Survey: Who Should CyberDroog Spread Lies About Next?

#1 11-09-2006, 10:35 AM

1: Millipedes.

2: Czar Nicholas II.

3: Koala Bears.

4: The Global Candy Bar Cabal.

5: The aliens who abducted him last night.

#2 11-09-2006, 10:35 AM

x-no-archive: yes

CyberDroog wrote:
> 1: Millipedes.
>
> 2: Czar Nicholas II.
>
> 3: Koala Bears.
>
> 4: The Global Candy Bar Cabal.
>
> 5: The aliens who abducted him last night.

I think Charles is overdue.

#3 11-09-2006, 10:35 AM

On Mon, 30 Oct 2006 07:11:11 GMT, Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net>
wrote:

>x-no-archive: yes
>
>CyberDroog wrote:
>> 1: Millipedes.
>>
>> 2: Czar Nicholas II.
>>
>> 3: Koala Bears.
>>
>> 4: The Global Candy Bar Cabal.
>>
>> 5: The aliens who abducted him last night.
>
>
>I think Charles is overdue.

There are no lies about me. Everything is true. Ha!

#4 11-09-2006, 10:35 AM

On Mon, 30 Oct 2006 07:05:53 GMT, CyberDroog
<CyberDroog@ClockworkOrange.com> wrote:

>1: Millipedes.
>
>2: Czar Nicholas II.
>
>3: Koala Bears.
>
>4: The Global Candy Bar Cabal.
>
>5: The aliens who abducted him last night.

I'd rather be spread with peanut butter, covered in chocolate and
licked clean...but that's just me.

denise

#5 11-09-2006, 10:35 AM

On Mon, 30 Oct 2006 02:19:29 -0500, arethusa <denise@onlyaret.net>
wrote:

>On Mon, 30 Oct 2006 07:05:53 GMT, CyberDroog
><CyberDroog@ClockworkOrange.com> wrote:
>
>>1: Millipedes.
>>
>>2: Czar Nicholas II.
>>
>>3: Koala Bears.
>>
>>4: The Global Candy Bar Cabal.
>>
>>5: The aliens who abducted him last night.
>
>I'd rather be spread with peanut butter, covered in chocolate and
>licked clean...but that's just me.
>
>denise

That's a spreadest comment against Nutella. I protest!

#6 11-09-2006, 10:35 AM

On Mon, 30 Oct 2006 07:27:52 GMT, Charles <ckraft@SPAMTRAP.west.net>
wrote:

>On Mon, 30 Oct 2006 02:19:29 -0500, arethusa <denise@onlyaret.net>
>wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 30 Oct 2006 07:05:53 GMT, CyberDroog
>><CyberDroog@ClockworkOrange.com> wrote:
>>
>>>1: Millipedes.
>>>
>>>2: Czar Nicholas II.
>>>
>>>3: Koala Bears.
>>>
>>>4: The Global Candy Bar Cabal.
>>>
>>>5: The aliens who abducted him last night.
>>
>>I'd rather be spread with peanut butter, covered in chocolate and
>>licked clean...but that's just me.
>>
>>denise
>
>
>That's a spreadest comment against Nutella. I protest!

I protest your protestation!

(Who is CyberDroog anyway and why should he/she want to spread lies
about Nutella and peanut butter?)

Only the names change, the games remain the same.

denise

#7 11-09-2006, 10:35 AM

On Mon, 30 Oct 2006 02:19:29 -0500, arethusa <denise@onlyaret.net> wrote:

>I'd rather be spread with peanut butter, covered in chocolate and
>licked clean...but that's just me.

Will Nutella do?

#8 11-09-2006, 10:35 AM

On Mon, 30 Oct 2006 02:34:09 -0500, arethusa <denise@onlyaret.net> wrote:

>(Who is CyberDroog anyway and why should he/she want to spread lies
>about Nutella and peanut butter?)

I Am.

But I would never spread lies about Nutella or peanut butter.

#9 11-09-2006, 10:35 AM

On Mon, 30 Oct 2006 08:37:07 GMT, CyberDroog
<CyberDroog@ClockworkOrange.com> wrote:

>On Mon, 30 Oct 2006 02:19:29 -0500, arethusa <denise@onlyaret.net> wrote:
>
>>I'd rather be spread with peanut butter, covered in chocolate and
>>licked clean...but that's just me.
>
>Will Nutella do?

Whenever two consenting adults consent to .......... ( <-------fill
in the blank), anything will do.

You bring the Nutella, I'll bring me.

denise

#10 11-09-2006, 10:35 AM

"CyberDroog" <CyberDroog@ClockworkOrange.com> wrote in message
news:1r8bk2192k69a2asp69kan19f52m6ac9gr@news.easyn ews.com...

> 1: Millipedes.
>
> 2: Czar Nicholas II.
>
> 3: Koala Bears.
>
> 4: The Global Candy Bar Cabal.
>
> 5: The aliens who abducted him last night.

Oh, oh, do the Czar, do the Czar! It helps that he isn't here to defend
himself.

--
Rhi

#11 11-09-2006, 10:35 AM

On Mon, 30 Oct 2006 14:20:39 -0500, "Rhiannon" <rhianon@sympatico.com>
wrote:

>"CyberDroog" <CyberDroog@ClockworkOrange.com> wrote in message
>news:1r8bk2192k69a2asp69kan19f52m6ac9gr@news.easy news.com...
>
>> 1: Millipedes.
>>
>> 2: Czar Nicholas II.
>>
>> 3: Koala Bears.
>>
>> 4: The Global Candy Bar Cabal.
>>
>> 5: The aliens who abducted him last night.
>
>Oh, oh, do the Czar, do the Czar! It helps that he isn't here to defend
>himself.

Okay.

Czar Nicholas II was a transvestite. Do you recall those allegations that
Rasputin may have bedded the Czar's wife? Nope. He bedded the Czar, who
happened to be dressed in his wife's clothes.

The facts prove two things:

1. The Czar was a bottom.

2. Rasputin's vaunted clairvoyance was obviously a myth. Either that or he
was too drunk to notice.

#12 11-09-2006, 10:35 AM

Ahem...that should be "Whom Should CyberDroog Spread Lies About Next?".

#13 11-09-2006, 10:35 AM

"Noon Cat Nick" <chatdemidiSPAMBEGONE@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4546AAA3.6060908@hotmail.com...
> Ahem...that should be "Whom Should CyberDroog Spread Lies About Next?".
>

i hope its me so that nothing much changes except the spreader

#14 11-09-2006, 10:35 AM

"CyberDroog" <CyberDroog@ClockworkOrange.com> wrote in message
news:jb9dk2l1snduga69u6eqhcns3tqv4dqv48@news.easyn ews.com...
> On Mon, 30 Oct 2006 14:20:39 -0500, "Rhiannon" <rhianon@sympatico.com>
> wrote:
>
> >"CyberDroog" <CyberDroog@ClockworkOrange.com> wrote in message
> >news:1r8bk2192k69a2asp69kan19f52m6ac9gr@news.easy news.com...
> >
> >> 1: Millipedes.
> >>
> >> 2: Czar Nicholas II.
> >>
> >> 3: Koala Bears.
> >>
> >> 4: The Global Candy Bar Cabal.
> >>
> >> 5: The aliens who abducted him last night.
> >
> >Oh, oh, do the Czar, do the Czar! It helps that he isn't here to defend
> >himself.
>
> Okay.
>
> Czar Nicholas II was a transvestite. Do you recall those allegations that
> Rasputin may have bedded the Czar's wife? Nope. He bedded the Czar, who
> happened to be dressed in his wife's clothes.
>
> The facts prove two things:
>
> 1. The Czar was a bottom.
>
> 2. Rasputin's vaunted clairvoyance was obviously a myth. Either that or he
> was too drunk to notice.

Laugh! You know, I am actually willing to believe all of this. I always
said if I could go back in time and meet anyone in history it would be
Rasputin. He has always intrigued me. Then it occurred to me that if I
wanted to meet a drunk foreigner who thought himself all powerful, all I had
to do was visit my dad on the couch in front of the television.

--
Rhi

#15 11-09-2006, 10:35 AM

On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 01:45:57 GMT, Noon Cat Nick
<chatdemidiSPAMBEGONE@hotmail.com> wrote:

>Ahem...that should be "Whom Should CyberDroog Spread Lies About Next?".

If I had some sort of net taser you'd be on the floor right now, grammar
cop!

The funny thing about grammar is that one has to understand what a person
said wrongly in order to be able to correct them. So what is the point
really?

#16 11-09-2006, 10:36 AM

CyberDroog wrote:

>On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 01:45:57 GMT, Noon Cat Nick
><chatdemidiSPAMBEGONE@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>>Ahem...that should be "Whom Should CyberDroog Spread Lies About Next?".
>>
>>
>
>If I had some sort of net taser you'd be on the floor right now, grammar
>cop!

>
>The funny thing about grammar is that one has to understand what a person
>said wrongly in order to be able to correct them. So what is the point
>really?
>
>
>
I think you just illustrated the point quite well. In a prescriptive
sense, your grammar was incorrect. But in a descriptive sense, your
grammar was A-OK. So whom cares?

#17 11-09-2006, 10:36 AM

On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 15:50:31 GMT, Noon Cat Nick
<chatdemidiSPAMBEGONE@hotmail.com> wrote:

>CyberDroog wrote:
>
>>The funny thing about grammar is that one has to understand what a person
>>said wrongly in order to be able to correct them. So what is the point
>>really?
>>
>I think you just illustrated the point quite well. In a prescriptive
>sense, your grammar was incorrect. But in a descriptive sense, your
>grammar was A-OK. So whom cares?

Me cares. I likes to haves good grammar.