TAKING MY OWN INVENTORY

RGB wrote:

>In article <K7OdnTgkg6ABSqLYnZ2dnUVZ_tCdnZ2d@giganews.com>,
> "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>>>I wouldn't know where to begin taking your own inventory. At least not
>>>after I got done cataloguing the empty jugs.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>first we are in shock ,
>>then we grieve ,
>>then we get angry ,
>>but please don't redirect it here
>>
>>
>
>Once again, you really are a piece of shit.
>
>For those who don't know, this is a reference to the recent death of
>Noon Cat Nick's mother. And yeah, I saw your "appology", it doesn't
>change a fucking thing. You really are just a disgusting piece of shit.
>
>(Yes, ladies, I know, "nobody's perfect".)
>
>Mark
>
>
Mark, % and I are cool with each other in general, and on this matter in
particular. % was very kind to me during my mother's illness and with
regard to her passing, and so I don't have any ill will toward him at
all about this.

Lord knows I've been overly reactive and gone off on people hereabouts
by misinterpreting what they wrote; numerous people here on a.s.d have
done the same. But life's too short to hold grudges. It's like drinking
poison and expecting the other person to die.

I didn't mean to piss off %, and I felt bad that that's what happened.
So I apologized. Whether what I did merited an apology isn't the point.
The point is that he was pissed off by what I wrote, which I didn't mean
to happen, and I was sorry that happened (and still am). I don't know
much of what % is going through; not for a minute have either of us
walked in the other's shoes. Thus I gave him the benefit of the doubt.
And I don't regret it.

I realize this is a public forum. But this really is primarily a matter
between % and me. And we've reconciled it amicably; the end. I also know
% rates rather low with you. But he and I don't have a problem with each
other. I don't agree with every single word he posts. I don't have to;
neither does anyone else. But in this case, he and I have made peace and
moved on. Please let it rest.

In article <45402907.8030709@hotmail.com>,
Noon Cat Nick <chatdemidiSPAMBEGONE@hotmail.com> wrote:

> Please let it rest.

As you request. Be well.

Mark

In message <E5ydnUgD-uDRgN3YnZ2dnUVZ_rSdnZ2d@giganews.com>, %
<persent@gmail.com> writes
>"RGB" <mark022806-asd@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>news:1161829527.491135.213820@m73g2000cwd.googleg roups.com...
>> % wrote:
>>
>> > > > and then get the blame for fighting back ,
>> > >
>> > > Right. "Fighting back". NCN makes a crack about the "jugs" you
>> > > constantly brag about pouring into your damaged brain and empty life,
>> > > you "fight back" by taunting him about the recent death of his mother.
>> > > I'm surprised you didn't accuse him of making it up. You pathetic,
>> > > broken piece of shit.
>> >
>> > yes , you are right ,
>> > and i am / was wrong ,
>> > and you are god ,
>> > and i am nothing
>>
>> Yes, I am right. Yes, you were wrong. No, I am not God. No, you are not
>> nothing. You're a toxic little scumbag, and the nothingness you're
>> headed for will be a huge improvement. So drink up, piece of shit,
>> hoist that jug and drink yourself into oblivion.
>>
>yes , you are right ,
>and you've always been right ,
>and i am wrong and i have always been wrong ,
>i am humbled in your replies

Now, now. Remember what gravity said about sarcasm. I forget what it was
but it was boring at the time.

--
The opinions given above may be mine. They might also
just be what I feel like saying right now, okay?

"Alan Harding" <Alan@harding.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:44bXVUURvGQFFwqF@harding.demon.co.uk...
> In message <E5ydnUgD-uDRgN3YnZ2dnUVZ_rSdnZ2d@giganews.com>, %
> <persent@gmail.com> writes
> >"RGB" <mark022806-asd@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> >news:1161829527.491135.213820@m73g2000cwd.googleg roups.com...
> >> % wrote:
> >>
> >> > > > and then get the blame for fighting back ,
> >> > >
> >> > > Right. "Fighting back". NCN makes a crack about the "jugs" you
> >> > > constantly brag about pouring into your damaged brain and empty
life,
> >> > > you "fight back" by taunting him about the recent death of his
mother.
> >> > > I'm surprised you didn't accuse him of making it up. You pathetic,
> >> > > broken piece of shit.
> >> >
> >> > yes , you are right ,
> >> > and i am / was wrong ,
> >> > and you are god ,
> >> > and i am nothing
> >>
> >> Yes, I am right. Yes, you were wrong. No, I am not God. No, you are not
> >> nothing. You're a toxic little scumbag, and the nothingness you're
> >> headed for will be a huge improvement. So drink up, piece of shit,
> >> hoist that jug and drink yourself into oblivion.
> >>
> >yes , you are right ,
> >and you've always been right ,
> >and i am wrong and i have always been wrong ,
> >i am humbled in your replies
>
> Now, now. Remember what gravity said about sarcasm. I forget what it was
> but it was boring at the time.
>
> --
> The opinions given above may be mine. They might also
> just be what I feel like saying right now, okay?


who's Gravity

"Janithor" <Janithor@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:453FFCE1.3080806@comcast.net...
> x-no-archive: yes
>
> used2be wrote:
>
>> there are still some states that don't have open container laws, and they
>> are full of drive-thru liquor stores. everytime i go thru arkansas, my
>> mouth waters when i pass this little mexican joint that serves margaritas
>> thru a drive thru window. i never stop, of course, because i wouldn't do
>> that with my kids in the car, but my mouth sure waters!
>
>
> I remember drive through places in Dallas, don't you have them in San
> Antonio?

well, i'm in austin, but no, i don't think so. we have that new open
container law. well, it's not so new anymore. apparently you can still
driv thru and pick up a alcohol in a keg or other type of container, just
don't open it til you get home.

"RGB" <RGB-101506@gipgipgip.com> wrote

> (Yes, ladies, I know, "nobody's perfect".)

i totally resent the fact that you keep bringing other ppl into your little
war, mark. namely myself. keep your war between you and dave and leave me
the hell out of it. i'd appreciate it greatly. is that too freakin much to
ask of you?

~cindy

"used2be" <used2be@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:jT80h.23533$GR2.5924@tornado.texas.rr.com...
>
>
>
> "RGB" <RGB-101506@gipgipgip.com> wrote
>
> > (Yes, ladies, I know, "nobody's perfect".)
>
> i totally resent the fact that you keep bringing other ppl into your
little
> war, mark. namely myself. keep your war between you and dave and leave
me
> the hell out of it. i'd appreciate it greatly. is that too freakin much
to
> ask of you?
>
> ~cindy
>
>

i agree and leave me out of it too

X-No-Archive: yes

used2be wrote:

> > (Yes, ladies, I know, "nobody's perfect".)
>
> i totally resent the fact that you keep bringing other ppl into your little
> war, mark. namely myself. keep your war between you and dave and leave me
> the hell out of it. i'd appreciate it greatly. is that too freakin much to
> ask of you?

First of all, I didn't mention you specifically.

Second of all, look a little farther back in this thread to your
remarks about how you "do see alot of halos in here at times. folks
pretending to be far more perfect than they really are", and consider
who brought you into the fray on this particular occasion.

Mark

"RGB" <mark022806-asd@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1161899844.949099.207400@h48g2000cwc.googlegr oups.com...
> X-No-Archive: yes
>
> used2be wrote:
>
>> > (Yes, ladies, I know, "nobody's perfect".)
>>
>> i totally resent the fact that you keep bringing other ppl into your
>> little
>> war, mark. namely myself. keep your war between you and dave and leave me
>> the hell out of it. i'd appreciate it greatly. is that too freakin much
>> to
>> ask of you?
>
> First of all, I didn't mention you specifically.
>
> Second of all, look a little farther back in this thread to your
> remarks about how you "do see alot of halos in here at times. folks
> pretending to be far more perfect than they really are", and consider
> who brought you into the fray on this particular occasion.
>

nm, i knew it would do no good...

X-No-Archive: yes

used2be wrote:

> nm, i knew it would do no good...

Well, you know, poking at someone and then asking them not to poke back
isn't the best way to not get poked. Let's just call it even (one
non-identifying allusion for another non-identifying allusion) and
leave it at that, if you're really interested in staying out of this.

Mark

"RGB" <mark022806-asd@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1161906695.925877.228840@i42g2000cwa.googlegr oups.com...
> X-No-Archive: yes
>
> used2be wrote:
>
>> nm, i knew it would do no good...
>
> Well, you know, poking at someone and then asking them not to poke back
> isn't the best way to not get poked. Let's just call it even (one
> non-identifying allusion for another non-identifying allusion) and
> leave it at that, if you're really interested in staying out of this.
>

mind you, i'm very careful who i poke.

X-No-Archive: yes

used2be wrote:

> mind you, i'm very careful who i poke.

Ever read or watch "Lonesome Dove"? Scene where the town whore,
officially retired, agrees to thump a guy if he picks the high card:

Lorena: "Gus, when you cut the cards before, you cheated, didn't you?"

Gus: "Well, Lori, I won't say I did and I won't say I didn't but I will
say this -- a man who isn't willing to cheat at cards for a poke don't
want it bad enough."

"RGB" <mark022806-asd@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1161911322.493979.287270@m73g2000cwd.googlegr oups.com...
> X-No-Archive: yes
>
> used2be wrote:
>
>> mind you, i'm very careful who i poke.
>
> Ever read or watch "Lonesome Dove"? Scene where the town whore,
> officially retired, agrees to thump a guy if he picks the high card:

i <heart> that movie greatly. *sigh*

that movie is why me and hubby starting calling sex "a poke."

In article <2id0h.23611$GR2.21596@tornado.texas.rr.com>,
"used2be" <used2be@nowhere.com> wrote:

> > Ever read or watch "Lonesome Dove"? Scene where the town whore,
> > officially retired, agrees to thump a guy if he picks the high card:
>
> i <heart> that movie greatly. *sigh*

It's one of my very, very, very favorites. Everything about it is
amazing, but especially Robert Duvall. I could go on for a long time
about that movie. There's a lot of wisdom in there.

Have you read the original novel?

> that movie is why me and hubby starting calling sex "a poke."

Roffle*3! Do you cry out, "Poke me, poke me!" in ecstasy?

Mark

In message <drc0h.23601$GR2.11419@tornado.texas.rr.com>, used2be
<used2be@nowhere.com> writes
>"RGB" <mark022806-asd@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>news:1161906695.925877.228840@i42g2000cwa.googleg roups.com...
>> used2be wrote:
>>
>>> nm, i knew it would do no good...
>>
>> Well, you know, poking at someone and then asking them not to poke back
>> isn't the best way to not get poked. Let's just call it even (one
>> non-identifying allusion for another non-identifying allusion) and
>> leave it at that, if you're really interested in staying out of this.
>>
>mind you, i'm very careful who i poke.

I'm sure you meant me. I'm sure several others did too, whether or not
you intended to poke them. asd's like that - issue a general
unpleasantness and half the group gets hurt.

--
The opinions given above may be mine. They might also
just be what I feel like saying right now, okay?

In message <A3f0h.52452$x12.15962@fe01.news.easynews.com>, RGB
<RGB-101506@gipgipgip.com> writes
>In article <2id0h.23611$GR2.21596@tornado.texas.rr.com>,
> "used2be" <used2be@nowhere.com> wrote:
>
>> > Ever read or watch "Lonesome Dove"? Scene where the town whore,
>> > officially retired, agrees to thump a guy if he picks the high card:
>>
>> i <heart> that movie greatly. *sigh*
>
>It's one of my very, very, very favorites. Everything about it is
>amazing, but especially Robert Duvall. I could go on for a long time
>about that movie. There's a lot of wisdom in there.

One more for the movie list.

--
The opinions given above may be mine. They might also
just be what I feel like saying right now, okay?

"RGB" <RGB-101506@gipgipgip.com> wrote in message
news:A3f0h.52452$x12.15962@fe01.news.easynews.com. ..
> In article <2id0h.23611$GR2.21596@tornado.texas.rr.com>,
> "used2be" <used2be@nowhere.com> wrote:
>
>> > Ever read or watch "Lonesome Dove"? Scene where the town whore,
>> > officially retired, agrees to thump a guy if he picks the high card:
>>
>> i <heart> that movie greatly. *sigh*
>
> It's one of my very, very, very favorites. Everything about it is
> amazing, but especially Robert Duvall. I could go on for a long time
> about that movie. There's a lot of wisdom in there.

i just LOVE rob't duvall anyway...he's magic.

> Have you read the original novel?

no, maybe that's something i'll aspire to do during Xmas break.

>> that movie is why me and hubby starting calling sex "a poke."
>
> Roffle*3! Do you cry out, "Poke me, poke me!" in ecstasy?

no, it's more like this:

hubby: "Can i have a poke?"

me: "didn't we just do that last month?"

"Alan Harding" <Alan@harding.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
newshADjeB9saQFFwJ9@harding.demon.co.uk...
> In message <drc0h.23601$GR2.11419@tornado.texas.rr.com>, used2be
> <used2be@nowhere.com> writes
>>"RGB" <mark022806-asd@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>news:1161906695.925877.228840@i42g2000cwa.google groups.com...
>>> used2be wrote:
>>>
>>>> nm, i knew it would do no good...
>>>
>>> Well, you know, poking at someone and then asking them not to poke back
>>> isn't the best way to not get poked. Let's just call it even (one
>>> non-identifying allusion for another non-identifying allusion) and
>>> leave it at that, if you're really interested in staying out of this.
>>>
>>mind you, i'm very careful who i poke.
>
> I'm sure you meant me. I'm sure several others did too, whether or not you
> intended to poke them. asd's like that - issue a general unpleasantness
> and half the group gets hurt.

i poked you, alan?

*confusion*

~u2b

In message <cft0h.23625$ta3.14112@tornado.texas.rr.com>, used2be
<used2be@nowhere.com> writes
>"Alan Harding" <Alan@harding.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
>newshADjeB9saQFFwJ9@harding.demon.co.uk...
>> In message <drc0h.23601$GR2.11419@tornado.texas.rr.com>, used2be
>> <used2be@nowhere.com> writes
>>>"RGB" <mark022806-asd@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>>news:1161906695.925877.228840@i42g2000cwa.googl egroups.com...
>>>> used2be wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> nm, i knew it would do no good...
>>>>
>>>> Well, you know, poking at someone and then asking them not to poke back
>>>> isn't the best way to not get poked. Let's just call it even (one
>>>> non-identifying allusion for another non-identifying allusion) and
>>>> leave it at that, if you're really interested in staying out of this.
>>>>
>>>mind you, i'm very careful who i poke.
>>
>> I'm sure you meant me. I'm sure several others did too, whether or not you
>> intended to poke them. asd's like that - issue a general unpleasantness
>> and half the group gets hurt.
>
>i poked you, alan?
>
>*confusion*

Who else could you have been aiming at?

--
The opinions given above may be mine. They might also
just be what I feel like saying right now, okay?