Maryanne Kehoe: "I'm BUSY + IMPORTANT + I Need A SECRETARY...".

Yes, it seems that Our Loafhead is very IMPORTANT and very BUSY and
she needs a SECRETARY...

Lol...

From her moronic blog:


http://gamesvision.blogspot.com/2008...ing-loopy.html

Monday, June 16, 2008

"Getting loopy

I've been trying to chase someone down this week to get a response to
a question. I won't mention who or where but it is one of the current
2016 bid cities. The second email just went out this afternoon. The
first one was Friday. I am not saying I expect an immediate response,
but a prompt one, at least within a couple of business days. Contrast
this to my friends at VANOC (love you guys) who found out a little
used email address and have been emailing me thier updates on that
one. I very rarely (if ever) give out that address and have *never*
given it out for Olympic business. I just had to smile when I recieved
the first VANOC email and said to myself "you guys got it right!"
Those are people who WANT to keep people like me in the loop.

[GM: WHY would the Vancouver Olympic Committee want to keep a
LOAFHEAD in the "loop"...???]

Maybe if you have a secretary, you have time to chase people down. But
on days like today when other non-sport related business has to be
taken care of, it would be a common courtesy to take a few moments to
respond, a quick email, or even something that said "we're tied up at
the moment but we will get back to you within______(insert time
here.)"

You meet the same people on the way up as you do on the way down.
Being selective in trying to get your message out doesn't work.
Witholding info only tells me you have something to hide.

And if you do, rest assured, I will find out about it and scribe it
here.

BOCOG would tell you it's not worth it..."

Posted by Maryanne Kehoe at 11:26 PM


{Legal copyight disclaimer: permission granted by author to quote on a
not - for - profit basis...]

"Mrs. Ken Laws" <gregorymorrow@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:a493cd1b-5176-4f00-a69d-63f2ba95854f@34g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
> Yes, it seems that Our Loafhead is very IMPORTANT and very BUSY and
> she needs a SECRETARY...
>
> Lol...
>
> From her moronic blog:
>
>
> http://gamesvision.blogspot.com/2008...ing-loopy.html
>
> Monday, June 16, 2008
>
> "Getting loopy
>
> I've been trying to chase someone down this week to get a response to
> a question. I won't mention who or where but it is one of the current
> 2016 bid cities. The second email just went out this afternoon. The
> first one was Friday. I am not saying I expect an immediate response,
> but a prompt one, at least within a couple of business days. Contrast
> this to my friends at VANOC (love you guys) who found out a little
> used email address and have been emailing me thier updates on that
> one. I very rarely (if ever) give out that address and have *never*
> given it out for Olympic business. I just had to smile when I recieved
> the first VANOC email and said to myself "you guys got it right!"
> Those are people who WANT to keep people like me in the loop.
>
> [GM: WHY would the Vancouver Olympic Committee want to keep a
> LOAFHEAD in the "loop"...???]

Could the loop be a fiery hoop?

"Mrs. Ken Laws" <gregorymorrow@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:a493cd1b-5176-4f00-a69d-63f2ba95854f@34g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...

> [GM: WHY would the Vancouver Olympic Committee want to keep a
> LOAFHEAD in the "loop"...???]

She appears to be a flea on the ass of a barking dog. Not sure why she
thinks any of these organizations should be bothered to know who she is, or
to even respond to her. What exactly are her credentials? That she did
volunteer work with the summer games back in Atlanta in 1996?

I-285 is a loop as well, yet it's hard to keep Fattyanne in it; homegirl
needs to go on a diet.

> And if you do, rest assured, I will find out about it and scribe it
> here.
>
> BOCOG would tell you it's not worth it..."

Oh yeah, riiiiight. I really think the Chinese government, what with their
attempts at putting a man on the moon, feeding one billion people, and
buying up all of the U.S.'s foreign debt, really has the time, the care, or
the inclination to either speak with you, or to be worried about your
veiled, impotent threats Maryanne. Have you toppled Beijing? Because the
last time I checked, they're still around, and you're still posting to a
blog that has gotten less than 252 profile views since last September. That
means, at best, one person a day bothers to come to your site and see who
you are. Hardly what I would call a blog so important that The Communist
Party in China needs to stop what they're doing and see what state secrets
Maryanne Piehole is about to expose!

--

-------------------------------------
Icebreaker
"Alec, Alec, regarding that so called "silent" propulsion system in "The
Hunt For Red October"...I printed out a list of technical errors which I
think you'd enjoy discussing."

On Jun 17, 4:33*pm, "Mrs. Ken Laws" <gregorymor...@earthlink.net>
wrote:
> Yes, it seems that Our Loafhead is very IMPORTANT and very BUSY and
> she needs a SECRETARY...
>
> Lol...
>
> From her moronic blog:
>
> http://gamesvision.blogspot.com/2008...ing-loopy.html
>
> Monday, June 16, 2008
>
> "Getting loopy
>
> I've been trying to chase someone down this week to get a response to
> a question. I won't mention who or where but it is one of the current
> 2016 bid cities. The second email just went out this afternoon. The
> first one was Friday. I am not saying I expect an immediate response,
> but a prompt one, at least within a couple of business days. Contrast
> this to my friends at VANOC (love you guys) who found out a little
> used email address and have been emailing me thier updates on that
> one. I very rarely (if ever) give out that address and have *never*
> given it out for Olympic business. I just had to smile when I recieved
> the first VANOC email and said to myself "you guys got it right!"
> Those are people who WANT to keep people like me in the loop.
>
> [GM: *WHY would the Vancouver Olympic Committee want to keep a
> LOAFHEAD in the "loop"...???]
>
> Maybe if you have a secretary, you have time to chase people down. But
> on days like today when other non-sport related business has to be
> taken care of, it would be a common courtesy to take a few moments to
> respond, a quick email, or even something that said "we're tied up at
> the moment but we will get back to you within______(insert time
> here.)"
>
> You meet the same people on the way up as you do on the way down.
> Being selective in trying to get your message out doesn't work.
> Witholding info only tells me you have something to hide.
>
> And if you do, rest assured, I will find out about it and scribe it
> here.
>
> BOCOG would tell you it's not worth it..."
>
> Posted by Maryanne Kehoe at 11:26 PM
>
> {Legal copyight disclaimer: permission granted by author to quote on a
> not - for - profit basis...]

Is Loafie Kris Baker's daughter?

On the long hot summer day of Tue, 17 Jun 2008 13:33:52 -0700, Mrs. Ken
Laws dribbled:

> Yes, it seems that Our Loafhead is very IMPORTANT and very BUSY and she
> needs a SECRETARY...
>
> Lol...
>
> From her moronic blog:
>
>
> http://gamesvision.blogspot.com/2008...ing-loopy.html
>
> Monday, June 16, 2008
>
> "Getting loopy
>
> I've been trying to chase someone down this week to get a response to a
> question. I won't mention who or where but it is one of the current 2016
> bid cities. The second email just went out this afternoon. The first one
> was Friday. I am not saying I expect an immediate response, but a prompt
> one, at least within a couple of business days. Contrast this to my
> friends at VANOC (love you guys) who found out a little used email address
> and have been emailing me thier updates on that one. I very rarely (if
> ever) give out that address and have *never* given it out for Olympic
> business. I just had to smile when I recieved the first VANOC email and
> said to myself "you guys got it right!" Those are people who WANT to keep
> people like me in the loop.
>
> [GM: WHY would the Vancouver Olympic Committee want to keep a LOAFHEAD in
> the "loop"...???]
<snip>

I just want someone to reassure me that she won't be coming to Vancouver
(or BC) herself, that's all. I'd hate for her stepping onto the tarmac at
YVR to cause a major earthquake.

--
__________________________________________________ ______________________
Hail Eris! mhm 29x21; Usenet Ruiner #5; Official Chung Demon
The original "Henry Schmidt"; Top Asshole #3; Lits Slut #16
COOSN-029-06-71069; Most Hated Usenetizen of All Time #13
Gutter Chix0r #17; BowTie's Spuriously Accused Pedo Photographer #4
AUK Psycho & Felon #21; Parrot & Zombie #2
Anonymous Psycho Criminal #18
"Do not taunt the Happy Fun Ball. If Happy Fun Ball starts to smoke, run
away and take cover."

Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle
Trainer of PorchMonkey4Life
The PM4L FAQ: http://www.screedbomb.info/porchie/

================================================
Brad Jesness Memorial Kook Appraisal Test (KAT or KAT Index) v. 5.1 by
Cipher and the a.u.k crew

So, you think you've got a contender, eh? Hard to separate the Kooks
from the mere pains in the ass though. Hopefully this will help you.

Instructions :
In this section give your Prospective Kook ONE point for every YES
answer. Give your Prospective Kook additional points for multiple
occurrences.

Grading scale follows questions.

Have they ever :

1. Been the first to go ad-hominem in a newsgroup debate.

2. Accused someone of breaking a non-existent Federal Law.

3. Called a properly formatted cancel of a BI>20 article a *forged
cancel*

4. Ranted about *Free Speech* when a moderator rejected their article.
Two points if it's spelled "FREE SPEACH".

5. Tried to censor others, yet scream when others suggest that they
killfile them or create a moderated newsgroup.

6. Complained to someone's ISP when they got spanked in a flame war.

7. Been complained about to their ISP deservedly.

8. Flamed someone from an anonymous account.

9. Made a spelling flame. (*)

10. Used RANT-CAPS & manic punctuation.

11. Claimed to be qualified to make a legal determination or medical
diagnosis with no justification - bonus points if the kook is obviously
projecting her/his *own* condition/behavior. (**)

12. Claimed an academic or professional degree they obviously do not
have.

13. Claimed that because of a degree or research topic, another poster
cannot know anything about any other subject.

In this section give your Prospective Kook TWO points for every YES
answer. Give your Prospective Kook additional points for multiple
occurrences.

1. Called someone a pedophile or drug pusher without proof.

2. Bonus if they called anyone a "Republican Nazi Pedophile"

3. Ranted about *Free Speech* when an anti-spammer canceled their
article.

4. Posted to a newsgroup via sock-puppet.

5. Thought about becoming a Freedom Knight.

6. Voted via sock-puppet in a Big Eight vote.

7. Defended a well known kook.

8. Been Nominated for a Kook award.

9. Invented Usenet 'rules' & 'laws', particularly coming up with
creative definitions for what constitutes spam & spamming.

10. Implied that she/he has powerful allies who will deal with his/her
enemies, due to having affiliations with Microsoft, the CIA or some
other powerful organization - no matter how flimsy the association.

11. Claimed an academic or professional degree after having stated they
are a high school dropout or otherwise indicated their actual level of
achievement, or claim multiple PhD's, MD's, etc.

12. 'Removed' an academic or professional degree or title from another
more clueful poster. (Includes scare quotes such as 'Esq.', or 'Dr.')

13. Claimed one of the well known regulars of AUK is using a remailer to
impersonate them, when all kook sign points to them.

In this section give your Prospective Kook THREE points for every YES
answer. Give your Prospective Kook additional points for multiple
occurrences.

1. Threatened to kill or cause bodily harm to another via mail or post.

2. Told someone they have caused the kook to harm himself.

3. Stalked/harassed an opponent off-line.

4. Mail-bombed anyone.

5. Spammed a newsgroup.

6. Posted a forged or altered newsgroup article.

7. Lost an account due to abuse.

8. Won a kook award.

9. Threatened a groundless lawsuit via mail or post. LA Law bonus:
Additional point if a TV lawyer is used.)

(Grubor bonus: If they claim John Grubor/Law Systems Institoot as
counsel)

10. Threatened to have their "agents" come after someone.

11. Had a FAQ posted about their kookiness.

12. Pretended to be a sysadmin or ISP owner.

13. CC'ed emailed complaints to irrelevant or non-existent organizations
email addresses, such as the DOJ, AG, CIA, FBI etc.

14. Been TOSsed and then claimed to have canceled it, her/it/himself?

(*) PalmJob Exception Rule. Cannot be applied to a mere troll's points.

(**) Brad Jesness Factor. Not applicable to BJ, it is expected.

Scale/Rank :
1 - 10 points : Kook Wannabe. Needs to read Grubor's posting history on
dejanews. Your Prospective Kook has much to learn. They may have just
screwed up once or twice.

11 - 25 points : Journeyman Kook. Needs to Continue to mimic the real
kooks. Your Prospective Kook could be a contender.

26 - 36 points : Kook First Class. Still a lesser light, but Your
Prospective Kook HAS arrived! People killfile him/her.

36 - 50 points : Kook cum Laude. Someone is considering writing a FAQ
about your Prospective Kook. Has been nominated for at least one a.u.k
award.

51 + points : Kook Magna cum Laude. Your Prospective Kook has a FAQ.
Your Prospective Kook will eventually win all the big awards. Your
Prospective Kook can leap tall newbies with a single bound.

doomella wrote:

> "Mrs. Ken Laws" <gregorymor...@earthlink.net> wrote in messagenews:a493cd1b-5176-4f00-a69d-63f2ba95854f@34g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
>
>
> > Yes, it seems that Our Loafhead is very IMPORTANT and very BUSY and
> > she needs a SECRETARY...
>
> > Lol...
>
> > From her moronic blog:
>
> >http://gamesvision.blogspot.com/2008...ing-loopy.html
>
> > Monday, June 16, 2008
>
> > "Getting loopy
>
> > I've been trying to chase someone down this week to get a response to
> > a question. I won't mention who or where but it is one of the current
> > 2016 bid cities. The second email just went out this afternoon. The
> > first one was Friday. I am not saying I expect an immediate response,
> > but a prompt one, at least within a couple of business days. Contrast
> > this to my friends at VANOC (love you guys) who found out a little
> > used email address and have been emailing me thier updates on that
> > one. I very rarely (if ever) give out that address and have *never*
> > given it out for Olympic business. I just had to smile when I recieved
> > the first VANOC email and said to myself "you guys got it right!"
> > Those are people who WANT to keep people like me in the loop.
>
> > [GM: *WHY would the Vancouver Olympic Committee want to keep a
> > LOAFHEAD in the "loop"...???]
>
> Could the loop be a fiery hoop?



Probably has something to do with food...


--
Best
Greg

The Assassination of Ice Breaker By the Coward Laura Linger :

> "Mrs. Ken Laws" <gregorymor...@earthlink.net> wrote in messagenews:a493cd1b-5176-4f00-a69d-63f2ba95854f@34g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
>
> > [GM: *WHY would the Vancouver Olympic Committee want to keep a
> > LOAFHEAD in the "loop"...???]
>
> She appears to be a flea on the ass of a barking dog. Not sure why she
> thinks any of these organizations should be bothered to know who she is, or
> to even respond to her. What exactly are her credentials? That she did
> volunteer work with the summer games back in Atlanta in 1996?


Two weeks as a volunteer usher IIRC...12 years later she is trying to
revive those moments of glory...



> *I-285 is a loop as well, yet it's hard to keep Fattyanne in it; homegirl
> needs to go on a diet.
>
> > And if you do, rest assured, I will find out about it and scribe it
> > here.
>
> > BOCOG would tell you it's not worth it..."
>
> Oh yeah, riiiiight. I really think the Chinese government, what with their
> attempts at putting a man on the moon, feeding one billion people, and
> buying up all of the U.S.'s foreign debt, really has the time, the care, or
> the inclination to either speak with you, or to be worried about your
> veiled, impotent threats Maryanne. Have you toppled Beijing? Because the
> last time I checked, they're still around, and you're still posting to a
> blog that has gotten less than 252 profile views since last September. That
> means, at best, one person a day bothers to come to your site and see who
> you are. Hardly what I would call a blog so important that The Communist
> Party in China needs to stop what they're doing and see what state secrets
> Maryanne Piehole is about to expose!


I have to tell ya, Laura and Maryanne are the Laverne & Shirley of
sheer stupidity...the poster girls for utter and absolute
uselessness...the Toni Twins of cretinism...


--
Best
Greg

charley wrote:

> On Jun 17, 4:33*pm, "Mrs. Ken Laws" <gregorymor...@earthlink.net>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Yes, it seems that Our Loafhead is very IMPORTANT and very BUSY and
> > she needs a SECRETARY...
>
> > Lol...
>
> > From her moronic blog:
>
> >http://gamesvision.blogspot.com/2008...ing-loopy.html
>
> > Monday, June 16, 2008
>
> > "Getting loopy
>
> > I've been trying to chase someone down this week to get a response to
> > a question. I won't mention who or where but it is one of the current
> > 2016 bid cities. The second email just went out this afternoon. The
> > first one was Friday. I am not saying I expect an immediate response,
> > but a prompt one, at least within a couple of business days. Contrast
> > this to my friends at VANOC (love you guys) who found out a little
> > used email address and have been emailing me thier updates on that
> > one. I very rarely (if ever) give out that address and have *never*
> > given it out for Olympic business. I just had to smile when I recieved
> > the first VANOC email and said to myself "you guys got it right!"
> > Those are people who WANT to keep people like me in the loop.
>
> > [GM: *WHY would the Vancouver Olympic Committee want to keep a
> > LOAFHEAD in the "loop"...???]
>
> > Maybe if you have a secretary, you have time to chase people down. But
> > on days like today when other non-sport related business has to be
> > taken care of, it would be a common courtesy to take a few moments to
> > respond, a quick email, or even something that said "we're tied up at
> > the moment but we will get back to you within______(insert time
> > here.)"
>
> > You meet the same people on the way up as you do on the way down.
> > Being selective in trying to get your message out doesn't work.
> > Witholding info only tells me you have something to hide.
>
> > And if you do, rest assured, I will find out about it and scribe it
> > here.
>
> > BOCOG would tell you it's not worth it..."
>
> > Posted by Maryanne Kehoe at 11:26 PM
>
> > {Legal copyight disclaimer: permission granted by author to quote on a
> > not - for - profit basis...]
>
> Is Loafie Kris Baker's daughter?


Anyone that burfed a daughter the size of Loafie would get their
pelvis torn asunder when the Loafster slipped out...so no...if KB is
still around, that is...seeing that she hasn't posted for a whiles.

The reason Loafie has always sucked up to Kris Baker is that Kris was
a volunteer for the '96 Winter Olympics in Salt Lake City...

BTW does anyone miss Kris Baker's utter and complete worthlessness? I
sure don't...


--
Best
Greg

Porsche Monkey For Life wrote:

> On the long hot summer day of Tue, 17 Jun 2008 13:33:52 -0700, Mrs. Ken
> Laws dribbled:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Yes, it seems that Our Loafhead is very IMPORTANT and very BUSY and she
> > needs a SECRETARY...
>
> > Lol...
>
> > From her moronic blog:
>
> >http://gamesvision.blogspot.com/2008...ing-loopy.html
>
> > Monday, June 16, 2008
>
> > "Getting loopy
>
> > I've been trying to chase someone down this week to get a response to a
> > question. I won't mention who or where but it is one of the current 2016
> > bid cities. The second email just went out this afternoon. The first one
> > was Friday. I am not saying I expect an immediate response, but a prompt
> > one, at least within a couple of business days. Contrast this to my
> > friends at VANOC (love you guys) who found out a little used email address
> > and have been emailing me thier updates on that one. I very rarely (if
> > ever) give out that address and have *never* given it out for Olympic
> > business. I just had to smile when I recieved the first VANOC email and
> > said to myself "you guys got it right!" Those are people who WANT to keep
> > people like me in the loop.
>
> > [GM: *WHY would the Vancouver Olympic Committee want to keep a LOAFHEAD in
> > the "loop"...???]
>
> <snip>
>
> I just want someone to reassure me that she won't be coming to Vancouver
> (or BC) herself, that's all. I'd hate for her stepping onto the tarmac at
> YVR to cause a major earthquake.


Seriously...if Maryanne landed at YVR her ginormous weight could tilt
the continent...the Canadian Rockies might be submerged...California
would cleave off and become an island in the far southe Pacific...and
all the local Waffle Houses would be on 24 hour alert...



--
Best
Greg

On Jun 18, 4:59*pm, "Mrs. Ken Laws" <gregorymor...@earthlink.net>
wrote:
> charley wrote:
> > On Jun 17, 4:33*pm, "Mrs. Ken Laws" <gregorymor...@earthlink.net>
> > wrote:
>
> > > Yes, it seems that Our Loafhead is very IMPORTANT and very BUSY and
> > > she needs a SECRETARY...
>
> > > Lol...
>
> > > From her moronic blog:
>
> > >http://gamesvision.blogspot.com/2008...ing-loopy.html
>
> > > Monday, June 16, 2008
>
> > > "Getting loopy
>
> > > I've been trying to chase someone down this week to get a response to
> > > a question. I won't mention who or where but it is one of the current
> > > 2016 bid cities. The second email just went out this afternoon. The
> > > first one was Friday. I am not saying I expect an immediate response,
> > > but a prompt one, at least within a couple of business days. Contrast
> > > this to my friends at VANOC (love you guys) who found out a little
> > > used email address and have been emailing me thier updates on that
> > > one. I very rarely (if ever) give out that address and have *never*
> > > given it out for Olympic business. I just had to smile when I recieved
> > > the first VANOC email and said to myself "you guys got it right!"
> > > Those are people who WANT to keep people like me in the loop.
>
> > > [GM: *WHY would the Vancouver Olympic Committee want to keep a
> > > LOAFHEAD in the "loop"...???]
>
> > > Maybe if you have a secretary, you have time to chase people down. But
> > > on days like today when other non-sport related business has to be
> > > taken care of, it would be a common courtesy to take a few moments to
> > > respond, a quick email, or even something that said "we're tied up at
> > > the moment but we will get back to you within______(insert time
> > > here.)"
>
> > > You meet the same people on the way up as you do on the way down.
> > > Being selective in trying to get your message out doesn't work.
> > > Witholding info only tells me you have something to hide.
>
> > > And if you do, rest assured, I will find out about it and scribe it
> > > here.
>
> > > BOCOG would tell you it's not worth it..."
>
> > > Posted by Maryanne Kehoe at 11:26 PM
>
> > > {Legal copyight disclaimer: permission granted by author to quote on a
> > > not - for - profit basis...]
>
> > Is Loafie Kris Baker's daughter?
>
> Anyone that burfed a daughter the size of Loafie would get their
> pelvis torn asunder when the Loafster slipped out...so no...if KB is
> still around, that is...seeing that she hasn't posted for a whiles.
>
> The reason Loafie has always sucked up to Kris Baker is that Kris was
> a volunteer for the '96 Winter Olympics in Salt Lake City...
>
> BTW does anyone miss Kris Baker's utter and complete worthlessness? *I
> sure don't...
>
> --
> Best
> Greg

I sure don't but she's posting under another name. And what does a
person do as a volunteer in the Olympics? Perhaps a food tester.