it wasn't yet known for a few years
(2), the skin makes this 1,25D from the circulating precursor 25D (25-
hydroxyvitamin D3), which is produced in the liver from the inactive
vitamin D (cholecalciferol) that is formed in skin exposed to
sunlight. Also in the mid-1980's (3), it was found that the 1,25D
hormone inhibits the growth of skin cells.

(See (1) Colston K, Colston MJ, Feldman D. "1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3
and malignant melanoma: the presence of receptors and inhibition of
cell growth in culture." Endocrinology. 1981 March;108(3):1083-6. (2)
Bikle DD, Nemanic MK, Gee E, Elias P. "1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3
production by human keratinocytes. Kinetics and regulation." J Clin
Invest. 1986 Aug;78(2):557-66. (3) Smith EL, Walworth NC, Holick MF.
"Effect of 1 alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 on the morphologic and
biochemical differentiation of cultured human epidermal keratinocytes
grown in serum-free conditions." J Invest Dermatol. 1986 Jun;86(6):
709-14.)

Now, every structure or process in the body has a logical purpose for
being the way it is. So, why would the body continue sending vitamin
D (25D) to the skin if it were faced with a critical shortage?
Wouldn't the epidermis be the last place the body would send that
precious, remaining vitamin D (25D)? Why would the body suffer a
vitamin D (25D) deficiency first inside an organ, gland, or bone, if
it didn't have any chance whatsoever of gaining more vitamin D
(cholecalciferol) from the internal depletion?

James Semmel
Albuquerque, New Mexico


reference:
http://www.mpip.org/bb/shtml/372247.shtml
Last month's follow up to the 4th annual discussion: "Is melanoma
simply a vitamin D deficiency cancer?"

Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
February 2007 monthly follow up: "Is melanoma simply a Vitamin D deficiency cancer?" James Semmel alt.support.cancer.breast 0 02-06-2007 09:10 PM
February 2007 monthly follow up: "Is melanoma simply a Vitamin D deficiency cancer?" James Semmel alt.support.cancer.prostate 0 02-06-2007 09:10 PM
February 2007 monthly follow up: "Is melanoma simply a Vitamin D deficiency cancer?" James Semmel alt.support.cancer 0 02-06-2007 09:10 PM
November 2006 follow up: "Is melanoma simply a Vitamin D deficiency cancer?" James Semmel alt.support.cancer 0 11-14-2006 06:40 PM
October 2006 follow up: "Is melanoma simply a Vitamin D deficiency cancer?" James Semmel alt.support.cancer 1 11-09-2006 04:01 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0
     
   
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41