Thor

"Luna" <lunajean@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:x0z%g.186570$1T2.111651@pd7urf2no...
>
> "cal" <cal1360@gmaNOSPAMail.com> wrote in message
> news:ehdu96$pgf$1@news.datemas.de...
>> "Gayle" <gayleco@rcn.com> wrote in message
>> news:5OudnRkewMUN8KfYnZ2dnUVZ_qqdnZ2d@rcn.net...
>>> cal wrote:
>>>
>>>> really. the guy is routinely defended and befriended by a few women
>>>> he's succeeded in beschmoozing over the years. i think they're
>>>> susceptible to his brand of manipulation similarly to the way charlie
>>>> manson's girls were to his. he intuitively knows their areas of
>>>> emotional weakness, and attaches himself there in ways that make him
>>>> hard to remove.
>>>
>>> Is that why you think Rhiannon has been a friend to %?
>>
>> i don't think rhiannon is the kind of all-forgiving friend to him that
>> some of the other "friends" have been. you know, the kind who say, if
>> anyone but you had done this, it would be despicable and impossible to
>> overlook, but since it was you, it's ok.
>>
>> sorry, but that's just fucked, as in pursuant to some kind of
>> mind-fuckery that's gone on before.
>>
>> and i would just add that an apology with the subtext, "but i'll still do
>> whatever i want, including this very same thing or worse, the very next
>> time i feel like it," is absolutely meaningless, except as a pretext for
>> those who would have his friendship at any cost to hold up and say, "but
>> see, he apologized."
>>
>>> Just call me "Squeaky".
>>
>> bah. at least she was only what, 17 at the time.
>
> You can be annoyingly condescending at times. I mean, really.

i know, eh?

"cal" <cal1360@gmaNOSPAMail.com> wrote in message
news:ehmhpp$c07$1@news.datemas.de...
<snip>

>>
>> You can be annoyingly condescending at times. I mean, really.
>
> i know, eh?

Yeah well, I for one forgive you.

(Okay, abuse me now!)

Jean

>
>

"Gayle" <gayleco@rcn.com> wrote in message
news:A96dnbnE1Mz4VKPYnZ2dnUVZ_v2dnZ2d@rcn.net...
> Luna wrote:
>
>> Jean "Fromme"
>
> Hi, honey.

Hi Gayle.

Jean
'i like 'im no matter what'
~ 'and no, I'm absolutely NOT a cult member and yes, I actually have a
brain'
~~ 'try to make this an issue of "the poor weak-minded abuse-lovin' women"
and I will spit in your direction'

I like the Godwin's Law idea - cuz that is what this is. Anyway. How are
ya? The kids? The life?

Jean
>
> Gayle

"Luna" <lunajean@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:aZz%g.192710$R63.96395@pd7urf1no...
>
> "cal" <cal1360@gmaNOSPAMail.com> wrote in message
> news:ehmhpp$c07$1@news.datemas.de...
> <snip>
>
>>>
>>> You can be annoyingly condescending at times. I mean, really.
>>
>> i know, eh?
>
> Yeah well, I for one forgive you.
>
> (Okay, abuse me now!)

show me your , hooters

"cal" <cal1360@gmaNOSPAMail.com> wrote in message
news:ehmil2$d7l$1@news.datemas.de...
> "Luna" <lunajean@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:aZz%g.192710$R63.96395@pd7urf1no...
>>
>> "cal" <cal1360@gmaNOSPAMail.com> wrote in message
>> news:ehmhpp$c07$1@news.datemas.de...
>> <snip>
>>
>>>>
>>>> You can be annoyingly condescending at times. I mean, really.
>>>
>>> i know, eh?
>>
>> Yeah well, I for one forgive you.
>>
>> (Okay, abuse me now!)
>
> show me your , hooters

that's abuse? geez. i was sure you could do better than *that!*

"Gayle" <gayleco@rcn.com> wrote in message
news:A96dnbnE1Mz4VKPYnZ2dnUVZ_v2dnZ2d@rcn.net...
> Luna wrote:
>
>> Jean "Fromme"
>
> Hi, honey.
>
> Gayle

oh no! you didn't just say "honey" did you???

used2be wrote:
> "Gayle" <gayleco@rcn.com> wrote in message

>>Hi, honey.

> oh no! you didn't just say "honey" did you???

Uh-oh. I forget, does that mean
"everybody drink", "abuse me, please",
or "I forgive everybunny for everything"?

I miss Miss Bunny. But I sure am glad
you're here, C., and I don't tell you
often enough. Honey.

Gayle

"Gayle" <gayleco@rcn.com> wrote in message
news:rPqdnfSqNutRRaLYnZ2dnUVZ_qqdnZ2d@rcn.net...
> used2be wrote:
>> "Gayle" <gayleco@rcn.com> wrote in message
>
>>>Hi, honey.
>
>> oh no! you didn't just say "honey" did you???
>
> Uh-oh. I forget, does that mean "everybody drink", "abuse me, please", or
> "I forgive everybunny for everything"?

all of the above?

> I miss Miss Bunny.

i miss her too! i've tho't of her so often lately. she did something so
special for me last Xmas and i'll never forget it. what a sweetheart she
is.

>But I sure am glad you're here, C., and I don't tell you often enough.
>Honey.

ditto, sugar pie. ;-)

"used2be" <used2be@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:1WP%g.22633$ta3.134@tornado.texas.rr.com...
>
> "cal" <cal1360@gmaNOSPAMail.com> wrote in message
> news:ehmil2$d7l$1@news.datemas.de...
>> "Luna" <lunajean@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:aZz%g.192710$R63.96395@pd7urf1no...
>>>
>>> "cal" <cal1360@gmaNOSPAMail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:ehmhpp$c07$1@news.datemas.de...
>>> <snip>
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> You can be annoyingly condescending at times. I mean, really.
>>>>
>>>> i know, eh?
>>>
>>> Yeah well, I for one forgive you.
>>>
>>> (Okay, abuse me now!)
>>
>> show me your , hooters
>
> that's abuse?

that's a shot across the bow.

"used2be" <used2be@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:N0R%g.22673$ta3.19503@tornado.texas.rr.com...
>
> "Gayle" <gayleco@rcn.com> wrote in message
> news:rPqdnfSqNutRRaLYnZ2dnUVZ_qqdnZ2d@rcn.net...
>> used2be wrote:
>>> "Gayle" <gayleco@rcn.com> wrote in message
>>
>>>>Hi, honey.
>>
>>> oh no! you didn't just say "honey" did you???
>>
>> Uh-oh. I forget, does that mean "everybody drink", "abuse me, please", or
>> "I forgive everybunny for everything"?
>
> all of the above?
>
>> I miss Miss Bunny.
>
> i miss her too! i've tho't of her so often lately. she did something so
> special for me last Xmas and i'll never forget it. what a sweetheart she
> is.
>
>>But I sure am glad you're here, C., and I don't tell you often enough.
>>Honey.
>
> ditto, sugar pie. ;-)
>

Does anyone know how she is???? I miss her too ;((

"Jane" <jarsenal66nospam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:WamdnelMTKVAj93YnZ2dnUVZ_r2dnZ2d@adelphia.com ...
>
> "used2be" <used2be@nowhere.com> wrote in message
> news:N0R%g.22673$ta3.19503@tornado.texas.rr.com...
> >
> > "Gayle" <gayleco@rcn.com> wrote in message
> > news:rPqdnfSqNutRRaLYnZ2dnUVZ_qqdnZ2d@rcn.net...
> >> used2be wrote:
> >>> "Gayle" <gayleco@rcn.com> wrote in message
> >>
> >>>>Hi, honey.
> >>
> >>> oh no! you didn't just say "honey" did you???
> >>
> >> Uh-oh. I forget, does that mean "everybody drink", "abuse me, please",
or
> >> "I forgive everybunny for everything"?
> >
> > all of the above?
> >
> >> I miss Miss Bunny.
> >
> > i miss her too! i've tho't of her so often lately. she did something
so
> > special for me last Xmas and i'll never forget it. what a sweetheart
she
> > is.
> >
> >>But I sure am glad you're here, C., and I don't tell you often enough.
> >>Honey.
> >
> > ditto, sugar pie. ;-)
> >
>
> Does anyone know how she is???? I miss her too ;((
>
>

i miss everybody ,
even the people that are hear ,
but i'm big hearted that way

"RGB" <RGB-101506@gipgipgip.com> wrote in message
news:f5s_g.195053$N72.194505@fe12.news.easynews.co m...

>
> Like I said, he can be shit or not shit; the choice is his. Meanwhile,
> I'm not about to waste a drop of compassion on someone who OVER and
> OVER and OVER again chooses to devote entire nights to viciously
> targeting people who have done nothing to harm him.

How many night have you devoted to exactly that activity? Many. So let's
tend our own gardens, shall we?

Jean
>
> Mark

"jill" <ojj9691@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1161445306.104994.113170@m7g2000cwm.googlegro ups.com...
> I got to know were you wearing the shoe when the dog took a dump on
> it. HAHA , this is so funny. You got to laugh. That is too funny.
>
> I really don't think Dave meant what he said. Your always the one
> who sees right thru that crap. You don't really believe in your heart
> that he meant that I hope. dave is dave. You have to care about people
> warts and all or it doesn't mean anything. there is good in him.
> I hope all is well with you all up in Sac. Pretty weather the last
> few days hunh. I hope it lasts awhile . Maybe by next spring that
> wife of yours will be planning to plant something outside.

Hi Jill

I'm with you on this.

Jean
> waving, jill
>

"RGB" <RGB-101506@gipgipgip.com> wrote in message
news:f5s_g.195053$N72.194505@fe12.news.easynews.co m...
> "jill" wrote:
>
>> I really don't think Dave meant what he said.
>
> So what? Of course he didn't "mean" it, if by that you mean believe his
> own lies. He didn't "mean" it when he accused me numerous times of
> stealing from people here, either. But it isn't about "meaning" it.
> It's about Dave routinely trying to hit people where he thinks they're
> most vulnerable. It's about Dave being a sadistic prick. It doesn't
> matter in the least whether he "means" it or not; in fact, he'd be a
> lot less of a prick if he actually *did* believe the things he said.
>
>> dave is dave. You have to care about people warts and all or it
>> doesn't mean anything.
>
> No, you don't. I don't speak for Thor, obviously, but my life can be
> good and meaningful without giving a shit about somebody like
> "Persent". There are plenty of decent people in terrible pain to care
> about who aren't sadistic pricks.
>
> You ladies are amazing.

Let's get this cascade of condecension going, it's so.....FAMILIAR.

Rejectable, too. Bye.

Jean

In article <OWV%g.191581$1T2.43538@pd7urf2no>,
"Luna" <lunajean@gmail.com> wrote:

> > Meanwhile, I'm not about to waste a drop of compassion on someone
> > who OVER and OVER and OVER again chooses to devote entire nights to
> > viciously targeting people who have done nothing to harm him.
>
> How many nights have you devoted to exactly that activity?

None.

"RGB" <RGB-101506@gipgipgip.com> wrote in message
news:Y3W%g.667809$Jn2.18786@fe10.news.easynews.com ...
> In article <OWV%g.191581$1T2.43538@pd7urf2no>,
> "Luna" <lunajean@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> > Meanwhile, I'm not about to waste a drop of compassion on someone
>> > who OVER and OVER and OVER again chooses to devote entire nights to
>> > viciously targeting people who have done nothing to harm him.
>>
>> How many nights have you devoted to exactly that activity?
>
> None.

Yes you have - you are responsible for making many people feel like shit,
haven't you noticed that? That said, you tend to do it with a certain
logical inevitability but still...

Feeling like shit after a conversation with you is a fairly common outcome.
You're all angry and argumentative, dismissive and ....etc..

Jean

In article <HgW%g.191614$1T2.9838@pd7urf2no>,
"Luna" <lunajean@gmail.com> wrote:

> >> How many nights have you devoted to exactly that activity?
> >
> > None.
>
> [ ... ] You're all angry and argumentative, dismissive and ....etc..

Yes, I can be, of course I can. Christ, I could hardly deny that. But
"devoting entire nights to viciously targeting people who have done
nothing to harm me"? No. Not once, in the 9 years I've been posting.
Not one entire night, not one entire hour, not one single post.

Disagree all you like, I'm sure you'll get a "% stands and applauds"
soon enough. But you know the truth.

Mark

"RGB" <RGB-101506@gipgipgip.com> wrote in message
news:ztW%g.35532$Mn2.15426@fe02.news.easynews.com. ..
> In article <HgW%g.191614$1T2.9838@pd7urf2no>,
> "Luna" <lunajean@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > >> How many nights have you devoted to exactly that activity?
> > >
> > > None.
> >
> > [ ... ] You're all angry and argumentative, dismissive and ....etc..
>
> Yes, I can be, of course I can. Christ, I could hardly deny that. But
> "devoting entire nights to viciously targeting people who have done
> nothing to harm me"? No. Not once, in the 9 years I've been posting.
> Not one entire night, not one entire hour, not one single post.
>
> Disagree all you like, I'm sure you'll get a "% stands and applauds"
> soon enough. But you know the truth.
>
> Mark


yes , you are right ,
you always are right ,
and i am wrong and i always am wrong ,
i was wondering but i doubt you'll do it ,
could you like maybe help me ,
like take me under your wing ,
you know , sort of like a protégé ,
and teach me how to make ,
the whole world see everything the way i see it ,
or else they have to piss off cause i'm right and always am

"cal" <cal1360@gmaNOSPAMail.com> wrote in message
news:ehmil2$d7l$1@news.datemas.de...
> "Luna" <lunajean@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:aZz%g.192710$R63.96395@pd7urf1no...
>>
>> "cal" <cal1360@gmaNOSPAMail.com> wrote in message
>> news:ehmhpp$c07$1@news.datemas.de...
>> <snip>
>>
>>>>
>>>> You can be annoyingly condescending at times. I mean, really.
>>>
>>> i know, eh?
>>
>> Yeah well, I for one forgive you.
>>
>> (Okay, abuse me now!)
>
> show me your , hooters

Is that abuse? I thought you could do better. Tell me that I'm a failure
and always will be...or something like that.

Hooters are too friendly for any abuse conversation. )

Jean
>
>

"RGB" <RGB-101506@gipgipgip.com> wrote in message
news:ztW%g.35532$Mn2.15426@fe02.news.easynews.com. ..
> In article <HgW%g.191614$1T2.9838@pd7urf2no>,
> "Luna" <lunajean@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> >> How many nights have you devoted to exactly that activity?
>> >
>> > None.
>>
>> [ ... ] You're all angry and argumentative, dismissive and ....etc..
>
> Yes, I can be, of course I can. Christ, I could hardly deny that. But
> "devoting entire nights to viciously targeting people who have done
> nothing to harm me"? No. Not once, in the 9 years I've been posting.
> Not one entire night, not one entire hour, not one single post.

How about...Jill - and that's just the a very recent example that comes to
mind. Maybe you don't even realize the effect you have on people...

>
> Disagree all you like, I'm sure you'll get a "% stands and applauds"
> soon enough. But you know the truth.

That's nifty, the way you say that "I know the truth" as if my posted
disagreement with your assessment of your own behaviour must be a lie that
I'm aware of deep in my inner, honest soul. It's not. It's just the way I
see it.

Jean
>
> Mark

In article <zrT0h.207577$5R2.129022@pd7urf3no>,
"Luna" <lunajean@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > [ ... ] You're all angry and argumentative, dismissive and ....etc..
> >
> > Yes, I can be, of course I can. Christ, I could hardly deny that. But
> > "devoting entire nights to viciously targeting people who have done
> > nothing to harm me"? No. Not once, in the 9 years I've been posting.
> > Not one entire night, not one entire hour, not one single post.
>
> How about...Jill - and that's just the a very recent example that comes to
> mind. Maybe you don't even realize the effect you have on people...

Jill? I know I annoy Jill and she annoys me. I know we had a recent
disagreement about Grace's departure and it got kind of heated on both
sides. She thought I was obnoxious, I thought she was obnoxious. Take
whichever side you want, but if you're going to tell me I've "devoted
entire nights to viciously targeting" her, on the level of what I'm
talking about here, you're out of your mind.

> > Disagree all you like, I'm sure you'll get a "% stands and
> > applauds" soon enough. But you know the truth.
>
> That's nifty, the way you say that "I know the truth" as if

<*snip*>

You know that scene in "The Fugitive" where Harrison Ford and Tommy Lee
Jones are standing at the top of Niagara Falls or whatever and Harrison
Ford says "I did not kill my wife!" and Tommy Lee Jones says "I don't
care!"? Well, there you go.

Mark

RGB wrote:
> In article <zrT0h.207577$5R2.129022@pd7urf3no>,
> "Luna" <lunajean@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>>> [ ... ] You're all angry and argumentative, dismissive and ....etc..
>>> Yes, I can be, of course I can. Christ, I could hardly deny that. But
>>> "devoting entire nights to viciously targeting people who have done
>>> nothing to harm me"? No. Not once, in the 9 years I've been posting.
>>> Not one entire night, not one entire hour, not one single post.
>> How about...Jill - and that's just the a very recent example that comes to
>> mind. Maybe you don't even realize the effect you have on people...
>
> Jill? I know I annoy Jill and she annoys me. I know we had a recent
> disagreement about Grace's departure and it got kind of heated on both
> sides. She thought I was obnoxious, I thought she was obnoxious. Take
> whichever side you want, but if you're going to tell me I've "devoted
> entire nights to viciously targeting" her, on the level of what I'm
> talking about here, you're out of your mind.
>
>>> Disagree all you like, I'm sure you'll get a "% stands and
>>> applauds" soon enough. But you know the truth.
>> That's nifty, the way you say that "I know the truth" as if
>
> <*snip*>
>
> You know that scene in "The Fugitive" where Harrison Ford and Tommy Lee
> Jones are standing at the top of Niagara Falls or whatever and Harrison
> Ford says "I did not kill my wife!" and Tommy Lee Jones says "I don't
> care!"? Well, there you go.
>
> Mark

Go Luna go!!

"Luna" <lunajean@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:AoT0h.207458$5R2.3035@pd7urf3no...
>
> "cal" <cal1360@gmaNOSPAMail.com> wrote in message
> news:ehmil2$d7l$1@news.datemas.de...
>> "Luna" <lunajean@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:aZz%g.192710$R63.96395@pd7urf1no...
>>>
>>> "cal" <cal1360@gmaNOSPAMail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:ehmhpp$c07$1@news.datemas.de...
>>> <snip>
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> You can be annoyingly condescending at times. I mean, really.
>>>>
>>>> i know, eh?
>>>
>>> Yeah well, I for one forgive you.
>>>
>>> (Okay, abuse me now!)
>>
>> show me your , hooters
>
> Is that abuse? I thought you could do better. Tell me that I'm a failure
> and always will be...or something like that.
>
> Hooters are too friendly for any abuse conversation. )

i have no interest in conversing about either your hooters or your failures.
my part in this thread had to do with enabling usenet thuggery by your buddy
%, and my line about hooters was actually a quote from him to you. the
typographically adept didn't miss the reference or my intent.. topic drift
noted and dismissed.

"cal" <cal1360@gmaNOSPAMail.com> wrote in message
news:ei2rjs$pbi$1@news.datemas.de...
> "Luna" <lunajean@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:AoT0h.207458$5R2.3035@pd7urf3no...
> >
> > "cal" <cal1360@gmaNOSPAMail.com> wrote in message
> > news:ehmil2$d7l$1@news.datemas.de...
> >> "Luna" <lunajean@gmail.com> wrote in message
> >> news:aZz%g.192710$R63.96395@pd7urf1no...
> >>>
> >>> "cal" <cal1360@gmaNOSPAMail.com> wrote in message
> >>> news:ehmhpp$c07$1@news.datemas.de...
> >>> <snip>
> >>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> You can be annoyingly condescending at times. I mean, really.
> >>>>
> >>>> i know, eh?
> >>>
> >>> Yeah well, I for one forgive you.
> >>>
> >>> (Okay, abuse me now!)
> >>
> >> show me your , hooters
> >
> > Is that abuse? I thought you could do better. Tell me that I'm a
failure
> > and always will be...or something like that.
> >
> > Hooters are too friendly for any abuse conversation. )
>
> i have no interest in conversing about either your hooters or your
failures.
> my part in this thread had to do with enabling usenet thuggery by your
buddy
> %, and my line about hooters was actually a quote from him to you. the
> typographically adept didn't miss the reference or my intent.. topic drift
> noted and dismissed.
>
>

cry me a river boo woo boy

cal wrote:

>>Hooters are too friendly for any abuse conversation. )
>
>
> i have no interest in conversing about either your hooters or your failures.
> my part in this thread had to do with enabling usenet thuggery by your buddy
> %, and my line about hooters was actually a quote from him to you. the
> typographically adept didn't miss the reference or my intent.. topic drift
> noted and dismissed.

In responding the way Jean did, this
typographically adept observer, who
didn't miss your reference and intent,
inferred her intentions of communicating
along the lines of, "What you see as
usenet thuggery, e.g. references to my
breasts, is not something I perceive as
abusive."

Lack of perception double-noted.

Squeaky

"cal" <cal1360@gmaNOSPAMail.com> wrote in message
news:ei2rjs$pbi$1@news.datemas.de...
> "Luna" <lunajean@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:AoT0h.207458$5R2.3035@pd7urf3no...
>>
>> "cal" <cal1360@gmaNOSPAMail.com> wrote in message
>> news:ehmil2$d7l$1@news.datemas.de...
>>> "Luna" <lunajean@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:aZz%g.192710$R63.96395@pd7urf1no...
>>>>
>>>> "cal" <cal1360@gmaNOSPAMail.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:ehmhpp$c07$1@news.datemas.de...
>>>> <snip>
>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You can be annoyingly condescending at times. I mean, really.
>>>>>
>>>>> i know, eh?
>>>>
>>>> Yeah well, I for one forgive you.
>>>>
>>>> (Okay, abuse me now!)
>>>
>>> show me your , hooters
>>
>> Is that abuse? I thought you could do better. Tell me that I'm a
>> failure
>> and always will be...or something like that.
>>
>> Hooters are too friendly for any abuse conversation. )
>
> i have no interest in conversing about either your hooters or your
> failures.
> my part in this thread had to do with enabling usenet thuggery by your
> buddy
> %, and my line about hooters was actually a quote from him to you. the
> typographically adept didn't miss the reference or my intent.. topic drift
> noted and dismissed.

You'd better watch it, one of these days all of that hot air will explode
you into a red misty mess.

Seeing as how I've been around here for years I am perfectly aware that Dave
refers to 'em as hooters. I see you can't stop taking yourself
superseriously for even one lighthearted moment but then again - your
textual battle against abusers of us poor helpless women is very important ~
and super impressive to all of us hooter owners ~ so I'll leave you to it.

Jean
>
>

"Gayle" <gayleco@rcn.com> wrote in message
news:v9mdnX3PK8MTjdjYnZ2dnUVZ_vidnZ2d@rcn.net...
> cal wrote:
>
>>>Hooters are too friendly for any abuse conversation. )
>>
>>
>> i have no interest in conversing about either your hooters or your
>> failures. my part in this thread had to do with enabling usenet thuggery
>> by your buddy %, and my line about hooters was actually a quote from him
>> to you. the typographically adept didn't miss the reference or my
>> intent.. topic drift noted and dismissed.
>
> In responding the way Jean did, this typographically adept observer, who
> didn't miss your reference and intent, inferred her intentions of
> communicating along the lines of, "What you see as usenet thuggery, e.g.
> references to my breasts, is not something I perceive as abusive."
>
> Lack of perception double-noted.

i think my point has been sufficiently made to be understood by those who
want to understand, and to expose the disingenuousness of those who don't.
this has gone stale now. i may pick it up again next time there's new
material to work with.

"cal" <cal1360@gmaNOSPAMail.com> wrote in message
news:ei41pk$okd$1@news.datemas.de...
> "Gayle" <gayleco@rcn.com> wrote in message
> news:v9mdnX3PK8MTjdjYnZ2dnUVZ_vidnZ2d@rcn.net...
> > cal wrote:
> >
> >>>Hooters are too friendly for any abuse conversation. )
> >>
> >>
> >> i have no interest in conversing about either your hooters or your
> >> failures. my part in this thread had to do with enabling usenet
thuggery
> >> by your buddy %, and my line about hooters was actually a quote from
him
> >> to you. the typographically adept didn't miss the reference or my
> >> intent.. topic drift noted and dismissed.
> >
> > In responding the way Jean did, this typographically adept observer, who
> > didn't miss your reference and intent, inferred her intentions of
> > communicating along the lines of, "What you see as usenet thuggery, e.g.
> > references to my breasts, is not something I perceive as abusive."
> >
> > Lack of perception double-noted.
>
> i think my point has been sufficiently made to be understood by those who
> want to understand, and to expose the disingenuousness of those who don't.
> this has gone stale now. i may pick it up again next time there's new
> material to work with.
>
>
> wannnnnh