Re: RCMP and Government of Canada are killing us! Documentary - Hemp OilCures Cancer

having today read this poster and the following thread,

i observe that the poster is unwilling to hold a reasonable [imo]
conversation, and is now resorting to obscenities, and harrassing
statements.

since s/he is now engaged in trolling us, perhaps each should avail
themselves of:

abuse@uniserve.com

they [newserver uniserve] 'does' ask for you to include headers with
each specific complaint/message

aup/tos
Uniserve Acceptable Use Policy

Violations of the Rights of Others:

While using the Communication Services, you are prohibited from posting,
uploading, reproducing, distributing or otherwise transmitting
information or materials where such activity constitutes a criminal
offence or from otherwise engaging in or assisting others to engage in
any criminal offence including, but not limited to, those offences
listed below:

* Communicating hatred <<<<<<<<<<PLEASE NOTE
* Pyramid selling
* Unauthorized use of a computer
* Mischief in relation to data
* Fraud
* Obscenity <<<<<<<<<<<PLEASE NOTE
* Child pornography

Other:

While using the Communication Services, you are prohibited from engaging
in or assisting others to engage in any activity that (1) violates
established or accepted network etiquette, (2) violates applicable
charters, FAQS, policies, rules or guidelines of UNISERVE or other
parties,...(4) elicits complaints from other Internet users,...Engaging
in threats, harassment, intimidation, stalking or abuse of others...



Anarchore wrote:
>
> Another cancer cure is being ignored by mainstream pharma-medicine and
> media.
>
> The government is literally killing people by denying them their
> medicine. This cannot stand, let us demand our Gods given rights to
> the plants of the earth, and give a fat middle finger to the fascist
> drug czars and slimey crimey neocon "ambassadors" from the US, and
> their mirror-image counterparts in Canada that have thrived in the wake
> of Bus-style war-on-terror BS that is now discreditted.
>
> (youtube)
>
> A Film By Christian Laurette - After a serious head injury in 1997,
> Rick Simpson sought relief from his medical condition through the use
> of medicinal hemp oil. When Rick discovered that the hemp oil (with its
> high concentration of T.H.C.) cured cancers and other illnesses, he
> tried to share it with as many people as he could free of charge -
> curing and controlling literally hundreds of people's illnesses... but
> when the story went public, the long arm of the law snatched the
> medicine - leaving potentially thousands of people without their cancer
> treatments - and leaving Rick with unconsitutional charges of
> possessing and trafficking marijuana!
>
> Canada is in the middle of a CANCER EPIDEMIC! Meet the people who were
> not allowed to testify on Rick's behalf at the Supreme Court of
> Canada's Infamous Rick Simpson Trial on September 10, 2007... INCLUDING
> A MAN WHO WAS CURED OF TERMINAL CANCER USING HEMP OIL!
>
> IF YOU SEE ONLY ONE DOCUMENTARY THIS YEAR... MAKE IT THIS ONE!
>
> (Parental Guidance Suggested - Mature subject matter.)
>
> Part 1:
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pjhT9282-Tw
>
> Part 2:
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ysdaDhM9rfA
>
> Part 3
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hGhpVzN0ik8
>
> Part 4
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D9NN98CuFGA
>
> Part 5
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zn6XIG_oxUM
>
> Part 6
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G4Lqug_vaqo
>
> Part 7
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fa2iCx3ZLgQ
>
> --

Paul T. Holland wrote:

>having today read this poster and the following thread,
>
>i observe that the poster is unwilling to hold a reasonable [imo]
>conversation, and is now resorting to obscenities, and harrassing
>statements.

Good luck with that, buddy! LOL!

>
>Anarchore wrote:
>>
>> Another cancer cure is being ignored by mainstream pharma-medicine
>>and media.
>>
>> The government is literally killing people by denying them their
>> medicine. This cannot stand, let us demand our Gods given rights
>>to the plants of the earth, and give a fat middle finger to the
>>fascist drug czars and slimey crimey neocon "ambassadors" from the
>>US, and their mirror-image counterparts in Canada that have
>>thrived in the wake of Bus-style war-on-terror BS that is now
>>discreditted.
>> (youtube)
>>
>> A Film By Christian Laurette - After a serious head injury in 1997,
>> Rick Simpson sought relief from his medical condition through the
>>use of medicinal hemp oil. When Rick discovered that the hemp oil
>>(with its high concentration of T.H.C.) cured cancers and other
>>illnesses, he tried to share it with as many people as he could
>>free of charge - curing and controlling literally hundreds of
>>people's illnesses... but when the story went public, the long arm
>>of the law snatched the medicine - leaving potentially thousands
>>of people without their cancer treatments - and leaving Rick with
>>unconsitutional charges of possessing and trafficking marijuana!
>>
>> Canada is in the middle of a CANCER EPIDEMIC! Meet the people who
>>were not allowed to testify on Rick's behalf at the Supreme Court
>>of Canada's Infamous Rick Simpson Trial on September 10, 2007...
>>INCLUDING A MAN WHO WAS CURED OF TERMINAL CANCER USING HEMP OIL!
>>
>> IF YOU SEE ONLY ONE DOCUMENTARY THIS YEAR... MAKE IT THIS ONE!
>>
>> (Parental Guidance Suggested - Mature subject matter.)
>>
>> Part 1:
>>
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pjhT9282-Tw
>>
>> Part 2:
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ysdaDhM9rfA
>>
>> Part 3
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hGhpVzN0ik8
>>
>> Part 4
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D9NN98CuFGA
>>
>> Part 5
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zn6XIG_oxUM
>>
>> Part 6
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G4Lqug_vaqo
>>
>> Part 7
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fa2iCx3ZLgQ
>>
>> --



--
If you're thick enough to believe that Jews are your enemy why the
fuck would I want to have anything to do with you.
Consider me a Jew.
Consider me a fag.
Consider me an immigrant.

alt.conspiracy and politics groups snipped

actually youngster, i seldom rely upon luck for much of anything...

as to your inchoate ramblings, you have more than shown yourself to be
an empty drum - being beaten upon by others, to a tempo not your own -

since you aren't 'able' to actually discuss any 'facts' concerning the
clips you so badly wished others to view - and are even less able to
discuss the why's or wherefore's of the claim...

let those of us here in this group educate you - information that you
clearly don't possess, and counter to your claims of 'suppression' -
[sheesh]

fyi, kid, there 'has' been legit research - done years ago for the
basics, studies dating back to 1996.

i'll make it a bit easier on you, and only use info from the canadian
studies [wouldn't want to overtax you would we?]

hemp oil consists of :

Components

Fatty Acids
(% w/w)
(% w/w)
Linoleic Acid (18:2w6)
50-70
52-62
a-Linolenic Acid (18:3w3)
15-25
12-23
Oleic Acid (18:1w9)
10-16
8-13
Palmitic Acid (16:0)
6-9
5-7
Stearic Acid (18:0)
2-3
1-2
g-Linolenic Acid (18:3w6)
1-6
3-4
Eicosanoic Acid (20:0)
0.79-0.81*
0.39-0.79
Eicosenoic Acid (20:1)
0.39-0.41*
0.51
Eicosadienoic Acid (20:2)
0.00-0.09*
0.00
Natural Products
Cannabidiol
nr
10 mg/kg
D
9
-tetrahydrocannabinol
50 mg/kg**
nd
Myrcene
nr
160 mg/L
b-Caryophyllene
nr
740 mg/L
b-Sitosterol
nr
100-148 g/L
‡
a-Tocopherol
7-80 ppm
†
,
††
tr
g-Tocopherol
710-870 ppm
†,††
468 mg/L
Methyl salicylate
nr
tr

now - mr big shot - tell us,

which of the above are the compounds being researched as known
anti-cancer
[inhibitory effect] agents?

you're the know-it-all, so you won't have any problem whatsoever is
pointing to the correct compounds

[clue: we already know]

we also know that unlike the oil grown by the pix protagonist, with
little or no actual production controls, hemp requires a) the proper
variety, and proper controlled growing env. for the needed comppounds
to actually be present in any measurable amount to be useful.

you see, puppy, there a little thing called Cannabinoid Biosynthetic
Pathway
iirc, Clark laid it out back in 1981, and/or Clark in 1980 [you don't
rate as important enough for me going back and looking it up...]

we also know that the pharm's would gladly 'increase' the ongoing
research if it weren't for the somewhat hysterical anti-drug attitudes
of a less than majority group currently in political power.

a goup very much like yourself in presentational skills, only on the
opposite end of the pendulum swing both of you are obnoxious in your
radicalism.

after all, they have already begun the list assembly of which cancers
can be effected, and ascertained a couple that are not.

now, that isn't a 'pro' pot stance, just an observation of current
events. what is clear is that 'you' aren't helping change anyone's minds
- too shrill, too bombastic, too intolerant of others.

'you' make a good case for the undereducated to ignore you - you're a
buffoon. and those of us who actually have kept abreast of the true
studies, and the actual real information find you to be a joke.

you are a poster child of how 'not' to effect change. but that said -

do tell us: from the list above, what are the actual chemical agents
being studied?

also: please name the compound i deliberately left off the list that is
also known to have inhibitory effects?

give ya a hint: pufa...

Anarchore wrote:
>
> Paul T. Holland wrote:
>
> >having today read this poster and the following thread,
> >
> >i observe that the poster is unwilling to hold a reasonable [imo]
> >conversation, and is now resorting to obscenities, and harrassing
> >statements.
>
> Good luck with that, buddy! LOL!
>
> >
> >Anarchore wrote:
> >>
> >> Another cancer cure is being ignored by mainstream pharma-medicine
> >>and media.
> >>
> >> The government is literally killing people by denying them their
> >> medicine. This cannot stand, let us demand our Gods given rights
> >>to the plants of the earth, and give a fat middle finger to the
> >>fascist drug czars and slimey crimey neocon "ambassadors" from the
> >>US, and their mirror-image counterparts in Canada that have
> >>thrived in the wake of Bus-style war-on-terror BS that is now
> >>discreditted.
> >> (youtube)
> >>
> >> A Film By Christian Laurette - After a serious head injury in 1997,
> >> Rick Simpson sought relief from his medical condition through the
> >>use of medicinal hemp oil. When Rick discovered that the hemp oil
> >>(with its high concentration of T.H.C.) cured cancers and other
> >>illnesses, he tried to share it with as many people as he could
> >>free of charge - curing and controlling literally hundreds of
> >>people's illnesses... but when the story went public, the long arm
> >>of the law snatched the medicine - leaving potentially thousands
> >>of people without their cancer treatments - and leaving Rick with
> >>unconsitutional charges of possessing and trafficking marijuana!
> >>
> >> Canada is in the middle of a CANCER EPIDEMIC! Meet the people who
> >>were not allowed to testify on Rick's behalf at the Supreme Court
> >>of Canada's Infamous Rick Simpson Trial on September 10, 2007...
> >>INCLUDING A MAN WHO WAS CURED OF TERMINAL CANCER USING HEMP OIL!
> >>
> >> IF YOU SEE ONLY ONE DOCUMENTARY THIS YEAR... MAKE IT THIS ONE!
> >>
> >> (Parental Guidance Suggested - Mature subject matter.)
> >>
> >> Part 1:
> >>
> >> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pjhT9282-Tw
> >>
> >> Part 2:
> >> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ysdaDhM9rfA
> >>
> >> Part 3
> >> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hGhpVzN0ik8
> >>
> >> Part 4
> >> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D9NN98CuFGA
> >>
> >> Part 5
> >> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zn6XIG_oxUM
> >>
> >> Part 6
> >> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G4Lqug_vaqo
> >>
> >> Part 7
> >> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fa2iCx3ZLgQ
> >>
> >> --
>
> --
> If you're thick enough to believe that Jews are your enemy why the
> fuck would I want to have anything to do with you.
> Consider me a Jew.
> Consider me a fag.
> Consider me an immigrant.

Paul T. Holland wrote:

>
>alt.conspiracy and politics groups snipped

Oooh nice attempt at evasion, but it didn't work.

>
>actually youngster, i seldom rely upon luck for much of anything...
>
>as to your inchoate ramblings, you have more than shown yourself to be
>an empty drum - being beaten upon by others, to a tempo not your own

Here you are, Mr Cocksucker!


http://drugpolicycentral.com/bot/pg/...r_nov_2003.htm

New Study Explains How Pot Kills Cancer Cells

Nov 6, 2003, Steve Kubby

A new study published in Nature Reviews-Cancer provides an historic and
detailed explanation about how THC and natural cannabinoids counteract
cancer, but preserve normal cells.

The study by Manuel Guzmán of Madrid Spain found that cannabinoids, the
active components of marijuana, inhibit tumor growth in laboratory
animals. They do so by modulating key cell-signalling pathways, thereby
inducing direct growth arrest and death of tumor cells, as well as by
inhibiting the growth of blood vessels that supply the tumor.

The Guzman study is very important according to Dr. Ethan Russo , a
neurologist and world authority on medical cannabis: "Cancer occurs
because cells become immortalized; they fail to heed normal signals to
turn off growth. A normal function of remodelling in the body requires
that cells die on cue. This is called apoptosis, or programmed cell
death. That process fails to work in tumors. THC promotes its
reappearance so that gliomas, leukemias, melanomas and other cell types
will in fact heed the signals, stop dividing, and die."

"But, that is not all," explains Dr. Russo: "The other way that tumors
grow is by ensuring that they are nourished: they send out signals to
promote angiogenesis, the growth of new blood vessels. Cannabinoids
turn off these signals as well. It is truly incredible, and elegant."

In other words, this article explains several ways in which
cannabinoids might be used to fight cancer, and, as the article says,
"Cannabinoids are usually well tolerated, and do not produce the
generalized toxic effects of conventional chemotherapies.

Usually, any story that even suggests the possibility of a new
treatment for cancer is greeted with headlines about a "cancer cure" -
however remote in the future and improbable in fact it might be. But if
marijuana is involved, don't expect any coverage from mainstream media,
especially since mainstream editors have been quietly killing this
story for the past thirty years.

That's right, news about the abilility of pot to shrink tumors first
surfaced, way back in 1974. Researchers at the Medical College of
Virginia, who had been funded by the National Institutes of Health to
find evidence that marijuana damages the immune system, found instead
that THC slowed the growth of three kinds of cancer in mice -- lung and
breast cancer, and a virus-induced leukemia.

The Washington Post reported on the 1974 study -- in the "Local"
section -- on Aug. 18, 1974. Under the headline, "Cancer Curb Is
Studied," it read in part: "The active chemical agent in marijuana
curbs the growth of three kinds of cancer in mice and may also suppress
the immunity reaction that causes rejection of organ transplants, a
Medical College of Virginia team has discovered." The researchers
"found that THC slowed the growth of lung cancers, breast cancers, and
a virus-induced leukemia in laboratory mice, and prolonged their lives
by as much as 36 percent."

"News coverage of the Madrid discovery has been virtually nonexistent
in this country. The news broke quietly on Feb. 29, 2000 with a story
that ran once on the UPI wire about the Nature Medicine article,"
complained MarijuanaNews.com editor Richard Cowan, who said he was only
able to find the article through a link that appeared briefly on the
Drudge Report Web page. "The New York Times, The Washington Post, and
Los Angeles Times all ignored the story, even though its newsworthiness
is indisputable: a benign substance occurring in nature destroys deadly
brain tumors," added Cowan.

On March 29, 2001, the San Antonio Current printed a carefully
researched, bombshell of a story by Raymond Cushing titled, "POT
SHRINKS TUMORS; GOVERNMENT KNEW IN '74." Media coverage since then has
been nonexistant, except for a copy of the story on Alternet .

It is hard to believe that the knowledge that cannabis can be used to
fight cancer has been suppressed for almost thirty years , yet it seems
likely that it will continue to be suppressed. Why?

According to Cowan, the answer is because it is a threat to cannabis
prohibition . "If this article and its predecessors from 2000 and 1974
were the only evidence of the suppression of medical cannabis, then one
might perhaps be able to rationalize it in some herniated way. However,
there really is massive proof that the suppression of medical cannabis
represents the greatest failure of the institutions of a free society,
medicine, journalism, science, and our fundamental values," Cowan notes.

Millions of people have died horrible deaths and in many cases, familes
exhausted their savings on dangerous, toxic and expensive drugs. Now we
are just beginning to realize that while marijuana has never killed
anyone, marijuana prohibition has killed millions.


>> >>
>> >> Part 1:
>> >>
>> >> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pjhT9282-Tw
>> >>
>> >> Part 2:
>> >> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ysdaDhM9rfA
>> >>
>> >> Part 3
>> >> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hGhpVzN0ik8
>> >>
>> >> Part 4
>> >> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D9NN98CuFGA
>> >>
>> >> Part 5
>> >> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zn6XIG_oxUM
>> >>
>> >> Part 6
>> >> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G4Lqug_vaqo
>> >>
>> >> Part 7
>> >> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fa2iCx3ZLgQ
>> >>
>> >> --
>>
>> --
>> If you're thick enough to believe that Jews are your enemy why the
>> fuck would I want to have anything to do with you.
>> Consider me a Jew.
>> Consider me a fag.
>> Consider me an immigrant.



--

Anarchore wrote:

> That's right, news about the abilility of pot to shrink tumors first
> surfaced, way back in 1974. Researchers at the Medical College of
> Virginia, who had been funded by the National Institutes of Health to
> find evidence that marijuana damages the immune system, found instead
> that THC slowed the growth of three kinds of cancer in mice -- lung and
> breast cancer, and a virus-induced leukemia.

Groan...another mouse enthusiast...
(other newsgroups trimmed]
J

On Apr 30, 6:25*pm, J <xnswex@nalid;"no> wrote:Groan...another mouse
enthusiast. <<

One wonders how Steph and you are soooo compatible .. joined at the
hip so to speak .. WHEN .. you have no regard for the scientific ..
process .. ?

Oh .. yeah .. Steph is ALSO .. a .. clown .. a .. what do they call
it .. a .. "quack" .. acupuncture needle in hand ..

Do you advocate acupuncture for cancer TOO .. 'j' .. ?

Do ya ..

Don't snip groups ..
Don't be .. rude ..

Is he trying to sell you some hash oil .. ? .. weed oil .. ? .. honey
oil .. ? .. cherry oil .. ? ..
thaiweedhashfermentedpsychodelicmushroom .. fkg .. tea .. ?

Is he .. ?

The original poster is the one who decides whether the groups included
NEEDED to BE .. included ..

Not some cat fancier from a cancer group .. who NEVER ever .. had ..
cancer ..

Understand .. ?

Mouse studies are .. **accepted** .. in scientific circles and
everytime one of you greaseballs attempt to UNDERMINE the scientific
process WITH your .. "I'll cut and snip his groups" .. means .. YOU
aren't in it for nothing BUT .. derision ..

But we already know all about .. 'j' .. don't we 'j' ..

Evidenced by your .. stalking .. in OTHER newsgroups and your feeble
attempts at slander by .. inference ..

Isn't that .. right ..

Stay out of threads which take **brains** ..

Why .. ?

You ain't got .. none ..

Remember hyperthermia for cancer and your .. disapproval .. ?

How DID you slime your way out of that .. debacle ..

http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/f...y/hyperthermia

How did ya ..

Who loves ya.
Tom


Jesus Was A Vegetarian!
http://tinyurl.com/2r2nkh


Man Is A Herbivore!
http://tinyurl.com/a3cc3


DEAD PEOPLE WALKING
http://tinyurl.com/zk9fk



> Anarchore wrote:
> > That's right, news about the abilility of pot to shrink tumors first
> > surfaced, way back in 1974. Researchers at the Medical College of
> > Virginia, who had been funded by the National Institutes of Health to
> > find evidence that marijuana damages the immune system, found instead
> > that THC slowed the growth of three kinds of cancer in mice -- lung and
> > breast cancer, and a virus-induced leukemia.
>
> Groan...another mouse enthusiast...
> (other newsgroups trimmed]
> J

hi j

this puppy doesn't even know about current human trials - silly twit

as conspiracy rants go, this one is pretty lame

J, no> wrote:
>
> Anarchore wrote:
>
> > That's right, news about the abilility of pot to shrink tumors first
> > surfaced, way back in 1974. Researchers at the Medical College of
> > Virginia, who had been funded by the National Institutes of Health to
> > find evidence that marijuana damages the immune system, found instead
> > that THC slowed the growth of three kinds of cancer in mice -- lung and
> > breast cancer, and a virus-induced leukemia.
>
> Groan...another mouse enthusiast...
> (other newsgroups trimmed]
> J

thanks for proving the point youngster - you really don't have any 'new'
information at all.

your little bit of fast research when confronted doesn't expand upon
already known and discussed information - and it's not even the latest

Anarchore wrote:
>
> Paul T. Holland wrote:
>
> >
> >alt.conspiracy and politics groups snipped
>
> Oooh nice attempt at evasion, but it didn't work.

snipped again, not because your addled mind is correct re evasion,
rather because those groups have no bearing upon where i read...but nice
try your silliness

>
> >
> >actually youngster, i seldom rely upon luck for much of anything...
> >
> >as to your inchoate ramblings, you have more than shown yourself to be
> >an empty drum - being beaten upon by others, to a tempo not your own
>
> Here you are, Mr Cocksucker!

ah! once again you use such form of address...how droll

i won't bother to snip your articles for a couple reasons

a) they don't answer the query put to you: did you know the actual
active compounds being researched...answer - no you don't -

they also show that you really don't think for yourself - assimilate
information - assemble it in a manner to expand upon knowledge and facts
already known to your reader

b) you have been crying to the heavens about conspiracy, suppression, et
al...
these articles clearly show that there has been research - you claimed
there hadn't been,
they show that there has been media attention - you claimed there was
none,

gosh but it's hard to take your good rant seriously since we 'already'
knew the truth:

"In the last two decades, research has dramatically increased the
knowledge of cannabinoids biology and pharmacology." [2006
May;148(2):123-35.]

"To date, cannabinoids have been licensed for clinical use as palliative
treatment of chemotherapy, but increased evidences showed direct
antiproliferative actions of cannabinoid agonists on several tumour
cells in vitro and in animal models."
[PMID: 16501583 ]

what this also shows is that you aren't even 'current' on what is known,
is still being learned, and who is funding it, and where it is leading

Contrary to your 'the pharms' and 'gov' are holding everything back
[hsssss, boooooo], the truth is the opposite of what you claim:

"On the basis of these preclinical findings, a pilot clinical study of
Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) in patients with recurrent
glioblastoma multiforme has been recently run. The good safety profile
of THC, together with its possible growth-inhibiting action on tumor
cells, justifies the setting up of future trials aimed at evaluating the
potential antitumoral activity of cannabinoids."
[PMID: 17952650/2007 Aug;36(1):60-7.]

but gosh, i guess you didn't know about it from the tone of your
screed...

in your hysteria, you have proven that you don't even comprehend the
mechanism by which inhibitory function occurs, and we are not at all
surprised that you also don't know what is 'currently' being done -- by
those very agencies that you 'claim' are so bad...

so, tell ya what - come back when you have contemporary news that hasn't
already been read, literature that you understand and can articulate
without hyperbole, and can write like an adult in a group where folks
are living with it - this isn't your political group, or your conspiracy
group.

to sum things up - you're a day late and a dollar short

>
> http://drugpolicycentral.com/bot/pg/...r_nov_2003.htm
>
> New Study Explains How Pot Kills Cancer Cells
>
> Nov 6, 2003, Steve Kubby
>
> A new study published in Nature Reviews-Cancer provides an historic and
> detailed explanation about how THC and natural cannabinoids counteract
> cancer, but preserve normal cells.
>
> The study by Manuel Guzmán of Madrid Spain found that cannabinoids, the
> active components of marijuana, inhibit tumor growth in laboratory
> animals. They do so by modulating key cell-signalling pathways, thereby
> inducing direct growth arrest and death of tumor cells, as well as by
> inhibiting the growth of blood vessels that supply the tumor.
>
> The Guzman study is very important according to Dr. Ethan Russo , a
> neurologist and world authority on medical cannabis: "Cancer occurs
> because cells become immortalized; they fail to heed normal signals to
> turn off growth. A normal function of remodelling in the body requires
> that cells die on cue. This is called apoptosis, or programmed cell
> death. That process fails to work in tumors. THC promotes its
> reappearance so that gliomas, leukemias, melanomas and other cell types
> will in fact heed the signals, stop dividing, and die."
>
> "But, that is not all," explains Dr. Russo: "The other way that tumors
> grow is by ensuring that they are nourished: they send out signals to
> promote angiogenesis, the growth of new blood vessels. Cannabinoids
> turn off these signals as well. It is truly incredible, and elegant."
>
> In other words, this article explains several ways in which
> cannabinoids might be used to fight cancer, and, as the article says,
> "Cannabinoids are usually well tolerated, and do not produce the
> generalized toxic effects of conventional chemotherapies.
>
> Usually, any story that even suggests the possibility of a new
> treatment for cancer is greeted with headlines about a "cancer cure" -
> however remote in the future and improbable in fact it might be. But if
> marijuana is involved, don't expect any coverage from mainstream media,
> especially since mainstream editors have been quietly killing this
> story for the past thirty years.
>
> That's right, news about the abilility of pot to shrink tumors first
> surfaced, way back in 1974. Researchers at the Medical College of
> Virginia, who had been funded by the National Institutes of Health to
> find evidence that marijuana damages the immune system, found instead
> that THC slowed the growth of three kinds of cancer in mice -- lung and
> breast cancer, and a virus-induced leukemia.
>
> The Washington Post reported on the 1974 study -- in the "Local"
> section -- on Aug. 18, 1974. Under the headline, "Cancer Curb Is
> Studied," it read in part: "The active chemical agent in marijuana
> curbs the growth of three kinds of cancer in mice and may also suppress
> the immunity reaction that causes rejection of organ transplants, a
> Medical College of Virginia team has discovered." The researchers
> "found that THC slowed the growth of lung cancers, breast cancers, and
> a virus-induced leukemia in laboratory mice, and prolonged their lives
> by as much as 36 percent."
>
> "News coverage of the Madrid discovery has been virtually nonexistent
> in this country. The news broke quietly on Feb. 29, 2000 with a story
> that ran once on the UPI wire about the Nature Medicine article,"
> complained MarijuanaNews.com editor Richard Cowan, who said he was only
> able to find the article through a link that appeared briefly on the
> Drudge Report Web page. "The New York Times, The Washington Post, and
> Los Angeles Times all ignored the story, even though its newsworthiness
> is indisputable: a benign substance occurring in nature destroys deadly
> brain tumors," added Cowan.
>
> On March 29, 2001, the San Antonio Current printed a carefully
> researched, bombshell of a story by Raymond Cushing titled, "POT
> SHRINKS TUMORS; GOVERNMENT KNEW IN '74." Media coverage since then has
> been nonexistant, except for a copy of the story on Alternet .
>
> It is hard to believe that the knowledge that cannabis can be used to
> fight cancer has been suppressed for almost thirty years , yet it seems
> likely that it will continue to be suppressed. Why?
>
> According to Cowan, the answer is because it is a threat to cannabis
> prohibition . "If this article and its predecessors from 2000 and 1974
> were the only evidence of the suppression of medical cannabis, then one
> might perhaps be able to rationalize it in some herniated way. However,
> there really is massive proof that the suppression of medical cannabis
> represents the greatest failure of the institutions of a free society,
> medicine, journalism, science, and our fundamental values," Cowan notes.
>
> Millions of people have died horrible deaths and in many cases, familes
> exhausted their savings on dangerous, toxic and expensive drugs. Now we
> are just beginning to realize that while marijuana has never killed
> anyone, marijuana prohibition has killed millions.
>
> >> >>
> >> >> Part 1:
> >> >>
> >> >> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pjhT9282-Tw
> >> >>
> >> >> Part 2:
> >> >> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ysdaDhM9rfA
> >> >>
> >> >> Part 3
> >> >> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hGhpVzN0ik8
> >> >>
> >> >> Part 4
> >> >> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D9NN98CuFGA
> >> >>
> >> >> Part 5
> >> >> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zn6XIG_oxUM
> >> >>
> >> >> Part 6
> >> >> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G4Lqug_vaqo
> >> >>
> >> >> Part 7
> >> >> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fa2iCx3ZLgQ
> >> >>
> >> >> --
> >>
> >> --
> >> If you're thick enough to believe that Jews are your enemy why the
> >> fuck would I want to have anything to do with you.
> >> Consider me a Jew.
> >> Consider me a fag.
> >> Consider me an immigrant.
>
> --

Paul T. Holland wrote:

>thanks for proving the point youngster - you really don't have any
>'new' information at all.
>

This is the new information, shilly. I know scum like you hate people
discovering the truth! It will spell the end of your cancer industry
that is always "looking for the cure" that is just around the corner,
even as they suppress real cures. One day it will catch up to you
rats. Rick Simpson doesn't believe in retribution, but others will.


Another cancer cure is being ignored by mainstream pharma-medicine and
media.

The government is literally killing people by denying them their
medicine. This cannot stand, let us demand our Gods given rights to
the plants of the earth, and give a fat middle finger to the fascist
drug czars and slimey crimey neocon "ambassadors" from the US, and
their mirror-image counterparts in Canada that have thrived in the wake
of Bus-style war-on-terror BS that is now discreditted.

(youtube)

A Film By Christian Laurette - After a serious head injury in 1997,
Rick Simpson sought relief from his medical condition through the use
of medicinal hemp oil. When Rick discovered that the hemp oil (with its
high concentration of T.H.C.) cured cancers and other illnesses, he
tried to share it with as many people as he could free of charge -
curing and controlling literally hundreds of people's illnesses... but
when the story went public, the long arm of the law snatched the
medicine - leaving potentially thousands of people without their cancer
treatments - and leaving Rick with unconsitutional charges of
possessing and trafficking marijuana!

Canada is in the middle of a CANCER EPIDEMIC! Meet the people who were
not allowed to testify on Rick's behalf at the Supreme Court of
Canada's Infamous Rick Simpson Trial on September 10, 2007... INCLUDING
A MAN WHO WAS CURED OF TERMINAL CANCER USING HEMP OIL!

IF YOU SEE ONLY ONE DOCUMENTARY THIS YEAR... MAKE IT THIS ONE!

(Parental Guidance Suggested - Mature subject matter.)



Part 1:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pjhT9282-Tw


Part 2:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ysdaDhM9rfA


Part 3
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hGhpVzN0ik8


Part 4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D9NN98CuFGA


Part 5
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zn6XIG_oxUM


Part 6
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G4Lqug_vaqo


Part 7
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fa2iCx3ZLgQ

lolol

Anarchore wrote:
>
> Paul T. Holland wrote:
>
> >thanks for proving the point youngster - you really don't have any
> >'new' information at all.
> >
>
> This is the new information, shilly.

ahhhhhh - wassamatter wannabe? hard to accept that once you acceded to
the requirememnt to provide actual citations for part of your screed, it
turns out that your articles are several years older than what has
already been read?

that you aren't current at all? well shucks, do try to keep up won't
you?

'course the fact that there are ongoing studies, and that they are
published kind of shoots your other point of there being any sort of
conspiracy [shhhhhhh, gnash, secrets]



>I know scum like you hate people

who make stuff up and claim it to be the truth? you bet!


> discovering the truth!

of course, when you have had to read that others know more about it than
you do, you just call them names - how adult of you! lololol


> It will spell the end of your cancer industry
> that is always "looking for the cure" that is just around the corner,

gosh! you've just described legitimate research - it takes whatever time
it takes.

> even as they suppress real cures.

by the very studies discussed, claim proved false

>One day it will catch up to you
> rats. Rick Simpson doesn't believe in retribution, but others will.

awwwwwwwww - you are such a gem of a person


>
> Another cancer cure is being ignored by mainstream pharma-medicine and
> media.

already proved false calim on your part

Paul T. Holland wrote:

>lolol
>
>Anarchore wrote:
>>
>> Paul T. Holland wrote:
>>
>> >thanks for proving the point youngster - you really don't have any
>> >'new' information at all.
>> >
>>
>> This is the new information, shilly.
>
>ahhhhhh - wassamatter wannabe?

Wannabe? Wannabe what? I am that I am.

hard to accept that once you acceded to
>the requirememnt to provide actual citations for part of your screed,
>it turns out that your articles are several years older than what has
>already been read?

So what? I smashed your lies, and all you have as counter-argument is
that the article is a few years old? Was the research debunked, or are
you getting more desperate and pathetic?

>
>that you aren't current at all? well shucks, do try to keep up won't
>you?
>
>'course the fact that there are ongoing studies, and that they are
>published kind of shoots your other point of there being any sort of
>conspiracy [shhhhhhh, gnash, secrets]

And rather than post links like I do, you post fluff. WOW!

>
>
>
>>I know scum like you hate people
>
>who make stuff up and claim it to be the truth? you bet!
>
>
>> discovering the truth!
>
>of course, when you have had to read that others know more about it
>than you do, you just call them names - how adult of you! lololol

You do not demonstrate anything like that.

>
>
>> It will spell the end of your cancer industry
>> that is always "looking for the cure" that is just around the
>>corner,
>
>gosh! you've just described legitimate research - it takes whatever
>time it takes.

LOL, especially with billions of dollars at stake! Maybe we can bury
any cures that actually work, and keep the gravy train for radiation
chemo and leeches rolling!


>
>> even as they suppress real cures.
>
>by the very studies discussed, claim proved false

Prove it scum.

>
>>One day it will catch up to you
>> rats. Rick Simpson doesn't believe in retribution, but others
>>will.
>
>awwwwwwwww - you are such a gem of a person

So are you, the diamond at the bottom of the sewer!

>
>
>>
>> Another cancer cure is being ignored by mainstream pharma-medicine
>>and media.
>
>already proved false calim on your part

Where is the ongoing media story about Rick Simpson, scumbag?


Another cancer cure is being ignored by mainstream pharma-medicine and
media.

The government is literally killing people by denying them their
medicine. This cannot stand, let us demand our Gods given rights to
the plants of the earth, and give a fat middle finger to the fascist
drug czars and slimey crimey neocon "ambassadors" from the US, and
their mirror-image counterparts in Canada that have thrived in the wake
of Bus-style war-on-terror BS that is now discreditted.

(youtube)

A Film By Christian Laurette - After a serious head injury in 1997,
Rick Simpson sought relief from his medical condition through the use
of medicinal hemp oil. When Rick discovered that the hemp oil (with its
high concentration of T.H.C.) cured cancers and other illnesses, he
tried to share it with as many people as he could free of charge -
curing and controlling literally hundreds of people's illnesses... but
when the story went public, the long arm of the law snatched the
medicine - leaving potentially thousands of people without their cancer
treatments - and leaving Rick with unconsitutional charges of
possessing and trafficking marijuana!

Canada is in the middle of a CANCER EPIDEMIC! Meet the people who were
not allowed to testify on Rick's behalf at the Supreme Court of
Canada's Infamous Rick Simpson Trial on September 10, 2007... INCLUDING
A MAN WHO WAS CURED OF TERMINAL CANCER USING HEMP OIL!

IF YOU SEE ONLY ONE DOCUMENTARY THIS YEAR... MAKE IT THIS ONE!

(Parental Guidance Suggested - Mature subject matter.)



Part 1:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pjhT9282-Tw


Part 2:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ysdaDhM9rfA


Part 3
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hGhpVzN0ik8


Part 4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D9NN98CuFGA


Part 5
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zn6XIG_oxUM


Part 6
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G4Lqug_vaqo


Part 7
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fa2iCx3ZLgQ

--

Anarchore wrote:
>
> Paul T. Holland wrote:
>
> >lolol
> >
> >Anarchore wrote:
> >>
> >> Paul T. Holland wrote:
> >>
> >> >thanks for proving the point youngster - you really don't have any
> >> >'new' information at all.
> >> >
> >>
> >> This is the new information, shilly.
> >
> >ahhhhhh - wassamatter wannabe?
>
> Wannabe? Wannabe what? I am that I am.

vacuous drum thumper?


>
> hard to accept that once you acceded to
> >the requirememnt to provide actual citations for part of your screed,
> >it turns out that your articles are several years older than what has
> >already been read?
>
> So what?

well, for one thing it shows that your information is behind the times,
and factually incomplete

>I smashed your lies,

lies? you mean the infromation i showed whereby that there is research,
and there is coverage,

lololol i guess that makes your rant a bit lame


>and all you have as counter-argument is
> that the article is a few years old?

well, we do like unknown, self-styled 'experts' to have current
knowledge...lololol

>Was the research debunked,

lolol i just love it that you didn't actually read what was written -
you have no idea how funny these last couple of exchanges have been -
content wannabe, content

>or are
> you getting more desperate and pathetic?

not at all wannabe - watching you flail around is too precious

>
> >
> >that you aren't current at all? well shucks, do try to keep up won't
> >you?
> >
> >'course the fact that there are ongoing studies, and that they are
> >published kind of shoots your other point of there being any sort of
> >conspiracy [shhhhhhh, gnash, secrets]
>
> And rather than post links like I do, you post fluff. WOW!

too difficult for you to understand what was given? - someday when you
actually get it, you're going to be so surprised how you were facing 180
degrees in the wrong dialectic direction...

of course you will also discover just why you have been found to be so
delightfully humorous

>
> >
> >
> >
> >>I know scum like you hate people
> >
> >who make stuff up and claim it to be the truth? you bet!
> >
> >
> >> discovering the truth!
> >
> >of course, when you have had to read that others know more about it
> >than you do, you just call them names - how adult of you! lololol
>
> You do not demonstrate anything like that.

i demonstrate sources of current knowledge and info - you rant...

>
> >
> >
> >> It will spell the end of your cancer industry
> >> that is always "looking for the cure" that is just around the
> >>corner,
> >
> >gosh! you've just described legitimate research - it takes whatever
> >time it takes.
>
> LOL, especially with billions of dollars at stake!

well, since it takes a bit more education and credentialing than your
self-styled expertise, i l think i'll go with the legit researchers...

>Maybe we can bury
> any cures that actually work, and keep the gravy train for radiation
> chemo and leeches rolling!

since it's been show that there isn't any 'burying' going on, guess that
gravy train is moot...


>
> >
> >> even as they suppress real cures.
> >
> >by the very studies discussed, claim proved false
>
> Prove it scum.

already did - shame you didn't read what was actaully written. on the
other hand, it does show what a wannabe you are

>
> >
> >>One day it will catch up to you
> >> rats. Rick Simpson doesn't believe in retribution, but others
> >>will.
> >
> >awwwwwwwww - you are such a gem of a person
>
> So are you, the diamond at the bottom of the sewer!

yawn

>
> >
> >
> >>
> >> Another cancer cure is being ignored by mainstream pharma-medicine
> >>and media.
> >
> >already proved false calim on your part
>
> Where is the ongoing media story about Rick Simpson, scumbag?

yawn

>
> Another cancer cure is being ignored by mainstream pharma-medicine and
> media.
>
> The government is literally killing people by denying them their
> medicine. This cannot stand, let us demand our Gods given rights to
> the plants of the earth, and give a fat middle finger to the fascist
> drug czars and slimey crimey neocon "ambassadors" from the US, and
> their mirror-image counterparts in Canada that have thrived in the wake
> of Bus-style war-on-terror BS that is now discreditted.

please do - it is after all your right to try.

in the mean time, understand that any actual discussion of medical
facts is to be accompnaied by factual information.

Anarchore wrote:
> Paul T. Holland wrote:
>
>> lolol
>>
>> Anarchore wrote:
>>> Paul T. Holland wrote:
>>>
>>>> thanks for proving the point youngster - you really don't have any
>>>> 'new' information at all.
>>>>
>>> This is the new information, shilly.
>> ahhhhhh - wassamatter wannabe?
>
> Wannabe? Wannabe what? I am that I am.
>
> hard to accept that once you acceded to
>> the requirememnt to provide actual citations for part of your screed,
>> it turns out that your articles are several years older than what has
>> already been read?
>
> So what? I smashed your lies, and all you have as counter-argument is
> that the article is a few years old? Was the research debunked, or are
> you getting more desperate and pathetic?
>
>> that you aren't current at all? well shucks, do try to keep up won't
>> you?
>>
>> 'course the fact that there are ongoing studies, and that they are
>> published kind of shoots your other point of there being any sort of
>> conspiracy [shhhhhhh, gnash, secrets]
>
> And rather than post links like I do, you post fluff. WOW!
>
>>
>>
>>> I know scum like you hate people
>> who make stuff up and claim it to be the truth? you bet!
>>
>>
>>> discovering the truth!
>> of course, when you have had to read that others know more about it
>> than you do, you just call them names - how adult of you! lololol
>
> You do not demonstrate anything like that.
>
>>
>>> It will spell the end of your cancer industry
>>> that is always "looking for the cure" that is just around the
>>> corner,
>> gosh! you've just described legitimate research - it takes whatever
>> time it takes.
>
> LOL, especially with billions of dollars at stake! Maybe we can bury
> any cures that actually work, and keep the gravy train for radiation
> chemo and leeches rolling!
>
>
>>> even as they suppress real cures.
>> by the very studies discussed, claim proved false
>
> Prove it scum.
>
>>> One day it will catch up to you
>>> rats. Rick Simpson doesn't believe in retribution, but others
>>> will.
>> awwwwwwwww - you are such a gem of a person
>
> So are you, the diamond at the bottom of the sewer!
>
>>
>>> Another cancer cure is being ignored by mainstream pharma-medicine
>>> and media.
>> already proved false calim on your part
>
> Where is the ongoing media story about Rick Simpson, scumbag?
>
>
> Another cancer cure is being ignored by mainstream pharma-medicine and
> media.
>
> The government is literally killing people by denying them their
> medicine. This cannot stand, let us demand our Gods given rights to
> the plants of the earth, and give a fat middle finger to the fascist
> drug czars and slimey crimey neocon "ambassadors" from the US, and
> their mirror-image counterparts in Canada that have thrived in the wake
> of Bus-style war-on-terror BS that is now discreditted.
>
> (youtube)
>
> A Film By Christian Laurette - After a serious head injury in 1997,
> Rick Simpson sought relief from his medical condition through the use
> of medicinal hemp oil. When Rick discovered that the hemp oil (with its
> high concentration of T.H.C.) cured cancers and other illnesses, he
> tried to share it with as many people as he could free of charge -
> curing and controlling literally hundreds of people's illnesses... but
> when the story went public, the long arm of the law snatched the
> medicine - leaving potentially thousands of people without their cancer
> treatments - and leaving Rick with unconsitutional charges of
> possessing and trafficking marijuana!
>
> Canada is in the middle of a CANCER EPIDEMIC! Meet the people who were
> not allowed to testify on Rick's behalf at the Supreme Court of
> Canada's Infamous Rick Simpson Trial on September 10, 2007... INCLUDING
> A MAN WHO WAS CURED OF TERMINAL CANCER USING HEMP OIL!
>
> IF YOU SEE ONLY ONE DOCUMENTARY THIS YEAR... MAKE IT THIS ONE!
>
> (Parental Guidance Suggested - Mature subject matter.)
>
>
>
> Part 1:
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pjhT9282-Tw
>
>
> Part 2:
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ysdaDhM9rfA
>
>
> Part 3
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hGhpVzN0ik8
>
>
> Part 4
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D9NN98CuFGA
>
>
> Part 5
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zn6XIG_oxUM
>
>
> Part 6
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G4Lqug_vaqo
>
>
> Part 7
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fa2iCx3ZLgQ
>

Thanks for the link... good flick. You should send the links to people
you think might benefit from it rather than wasting time with this
sandbox of idiots!

April Fresh wrote:

>
>>
>
>Thanks for the link... good flick. You should send the links to
>people you think might benefit from it rather than wasting time with
>this sandbox of idiots!

LOL, thanks April. I'm spreading it far and wide!

--
If you're thick enough to believe that Jews are your enemy why the
fuck would I want to have anything to do with you.
Consider me a Jew.
Consider me a fag.
Consider me an immigrant.

Paul T. Holland wrote:

>
>
>Anarchore wrote:
>>
>> Paul T. Holland wrote:
>>
>> >lolol
>> >
>> >Anarchore wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Paul T. Holland wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >thanks for proving the point youngster - you really don't have
>>any >> >'new' information at all.
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> This is the new information, shilly.
>> >
>> >ahhhhhh - wassamatter wannabe?
>>
>> Wannabe? Wannabe what? I am that I am.
>
>vacuous drum thumper?
>
>
>>
>> hard to accept that once you acceded to
>> >the requirememnt to provide actual citations for part of your
>>screed, >it turns out that your articles are several years older
>>than what has >already been read?
>>
>> So what?
>
>well, for one thing it shows that your information is behind the
>times, and factually incomplete
>
>>I smashed your lies,
>
>lies? you mean the infromation i showed whereby that there is
>research, and there is coverage,
>
>lololol i guess that makes your rant a bit lame
>
>
>>and all you have as counter-argument is
>> that the article is a few years old?
>
>well, we do like unknown, self-styled 'experts' to have current
>knowledge...lololol
>
>>Was the research debunked,
>
>lolol i just love it that you didn't actually read what was written -
>you have no idea how funny these last couple of exchanges have been -
>content wannabe, content
>
>>or are
>> you getting more desperate and pathetic?
>
>not at all wannabe - watching you flail around is too precious
>
>>
>> >
>> >that you aren't current at all? well shucks, do try to keep up
>>won't >you?
>> >
>> >'course the fact that there are ongoing studies, and that they are
>> >published kind of shoots your other point of there being any sort
>>of >conspiracy [shhhhhhh, gnash, secrets]
>>
>> And rather than post links like I do, you post fluff. WOW!
>
>too difficult for you to understand what was given? - someday when you
>actually get it, you're going to be so surprised how you were facing
>180 degrees in the wrong dialectic direction...
>
>of course you will also discover just why you have been found to be so
>delightfully humorous
>
>>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >>I know scum like you hate people
>> >
>> >who make stuff up and claim it to be the truth? you bet!
>> >
>> >
>> >> discovering the truth!
>> >
>> >of course, when you have had to read that others know more about
>>it >than you do, you just call them names - how adult of you!
>>lololol
>> You do not demonstrate anything like that.
>
>i demonstrate sources of current knowledge and info - you rant...
>
>>
>> >
>> >
>> >> It will spell the end of your cancer industry
>> >> that is always "looking for the cure" that is just around the
>> >>corner,
>> >
>> >gosh! you've just described legitimate research - it takes
>>whatever >time it takes.
>>
>> LOL, especially with billions of dollars at stake!
>
>well, since it takes a bit more education and credentialing than your
>self-styled expertise, i l think i'll go with the legit researchers...
>
>>Maybe we can bury
>> any cures that actually work, and keep the gravy train for
>>radiation chemo and leeches rolling!
>
>since it's been show that there isn't any 'burying' going on, guess
>that gravy train is moot...
>
>
>>
>> >
>> >> even as they suppress real cures.
>> >
>> >by the very studies discussed, claim proved false
>>
>> Prove it scum.
>
>already did - shame you didn't read what was actaully written. on the
>other hand, it does show what a wannabe you are
>
>>
>> >
>> >>One day it will catch up to you
>> >> rats. Rick Simpson doesn't believe in retribution, but others
>> >>will.
>> >
>> >awwwwwwwww - you are such a gem of a person
>>
>> So are you, the diamond at the bottom of the sewer!
>
>yawn
>
>>
>> >
>> >
>> >>
>> >> Another cancer cure is being ignored by mainstream
>>pharma-medicine >>and media.
>> >
>> >already proved false calim on your part
>>
>> Where is the ongoing media story about Rick Simpson, scumbag?
>
>yawn
>
>>
>> Another cancer cure is being ignored by mainstream pharma-medicine
>>and media.
>>
>> The government is literally killing people by denying them their
>> medicine. This cannot stand, let us demand our Gods given rights
>>to the plants of the earth, and give a fat middle finger to the
>>fascist drug czars and slimey crimey neocon "ambassadors" from the
>>US, and their mirror-image counterparts in Canada that have
>>thrived in the wake of Bus-style war-on-terror BS that is now
>>discreditted.
>
>please do - it is after all your right to try.
>
>in the mean time, understand that any actual discussion of medical
>facts is to be accompnaied by factual information.

Where is your factual information?

Anarchore wrote:
>

> >in the mean time, understand that any actual discussion of medical
> >facts is to be accompnaied by factual information.
>
> Where is your factual information?

you ignored 3 studies already cited - dated 2006-2007 - including human
trials...just a couple of many that you weren't/aren't aware of. you
also ignored media sources already cited.

that shows you weren't willing/capable of 'discussing' anything - you
just wanted to try to force your idea/perspective on others.

like i said - you've been calling names, and ranting, and failing to
read responses for 'content'

all the while information is there for anyone really wishing to know
what is actually being currently studied

your 'agenda' blinds you to knowledge that others already have, and
blinds you to what others actually understand

that makes you boring, and any point you might wish to have understood
irrelevant to what folks here are going thru.

if you're going to try to be a crusader, you'll have to learn that any
message needs to be tailored to the specific audience - or, you will be
ignored as the kook you act like

Paul T. Holland wrote:

>
>
>Anarchore wrote:
>>
>
>> >in the mean time, understand that any actual discussion of medical
>> >facts is to be accompnaied by factual information.
>>
>> Where is your factual information?
>
>you ignored 3 studies already cited - dated 2006-2007

Where?

- including
>human trials...just a couple of many that you weren't/aren't aware
>of. you also ignored media sources already cited.

Not relevant to the cancer cure of THC, but thanks for showing up your
stupidity just the same!

>
>that shows you weren't willing/capable of 'discussing' anything - you
>just wanted to try to force your idea/perspective on others.
>
>like i said - you've been calling names, and ranting, and failing to
>read responses for 'content'
>
>all the while information is there for anyone really wishing to know
>what is actually being currently studied
>
>your 'agenda' blinds you to knowledge that others already have, and
>blinds you to what others actually understand
>
>that makes you boring, and any point you might wish to have understood
>irrelevant to what folks here are going thru.
>
>if you're going to try to be a crusader, you'll have to learn that any
>message needs to be tailored to the specific audience - or, you will
>be ignored as the kook you act like



--
Go fuck yourself

oh my - still having problems following a thread i see

Anarchore wrote:
>
> Paul T. Holland wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >Anarchore wrote:
> >>
> >
> >> >in the mean time, understand that any actual discussion of medical
> >> >facts is to be accompnaied by factual information.
> >>
> >> Where is your factual information?
> >
> >you ignored 3 studies already cited - dated 2006-2007
>
> Where?

citations posted in response early on - as stated several times, do try
to keep up

>
> - including
> >human trials...just a couple of many that you weren't/aren't aware
> >of. you also ignored media sources already cited.
>
> Not relevant to the cancer cure of THC, but thanks for showing up your
> stupidity just the same!

had you actually read the responses to your posts, you would have seen
that one referred directly, specifically, and currently, to human
trials/thc -

so - relevant? indeed so, therefore the only stupidity is your inability
to read for content

you don't even understand when you are being handed information that
might - just possibly - be in accord with your thesis...but, that isn't
unusual for silly ranters.


>
> >
> >that shows you weren't willing/capable of 'discussing' anything - you
> >just wanted to try to force your idea/perspective on others.
> >
> >like i said - you've been calling names, and ranting, and failing to
> >read responses for 'content'
> >
> >all the while information is there for anyone really wishing to know
> >what is actually being currently studied
> >
> >your 'agenda' blinds you to knowledge that others already have, and
> >blinds you to what others actually understand
> >
> >that makes you boring, and any point you might wish to have understood
> >irrelevant to what folks here are going thru.
> >
> >if you're going to try to be a crusader, you'll