Re: Measures and Propositions, November 7, 2006 California General Election.

On 6 Oct 2006 16:57:51 -0700, "bobgnote" <bobgnote@gmail.com> wrote:

>Shall we review the illegally devised general election, November 7,
>2006?
>
>We suffer a big slate of illegally devised measures, devised of cooked
>fraud and false contraversy, to illegally superfund various service
>districts, now constricted at funding, by the illegal power deals of
>2000-1 in Ca. and by the 15 interest hikes by the US Fed, during
>various wars related to drugs and Israel, with hidden conflicts
>illegally interspersed and illegally funded, tacitly or directly, at
>various fraud.
>
>Superfunding is ILLEGAL, when it is devised solely to illegally tap by
>transition to unseemly fund sources, to cover illegal cost
>assimilations from the power deals and interest hikes during illegal,
>invasive public policy for WAR, while pretending peace!!
>
>The circumstances of fraud show how the conspiracy by government and
>corporate media has metamorphacized over five years, from unfair
>business practices, illegally affected by Prop. 64 in 2004, then
>evident as seditious conspiracy while BRAC hearings illegally hid the
>illegal cost-passing, from the DOD for 5 years, during TWO WARS. All
>agents and media connected to this fraud do a tap-dance around TREASON,
>enabled by the weakness of this Art.II tome, which is designed to
>enable SEDITION to fourish under the circumstances of
>government-corporate collusion, actually.
>
>The SEDITION stacked on UNFAIR BUSINESS PRACTICES means any
>restructuring of funds and funding to illegally reach general funds or
>property taxes is despicable, but look at what Measure 1(A)-(E) are,
>with Props. 83-90! Fund-invasions, in the wake of the illegal media
>opposed to Prop. 80 last year, in favor of re-regulating the rampantly
>profiteering US energy providers, which enabled flipping of energy cost
>assimilation by the oil companies, so LEE RAYMOND walked off with $400
>million severance from Mobil, but hemp alcohol is nowhere for cars.
>Prop. 87 is mandatory YES, since the energy controversy has continued
>to deregulate, and 87 is the ONLY sensible measure on the ballot, which
>attacks a fund source, logically available! The other measure for YES,
>1(A), re-allocates funds to vital infrastructure. The others are for
>dismissal, as charlatanry.
>
>The most RIDICULOUS is not what most persons would think dangerous
>legislation, but Prop. 83 calls for restricting all sex offenders,
>without regard to status, from living within 1000 feet of any public
>school or park. Guess what! The state is already illegally interested
>in PC 290, having illegally removed PC 290(q) by illegally submitted
>and (1/1/04)enacted AB 1313, so that the vital and fundamentally
>unremovable provision for punishment for illegal use of registrant
>information was illegally removed, by conspiracy, known to be directed
>at particular violations of the constitutions of Ca. and US, so PC 290
>is for VOID, not for enhancement, with a provision that takes ALL
>offenders and forces relocation, regardless of status.
>
>LOOK, anybody sentenced to LIFE without parole who noticed that
>provision removed can trigger a vast class lawsuit. That the state is
>not nailed in USDC by all the registrants is because this cause is
>being COOKED. Beware what happens when you waitresses get tagged on
>the reverse, ON THE VERY NEXT PLAY! You PAY, for that amount of
>encroachment, government run by 'girls' and cops who don't charge each
>other and cruise media, doinking us all to ruin, inc., for superfunding
>your show!
>
>The provision to relocate is disasterous and unfundable, a result of
>some San Diego idiot DA trying to write and chew gum he has wrapped up
>in the US Constitution, overnight, TOO MANY NIGHTS IN A ROW. The
>illegal provision with illegal enactment of AB 1313 and illegal
>enforcement of Megan's Law in Ca. the entire time through 2006 shows
>the determination of the now illegally interested Legislature,
>Governor, and AG, to fraud and deliberate, repeated STEP Act
>violations, publically funded. Combined with the adjustment needed
>when power is re-regulated and lawsuits force all prices in California
>back to 2001, and REFUNDS and REMEDIES will certainly strap many
>businesses, legislative bodies, and agencies, the relief for abuse of
>sex offender class enhancements will go right through the roof, if
>voters are STUPID enough to pass 83. YOU CANNOT PAY FOR THIS FRAUD.
>
>You have to protect kids a legal way, not by Catholic School Class
>Clowns all 'swearing' in as cops and tweaking the constitutions to RAGS
>and bits of paper.
>
>1(B) is an illegally submitted BOND Act, during the fat, illegal power
>deals and interest hikes. Send it to hell, with any funding
>initiative, to superfund, including for campuses. Your campuses are
>not only illegaly funded since 2001, YOU ARE ILLEGALLY INTERESTED IN
>THEM. ANY FUNDING YOU TRY TO COP WITHOUT REFORM IS GROUNDS FOR YOUR
>REMOVAL FROM ANY FURTHER AGENDAS, WITH REGARD TO CAMPUSES OR ACTIVITIES
>TO BE FUNDED AND PROMOTED BY THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, so raus the funds
>until the reforms, OR ELSE.
>
>Or else public campuses are OVER WITH, babies in makeup!
>
>84 is a bond, 88 hits property taxes, 89 wants funds for ambiguous
>reforms, but 87 needs to make a play, just because 80 in November 2005
>was a GREAT prop by someone from The Utility Reform Network, but TURN
>flipped on it and failed to promote it, though it was VITAL, and along
>came super-geek CLYDE (Warren Beatty) the bankrobber and 'no'd'
>everything, since he is a rich Democratic geek who owns tons of stock
>in energy companies like Dianne Feinstein and Mayor Newsome.
>
>Warren Beatty is the worst Democratic Party movie-circus act since
>George C. Looney, who wants huge FUNDING and war in Darfur by the UN
>and US, but he won't notice or announce the fat power deals, the fat
>interest hikes, or that the baby-blue situation in Israel has ripened,
>that Israel is a Boer-type state which INCITED all violence and
>traditions for this in the Rift Valley and westward and southward, or
>that the violence is by Islamists who mimic the pre-David behavior of
>Jews around Sea of Galilee, attacking and moving around, A LOT.
>
>NO on all the Measures but 1(A), no on the Props. but 87, or we are in
>grave danger of unfunding California, with these illegally submitted
>superfunding laws, in the midst of a funding implosion, caused by other
>bad laws, super-super RIPE, for reform, BEFORE ANY MORE FUNDING OF
>ILLEGAL AGENCY BUBBLES FROM COST-PASSING IS COMMITTED, IN GRAVE ERROR.
>
>The public campuses with illegal superfunding are illegally occupied at
>this time. The students are hostages, with taxpayers. Whatcha gonna
>DO, when the real truth, dawns on YOU? School's gonna be OUT,
>for-EVER! Or fix the funding in one quick hurry, BOYS AND GIRLS!
>
>You military and radiohead persons are particularly negligent, hiding
>fat power deals during BRAC, then letting the Fed jack the interest 15
>times, in what you allege is WAR policy time. You need to lose the
>USMC back into the Navy and the standing USAF back into the standing
>Army, for your usual negligence! School's ALMOST OUT, for-ever, class
>clowns with GUNS. You may fight for no money, or NOT AT ALL, when the
>funds you neglected but to spend are GONE.
>
>You can wait to find out, but your accrued neglect has already doomed
>any missions AND public campus funding in the USA, past 2007. Look!
>You let in illegal costs, over five years. The matriculation of that
>to budgets and illegal price hikes with the migration of tainted
>persons, to further injury, marks California schools AND the USMC for
>imminent reformation.
>
>You lot sure are retired for all the right reasons. Your trolls and
>mods have NOTHING LEFT, but raves, in opposition to what I have written
>here, THE TRUTH!!!



You spelled some words wrong:


metamorphacized contraversy assimilations fourish charlatanry

There were more, but I got tired of looking


Charles
__

In message <vh8ei25e1824ifsen6o142ju6h4uevmeoj@4ax.com>, Charles
<ckraft@SPAMTRAP.west.net> writes
>On 6 Oct 2006 16:57:51 -0700, "bobgnote" <bobgnote@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>Shall we review the illegally devised general election, November 7,
>>2006?
>>
>>We suffer a big slate of illegally devised measures, devised of cooked
>>fraud and false contraversy, to illegally superfund various service
>>districts, now constricted at funding, by the illegal power deals of
>>2000-1 in Ca. and by the 15 interest hikes by the US Fed, during
>>various wars related to drugs and Israel, with hidden conflicts
>>illegally interspersed and illegally funded, tacitly or directly, at
>>various fraud.
>>
>>Superfunding is ILLEGAL, when it is devised solely to illegally tap by
>>transition to unseemly fund sources, to cover illegal cost
>>assimilations from the power deals and interest hikes during illegal,
>>invasive public policy for WAR, while pretending peace!!
>>
>>The circumstances of fraud show how the conspiracy by government and
>>corporate media has metamorphacized over five years, from unfair
>>business practices, illegally affected by Prop. 64 in 2004, then
>>evident as seditious conspiracy while BRAC hearings illegally hid the
>>illegal cost-passing, from the DOD for 5 years, during TWO WARS. All
>>agents and media connected to this fraud do a tap-dance around TREASON,
>>enabled by the weakness of this Art.II tome, which is designed to
>>enable SEDITION to fourish under the circumstances of
>>government-corporate collusion, actually.
>>
>>The SEDITION stacked on UNFAIR BUSINESS PRACTICES means any
>>restructuring of funds and funding to illegally reach general funds or
>>property taxes is despicable, but look at what Measure 1(A)-(E) are,
>>with Props. 83-90! Fund-invasions, in the wake of the illegal media
>>opposed to Prop. 80 last year, in favor of re-regulating the rampantly
>>profiteering US energy providers, which enabled flipping of energy cost
>>assimilation by the oil companies, so LEE RAYMOND walked off with $400
>>million severance from Mobil, but hemp alcohol is nowhere for cars.
>>Prop. 87 is mandatory YES, since the energy controversy has continued
>>to deregulate, and 87 is the ONLY sensible measure on the ballot, which
>>attacks a fund source, logically available! The other measure for YES,
>>1(A), re-allocates funds to vital infrastructure. The others are for
>>dismissal, as charlatanry.
>>
>>The most RIDICULOUS is not what most persons would think dangerous
>>legislation, but Prop. 83 calls for restricting all sex offenders,
>>without regard to status, from living within 1000 feet of any public
>>school or park. Guess what! The state is already illegally interested
>>in PC 290, having illegally removed PC 290(q) by illegally submitted
>>and (1/1/04)enacted AB 1313, so that the vital and fundamentally
>>unremovable provision for punishment for illegal use of registrant
>>information was illegally removed, by conspiracy, known to be directed
>>at particular violations of the constitutions of Ca. and US, so PC 290
>>is for VOID, not for enhancement, with a provision that takes ALL
>>offenders and forces relocation, regardless of status.
>>
>>LOOK, anybody sentenced to LIFE without parole who noticed that
>>provision removed can trigger a vast class lawsuit. That the state is
>>not nailed in USDC by all the registrants is because this cause is
>>being COOKED. Beware what happens when you waitresses get tagged on
>>the reverse, ON THE VERY NEXT PLAY! You PAY, for that amount of
>>encroachment, government run by 'girls' and cops who don't charge each
>>other and cruise media, doinking us all to ruin, inc., for superfunding
>>your show!
>>
>>The provision to relocate is disasterous and unfundable, a result of
>>some San Diego idiot DA trying to write and chew gum he has wrapped up
>>in the US Constitution, overnight, TOO MANY NIGHTS IN A ROW. The
>>illegal provision with illegal enactment of AB 1313 and illegal
>>enforcement of Megan's Law in Ca. the entire time through 2006 shows
>>the determination of the now illegally interested Legislature,
>>Governor, and AG, to fraud and deliberate, repeated STEP Act
>>violations, publically funded. Combined with the adjustment needed
>>when power is re-regulated and lawsuits force all prices in California
>>back to 2001, and REFUNDS and REMEDIES will certainly strap many
>>businesses, legislative bodies, and agencies, the relief for abuse of
>>sex offender class enhancements will go right through the roof, if
>>voters are STUPID enough to pass 83. YOU CANNOT PAY FOR THIS FRAUD.
>>
>>You have to protect kids a legal way, not by Catholic School Class
>>Clowns all 'swearing' in as cops and tweaking the constitutions to RAGS
>>and bits of paper.
>>
>>1(B) is an illegally submitted BOND Act, during the fat, illegal power
>>deals and interest hikes. Send it to hell, with any funding
>>initiative, to superfund, including for campuses. Your campuses are
>>not only illegaly funded since 2001, YOU ARE ILLEGALLY INTERESTED IN
>>THEM. ANY FUNDING YOU TRY TO COP WITHOUT REFORM IS GROUNDS FOR YOUR
>>REMOVAL FROM ANY FURTHER AGENDAS, WITH REGARD TO CAMPUSES OR ACTIVITIES
>>TO BE FUNDED AND PROMOTED BY THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, so raus the funds
>>until the reforms, OR ELSE.
>>
>>Or else public campuses are OVER WITH, babies in makeup!
>>
>>84 is a bond, 88 hits property taxes, 89 wants funds for ambiguous
>>reforms, but 87 needs to make a play, just because 80 in November 2005
>>was a GREAT prop by someone from The Utility Reform Network, but TURN
>>flipped on it and failed to promote it, though it was VITAL, and along
>>came super-geek CLYDE (Warren Beatty) the bankrobber and 'no'd'
>>everything, since he is a rich Democratic geek who owns tons of stock
>>in energy companies like Dianne Feinstein and Mayor Newsome.
>>
>>Warren Beatty is the worst Democratic Party movie-circus act since
>>George C. Looney, who wants huge FUNDING and war in Darfur by the UN
>>and US, but he won't notice or announce the fat power deals, the fat
>>interest hikes, or that the baby-blue situation in Israel has ripened,
>>that Israel is a Boer-type state which INCITED all violence and
>>traditions for this in the Rift Valley and westward and southward, or
>>that the violence is by Islamists who mimic the pre-David behavior of
>>Jews around Sea of Galilee, attacking and moving around, A LOT.
>>
>>NO on all the Measures but 1(A), no on the Props. but 87, or we are in
>>grave danger of unfunding California, with these illegally submitted
>>superfunding laws, in the midst of a funding implosion, caused by other
>>bad laws, super-super RIPE, for reform, BEFORE ANY MORE FUNDING OF
>>ILLEGAL AGENCY BUBBLES FROM COST-PASSING IS COMMITTED, IN GRAVE ERROR.
>>
>>The public campuses with illegal superfunding are illegally occupied at
>>this time. The students are hostages, with taxpayers. Whatcha gonna
>>DO, when the real truth, dawns on YOU? School's gonna be OUT,
>>for-EVER! Or fix the funding in one quick hurry, BOYS AND GIRLS!
>>
>>You military and radiohead persons are particularly negligent, hiding
>>fat power deals during BRAC, then letting the Fed jack the interest 15
>>times, in what you allege is WAR policy time. You need to lose the
>>USMC back into the Navy and the standing USAF back into the standing
>>Army, for your usual negligence! School's ALMOST OUT, for-ever, class
>>clowns with GUNS. You may fight for no money, or NOT AT ALL, when the
>>funds you neglected but to spend are GONE.
>>
>>You can wait to find out, but your accrued neglect has already doomed
>>any missions AND public campus funding in the USA, past 2007. Look!
>>You let in illegal costs, over five years. The matriculation of that
>>to budgets and illegal price hikes with the migration of tainted
>>persons, to further injury, marks California schools AND the USMC for
>>imminent reformation.
>>
>>You lot sure are retired for all the right reasons. Your trolls and
>>mods have NOTHING LEFT, but raves, in opposition to what I have written
>>here, THE TRUTH!!!
>
>
>You spelled some words wrong:
>
>metamorphacized contraversy assimilations fourish charlatanry
>
>There were more, but I got tired of looking

Anyone who capitalises 'the truth' and adds three exclamation marks
can't spell. It's one of the rules of spamming.

--
The opinions given above may be mine. They might also
just be what I feel like saying right now, okay?

"Alan Harding" <Alan@harding.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:btjQYfOF40JFFwmV@harding.demon.co.uk...
> In message <vh8ei25e1824ifsen6o142ju6h4uevmeoj@4ax.com>, Charles
> <ckraft@SPAMTRAP.west.net> writes
>>On 6 Oct 2006 16:57:51 -0700, "bobgnote" <bobgnote@gmail.com> wrote:

>>>You lot sure are retired for all the right reasons. Your trolls
>>>and
>>>mods have NOTHING LEFT, but raves, in opposition to what I have
>>>written
>>>here, THE TRUTH!!!
>>
>>You spelled some words wrong:
>>
>>metamorphacized contraversy assimilations fourish charlatanry
>>
>>There were more, but I got tired of looking
>
> Anyone who capitalises 'the truth' and adds three exclamation marks
> can't spell. It's one of the rules of spamming.

An example of the art form known as 'exclamation pointillism,'
perhaps?

--
Nom dePlume, Ph.D.
Why, yes, in fact, I am a rocket scientist.

Guide to Medications for Mental Illness:
http://www.geocities.com/nomdeplume1000/

=====