Re: Poor health in the type-2 diabetic and others will cause a loss of hunger.

convicted neighbor Kumar wrote:
> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> > convicted neighbor Kumar wrote:
> > >
> > > http://groups.google.com/group/sci.m...2e430790a7b2f?
> >
> >
> > "Instabilities can mean such thing. Unintentional abnormal Weight
> > gain, stay constant or weight loss related to simultaneous weakness,
> > wastings etc. indicative."
> >
> > Instabilities (ie abnormalities) would indicate poor health. Such an
> > affected person would not be hungry.
>
> Why then a hyperglycemic(an abnormality) or as you say a
> brainwashed(also an abnormality) person get hunger and overeat?

Hyperglycemia is neither an instability nor an abnormality because it
normally occurs after a meal in normal people.

Glucose is not a toxin so there is no reason to expect it to suppress
appetite and indeed it does not. Healthy people are hungry. Those
who hold the false belief that "hunger is bad" will be compelled to
overeat to drive it away.

> > "Hunger is good." -- Holy Spirit
> >
> > Amen.
> >
> > "Blessed are you who hunger now for you will be satisfied." -- LORD
> > Jesus Christ (Luke 6:21)
> >
> > Amen.
> >
> > "I am the way, the truth, and the life..." -- LORD Jesus Christ
> >
> > Amen ! Laus Deo ! ! ! Marana tha ! ! ! ! ! ! !

Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
http://EmoryCardiology.com

"Hyperglycemia is neither an instability nor an abnormality because it
normally occurs after a meal in normal people.

Glucose is not a toxin so there is no reason to expect it to suppress
appetite and indeed it does not. Healthy people are hungry. Those
who hold the false belief that "hunger is bad" will be compelled to
overeat to drive it away."

What alot of nonsense on several levels. Plays on words only to show
willfully using distortions in pursuit of a non-scientific agenda
promoting the equally nonsense non-scientific two pound diet. Hunger as
assereted as a "fear" in normally fed people is a nonsense. All
confirming again:

The source has not kept up with diabetes literature, willfully distorts
research in pursuit of a non-scientific agenda, ignores research
contridicting the agenda, is blind to the many logical and scientific
flaws in the agenda, all of which allows; nay drives; one to safely
ignore the source because the truth is not in it.