if the links to studies don't prove pollution ( moderate or worse
particulate pollution cause cancers and more heart disease enough , and
respiratory disease) other studies could. What the US don't want you to know
is akin to murder in reality not maybe definitely. We are being murded in
the uS by particulate pollution, not maybe definitely and I bet my life on
it.
day 5 snowstorm first decent day in eight days ( good all day) but last
night had to take my inhaler 3 times almost had to go to emergency room (
moderate zone in particulates) I am being murdered by my own gov. Today no
problems , all day with particulates I can't breathe.
I need help from a lawyer please help
http://www.asthmacapital.com/asthma_capitals2006.pdf
>>
>> 2007
>> http://www.medicinenet.com/script/ma...ticlekey=79126
>>
>>> Number one or two the number of days our air reaches moderate levels the
>>> kind that one study says does more harm then good if you exercise in it
>>> and
>>> the kind which automatically constricts lungs and a host of other
>>> horrible
>>> things ( the fact that they even did the studies surprises me)
>>> F rating my American Lung Association
>>> The most depressed city in the nation
>>
>> http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1359647/posts
>>
>>> After adjusting for age distribution of the population, female mortality
>>> was 20 percent higher!!!! then average for the US and Male mortality was
>>> 33
>>> percent higher then average! Is this healthy ? Or just a little bad?
>>>
>>> http://www.phila.gov/health/hp2010/P...emperature.pdf
>>>
>>> Bottom ten percent for air quality, in Sperlings list of cities.
>> Even low levels or particulates which we get more often then most every
>> city in the US causes elevated risks of stroke
>> Personally unlike some have said, I don't think the stats can get much
>> worse here
>> http://www.americanheart.org/present...tifier=3045419
>>
>>>and a photo of my air filter after 29 days in air that had 18 moderate
>>>particulate days out of 29 or worse
>
> http://s135.photobucket.com/albums/q...t=IMG_0118.jpg
>
>>...This new coal story for those who are down wind from coal http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070314/...sc/coal_report http://www.emaxhealth.com/24/7741.html
>>> We have NJ doing things , mandating emission control and California is
>>> going to stop using coal near their cities and
>>> other towns get upset if they have three warning days, of air, here we
>>> ignore it. The news media totally ignores all these correlations. Now I
>>> ask you why? Kids I urge your parents to ask politicians how you or
>>> family is
>>> to stay healthy in air not conducive to exercise? Can anyone show me a
>>> link or magical way of doing that ?
>>> how its done? How do you accept the possibility that when all areas of
>>> the country health is improving , in Philly its actually amongst the
>>> worse in several areas? Is there a magic reason for this? or for this to
>>> be ignored?
>>
>>> here we are blasted with ads for asthma and lung centers and you would
>>> not
>>> believe that so many people still don't correlate our air being bad or
>>> the
>>> city having problems
>>> We have one of the worse violent crime rates in the US on ration basis
>>> and lowest percentage
>>> of kids graduating, but its me that is the problem?
>>> What world am I in?
>>>
>> Pa is number 2 in the country for asthma
>>>
>>>Oil Company Profits Continue to Skyrocket
Big oil companies are swimming in a sea of record-breaking profits while
American consumers and taxpayers pay the price. In 2005, the world's biggest
oil companies reported a combined $111 billion in profits. In the first
three quarters of 2006 they reported more than $94 billion.
Some of the biggest oil company profits in 2005 were:
* ExxonMobil: $36.1 billion
* Royal Dutch Shell: $25.3 billion
* BP: $22.3 billion
* ConocoPhillips: $13.5 billion
* Chevron Texaco $14.1 billion
Federal Handouts Lavish Billions on Oil and Gas Companies
Despite earning record profits, oil and gas companies continue to benefit
from billions in handouts courtesy of American taxpayers. Between tax
incentives, below-market fees for drilling on public lands, research and
development subsidies and accounting gimmicks, these companies will receive
more than $31.6 billion from the federal government over the next five
years.
Specifically, these handouts break down as follows:
* Tax breaks: $16 billion
* Research and development subsidies: $1.8 billion
* Below-market fees for drilling on public lands: $9.5 billion
* Accounting gimmicks: $4.3 billion
* Total: $31.6 billion
Some of most outrageous handouts to Big Oil allows companies drilling for
oil and natural gas on public lands to pay below-market fees, or royalties,
for the resources they extract. Oil companies are currently slated to
shortchange taxpayers by $9.5 billion over the next five years.
Another giveaway allows oil companies to write off the costs of oil drilling
and refining. Together, these giveaways total more than $4 billion over the
next 5 years.