Does anybody know

Why?? Why did the liberal Democrats lose the 2006 elections? It was
all going great guns. Then they botched it. Again.

I'd wager with odds they blow it in 2008.

Blinkered bunch of wankers!



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This message was posted via one or more anonymous remailing services.
The original sender is unknown. Any address shown in the From header
is unverified.

"Prime Time Viewer" <green.pages@unlisted.co.uk> wrote in message
news:BGASC07S39011.1068518519@anonymous.poster...
>
>
>
> Why?? Why did the liberal Democrats lose the 2006 elections? It was
> all going great guns. Then they botched it. Again.
>
> I'd wager with odds they blow it in 2008.
>
> Blinkered bunch of wankers!

the election is not for 2 more weeks

Prime Time Viewer <green.pages@unlisted.co.uk> wrote in rec.arts.tv:

>
>
>
> Why?? Why did the liberal Democrats lose the 2006 elections?
> It was
> all going great guns. Then they botched it. Again.
>
> I'd wager with odds they blow it in 2008.
>
> Blinkered bunch of wankers!
>

I think the wanker is the one who asks such a question in a TV group.
How stupid is the left anyway?

--
Brandy Alexandre

--Everything tastes better with cat hair in it. =^.^=

"Brandy Alexandre" <brandyalx@kittylittercomcast.net> wrote in message
news:Xns9862DDE6EB0BB8675309@129.250.170.92...
> Prime Time Viewer <green.pages@unlisted.co.uk> wrote in rec.arts.tv:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> Why?? Why did the liberal Democrats lose the 2006 elections?
>> It was
>> all going great guns. Then they botched it. Again.
>>
>> I'd wager with odds they blow it in 2008.
>>
>> Blinkered bunch of wankers!
>>
>
> I think the wanker is the one who asks such a question in a TV group.
> How stupid is the left anyway?
>
> --
> Brandy Alexandre
>
> --Everything tastes better with cat hair in it. =^.^=

heh...

i love the word "wanker"...

used2be wrote:
> "Brandy Alexandre" <brandyalx@kittylittercomcast.net> wrote in message
> news:Xns9862DDE6EB0BB8675309@129.250.170.92...
> > Prime Time Viewer <green.pages@unlisted.co.uk> wrote in rec.arts.tv:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Why?? Why did the liberal Democrats lose the 2006 elections?
> >> It was
> >> all going great guns. Then they botched it. Again.
> >>
> >> I'd wager with odds they blow it in 2008.
> >>
> >> Blinkered bunch of wankers!
> >>
> >
> > I think the wanker is the one who asks such a question in a TV group.
> > How stupid is the left anyway?
> >
> > --
> > Brandy Alexandre
> >
> > --Everything tastes better with cat hair in it. =^.^=
>
> heh...
>
> i love the word "wanker"...
It is perfect it just so satisfying. The sound fits the
definition so well. does that make sense. hi cindy, hope you are
doing okay. jill

"jill" <ojj9691@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1161445898.381262.121430@i3g2000cwc.googlegro ups.com...
>
> used2be wrote:
>> "Brandy Alexandre" <brandyalx@kittylittercomcast.net> wrote in message
>> news:Xns9862DDE6EB0BB8675309@129.250.170.92...
>> > Prime Time Viewer <green.pages@unlisted.co.uk> wrote in rec.arts.tv:
>> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Why?? Why did the liberal Democrats lose the 2006 elections?
>> >> It was
>> >> all going great guns. Then they botched it. Again.
>> >>
>> >> I'd wager with odds they blow it in 2008.
>> >>
>> >> Blinkered bunch of wankers!
>> >>
>> >
>> > I think the wanker is the one who asks such a question in a TV group.
>> > How stupid is the left anyway?
>> >
>> > --
>> > Brandy Alexandre
>> >
>> > --Everything tastes better with cat hair in it. =^.^=
>>
>> heh...
>>
>> i love the word "wanker"...

> It is perfect it just so satisfying. The sound fits the
> definition so well. does that make sense. hi cindy, hope you are
> doing okay. jill


you are right...it is a very satisfying word.

i'm doing alrighty miss jill....i hope you are having a good saturday
yourself.

jill wrote:
> used2be wrote:
> > "Brandy Alexandre" <brandyalx@kittylittercomcast.net> wrote in message
> > news:Xns9862DDE6EB0BB8675309@129.250.170.92...
> > > Prime Time Viewer <green.pages@unlisted.co.uk> wrote in rec.arts.tv:
> > >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Why?? Why did the liberal Democrats lose the 2006 elections?
> > >> It was
> > >> all going great guns. Then they botched it. Again.
> > >>
> > >> I'd wager with odds they blow it in 2008.
> > >>
> > >> Blinkered bunch of wankers!
> > >>
> > >
> > > I think the wanker is the one who asks such a question in a TV group.
> > > How stupid is the left anyway?
> > >
> > > --
> > > Brandy Alexandre
> > >
> > > --Everything tastes better with cat hair in it. =^.^=
> >
> > heh...
> >
> > i love the word "wanker"...
> It is perfect it just so satisfying. The sound fits the
> definition so well. does that make sense. hi cindy, hope you are
> doing okay. jill

It's even more satisfying when you see 50 000 football fans all
shouting "Wan-kerrrr. Wan-kerrrr" at the referee while doing the hand
motion.

"BoredToTears" <beejayceee1@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1161462462.386880.327630@e3g2000cwe.googlegro ups.com...
>
> jill wrote:
>> used2be wrote:
>> > "Brandy Alexandre" <brandyalx@kittylittercomcast.net> wrote in message
>> > news:Xns9862DDE6EB0BB8675309@129.250.170.92...
>> > > Prime Time Viewer <green.pages@unlisted.co.uk> wrote in rec.arts.tv:
>> > >
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> Why?? Why did the liberal Democrats lose the 2006 elections?
>> > >> It was
>> > >> all going great guns. Then they botched it. Again.
>> > >>
>> > >> I'd wager with odds they blow it in 2008.
>> > >>
>> > >> Blinkered bunch of wankers!
>> > >>
>> > >
>> > > I think the wanker is the one who asks such a question in a TV group.
>> > > How stupid is the left anyway?
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > Brandy Alexandre
>> > >
>> > > --Everything tastes better with cat hair in it. =^.^=
>> >
>> > heh...
>> >
>> > i love the word "wanker"...
>> It is perfect it just so satisfying. The sound fits the
>> definition so well. does that make sense. hi cindy, hope you are
>> doing okay. jill
>
> It's even more satisfying when you see 50 000 football fans all
> shouting "Wan-kerrrr. Wan-kerrrr" at the referee while doing the hand
> motion.
>

lol...i bet!!!

used2be wrote:
> "BoredToTears" <beejayceee1@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:1161462462.386880.327630@e3g2000cwe.googlegro ups.com...
> >
> > jill wrote:
> >> used2be wrote:
> >> > "Brandy Alexandre" <brandyalx@kittylittercomcast.net> wrote in message
> >> > news:Xns9862DDE6EB0BB8675309@129.250.170.92...
> >> > > Prime Time Viewer <green.pages@unlisted.co.uk> wrote in rec.arts.tv:
> >> > >
> >> > >>
> >> > >>
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Why?? Why did the liberal Democrats lose the 2006 elections?
> >> > >> It was
> >> > >> all going great guns. Then they botched it. Again.
> >> > >>
> >> > >> I'd wager with odds they blow it in 2008.
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Blinkered bunch of wankers!
> >> > >>
> >> > >
> >> > > I think the wanker is the one who asks such a question in a TV group.
> >> > > How stupid is the left anyway?
> >> > >
> >> > > --
> >> > > Brandy Alexandre
> >> > >
> >> > > --Everything tastes better with cat hair in it. =^.^=
> >> >
> >> > heh...
> >> >
> >> > i love the word "wanker"...
> >> It is perfect it just so satisfying. The sound fits the
> >> definition so well. does that make sense. hi cindy, hope you are
> >> doing okay. jill
> >
> > It's even more satisfying when you see 50 000 football fans all
> > shouting "Wan-kerrrr. Wan-kerrrr" at the referee while doing the hand
> > motion.
> >
>
> lol...i bet!!!

Here's Wikipedia's take on it:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wankers

I did not know you could buy a bottle of "Wanker" in the States. I hate
to think what it must taste like...

In message <1161462462.386880.327630@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups. com>,
BoredToTears <beejayceee1@yahoo.co.uk> writes
>jill wrote:
>> used2be wrote:
>> > "Brandy Alexandre" <brandyalx@kittylittercomcast.net> wrote in message
>> > news:Xns9862DDE6EB0BB8675309@129.250.170.92...
>> > > Prime Time Viewer <green.pages@unlisted.co.uk> wrote in rec.arts.tv:
>> > >
>> > >> Why?? Why did the liberal Democrats lose the 2006 elections?
>> > >> It was
>> > >> all going great guns. Then they botched it. Again.
>> > >>
>> > >> I'd wager with odds they blow it in 2008.
>> > >>
>> > >> Blinkered bunch of wankers!
>> > >
>> > > I think the wanker is the one who asks such a question in a TV group.
>> > > How stupid is the left anyway?
>> > >
>> > heh...
>> >
>> > i love the word "wanker"...

>> It is perfect it just so satisfying. The sound fits the
>> definition so well. does that make sense. hi cindy, hope you are
>> doing okay. jill
>
>It's even more satisfying when you see 50 000 football fans all
>shouting "Wan-kerrrr. Wan-kerrrr" at the referee while doing the hand
>motion.

It's funny how they never show that on TV.

--
The opinions given above may be mine. They might also
just be what I feel like saying right now, okay?

In message <1161465564.236074.254970@k70g2000cwa.googlegroups .com>,
BoredToTears <beejayceee1@yahoo.co.uk> writes
>used2be wrote:
>> "BoredToTears" <beejayceee1@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
>> news:1161462462.386880.327630@e3g2000cwe.googlegro ups.com...
>> > jill wrote:
>> >> used2be wrote:
>> >> > "Brandy Alexandre" <brandyalx@kittylittercomcast.net> wrote in message
>> >> > news:Xns9862DDE6EB0BB8675309@129.250.170.92...
>> >> > > Prime Time Viewer <green.pages@unlisted.co.uk> wrote in rec.arts.tv:
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> Why?? Why did the liberal Democrats lose the 2006 elections?
>> >> > >> It was
>> >> > >> all going great guns. Then they botched it. Again.
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> I'd wager with odds they blow it in 2008.
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> Blinkered bunch of wankers!
>> >> > >
>> >> > > I think the wanker is the one who asks such a question in a TV group.
>> >> > > How stupid is the left anyway?
>> >> >
>> >> > heh...
>> >> >
>> >> > i love the word "wanker"...
>> >> It is perfect it just so satisfying. The sound fits the
>> >> definition so well. does that make sense. hi cindy, hope you are
>> >> doing okay. jill
>> >
>> > It's even more satisfying when you see 50 000 football fans all
>> > shouting "Wan-kerrrr. Wan-kerrrr" at the referee while doing the hand
>> > motion.
>>
>> lol...i bet!!!
>
>Here's Wikipedia's take on it:
>
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wankers
>
>I did not know you could buy a bottle of "Wanker" in the States. I hate
>to think what it must taste like...

That's the funniest thing I've read in ages! Dare I ask our American
readers what on earth it is?

--
The opinions given above may be mine. They might also
just be what I feel like saying right now, okay?

On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 07:17:58 +0100, Alan Harding
<Alan@harding.demon.co.uk> wrote:

>In message <1161465564.236074.254970@k70g2000cwa.googlegroups .com>,
>BoredToTears <beejayceee1@yahoo.co.uk> writes
>>used2be wrote:
>>> "BoredToTears" <beejayceee1@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
>>> news:1161462462.386880.327630@e3g2000cwe.googlegro ups.com...
>>> > jill wrote:
>>> >> used2be wrote:
>>> >> > "Brandy Alexandre" <brandyalx@kittylittercomcast.net> wrote in message
>>> >> > news:Xns9862DDE6EB0BB8675309@129.250.170.92...
>>> >> > > Prime Time Viewer <green.pages@unlisted.co.uk> wrote in rec.arts.tv:
>>> >> > >>
>>> >> > >> Why?? Why did the liberal Democrats lose the 2006 elections?
>>> >> > >> It was
>>> >> > >> all going great guns. Then they botched it. Again.
>>> >> > >>
>>> >> > >> I'd wager with odds they blow it in 2008.
>>> >> > >>
>>> >> > >> Blinkered bunch of wankers!
>>> >> > >
>>> >> > > I think the wanker is the one who asks such a question in a TV group.
>>> >> > > How stupid is the left anyway?
>>> >> >
>>> >> > heh...
>>> >> >
>>> >> > i love the word "wanker"...
>>> >> It is perfect it just so satisfying. The sound fits the
>>> >> definition so well. does that make sense. hi cindy, hope you are
>>> >> doing okay. jill
>>> >
>>> > It's even more satisfying when you see 50 000 football fans all
>>> > shouting "Wan-kerrrr. Wan-kerrrr" at the referee while doing the hand
>>> > motion.
>>>
>>> lol...i bet!!!
>>
>>Here's Wikipedia's take on it:
>>
>>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wankers
>>
>>I did not know you could buy a bottle of "Wanker" in the States. I hate
>>to think what it must taste like...
>
>That's the funniest thing I've read in ages! Dare I ask our American
>readers what on earth it is?


I found this quote:

So they have pretty girls on all the labels: big deal! The beer inside
the bottle is terrible. Maybe they only want to cater to the Beer
Bottle Collectors of the World Club or something. If that's the case,
dump out the contents straight down the drain...! //TSB

at this web site:

http://www.pubcrawler.com/Template/R...?BrewerID=1821

The stupid yellow flag goes away after too long of time

Labels are seen at:

http://www.usbeerstuff.com/microl/pa/wa.htm


Charles
__

"Charles" <ckraft@SPAMTRAP.west.net> wrote in message
news:8o7mj2p8qlslpmlelul9ds8gf55j77rs82@4ax.com...

> So they have pretty girls on all the labels: big deal!

i start by drinking beers with pretty girls on the label. by the end of the
night, i'm drinking beers with *any* woman on the label.

wank wank.

Gravity

Charles wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 07:17:58 +0100, Alan Harding
> <Alan@harding.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>
> >In message <1161465564.236074.254970@k70g2000cwa.googlegroups .com>,
> >BoredToTears <beejayceee1@yahoo.co.uk> writes
> >>used2be wrote:
> >>> "BoredToTears" <beejayceee1@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
> >>> news:1161462462.386880.327630@e3g2000cwe.googlegro ups.com...
> >>> > jill wrote:
> >>> >> used2be wrote:
> >>> >> > "Brandy Alexandre" <brandyalx@kittylittercomcast.net> wrote in message
> >>> >> > news:Xns9862DDE6EB0BB8675309@129.250.170.92...
> >>> >> > > Prime Time Viewer <green.pages@unlisted.co.uk> wrote in rec.arts.tv:
> >>> >> > >>
> >>> >> > >> Why?? Why did the liberal Democrats lose the 2006 elections?
> >>> >> > >> It was
> >>> >> > >> all going great guns. Then they botched it. Again.
> >>> >> > >>
> >>> >> > >> I'd wager with odds they blow it in 2008.
> >>> >> > >>
> >>> >> > >> Blinkered bunch of wankers!
> >>> >> > >
> >>> >> > > I think the wanker is the one who asks such a question in a TV group.
> >>> >> > > How stupid is the left anyway?
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> > heh...
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> > i love the word "wanker"...
> >>> >> It is perfect it just so satisfying. The sound fits the
> >>> >> definition so well. does that make sense. hi cindy, hope you are
> >>> >> doing okay. jill
> >>> >
> >>> > It's even more satisfying when you see 50 000 football fans all
> >>> > shouting "Wan-kerrrr. Wan-kerrrr" at the referee while doing the hand
> >>> > motion.
> >>>
> >>> lol...i bet!!!
> >>
> >>Here's Wikipedia's take on it:
> >>
> >>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wankers
> >>
> >>I did not know you could buy a bottle of "Wanker" in the States. I hate
> >>to think what it must taste like...
> >
> >That's the funniest thing I've read in ages! Dare I ask our American
> >readers what on earth it is?
>
>
> I found this quote:
>
> So they have pretty girls on all the labels: big deal! The beer inside
> the bottle is terrible. Maybe they only want to cater to the Beer
> Bottle Collectors of the World Club or something. If that's the case,
> dump out the contents straight down the drain...! //TSB
>
> at this web site:
>
> http://www.pubcrawler.com/Template/R...?BrewerID=1821
>
> The stupid yellow flag goes away after too long of time
>
> Labels are seen at:
>
> http://www.usbeerstuff.com/microl/pa/wa.htm
>
>
> Charles
> __

Oh. My. Gawd. Not only is it called "Wanker" but they've even got a
helpful picture on the label. So let me get this straight, you've got a
beer in one hand...

Alan Harding wrote:
> In message <1161462462.386880.327630@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups. com>,
> BoredToTears <beejayceee1@yahoo.co.uk> writes
> >jill wrote:
> >> used2be wrote:
> >> > "Brandy Alexandre" <brandyalx@kittylittercomcast.net> wrote in message
> >> > news:Xns9862DDE6EB0BB8675309@129.250.170.92...
> >> > > Prime Time Viewer <green.pages@unlisted.co.uk> wrote in rec.arts.tv:
> >> > >
> >> > >> Why?? Why did the liberal Democrats lose the 2006 elections?
> >> > >> It was
> >> > >> all going great guns. Then they botched it. Again.
> >> > >>
> >> > >> I'd wager with odds they blow it in 2008.
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Blinkered bunch of wankers!
> >> > >
> >> > > I think the wanker is the one who asks such a question in a TV group.
> >> > > How stupid is the left anyway?
> >> > >
> >> > heh...
> >> >
> >> > i love the word "wanker"...
>
> >> It is perfect it just so satisfying. The sound fits the
> >> definition so well. does that make sense. hi cindy, hope you are
> >> doing okay. jill
> >
> >It's even more satisfying when you see 50 000 football fans all
> >shouting "Wan-kerrrr. Wan-kerrrr" at the referee while doing the hand
> >motion.
>
> It's funny how they never show that on TV.
>
> --
> The opinions given above may be mine. They might also
> just be what I feel like saying right now, okay?

Isn't it?. Spoil-sports.

In message <453b2390$0$97246$892e7fe2@authen.yellow.readfreen ews.net>,
Gravity <gravity@example.net> writes
>"Charles" <ckraft@SPAMTRAP.west.net> wrote in message
>news:8o7mj2p8qlslpmlelul9ds8gf55j77rs82@4ax.com.. .
>
>> So they have pretty girls on all the labels: big deal!
>
>i start by drinking beers with pretty girls on the label. by the end of the
>night, i'm drinking beers with *any* woman on the label.
>
>wank wank.

Try 'La Gauloise: Blonde'. I only bought it for the busty blonde on the
label. It was her winged helmet that pulled my chain.


--
The opinions given above may be mine. They might also
just be what I feel like saying right now, okay?

In message <1161511409.751696.231230@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups. com>,
BoredToTears <beejayceee1@yahoo.co.uk> writes
>Alan Harding wrote:
>> In message <1161462462.386880.327630@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups. com>,
>> BoredToTears <beejayceee1@yahoo.co.uk> writes
>> >jill wrote:
>> >> used2be wrote:
>> >> > "Brandy Alexandre" <brandyalx@kittylittercomcast.net> wrote in message
>> >> > news:Xns9862DDE6EB0BB8675309@129.250.170.92...
>> >> > > Prime Time Viewer <green.pages@unlisted.co.uk> wrote in rec.arts.tv:
>> >> > >
>> >> > >> Why?? Why did the liberal Democrats lose the 2006 elections?
>> >> > >> It was
>> >> > >> all going great guns. Then they botched it. Again.
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> I'd wager with odds they blow it in 2008.
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> Blinkered bunch of wankers!
>> >> > >
>> >> > > I think the wanker is the one who asks such a question in a TV group.
>> >> > > How stupid is the left anyway?
>> >> > >
>> >> > heh...
>> >> >
>> >> > i love the word "wanker"...
>>
>> >> It is perfect it just so satisfying. The sound fits the
>> >> definition so well. does that make sense. hi cindy, hope you are
>> >> doing okay. jill
>> >
>> >It's even more satisfying when you see 50 000 football fans all
>> >shouting "Wan-kerrrr. Wan-kerrrr" at the referee while doing the hand
>> >motion.
>>
>> It's funny how they never show that on TV.
>
>Isn't it?. Spoil-sports.

The game's all about the fans, you know.

--
The opinions given above may be mine. They might also
just be what I feel like saying right now, okay?

On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 00:33:52 +0000, Prime Time Viewer wrote:

> Why?? Why did the liberal Democrats lose the 2006 elections? It was
> all going great guns. Then they botched it. Again.
>
> I'd wager with odds they blow it in 2008.
>
> Blinkered bunch of wankers!

Because the elections are now held on electronic voting machines that
produce no auditable paper trail, and are made by two companies of which
Dick Cheney is a MAJOR stock holder.

The CEO of Diabold promised to deliver Ohio to Bush.

Bush isn't the President... he's the emperor.

"Ivan Marsh" <annoyed@you.now> wrote in message
newsan.2006.10.23.14.48.03.640779@you.now...
> On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 00:33:52 +0000, Prime Time Viewer wrote:
>
>> Why?? Why did the liberal Democrats lose the 2006 elections? It was
>> all going great guns. Then they botched it. Again.
>>
>> I'd wager with odds they blow it in 2008.
>>
>> Blinkered bunch of wankers!
>
> Because the elections are now held on electronic voting machines that
> produce no auditable paper trail, and are made by two companies of which
> Dick Cheney is a MAJOR stock holder.
>
> The CEO of Diabold promised to deliver Ohio to Bush.
>
> Bush isn't the President... he's the emperor.

it turns me on when you talk politics, ivan.

where ya been??!!!!

On Mon, 23 Oct 2006 14:54:36 +0000, used2be wrote:


> "Ivan Marsh" <annoyed@you.now> wrote in message
> newsan.2006.10.23.14.48.03.640779@you.now...
>> On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 00:33:52 +0000, Prime Time Viewer wrote:
>>
>>> Why?? Why did the liberal Democrats lose the 2006 elections? It
>>> was
>>> all going great guns. Then they botched it. Again.
>>>
>>> I'd wager with odds they blow it in 2008.
>>>
>>> Blinkered bunch of wankers!
>>
>> Because the elections are now held on electronic voting machines that
>> produce no auditable paper trail, and are made by two companies of
>> which Dick Cheney is a MAJOR stock holder.
>>
>> The CEO of Diabold promised to deliver Ohio to Bush.
>>
>> Bush isn't the President... he's the emperor.
>
> it turns me on when you talk politics, ivan.

Thanks for putting a smile on my face sugar-pop. Glad to know I'm good for
something.

> where ya been??!!!!

I've been around, but haven't had much to say. I've been sleeping a lot...
like all weekend... which isn't a good sign.

"Ivan Marsh" <annoyed@you.now> wrote in message
newsan.2006.10.23.15.14.21.254651@you.now...
> On Mon, 23 Oct 2006 14:54:36 +0000, used2be wrote:
>
>
>> "Ivan Marsh" <annoyed@you.now> wrote in message
>> newsan.2006.10.23.14.48.03.640779@you.now...
>>> On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 00:33:52 +0000, Prime Time Viewer wrote:
>>>
>>>> Why?? Why did the liberal Democrats lose the 2006 elections? It
>>>> was
>>>> all going great guns. Then they botched it. Again.
>>>>
>>>> I'd wager with odds they blow it in 2008.
>>>>
>>>> Blinkered bunch of wankers!
>>>
>>> Because the elections are now held on electronic voting machines that
>>> produce no auditable paper trail, and are made by two companies of
>>> which Dick Cheney is a MAJOR stock holder.
>>>
>>> The CEO of Diabold promised to deliver Ohio to Bush.
>>>
>>> Bush isn't the President... he's the emperor.
>>
>> it turns me on when you talk politics, ivan.
>
> Thanks for putting a smile on my face sugar-pop. Glad to know I'm good for
> something.

heh...

>> where ya been??!!!!
>
> I've been around, but haven't had much to say. I've been sleeping a lot...
> like all weekend... which isn't a good sign.

no, it's not. you should have been out driving around all weekend in that
fancy new beemer of yours!!!

On Mon, 23 Oct 2006 15:25:15 +0000, used2be wrote:

>
> "Ivan Marsh" <annoyed@you.now> wrote in message
> newsan.2006.10.23.15.14.21.254651@you.now...
>> On Mon, 23 Oct 2006 14:54:36 +0000, used2be wrote:
>>
>>
>>> "Ivan Marsh" <annoyed@you.now> wrote in message
>>> newsan.2006.10.23.14.48.03.640779@you.now...
>>>> On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 00:33:52 +0000, Prime Time Viewer wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Why?? Why did the liberal Democrats lose the 2006 elections? It
>>>>> was
>>>>> all going great guns. Then they botched it. Again.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'd wager with odds they blow it in 2008.
>>>>>
>>>>> Blinkered bunch of wankers!
>>>>
>>>> Because the elections are now held on electronic voting machines that
>>>> produce no auditable paper trail, and are made by two companies of
>>>> which Dick Cheney is a MAJOR stock holder.
>>>>
>>>> The CEO of Diabold promised to deliver Ohio to Bush.
>>>>
>>>> Bush isn't the President... he's the emperor.
>>>
>>> it turns me on when you talk politics, ivan.
>>
>> Thanks for putting a smile on my face sugar-pop. Glad to know I'm good for
>> something.
>
> heh...
>
>>> where ya been??!!!!
>>
>> I've been around, but haven't had much to say. I've been sleeping a lot...
>> like all weekend... which isn't a good sign.
>
> no, it's not. you should have been out driving around all weekend in that
> fancy new beemer of yours!!!

Indeed.

"Ivan Marsh" <annoyed@you.now> wrote in message
newsan.2006.10.23.15.51.02.757644@you.now...
> On Mon, 23 Oct 2006 15:25:15 +0000, used2be wrote:
>
>>
>> "Ivan Marsh" <annoyed@you.now> wrote in message
>> newsan.2006.10.23.15.14.21.254651@you.now...
>>> On Mon, 23 Oct 2006 14:54:36 +0000, used2be wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> "Ivan Marsh" <annoyed@you.now> wrote in message
>>>> newsan.2006.10.23.14.48.03.640779@you.now...
>>>>> On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 00:33:52 +0000, Prime Time Viewer wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Why?? Why did the liberal Democrats lose the 2006 elections? It
>>>>>> was
>>>>>> all going great guns. Then they botched it. Again.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'd wager with odds they blow it in 2008.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Blinkered bunch of wankers!
>>>>>
>>>>> Because the elections are now held on electronic voting machines that
>>>>> produce no auditable paper trail, and are made by two companies of
>>>>> which Dick Cheney is a MAJOR stock holder.
>>>>>
>>>>> The CEO of Diabold promised to deliver Ohio to Bush.
>>>>>
>>>>> Bush isn't the President... he's the emperor.
>>>>
>>>> it turns me on when you talk politics, ivan.
>>>
>>> Thanks for putting a smile on my face sugar-pop. Glad to know I'm good
>>> for
>>> something.
>>
>> heh...
>>
>>>> where ya been??!!!!
>>>
>>> I've been around, but haven't had much to say. I've been sleeping a
>>> lot...
>>> like all weekend... which isn't a good sign.
>>
>> no, it's not. you should have been out driving around all weekend in
>> that
>> fancy new beemer of yours!!!
>
> Indeed.
>

pick me up at 7?

On Mon, 23 Oct 2006 20:39:56 +0000, used2be wrote:

>
>
> "Ivan Marsh" <annoyed@you.now> wrote in message
> newsan.2006.10.23.15.51.02.757644@you.now...
>> On Mon, 23 Oct 2006 15:25:15 +0000, used2be wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> "Ivan Marsh" <annoyed@you.now> wrote in message
>>> newsan.2006.10.23.15.14.21.254651@you.now...
>>>> On Mon, 23 Oct 2006 14:54:36 +0000, used2be wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> "Ivan Marsh" <annoyed@you.now> wrote in message
>>>>> newsan.2006.10.23.14.48.03.640779@you.now...
>>>>>> On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 00:33:52 +0000, Prime Time Viewer wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Why?? Why did the liberal Democrats lose the 2006 elections? It
>>>>>>> was
>>>>>>> all going great guns. Then they botched it. Again.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'd wager with odds they blow it in 2008.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Blinkered bunch of wankers!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Because the elections are now held on electronic voting machines that
>>>>>> produce no auditable paper trail, and are made by two companies of
>>>>>> which Dick Cheney is a MAJOR stock holder.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The CEO of Diabold promised to deliver Ohio to Bush.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Bush isn't the President... he's the emperor.
>>>>>
>>>>> it turns me on when you talk politics, ivan.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for putting a smile on my face sugar-pop. Glad to know I'm good
>>>> for
>>>> something.
>>>
>>> heh...
>>>
>>>>> where ya been??!!!!
>>>>
>>>> I've been around, but haven't had much to say. I've been sleeping a
>>>> lot...
>>>> like all weekend... which isn't a good sign.
>>>
>>> no, it's not. you should have been out driving around all weekend in
>>> that
>>> fancy new beemer of yours!!!
>>
>> Indeed.
>
> pick me up at 7?

I'd love to... If I leave here right after work and maintain an average
speed of approximately 400mph I should just make it... sounds like fun.

"Ivan Marsh" <annoyed@you.now> wrote in message
newsan.2006.10.23.21.58.09.186143@you.now...
> On Mon, 23 Oct 2006 20:39:56 +0000, used2be wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> "Ivan Marsh" <annoyed@you.now> wrote in message
>> newsan.2006.10.23.15.51.02.757644@you.now...
>>> On Mon, 23 Oct 2006 15:25:15 +0000, used2be wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Ivan Marsh" <annoyed@you.now> wrote in message
>>>> newsan.2006.10.23.15.14.21.254651@you.now...
>>>>> On Mon, 23 Oct 2006 14:54:36 +0000, used2be wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> "Ivan Marsh" <annoyed@you.now> wrote in message
>>>>>> newsan.2006.10.23.14.48.03.640779@you.now...
>>>>>>> On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 00:33:52 +0000, Prime Time Viewer wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Why?? Why did the liberal Democrats lose the 2006 elections? It
>>>>>>>> was
>>>>>>>> all going great guns. Then they botched it. Again.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'd wager with odds they blow it in 2008.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Blinkered bunch of wankers!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Because the elections are now held on electronic voting machines
>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>> produce no auditable paper trail, and are made by two companies of
>>>>>>> which Dick Cheney is a MAJOR stock holder.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The CEO of Diabold promised to deliver Ohio to Bush.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Bush isn't the President... he's the emperor.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> it turns me on when you talk politics, ivan.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for putting a smile on my face sugar-pop. Glad to know I'm good
>>>>> for
>>>>> something.
>>>>
>>>> heh...
>>>>
>>>>>> where ya been??!!!!
>>>>>
>>>>> I've been around, but haven't had much to say. I've been sleeping a
>>>>> lot...
>>>>> like all weekend... which isn't a good sign.
>>>>
>>>> no, it's not. you should have been out driving around all weekend in
>>>> that
>>>> fancy new beemer of yours!!!
>>>
>>> Indeed.
>>
>> pick me up at 7?
>
> I'd love to... If I leave here right after work and maintain an average
> speed of approximately 400mph I should just make it... sounds like fun.
>

in that case, you better bring the private jet...