want names?

Ok here is my block list. These are ones who have been least supportive this
time around and I need to block the negative posts that ridicule me so I can
concentrate on better health for myself

Alan S
Loretta E
Cheri

Di wrote in message <46d35f75$0$31867$4c368faf@roadrunner.com>...
>Ok here is my block list. These are ones who have been least
supportive this
>time around and I need to block the negative posts that ridicule me
so I can
>concentrate on better health for myself
>
>Alan S
>Loretta E
>Cheri


Cheri? How in the world was I unsupportive? Before Chuck got in touch
with you, I said that I had been wondering how you are too and hoped
you were OK. You posted that you were checking in, and I said it's
great to see you and to know that you're alive and kicking, and thanks
for letting us know. Tell me, Di, how was that unsupportive? You were
upset with another poster, and I was trying to reassure you that she
did care, even if she worded it differently than some of us might, and
I was just trying to say that people support in different ways,
especially when they have long histories with each other.

I would really like to see one post that I've ever made to you that
was unsupportive, mean, or judgmental. I know I haven't, not here, not
in a personal email, not anywhere, but it doesn't matter what I think,
it matters what you think, so block me if you need to. You know what's
best for you and your own situation.


Cheri

Di wrote:
>>Ok here is my block list. These are ones who have been least
>supportive this
>>time around and I need to block the negative posts that ridicule me
>so I can concentrate on better health for myself
>>Alan S
>>Loretta E
>>Cheri

"Cheri" wrote:
>Cheri? How in the world was I unsupportive? Before Chuck got in touch
>with you, I said that I had been wondering how you are too and hoped
>you were OK. You posted that you were checking in, and I said it's
>great to see you and to know that you're alive and kicking, and thanks
>for letting us know. Tell me, Di, how was that unsupportive? You were
>upset with another poster, and I was trying to reassure you that she
>did care, even if she worded it differently than some of us might, and
>I was just trying to say that people support in different ways,
>especially when they have long histories with each other.
>
> I would really like to see one post that I've ever made to you that
>was unsupportive, mean, or judgmental. I know I haven't, not here, not
>in a personal email, not anywhere, but it doesn't matter what I think,
>it matters what you think, so block me if you need to. You know what's
>best for you and your own situation.
>Cheri

Di can't seeeeee youuuuuuu.....
Here. Allow me ;-)

Port

On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 19:34:03 -0400, "Di"
<just.lil.ole.DiNO@SPAMgmail.com> wrote:

>Ok here is my block list. These are ones who have been least supportive this
>time around and I need to block the negative posts that ridicule me so I can
>concentrate on better health for myself
>
>Alan S
>Loretta E
>Cheri
>

I have seen very supportive posts to you today sent by Cheri. You may
wish to reconsider.

I don't believe Loretta is replying to your posts and I haven't been
paying much attention to what Alan has said to or about you recently.
--

Grandpa Chuck
-ô¿ô-
~


Americans killed in the occupation of Iraq as of August 26, 2007 is 3,732.
United Kingdom = 168 Other = 129.

How many more Americans must die to satisfy Bush's ego?
Let us all pray for Bush - God knows he needs it!

As of Augest 27, 2007 it has been 1610 days since Bush
while standing in front of the banner which was sent
to the ship by the White House saying MISSION ACCOMPLISHED
declared,"In the Battle of Iraq, the United States and our
allies have prevailed." IOW MISSION ACCOMPLISHED.

Isn't Bush's "surge" of troops working well?
Pay attention to the frequency of American deaths since it began.


"When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag, and carrying a cross." --Sinclair
Lewis

On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 17:11:56 -0700, "Cheri" <gserviceatinreachdotcom>
wrote:

>
>Di wrote in message <46d35f75$0$31867$4c368faf@roadrunner.com>...
>>Ok here is my block list. These are ones who have been least
>supportive this
>>time around and I need to block the negative posts that ridicule me
>so I can
>>concentrate on better health for myself
>>
>>Alan S
>>Loretta E
>>Cheri
>
>
>Cheri? How in the world was I unsupportive? Before Chuck got in touch
>with you, I said that I had been wondering how you are too and hoped
>you were OK. You posted that you were checking in, and I said it's
>great to see you and to know that you're alive and kicking, and thanks
>for letting us know. Tell me, Di, how was that unsupportive? You were
>upset with another poster, and I was trying to reassure you that she
>did care, even if she worded it differently than some of us might, and
>I was just trying to say that people support in different ways,
>especially when they have long histories with each other.
>
> I would really like to see one post that I've ever made to you that
>was unsupportive, mean, or judgmental. I know I haven't, not here, not
>in a personal email, not anywhere, but it doesn't matter what I think,
>it matters what you think, so block me if you need to. You know what's
>best for you and your own situation.
>
>
>Cheri
>

Give her a chance Cheri. If she has had you in her KF she may not be
aware just how supportive you have been recently. Hopefully she will
see this one and the other I wrote about her list.
--

Grandpa Chuck
-ô¿ô-
~


Americans killed in the occupation of Iraq as of August 26, 2007 is 3,732.
United Kingdom = 168 Other = 129.

How many more Americans must die to satisfy Bush's ego?
Let us all pray for Bush - God knows he needs it!

As of Augest 27, 2007 it has been 1610 days since Bush
while standing in front of the banner which was sent
to the ship by the White House saying MISSION ACCOMPLISHED
declared,"In the Battle of Iraq, the United States and our
allies have prevailed." IOW MISSION ACCOMPLISHED.

Isn't Bush's "surge" of troops working well?
Pay attention to the frequency of American deaths since it began.


"When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag, and carrying a cross." --Sinclair
Lewis

"Di" <just.lil.ole.DiNO@SPAMgmail.com> wrote in message
news:46d35f75$0$31867$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
> Ok here is my block list. These are ones who have been least supportive
> this time around and I need to block the negative posts that ridicule me
> so I can concentrate on better health for myself
>
> Alan S
> Loretta E
> Cheri

What? I guess I missed something.

Cheri, I was very surprised to see you on the list. I wasnt surprised
to see myself.
I am sorry Diana feels that way, but my words didnt come from nothing.

Loretta

Di, you have been the boy who cried wolf for eight years. If you have
me killfiled, it is fine with me. I was a very good friend to you but
you know what happened.

Loretta

<Port@nospam.invalid> wrote in message
news:i5q6d35r2g9klonp1iasehi6h1d3ar5544@4ax.com...
> Di wrote:
>>>Ok here is my block list. These are ones who have been least
>>supportive this
>>>time around and I need to block the negative posts that ridicule me
>>so I can concentrate on better health for myself
>>>Alan S
>>>Loretta E
>>>Cheri
>
> "Cheri" wrote:
>>Cheri? How in the world was I unsupportive? Before Chuck got in touch
>>with you, I said that I had been wondering how you are too and hoped
>>you were OK. You posted that you were checking in, and I said it's
>>great to see you and to know that you're alive and kicking, and thanks
>>for letting us know. Tell me, Di, how was that unsupportive? You were
>>upset with another poster, and I was trying to reassure you that she
>>did care, even if she worded it differently than some of us might, and
>>I was just trying to say that people support in different ways,
>>especially when they have long histories with each other.
>>
>> I would really like to see one post that I've ever made to you that
>>was unsupportive, mean, or judgmental. I know I haven't, not here, not
>>in a personal email, not anywhere, but it doesn't matter what I think,
>>it matters what you think, so block me if you need to. You know what's
>>best for you and your own situation.
>>Cheri
>
> Di can't seeeeee youuuuuuu.....
> Here. Allow me ;-)
>
> Port

Silly... LOL thanks for making me laugh. That is something I need more of.

"Grandpa Chuck" <GrandpaChuck@B4me.org> wrote in message
news:h4r6d3l543ukmck5oalu1kk2i1mc1l8rel@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 19:34:03 -0400, "Di"
> <just.lil.ole.DiNO@SPAMgmail.com> wrote:
>
>>Ok here is my block list. These are ones who have been least supportive
>>this
>>time around and I need to block the negative posts that ridicule me so I
>>can
>>concentrate on better health for myself
>>
>>Alan S
>>Loretta E
>>Cheri
>>
>
> I have seen very supportive posts to you today sent by Cheri. You may
> wish to reconsider.
>
> I don't believe Loretta is replying to your posts and I haven't been
> paying much attention to what Alan has said to or about you recently.

Chuck, I don't block anyone here. I just wanted to show it serves no purpose
and how it can hurt when someone does such things unless of course they
can't be hurt. If I were to have posted a real list there would have been a
couple more names on it but that was just a for instance to show naming
names hurts and does not serve a purpose.

> --
>
> Grandpa Chuck
> -ô¿ô-
> ~
>
>
> Americans killed in the occupation of Iraq as of August 26, 2007 is 3,732.
> United Kingdom = 168 Other = 129.
>
> How many more Americans must die to satisfy Bush's ego?
> Let us all pray for Bush - God knows he needs it!
>
> As of Augest 27, 2007 it has been 1610 days since Bush
> while standing in front of the banner which was sent
> to the ship by the White House saying MISSION ACCOMPLISHED
> declared,"In the Battle of Iraq, the United States and our
> allies have prevailed." IOW MISSION ACCOMPLISHED.
>
> Isn't Bush's "surge" of troops working well?
> Pay attention to the frequency of American deaths since it began.
>
>
> "When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag, and
> carrying a cross." --Sinclair
> Lewis

"Julie Bove" <juliebove@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:m7KAi.27$J65.21@trndny08...
>
> "Di" <just.lil.ole.DiNO@SPAMgmail.com> wrote in message
> news:46d35f75$0$31867$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
>> Ok here is my block list. These are ones who have been least supportive
>> this time around and I need to block the negative posts that ridicule me
>> so I can concentrate on better health for myself
>>
>> Alan S
>> Loretta E
>> Cheri
>
> What? I guess I missed something.
>

Hi Julie, No honey you didn't miss anything. I was just showing how naming
names serves no purpose when speaking as a "general" thing. Alan wanted Guy
to name names and I feel there is no purpose in that. It can only cause hurt
or hard feelings. I have no one blocked. :-)

On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 20:57:05 -0400, "Di"
<just.lil.ole.DiNO@SPAMgmail.com> wrote:

>
>"Grandpa Chuck" <GrandpaChuck@B4me.org> wrote in message
>news:h4r6d3l543ukmck5oalu1kk2i1mc1l8rel@4ax.com.. .
>> On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 19:34:03 -0400, "Di"
>> <just.lil.ole.DiNO@SPAMgmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Ok here is my block list. These are ones who have been least supportive
>>>this
>>>time around and I need to block the negative posts that ridicule me so I
>>>can
>>>concentrate on better health for myself
>>>
>>>Alan S
>>>Loretta E
>>>Cheri
>>>
>>
>> I have seen very supportive posts to you today sent by Cheri. You may
>> wish to reconsider.
>>
>> I don't believe Loretta is replying to your posts and I haven't been
>> paying much attention to what Alan has said to or about you recently.
>
>Chuck, I don't block anyone here. I just wanted to show it serves no purpose
>and how it can hurt when someone does such things unless of course they
>can't be hurt. If I were to have posted a real list there would have been a
>couple more names on it but that was just a for instance to show naming
>names hurts and does not serve a purpose.

This is the most ridiculous thing I've ever read -- today, anyway.
This reminds me so much of first grade -- passing notes and being mean
just "because."

General, sweeping nameless allegations are in the same category. I
liken it to talking about people behind their back. If Guy, or you,
have a real problem with someone, you should address it *with them*
preferably in private email, but if you choose a public forum, then
the person you are talking to should *know* you are talking to them.

I don't know how many times I've seen you apologize and get upset (and
leave) at someone's allegation or complaint -- a statement that has
*nothing* to do with you -- simply because it was general and shot out
at everyone in the group. So you assumed they were talking to you.
Since you didn't respond to the post I wrote to you the *last* time
this happened, I assume you were either already gone and didn't read
it, or decided I was not "supportive."

I don't know what your definition of "support" is, but it certainly
isn't mine. All I've seen here is people asking how you are,
congratulating you on your successes -- as big or small as they may be
-- and walking on eggshells to try to keep from offending or hurting
you.

It occurs to me that the best way to support you in this NG is by
simply not responding to you. Anything else becomes some kind of
insult or offense -- or part of some game I don't know the rules to
and am not interested in playing.

--
BlueBrooke
T2/D&E/June 2005
May 2007 A1c 5.5
Oct 2006 A1c 5.8
Jun 2005 A1c 6.8

Port wrote:
>> Di can't seeeeee youuuuuuu.....
>> Here. Allow me ;-)

Di wrote:
>Silly... LOL thanks for making me laugh. That is something I need more of.

LoL! Noooo.... thank you! I just saw your reply downthread to Julie
re nobody blocked. LoL! You pulled off a good one! :-D

"Di" <just.lil.ole.DiNO@SPAMgmail.com> wrote in message
news:46d373fd$0$4074$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...

> Hi Julie, No honey you didn't miss anything. I was just showing how naming
> names serves no purpose when speaking as a "general" thing. Alan wanted
> Guy to name names and I feel there is no purpose in that. It can only
> cause hurt or hard feelings. I have no one blocked. :-)

I can see why you posted Loretta's name but I can also see why Loretta said
what she said. Not that I'm taking sides here mind you. Just can't see why
Cheri and Alan were listed. If there's a REASON to name names, then that's
a different matter. Name the names and say what it is they did wrong.

On Tue, 28 Aug 2007 00:37:38 GMT, "Julie Bove"
<juliebove@verizon.net> wrote:

>
>"Di" <just.lil.ole.DiNO@SPAMgmail.com> wrote in message
>news:46d35f75$0$31867$4c368faf@roadrunner.com.. .
>> Ok here is my block list. These are ones who have been least supportive
>> this time around and I need to block the negative posts that ridicule me
>> so I can concentrate on better health for myself
>>
>> Alan S
>> Loretta E
>> Cheri
>
>What? I guess I missed something.
>
Apparently I did too. Mystified.

Cheers, Alan, T2, Australia.

Grandpa Chuck wrote in message
<29r6d3tctddh7mqil71ieth44b1h5gp951@4ax.com>...
>On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 17:11:56 -0700, "Cheri" <gserviceatinreachdotcom>
>wrote:
>
>>
>>Di wrote in message <46d35f75$0$31867$4c368faf@roadrunner.com>...
>>>Ok here is my block list. These are ones who have been least
>>supportive this
>>>time around and I need to block the negative posts that ridicule me
>>so I can
>>>concentrate on better health for myself
>>>
>>>Alan S
>>>Loretta E
>>>Cheri
>>
>>
>>Cheri? How in the world was I unsupportive? Before Chuck got in
touch
>>with you, I said that I had been wondering how you are too and hoped
>>you were OK. You posted that you were checking in, and I said it's
>>great to see you and to know that you're alive and kicking, and
thanks
>>for letting us know. Tell me, Di, how was that unsupportive? You
were
>>upset with another poster, and I was trying to reassure you that she
>>did care, even if she worded it differently than some of us might,
and
>>I was just trying to say that people support in different ways,
>>especially when they have long histories with each other.
>>
>> I would really like to see one post that I've ever made to you that
>>was unsupportive, mean, or judgmental. I know I haven't, not here,
not
>>in a personal email, not anywhere, but it doesn't matter what I
think,
>>it matters what you think, so block me if you need to. You know
what's
>>best for you and your own situation.
>>
>>
>>Cheri
>>
>
>Give her a chance Cheri. If she has had you in her KF she may not be
>aware just how supportive you have been recently. Hopefully she will
>see this one and the other I wrote about her list.
>--
>
>Grandpa Chuck
> -ô¿ô-


Chuck, I have always been supportive to Diana, and not just
*recently.* I do think there's been some sort of misunderstanding
here, but I'm certainly not dwelling on it. It will work itself out.

Cheri

"Di" wrote:
>>> Ok here is my block list. These are ones who have been least supportive
>>> this time around and I need to block the negative posts that ridicule me
>>> so I can concentrate on better health for myself
>>>
>>> Alan S
>>> Loretta E
>>> Cheri

Julie wrote:
>>What? I guess I missed something.

Alan S wrote:
>Apparently I did too. Mystified.

Nooooo no no she hasn't blocked anybody. She just posted that to make
a point. You must have missed her reply to Julie.... and apparently
missed the point as well lol!
Everything's cool.

Port

"Cheri" wrote:
>Chuck, I have always been supportive to Diana, and not just
>*recently.* I do think there's been some sort of misunderstanding
>here, but I'm certainly not dwelling on it. It will work itself out.

Cheri, you're not in Di's killfile. She just posted that message to
make a point. Apparently it was more effective than she could've
imagined. LoL! Didn't you see her explaination to Julie?

Port

<Port@nospam.invalid> wrote in message
news:1b37d31k8vreij30v5onknfh35ush5lh7p@4ax.com...
> "Cheri" wrote:
>>Chuck, I have always been supportive to Diana, and not just
>>*recently.* I do think there's been some sort of misunderstanding
>>here, but I'm certainly not dwelling on it. It will work itself out.
>
> Cheri, you're not in Di's killfile. She just posted that message to
> make a point. Apparently it was more effective than she could've
> imagined. LoL! Didn't you see her explaination to Julie?

But if she was making a point, I missed that as well. All I know is that
she said she KF'd three people and then she said she didn't. Makes no
sense.

"Julie Bove" wrote:
>All I know is that
>she said she KF'd three people and then she said she didn't. Makes no
>sense.

She was just trying to demonstrate how it feels to be called out an
KF'd. She sure faked ME out of my jockey shorts. I thought it was a
pretty effective way of making a point.
I "got it". And I'm new! How come nobody else got it?

Port

On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 20:34:09 -0400, sassybklynlady@webtv.net (Loretta
Eisenberg) wrote:

>Di, you have been the boy who cried wolf for eight years. If you have
>me killfiled, it is fine with me. I was a very good friend to you but
>you know what happened.
>
>Loretta

Loretta
Guy is the one that provoked this. Several that for some reason
thought that I meant them.

Di got into this defending me. It was not necessary
Blame me for all..

There is no problem. Just do not read old senile Guy.

A stupid game is--when you are lost--blame the poster.

KF are for children. Just read the header and skip
over the post.

We need to be concerned about one post today.

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

<Port@nospam.invalid> wrote in message
news:je47d3l26p2hmf16h4pia9v4mgh7b6k46e@4ax.com...
> "Julie Bove" wrote:
>>All I know is that
>>she said she KF'd three people and then she said she didn't. Makes no
>>sense.
>
> She was just trying to demonstrate how it feels to be called out an
> KF'd. She sure faked ME out of my jockey shorts. I thought it was a
> pretty effective way of making a point.
> I "got it". And I'm new! How come nobody else got it?

Because it made no sense. I could see why (just maybe) she might have KF'd
Loretta, but not Alan and Cheri. Had their been a reason for it, it would
have made sense. As it stands, it made no more sense than Guy's post about
the complaints.

If someone says they are KF'ing someone else for no apparent reason, it
isn't going to make that person feel bad. Just confused.

<guys@consolidated.net> wrote in message
news:ms47d3tejjre8hs7jknnd06nlk3v32hi4s@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 20:34:09 -0400, sassybklynlady@webtv.net (Loretta
> Eisenberg) wrote:
>
>>Di, you have been the boy who cried wolf for eight years. If you have
>>me killfiled, it is fine with me. I was a very good friend to you but
>>you know what happened.
>>
>>Loretta
>
> Loretta
> Guy is the one that provoked this. Several that for some reason
> thought that I meant them.
>
> Di got into this defending me. It was not necessary
> Blame me for all..
>
> There is no problem. Just do not read old senile Guy.
>
> A stupid game is--when you are lost--blame the poster.
>
> KF are for children. Just read the header and skip
> over the post.
>
> We need to be concerned about one post today.

You've got to be kidding. There are those who are in my KF (not naming
names) who have post after post after post. I am not about to skim through
all of those, or those who care to reply to them. One in particular. I
will refer to them as the cardiologist, the Aspartame troll and the iron
guy. Anyone who has been here for any length of time knows who I mean.

Children probably shouldn't be using newsgroups. My daughter hangs out at
disney.com and games2girls.com. If I find out she is hanging out in
newsgroups and KFing people, I might get concerned. Then again, she is
pretty mature for a 9 year old. I'm sure it wouldn't take her long to
figure out how to do it.

And now you just say we need to be concerned about one post today. What one
post is that? This is just maddening. Are you by any chance a Cancer? I
know we have a tendency to go about things in a sideways fashion, just like
the crab. But I guess I have enough Leo in me that I can be more direct.

Thank you for your reply.

"BlueBrooke" <.@.> wrote in message
news:bit6d3hrnh9dsnvhk6lpn5eqs4tr6sfc8o@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 20:57:05 -0400, "Di"
> <just.lil.ole.DiNO@SPAMgmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Grandpa Chuck" <GrandpaChuck@B4me.org> wrote in message
>>news:h4r6d3l543ukmck5oalu1kk2i1mc1l8rel@4ax.com. ..
>>> On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 19:34:03 -0400, "Di"
>>> <just.lil.ole.DiNO@SPAMgmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Ok here is my block list. These are ones who have been least supportive
>>>>this
>>>>time around and I need to block the negative posts that ridicule me so I
>>>>can
>>>>concentrate on better health for myself
>>>>
>>>>Alan S
>>>>Loretta E
>>>>Cheri
>>>>
>>>
>>> I have seen very supportive posts to you today sent by Cheri. You may
>>> wish to reconsider.
>>>
>>> I don't believe Loretta is replying to your posts and I haven't been
>>> paying much attention to what Alan has said to or about you recently.
>>
>>Chuck, I don't block anyone here. I just wanted to show it serves no
>>purpose
>>and how it can hurt when someone does such things unless of course they
>>can't be hurt. If I were to have posted a real list there would have been
>>a
>>couple more names on it but that was just a for instance to show naming
>>names hurts and does not serve a purpose.
>
> This is the most ridiculous thing I've ever read -- today, anyway.
> This reminds me so much of first grade -- passing notes and being mean
> just "because."
>
> General, sweeping nameless allegations are in the same category. I
> liken it to talking about people behind their back. If Guy, or you,
> have a real problem with someone, you should address it *with them*
> preferably in private email, but if you choose a public forum, then
> the person you are talking to should *know* you are talking to them.
>
> I don't know how many times I've seen you apologize and get upset (and
> leave) at someone's allegation or complaint -- a statement that has
> *nothing* to do with you -- simply because it was general and shot out
> at everyone in the group. So you assumed they were talking to you.
> Since you didn't respond to the post I wrote to you the *last* time
> this happened, I assume you were either already gone and didn't read
> it, or decided I was not "supportive."
>
> I don't know what your definition of "support" is, but it certainly
> isn't mine. All I've seen here is people asking how you are,
> congratulating you on your successes -- as big or small as they may be
> -- and walking on eggshells to try to keep from offending or hurting
> you.
>
> It occurs to me that the best way to support you in this NG is by
> simply not responding to you. Anything else becomes some kind of
> insult or offense -- or part of some game I don't know the rules to
> and am not interested in playing.
>
> --
> BlueBrooke
> T2/D&E/June 2005
> May 2007 A1c 5.5
> Oct 2006 A1c 5.8
> Jun 2005 A1c 6.8

<Port@nospam.invalid> wrote in message
news:4ju6d3d22anb7cq88ff6majcle5u567f02@4ax.com...
> Port wrote:
>>> Di can't seeeeee youuuuuuu.....
>>> Here. Allow me ;-)
>
> Di wrote:
>>Silly... LOL thanks for making me laugh. That is something I need more of.
>
> LoL! Noooo.... thank you! I just saw your reply downthread to Julie
> re nobody blocked. LoL! You pulled off a good one! :-D

Glad I gave you a big smile :-) Just wanted others to see how "names" could
hurt or cause hard feelings and I proved my point. Now they are mad at me
and wanting to bring past hurts in but I expected that.

"Julie Bove" <juliebove@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:34LAi.493$2p5.169@trndny05...
>
> "Di" <just.lil.ole.DiNO@SPAMgmail.com> wrote in message
> news:46d373fd$0$4074$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
>
>> Hi Julie, No honey you didn't miss anything. I was just showing how
>> naming names serves no purpose when speaking as a "general" thing. Alan
>> wanted Guy to name names and I feel there is no purpose in that. It can
>> only cause hurt or hard feelings. I have no one blocked. :-)
>
> I can see why you posted Loretta's name but I can also see why Loretta
> said what she said. Not that I'm taking sides here mind you. Just can't
> see why Cheri and Alan were listed. If there's a REASON to name names,
> then that's a different matter. Name the names and say what it is they
> did wrong.
>

Ok
Alan has been very testy this time around. Cool so to speak. Like it was a
cardinal sin I took time away.

Cheri hurt me in agreeing that I come for a "pity party" when I do not nor
do I come for a "fix" I do have a life outside ASD and when I came back and
seen how Loretta was talking about me to Wendy "behind my back" I might add
that is what angered me. She has no right. Then to say she was once my
friend and no longer is and "I know why" yes I know why however my proof
went down the tubes in a computer crash. She claimed I did not stand beside
her and support her in the time of her Step Father's death and that was a
blatant lie. She hurt me deeply and I have tried to overcome that and now I
have.

"Di" <just.lil.ole.DiNO@SPAMgmail.com> wrote in message
news:46d39c2a$0$24141$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...

> Ok
> Alan has been very testy this time around. Cool so to speak. Like it was a
> cardinal sin I took time away.

I hadn't noticed. I don't think Alan and I get along particularly well
though. Nothing in particular. Just personality differences.
>
> Cheri hurt me in agreeing that I come for a "pity party" when I do not nor
> do I come for a "fix" I do have a life outside ASD and when I came back
> and seen how Loretta was talking about me to Wendy "behind my back" I
> might add that is what angered me. She has no right. Then to say she was
> once my friend and no longer is and "I know why" yes I know why however my
> proof went down the tubes in a computer crash. She claimed I did not stand
> beside her and support her in the time of her Step Father's death and that
> was a blatant lie. She hurt me deeply and I have tried to overcome that
> and now I have.

Well, I guess I missed that part.

But I still don't understand the part about you KF'ing them and not really
doing it. But whatever. This whole thing is giving me a headache.

<Port@nospam.invalid> wrote in message
news:3s27d35ajle5jbsiri4mrtob0103sh4qvu@4ax.com...
> "Di" wrote:
>>>> Ok here is my block list. These are ones who have been least supportive
>>>> this time around and I need to block the negative posts that ridicule
>>>> me
>>>> so I can concentrate on better health for myself
>>>>
>>>> Alan S
>>>> Loretta E
>>>> Cheri
>
> Julie wrote:
>>>What? I guess I missed something.
>
> Alan S wrote:
>>Apparently I did too. Mystified.
>
> Nooooo no no she hasn't blocked anybody. She just posted that to make
> a point. You must have missed her reply to Julie.... and apparently
> missed the point as well lol!
> Everything's cool.
>
> Port

Yes it is cool :-) Thanks Port.

<Port@nospam.invalid> wrote in message
news:je47d3l26p2hmf16h4pia9v4mgh7b6k46e@4ax.com...
> "Julie Bove" wrote:
>>All I know is that
>>she said she KF'd three people and then she said she didn't. Makes no
>>sense.
>
> She was just trying to demonstrate how it feels to be called out an
> KF'd. She sure faked ME out of my jockey shorts. I thought it was a
> pretty effective way of making a point.
> I "got it". And I'm new! How come nobody else got it?
>
> Port

IIIII Liiikkkeeeee You Port LOL. You are a breath of fresh air. Thank you
for seeing what I was trying to convey.

<guys@consolidated.net> wrote in message
news:ms47d3tejjre8hs7jknnd06nlk3v32hi4s@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 20:34:09 -0400, sassybklynlady@webtv.net (Loretta
> Eisenberg) wrote:
>
>>Di, you have been the boy who cried wolf for eight years. If you have
>>me killfiled, it is fine with me. I was a very good friend to you but
>>you know what happened.
>>
>>Loretta
>
> Loretta
> Guy is the one that provoked this. Several that for some reason
> thought that I meant them.
>
> Di got into this defending me. It was not necessary
> Blame me for all..
>
> There is no problem. Just do not read old senile Guy.
>
> A stupid game is--when you are lost--blame the poster.
>
> KF are for children. Just read the header and skip
> over the post.
>
> We need to be concerned about one post today.
>
I disagree. You are not the blame. You have every right to post your
feelings on anything that bothers you. Support in this group is "Anything"
that effects us in our lives with diabetes. Meaning the Good, Bad, Sad etc.

"Julie Bove" <juliebove@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:eOMAi.48$Lz5.22@trndny04...
>
> <guys@consolidated.net> wrote in message
> news:ms47d3tejjre8hs7jknnd06nlk3v32hi4s@4ax.com...
>> On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 20:34:09 -0400, sassybklynlady@webtv.net (Loretta
>> Eisenberg) wrote:
>>
>>>Di, you have been the boy who cried wolf for eight years. If you have
>>>me killfiled, it is fine with me. I was a very good friend to you but
>>>you know what happened.
>>>
>>>Loretta
>>
>> Loretta
>> Guy is the one that provoked this. Several that for some reason
>> thought that I meant them.
>>
>> Di got into this defending me. It was not necessary
>> Blame me for all..
>>
>> There is no problem. Just do not read old senile Guy.
>>
>> A stupid game is--when you are lost--blame the poster.
>>
>> KF are for children. Just read the header and skip
>> over the post.
>>
>> We need to be concerned about one post today.
>
> You've got to be kidding. There are those who are in my KF (not naming
> names) who have post after post after post. I am not about to skim
> through all of those, or those who care to reply to them. One in
> particular. I will refer to them as the cardiologist, the Aspartame troll
> and the iron guy. Anyone who has been here for any length of time knows
> who I mean.
>
> Children probably shouldn't be using newsgroups. My daughter hangs out at
> disney.com and games2girls.com. If I find out she is hanging out in
> newsgroups and KFing people, I might get concerned. Then again, she is
> pretty mature for a 9 year old. I'm sure it wouldn't take her long to
> figure out how to do it.
>
> And now you just say we need to be concerned about one post today. What
> one post is that? This is just maddening. Are you by any chance a
> Cancer? I know we have a tendency to go about things in a sideways
> fashion, just like the crab. But I guess I have enough Leo in me that I
> can be more direct.
>
LOL odd you mention that. I myself am a "Cancer" but sometimes I "grow on
people" :-)

"Julie Bove" <juliebove@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:gJMAi.46$J65.35@trndny08...
>
> <Port@nospam.invalid> wrote in message
> news:je47d3l26p2hmf16h4pia9v4mgh7b6k46e@4ax.com...
>> "Julie Bove" wrote:
>>>All I know is that
>>>she said she KF'd three people and then she said she didn't. Makes no
>>>sense.
>>
>> She was just trying to demonstrate how it feels to be called out an
>> KF'd. She sure faked ME out of my jockey shorts. I thought it was a
>> pretty effective way of making a point.
>> I "got it". And I'm new! How come nobody else got it?
>
> Because it made no sense. I could see why (just maybe) she might have
> KF'd Loretta, but not Alan and Cheri. Had their been a reason for it, it
> would have made sense. As it stands, it made no more sense than Guy's
> post about the complaints.
>
> If someone says they are KF'ing someone else for no apparent reason, it
> isn't going to make that person feel bad. Just confused.
>

Exactly Julie that was what I was trying to convey. Alan wanted Guy to name
names and I was showing how doing that hurts !!!

On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 23:47:45 -0400, "Di"
<just.lil.ole.DiNO@SPAMgmail.com> wrote:

>
>"Julie Bove" <juliebove@verizon.net> wrote in message
>news:34LAi.493$2p5.169@trndny05...
>>
>> "Di" <just.lil.ole.DiNO@SPAMgmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:46d373fd$0$4074$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
>>
>>> Hi Julie, No honey you didn't miss anything. I was just showing how
>>> naming names serves no purpose when speaking as a "general" thing. Alan
>>> wanted Guy to name names and I feel there is no purpose in that. It can
>>> only cause hurt or hard feelings. I have no one blocked. :-)
>>
>> I can see why you posted Loretta's name but I can also see why Loretta
>> said what she said. Not that I'm taking sides here mind you. Just can't
>> see why Cheri and Alan were listed. If there's a REASON to name names,
>> then that's a different matter. Name the names and say what it is they
>> did wrong.
>>
>
>Ok
>Alan has been very testy this time around. Cool so to speak. Like it was a
>cardinal sin I took time away.

I was? I did? Sorry 'bout that - but I don't recall either.
Let's leave it there.
>
>Cheri hurt me in agreeing that I come for a "pity party" when I do not nor
>do I come for a "fix" I do have a life outside ASD and when I came back and
>seen how Loretta was talking about me to Wendy "behind my back" I might add
>that is what angered me. She has no right. Then to say she was once my
>friend and no longer is and "I know why" yes I know why however my proof
>went down the tubes in a computer crash. She claimed I did not stand beside
>her and support her in the time of her Step Father's death and that was a
>blatant lie. She hurt me deeply and I have tried to overcome that and now I
>have.
>

Cheers, Alan, T2, Australia.
d&e, metformin 1500mg, ezetrol 10mg
Everything in Moderation - Except Laughter.
--
http://loraldiabetes.blogspot.com

On Tue, 28 Aug 2007 03:57:27 GMT, "Julie Bove"
<juliebove@verizon.net> wrote:

>
>"Di" <just.lil.ole.DiNO@SPAMgmail.com> wrote in message
>news:46d39c2a$0$24141$4c368faf@roadrunner.com.. .
>
>> Ok
>> Alan has been very testy this time around. Cool so to speak. Like it was a
>> cardinal sin I took time away.
>
>I hadn't noticed. I don't think Alan and I get along particularly well
>though. Nothing in particular. Just personality differences.
>>
Sorry to hear that; I thought we got along fine. I like you
Julie, I just disagree with much of your advice on diet when
your own allergy restrictions and dislikes are unique. That
doesn't mean I dislike you at all.


Cheers, Alan, T2, Australia.
d&e, metformin 1500mg, ezetrol 10mg
Everything in Moderation - Except Laughter.
--
http://loraldiabetes.blogspot.com