For BillW50 - an observation

I have been reading your recent spate of posts with an interest bordering on fascination
and have come to a conclusion.

You are a ****ing idiot!


BigMâck

[Will, T2]

On Sun, 17 Jun 2007 20:23:48 GMT,
<[email protected]>Mâcksturbator©® wrote:

>I have been reading your recent spate of posts with an interest bordering on fascination
>and have come to a conclusion.
>
>You are a ****ing idiot!
>
>
>BigMâck


Hi Mack,

You are a great Bull**** detector, also... This guy is a total nut!

Will, T2

[Cheri]

I think the "Mack impersonator" has bigger problems overall.

Cheri


Will, T2 wrote in message
<[email protected]>...
>On Sun, 17 Jun 2007 20:23:48 GMT,
><[email protected]>Mâcksturbator©® wrote:
>
>>I have been reading your recent spate of posts with an interest
bordering on fascination
>>and have come to a conclusion.
>>
>>You are a ****ing idiot!
>>
>>
>>BigMâck
>
>
>Hi Mack,
>
>You are a great Bull**** detector, also... This guy is a total nut!
>
>Will, T2

[Will, T2]

On Mon, 18 Jun 2007 17:21:45 -0700, "Cheri" <gserviceatinreachdotcom>
wrote:

>I think the "Mack impersonator" has bigger problems overall.

Hi Cheri,

Please forgive me, but who is "Mack impersonator"?

I honestly thought the post to which I responded was our friend, Mack,
who lives near me...

Will, T2

[Cheri]

No, it's not. He came to attack "our Mack" for reporting spam and to
make fun of him and his computer skills. "Our Mack" hasn't posted in a
few days.

Cheri


Will, T2 wrote in message ...
>On Mon, 18 Jun 2007 17:21:45 -0700, "Cheri" <gserviceatinreachdotcom>
>wrote:
>
>>I think the "Mack impersonator" has bigger problems overall.
>
>Hi Cheri,
>
>Please forgive me, but who is "Mack impersonator"?
>
>I honestly thought the post to which I responded was our friend,
Mack,
>who lives near me...
>
>Will, T2

[Will, T2]

On Mon, 18 Jun 2007 17:29:56 -0700, "Cheri" <gserviceatinreachdotcom>
wrote:

>No, it's not. He came to attack "our Mack" for reporting spam and to
>make fun of him and his computer skills. "Our Mack" hasn't posted in a
>few days.
>
>Cheri
>
>
>Will, T2 wrote in message ...
>>On Mon, 18 Jun 2007 17:21:45 -0700, "Cheri" <gserviceatinreachdotcom>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>I think the "Mack impersonator" has bigger problems overall.
>>
>>Hi Cheri,
>>
>>Please forgive me, but who is "Mack impersonator"?
>>
>>I honestly thought the post to which I responded was our friend,
>Mack,
>>who lives near me...
>>
>>Will, T2
>


Wow, thanks, Cheri... I just did not realize. Yes, it makes sense.
Mack drops out for a few days at a time, because of the shifts and
schedules that he has to work. Now that you mention it, I do recall
something like that.... Some bogus idiot, pretending he was Mack. I
thought it was all over, though.

Thanks for your observation and posts.

Will, T2

[Mâck©®]

On Mon, 18 Jun 2007 20:22:11 -0400, "Will, T2" <[email protected]>
wrote:

>On Mon, 18 Jun 2007 17:21:45 -0700, "Cheri" <gserviceatinreachdotcom>
>wrote:
>
>>I think the "Mack impersonator" has bigger problems overall.
>
>Hi Cheri,
>
>Please forgive me, but who is "Mack impersonator"?
>
>I honestly thought the post to which I responded was our friend, Mack,
>who lives near me...
>
>Will, T2


when have you ever seen me post in such a manner?

--
Mâck©® Deltec CoZmore Pumper
Type 1 since 1975
http://www.alt-support-diabetes.org
http://www.diabetic-talk.org
http://www.insulin-pumpers.org
http://www.pandora.com enter "Jason & Demarco"



"To announce that there must be no criticism of the
President, or that we are to stand by the President
right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile,
but is morally treasonable to the American public."
....Theodore Roosevelt

(o ô)
--ooO-(_)-Ooo--------------------

"I don't know half of you
half as well as I should like;
and I like less than half of you
half as well as you deserve."
....Bilbo Baggins


DISCLAIMER If you find a posting or message from me
offensive, inappropriate, or disruptive, please ignore it.
If you don't know how to ignore a posting, complain to
me and I will be only too happy to demonstrate...
..

[Low_Carb_Lover]

Cheri wrote:
> No, it's not. He came to attack "our Mack" for reporting spam and to
> make fun of him and his computer skills.

It seemed to me that he was making fun of his lack of computer skills.

"Our Mack" hasn't posted in a
> few days.

He was playing his usual wannabe netcop just a few minutes ago. Unless that
is yet another pretend Mack? Every news group has it kooks, he is just one
of them. I don't know why people get so upset with him, they should just
ignore his nonsense like most people do. I think he's funny the way he
keeps popping up and listing what he thinks are the posting details of
everyone he doesn't like. I don't think that anyone ever cares about his
posts whether they are accurate or not. It isn't like any ISP nowdays takes
any notice of newsgroup complaints, if they did there'd be no such thing as
spam. If you post with your proper full name and ISP and someone copies you
then they will, but if you don't use genuine details and someone copies you
it isn't illegal. And with spam harvesting of addresses who uses genuine
details?

LCL

[Alan S]

On Mon, 18 Jun 2007 20:22:11 -0400, "Will, T2"
<[email protected]> wrote:

>On Mon, 18 Jun 2007 17:21:45 -0700, "Cheri" <gserviceatinreachdotcom>
>wrote:
>
>>I think the "Mack impersonator" has bigger problems overall.
>
>Hi Cheri,
>
>Please forgive me, but who is "Mack impersonator"?
>
>I honestly thought the post to which I responded was our friend, Mack,
>who lives near me...
>
>Will, T2

Hi Will

Try this one: http://tinyurl.com/2oz9c9


Cheers, Alan, T2, Australia.
d&e, metformin 1500mg, ezetrol 10mg
Everything in Moderation - Except Laughter.
--
http://loraldiabetes.blogspot.com/
http://loraltravel.blogspot.com/
latest: Slovenia

[Cheri]

Me.

Cheri


Low_Carb_Lover wrote in message

<[email protected]>...
> And with spam harvesting of addresses who uses genuine
>details?

>LCL

[DonnaB shallotpeel]

In alt.support.diabetes on Mon, 18 Jun 2007 20:00:34 -0700 in Msg.#
<[email protected]>, "Cheri"
<gserviceatinreachdotcom> wrote:

> Me.

Me, too, but, I didn't agree with most of that post!

--
DonnaB

"The more complex the mind, the greater the need for the simplicity of
play." - Captain Kirk, Shore Leave

[Julie Bove]

"Will, T2" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]..
> On Mon, 18 Jun 2007 17:21:45 -0700, "Cheri" <gserviceatinreachdotcom>
> wrote:
>
>>I think the "Mack impersonator" has bigger problems overall.
>
> Hi Cheri,
>
> Please forgive me, but who is "Mack impersonator"?
>
> I honestly thought the post to which I responded was our friend, Mack,
> who lives near me...

It wasn't him. But I don't know who it was. Frankly I am tired of all the
silly games around here. *sigh*

[Low_Carb_Lover]

Cheri wrote:
> Me.
>
> Cheri
>
>
> Low_Carb_Lover wrote in message
>
> <[email protected]>...
>> And with spam harvesting of addresses who uses genuine
>> details?
>
>> LCL
>
>

When?

You are using gserviceatinreachdotcom, which although easy to convert to a
workable address, is not your genuine address. If someone else wished to
use it, it would not constitute a forgery as it isn't a working address.

LCL

[Will, T2]

On Mon, 18 Jun 2007 22:03:34 -0400, Mâck©®
<[email protected]> wrote:

>>Hi Cheri,
>>
>>Please forgive me, but who is "Mack impersonator"?
>>
>>I honestly thought the post to which I responded was our friend, Mack,
>>who lives near me...
>>
>>Will, T2
>
>
>when have you ever seen me post in such a manner?

Hi Mack,

Sorry I mistook you for someone who was impersonating you....


Will, T2

[[email protected]]

On Jun 18, 9:32 pm, Low_Carb_Lover <no_one@no_where.net> wrote:

ATTN: NETNANNY TWATWAFFLE

Dearie, this is the 'net, and your children are simply not my
responsibility.
I came here to return the favor, of posting inane bull**** in ng where
he doesn't belong.
I will continue to respond to his posts, by simply doing a C&P of his
insane rantings in my ng.
I don't care if you think I'm nice.
Report me, but keep in mind that the sort of trolling ngs I was
responding to is not very nice, either.
> Cheri wrote:
> > Me.
>
> > Cheri
>
> > Low_Carb_Lover wrote in message
>
> > <5dos07F35k1l...@mid.individual.net>...
> >> And with spam harvesting of addresses who uses genuine
> >> details?
>
> >> LCL
>
> When?
>
> You are using gserviceatinreachdotcom, which although easy to convert to a
> workable address, is not your genuine address. If someone else wished to
> use it, it would not constitute a forgery as it isn't a working address.
>
> LCL