Re: "Diabetes grows as silent scourge"

convicted friend analog@logwell.com wrote:
> unnamed demon wrote in defense of another demon:
> > convicted friend analog@logwell.com wrote:
>
> >> Typical; lose an argument, then declare victory and refuse further
> >> discussion. You appear to be in the UK, and you do in fact use UK idiom (a
> >> polite way of saying you are the one who does not understand English), so
> >> the obvious question is how do you come to possess evidence of your
> >> claims? Have you traveled to the greater Atlanta metropolitan area to do
> >> intelligence gathering? Perhaps you should clearly state your claims and
> >> present the so-called evidence to back them up, or go away. You should
> >> also give your real name and prepared to face the much harsher UK libel
> >> and slander law as well.
>
> > Now, why should he be so stupid as to do that? Besides, he said he had
> > proof of the claims that he actually made, not other posters' claims.
>
> Why should he do that? Because it is the right and moral thing to do. He has
> not clearly stated his claims, nor has he presented this alleged evidence.
> Further, he hides under a rock, and is afraid to reveal his identity. How can
> his claims be taken seriously if he is too frightened or ashamed to even admit
> who he is?

The demon knows it has lost all credibility and is muttering in a dark
corner with its dark thoughts:

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.m...a609ce6935c65?

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.m...51743c9178831?

May G-D continue to heal our hearts with HIS living water curing our
diabetes, depression, anxiety, or panic so that we can love our
neighbors a little more and our Messiah a lot more, dear friend Syd
whom I love unconditionally.

Prayerfully in Christ's amazing love,

Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
http://EmoryCardiology.com

In article <1169250475.665911.95560@38g2000cwa.googlegroups.c om> "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <andrew@emorycardiology.com> writes:

> convicted friend analog@logwell.com wrote:


Oh? And now `analog' is "convicted"?

And why is that?


-- cary

Cary Kittrell wrote:

> In article <1169250475.665911.95560@38g2000cwa.googlegroups.c om> "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <andrew@emorycardiology.com> writes:
>
> > convicted friend analog@logwell.com wrote:
>
>
> Oh? And now `analog' is "convicted"?
>
> And why is that?
>
>
> -- cary

Feeding frenzy. Bloody hypocrite tells everybody else to starve
themselves.

convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:
> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>
> > convicted friend analog@logwell.com wrote:
>
> Oh? And now `analog' is "convicted"?

Yes.

> And why is that?

GOD's will be done and not my will.

However, HIS purpose is as described at:

http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts

Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
http://EmoryCardiology.com

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:

> convicted friend analog@logwell.com wrote:
> > unnamed demon wrote in defense of another demon:
> > > convicted friend analog@logwell.com wrote:
> >
> > >> Typical; lose an argument, then declare victory and refuse further
> > >> discussion. You appear to be in the UK, and you do in fact use UK idiom (a
> > >> polite way of saying you are the one who does not understand English), so
> > >> the obvious question is how do you come to possess evidence of your
> > >> claims? Have you traveled to the greater Atlanta metropolitan area to do
> > >> intelligence gathering? Perhaps you should clearly state your claims and
> > >> present the so-called evidence to back them up, or go away. You should
> > >> also give your real name and prepared to face the much harsher UK libel
> > >> and slander law as well.
> >
> > > Now, why should he be so stupid as to do that? Besides, he said he had
> > > proof of the claims that he actually made, not other posters' claims.
> >
> > Why should he do that? Because it is the right and moral thing to do. He has
> > not clearly stated his claims, nor has he presented this alleged evidence.
> > Further, he hides under a rock, and is afraid to reveal his identity. How can
> > his claims be taken seriously if he is too frightened or ashamed to even admit
> > who he is?
>
> The demon knows it has lost all credibility and is muttering in a dark
> corner with its dark thoughts:
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/sci.m...a609ce6935c65?
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/sci.m...51743c9178831?
>

Just exposing the effects of your starvationist propaganda. Anyway,
given your conduct here in Usenet, you cannot possibly deny that those
are YOUR fantasies.

http://www.aol.com.br/client/galeria...norexia_f1.jpg

Sick.

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:

> convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:
> > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> >
> > > convicted friend analog@logwell.com wrote:
> >
> > Oh? And now `analog' is "convicted"?
>
> Yes.
>
> > And why is that?
>
Well, it's a neat disguise for a sockpuppet!

In article <1169282504.570273.52610@l53g2000cwa.googlegroups. com> "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <love11@thetruth.com> writes:
> convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:
> > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> >
> > > convicted friend analog@logwell.com wrote:
> >
> > Oh? And now `analog' is "convicted"?
>
> Yes.
>
> > And why is that?
>
> GOD's will be done and not my will.

Allow me to rephrase: where is the post which led to this
conclusion?


-- cary

convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:
> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> > convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:
> > > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> > > > convicted friend analog@logwell.com wrote:
> > >
> > > Oh? And now `analog' is "convicted"?
> >
> > Yes.
> >
> > > And why is that?
> >
> > GOD's will be done and not my will.
>
> Allow me to rephrase: where is the post which led to this
> conclusion?

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.m...38fe755a660d0?

May GOD continue to heal our hearts with HIS living water curing our
diabetes, depression, anxiety, or panic so that we can love our
neighbors a little more and LORD Jesus Christ a whole bunch more, dear
neighbor Cary whom I love unconditionally.

Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
http://EmoryCardiology.com

In article <1169510118.032694.230100@l53g2000cwa.googlegroups .com> "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <andrew@emorycardiology.com> writes:
> convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:
> > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> > > convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:
> > > > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> > > > > convicted friend analog@logwell.com wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Oh? And now `analog' is "convicted"?
> > >
> > > Yes.
> > >
> > > > And why is that?
> > >
> > > GOD's will be done and not my will.
> >
> > Allow me to rephrase: where is the post which led to this
> > conclusion?
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/sci.m...38fe755a660d0?
>

Yes? And his "conviction" was a result of his saying...what, exactly?

This?:

You persist in mischaracterizing the episode in Florida. In fact, Dr.
Chung does not take exception with the right of the folks down there to
fire him (a position I disagree with and would go so far as to say the
firing was actionable, and could well have made Dr. Chung a wealthy man
had it been adjudicated).


Or was it perhaps where he said this?:

Further, I do not see you mentioning that the principal in the
case went so far as to praise Dr. Chung's medical expertise.


Or was it in fact this?:

You do not know what Dr. Chung's relationship with his wife has to do with
anything. But unless you have engaged in illegal stalking, how the fuck do you
know anything about her whereabouts?



-- cary

Convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:
> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> > convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:
> > > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> > > > convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:
> > > > > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> > > > > > convicted friend analog@logwell.com wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Oh? And now `analog' is "convicted"?
> > > >
> > > > Yes.
> > > >
> > > > > And why is that?
> > > >
> > > > GOD's will be done and not my will.
> > >
> > > Allow me to rephrase: where is the post which led to this
> > > conclusion?
> >
> > http://groups.google.com/group/sci.m...38fe755a660d0?
> >
>
> Yes? And his "conviction" was a result of his saying...what, exactly?
>
> This?:
>
> You persist in mischaracterizing the episode in Florida. In fact, Dr.
> Chung does not take exception with the right of the folks down there to
> fire him (a position I disagree with and would go so far as to say the
> firing was actionable, and could well have made Dr. Chung a wealthy man
> had it been adjudicated).
>
>
> Or was it perhaps where he said this?:
>
> Further, I do not see you mentioning that the principal in the
> case went so far as to praise Dr. Chung's medical expertise.
>
>
> Or was it in fact this?:
>
> You do not know what Dr. Chung's relationship with his wife has to do with
> anything. But unless you have engaged in illegal stalking, how the fuck do you
> know anything about her whereabouts?

Friend Syd's being convicted by the Holy Spirit is an act of HIS will
and not my will.

Clearly you remain convicted by HIM as well:

http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts

May GOD continue to heal our hearts with HIS living water curing our
diabetes, depression, anxiety or panic so that we can love our
neighbors a little more and LORD Jesus Christ a whole lot more, dear
neighbor Cary whom I love unconditionally.

Prayerfully in Christ's amazing love,

Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung
Cardiologist, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit

As for knowing who are the very elect, these you will know by the
unconditional love they have for everyone including their enemies
(Matthew 5:44-45, 1 Corinthians 13:3, James 2:14-17).
http://HeartMDPhD.com/Love

In article <1169513675.592063.110520@l53g2000cwa.googlegroups .com> "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <love4@thetruth.com> writes:
> Convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:
> > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> > > convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:
> > > > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> > > > > convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:
> > > > > > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> > > > > > > convicted friend analog@logwell.com wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Oh? And now `analog' is "convicted"?
> > > > >
> > > > > Yes.
> > > > >
> > > > > > And why is that?
> > > > >
> > > > > GOD's will be done and not my will.
> > > >
> > > > Allow me to rephrase: where is the post which led to this
> > > > conclusion?
> > >
> > > http://groups.google.com/group/sci.m...38fe755a660d0?
> > >
> >
> > Yes? And his "conviction" was a result of his saying...what, exactly?
> >
> > This?:
> >
> > You persist in mischaracterizing the episode in Florida. In fact, Dr.
> > Chung does not take exception with the right of the folks down there to
> > fire him (a position I disagree with and would go so far as to say the
> > firing was actionable, and could well have made Dr. Chung a wealthy man
> > had it been adjudicated).
> >
> >
> > Or was it perhaps where he said this?:
> >
> > Further, I do not see you mentioning that the principal in the
> > case went so far as to praise Dr. Chung's medical expertise.
> >
> >
> > Or was it in fact this?:
> >
> > You do not know what Dr. Chung's relationship with his wife has to do with
> > anything. But unless you have engaged in illegal stalking, how the fuck do you
> > know anything about her whereabouts?
>
> Friend Syd's being convicted by the Holy Spirit is an act of HIS will
> and not my will.

And what, exactly, did he say, do, think, or emit that caused him to
attain this state?


-- cary

convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:
> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> > Convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:
> > > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> > > > convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:
> > > > > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> > > > > > convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:
> > > > > > > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> > > > > > > > convicted friend analog@logwell.com wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Oh? And now `analog' is "convicted"?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Yes.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > And why is that?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > GOD's will be done and not my will.
> > > > >
> > > > > Allow me to rephrase: where is the post which led to this
> > > > > conclusion?
> > > >
> > > > http://groups.google.com/group/sci.m...38fe755a660d0?
> > > >
> > >
> > > Yes? And his "conviction" was a result of his saying...what, exactly?
> > >
> > > This?:
> > >
> > > You persist in mischaracterizing the episode in Florida. In fact, Dr.
> > > Chung does not take exception with the right of the folks down there to
> > > fire him (a position I disagree with and would go so far as to say the
> > > firing was actionable, and could well have made Dr. Chung a wealthy man
> > > had it been adjudicated).
> > >
> > >
> > > Or was it perhaps where he said this?:
> > >
> > > Further, I do not see you mentioning that the principal in the
> > > case went so far as to praise Dr. Chung's medical expertise.
> > >
> > >
> > > Or was it in fact this?:
> > >
> > > You do not know what Dr. Chung's relationship with his wife has to do with
> > > anything. But unless you have engaged in illegal stalking, how the fuck do you
> > > know anything about her whereabouts?
> >
> > Friend Syd's being convicted by the Holy Spirit is an act of HIS will
> > and not my will.
>
> And what, exactly, did he say, do, think, or emit that caused him to
> attain this state?

It remains an act of the Holy Spirit, Who is GOD.

Clearly you remains convicted by the Holy Spirit:

http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts

May GOD continue to heal our hearts with HIS living water curing our
diabetes, depression, anxiety, or panic so that we can love our
neighbors a little more and LORD Jesus Christ a whole lot more, dear
neighbor Cary whom I love unconditionally.

Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
http://EmoryCardiology.com

In article <1169523595.597129.199430@51g2000cwl.googlegroups. com> "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <love10@thetruth.com> writes:
> convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:
> > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> > > Convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:
> > > > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> > > > > convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:
> > > > > > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> > > > > > > convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:
> > > > > > > > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> > > > > > > > > convicted friend analog@logwell.com wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Oh? And now `analog' is "convicted"?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Yes.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > And why is that?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > GOD's will be done and not my will.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Allow me to rephrase: where is the post which led to this
> > > > > > conclusion?
> > > > >
> > > > > http://groups.google.com/group/sci.m...38fe755a660d0?
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Yes? And his "conviction" was a result of his saying...what, exactly?
> > > >
> > > > This?:
> > > >
> > > > You persist in mischaracterizing the episode in Florida. In fact, Dr.
> > > > Chung does not take exception with the right of the folks down there to
> > > > fire him (a position I disagree with and would go so far as to say the
> > > > firing was actionable, and could well have made Dr. Chung a wealthy man
> > > > had it been adjudicated).
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Or was it perhaps where he said this?:
> > > >
> > > > Further, I do not see you mentioning that the principal in the
> > > > case went so far as to praise Dr. Chung's medical expertise.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Or was it in fact this?:
> > > >
> > > > You do not know what Dr. Chung's relationship with his wife has to do with
> > > > anything. But unless you have engaged in illegal stalking, how the fuck do you
> > > > know anything about her whereabouts?
> > >
> > > Friend Syd's being convicted by the Holy Spirit is an act of HIS will
> > > and not my will.

> > And what, exactly, did he say, do, think, or emit that caused him to
> > attain this state?

> It remains an act of the Holy Spirit, Who is GOD.

And what, exactly, did he say, do, think, or emit that caused him to
attain this state?


-- cary

convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:
> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> > convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:
> > > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> > > > Convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:
> > > > > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> > > > > > convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:
> > > > > > > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> > > > > > > > convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:
> > > > > > > > > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > convicted friend analog@logwell.com wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Oh? And now `analog' is "convicted"?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Yes.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > And why is that?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > GOD's will be done and not my will.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Allow me to rephrase: where is the post which led to this
> > > > > > > conclusion?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > http://groups.google.com/group/sci.m...38fe755a660d0?
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Yes? And his "conviction" was a result of his saying...what, exactly?
> > > > >
> > > > > This?:
> > > > >
> > > > > You persist in mischaracterizing the episode in Florida. In fact, Dr.
> > > > > Chung does not take exception with the right of the folks down there to
> > > > > fire him (a position I disagree with and would go so far as to say the
> > > > > firing was actionable, and could well have made Dr. Chung a wealthy man
> > > > > had it been adjudicated).
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Or was it perhaps where he said this?:
> > > > >
> > > > > Further, I do not see you mentioning that the principal in the
> > > > > case went so far as to praise Dr. Chung's medical expertise.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Or was it in fact this?:
> > > > >
> > > > > You do not know what Dr. Chung's relationship with his wife has to do with
> > > > > anything. But unless you have engaged in illegal stalking, how the fuck do you
> > > > > know anything about her whereabouts?
> > > >
> > > > Friend Syd's being convicted by the Holy Spirit is an act of HIS will
> > > > and not my will.
>
> > > And what, exactly, did he say, do, think, or emit that caused him to
> > > attain this state?
>
> > It remains an act of the Holy Spirit, Who is GOD.
>
> And what, exactly, did he say, do, think, or emit that caused him to
> attain this state?

Like you, friend Syd, has been enlightened by the truth, Who is LORD
Jesus Christ.

Clearly you remain convicted by the Holy Spirit:

http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts

Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
http://EmoryCardiology.com

I do not understand why I am on the "convicted" list. Please explain why I am
convicted.

On 20 Jan 2007 00:41:44 -0800, "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <love11@thetruth.com>
wrote:

>convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:
>> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>>
>> > convicted friend analog@logwell.com wrote:
>>
>> Oh? And now `analog' is "convicted"?
>
>Yes.
>
>> And why is that?
>
>GOD's will be done and not my will.
>
>However, HIS purpose is as described at:
>
>http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts
>
>Andrew <><

Yeah, what did I do that led to being on the convicted list?

On Mon, 22 Jan 2007 17:45:23 +0000 (UTC), cary@afone.as.arizona.edu (Cary
Kittrell) wrote:

>In article <1169282504.570273.52610@l53g2000cwa.googlegroups. com> "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <love11@thetruth.com> writes:
>> convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:
>> > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>> >
>> > > convicted friend analog@logwell.com wrote:
>> >
>> > Oh? And now `analog' is "convicted"?
>>
>> Yes.
>>
>> > And why is that?
>>
>> GOD's will be done and not my will.
>
>Allow me to rephrase: where is the post which led to this
>conclusion?
>
>
>-- cary

But what exactly is responsible for the conviction?

On 22 Jan 2007 16:54:36 -0800, "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <love4@thetruth.com>
wrote:

>Convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:
>> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>> > convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:
>> > > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>> > > > convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:
>> > > > > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>> > > > > > convicted friend analog@logwell.com wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Oh? And now `analog' is "convicted"?
>> > > >
>> > > > Yes.
>> > > >
>> > > > > And why is that?
>> > > >
>> > > > GOD's will be done and not my will.
>> > >
>> > > Allow me to rephrase: where is the post which led to this
>> > > conclusion?
>> >
>> > http://groups.google.com/group/sci.m...38fe755a660d0?
>> >
>>
>> Yes? And his "conviction" was a result of his saying...what, exactly?
>>
>> This?:
>>
>> You persist in mischaracterizing the episode in Florida. In fact, Dr.
>> Chung does not take exception with the right of the folks down there to
>> fire him (a position I disagree with and would go so far as to say the
>> firing was actionable, and could well have made Dr. Chung a wealthy man
>> had it been adjudicated).
>>
>>
>> Or was it perhaps where he said this?:
>>
>> Further, I do not see you mentioning that the principal in the
>> case went so far as to praise Dr. Chung's medical expertise.
>>
>>
>> Or was it in fact this?:
>>
>> You do not know what Dr. Chung's relationship with his wife has to do with
>> anything. But unless you have engaged in illegal stalking, how the fuck do you
>> know anything about her whereabouts?
>
>Friend Syd's being convicted by the Holy Spirit is an act of HIS will
>and not my will.
>
>Clearly you remain convicted by HIM as well:
>
>http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts
>
>May GOD continue to heal our hearts with HIS living water curing our
>diabetes, depression, anxiety or panic so that we can love our
>neighbors a little more and LORD Jesus Christ a whole lot more, dear
>neighbor Cary whom I love unconditionally.
>
>Prayerfully in Christ's amazing love,
>
>Andrew <><

In article <7k4fr2p6q04bionbulndqfnp2rs4gtj25u@4ax.com> analog@logwell.com writes:
> On 20 Jan 2007 00:41:44 -0800, "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <love11@thetruth.com>
> wrote:
>
> >convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:
> >> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> >>
> >> > convicted friend analog@logwell.com wrote:
> >>
> >> Oh? And now `analog' is "convicted"?
> >
> >Yes.
> >
> >> And why is that?
> >
> >GOD's will be done and not my will.
> >
> >However, HIS purpose is as described at:
> >
> >http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts
> >
> >Andrew <><
>

> I do not understand why I am on the "convicted" list. Please explain why I am
> convicted.


And good luck to you on that one.

My first guess was that it was a slip of the keyboard on Andrew's
part, and, as he is utterly and unconstitutionally incapable of
admitting, ever ever ever, that he has made a mistake, then
you've now been permanently convicted by clerical error. Where I
use "clerical" with some reservations, mind you.

I'd be happy to be shown wrong, but all efforts to date
have met with the usual stonewalling.


-- cary

My role in the quoted post is 100% in defense of you, Dr. Chung. Did you
mistake some of another posters comments as being mine?

On 22 Jan 2007 15:55:18 -0800, "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"
<andrew@emorycardiology.com> wrote:

>convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:
>> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>> > convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:
>> > > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>> > > > convicted friend analog@logwell.com wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Oh? And now `analog' is "convicted"?
>> >
>> > Yes.
>> >
>> > > And why is that?
>> >
>> > GOD's will be done and not my will.
>>
>> Allow me to rephrase: where is the post which led to this
>> conclusion?
>
>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.m...38fe755a660d0?
>
>May GOD continue to heal our hearts with HIS living water curing our
>diabetes, depression, anxiety, or panic so that we can love our
>neighbors a little more and LORD Jesus Christ a whole bunch more, dear
>neighbor Cary whom I love unconditionally.
>
>Andrew <><

<analog@logwell.com> wrote:

>But what exactly is responsible for the conviction?

Do you really expect to get a rational answer from Andy Chung?
>
>On 22 Jan 2007 16:54:36 -0800, "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <love4@thetruth.com>
>wrote:

[flushage]

--
"To err is human, to cover it up is Weasel" -- Dogbert