<!-- google_ad_section_start -->"Genes Take Charge, and Diets Fall by the Wayside"<!-- google_ad_section_end -->
Health Forums

Go Back   Health Forums > Fitness and Nutrition > Diet > alt.support.diet

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-10-2007, 04:14 AM
Prisoner at War
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default "Genes Take Charge, and Diets Fall by the Wayside"


Sigh! ^_^


http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/08/he...361&ei=5087%0A

EXCERPTS

Every time the result was the same. The weight, so painstakingly lost,
came right back. But since this was a research study, the
investigators were also measuring metabolic changes, psychiatric
conditions, body temperature and pulse. And that led them to a
surprising conclusion: fat people who lost large amounts of weight
might look like someone who was never fat, but they were very
different. In fact, by every metabolic measurement, they seemed like
people who were starving.

....

The Rockefeller researchers explained their observations in one of
their papers: "It is entirely possible that weight reduction, instead
of resulting in a normal state for obese patients, results in an
abnormal state resembling that of starved nonobese individuals."

Eventually, more than 50 people lived at the hospital and lost weight,
and every one had physical and psychological signs of starvation.
There were a very few who did not get fat again, but they made staying
thin their life's work, becoming Weight Watchers lecturers, for
example, and, always, counting calories and maintaining themselves in
a permanent state of starvation.

....

The implications were clear. There is a reason that fat people cannot
stay thin after they diet and that thin people cannot stay fat when
they force themselves to gain weight. The body's metabolism speeds up
or slows down to keep weight within a narrow range. Gain weight and
the metabolism can as much as double; lose weight and it can slow to
half its original speed.

....

The message never really got out to the nation's dieters, but a few
research scientists were intrigued and asked the next question about
body weight: Is body weight inherited, or is obesity more of an
inadvertent, almost unconscious response to a society where food is
cheap, abundant and tempting? An extra 100 calories a day will pile on
10 pounds in a year, public health messages often say. In five years,
that is 50 pounds.

....

Dr. Stunkard ended up with 540 adults whose average age was 40. They
had been adopted when they were very young - 55 percent had been
adopted in the first month of life and 90 percent were adopted in the
first year of life. His conclusions, published in The New England
Journal of Medicine in 1986, were unequivocal. The adoptees were as
fat as their biological parents, and how fat they were had no relation
to how fat their adoptive parents were.

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-10-2007, 04:14 AM
Cubit
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: "Genes Take Charge, and Diets Fall by the Wayside"

I have serious doubts about the "starvation" part, but the characterization
of the type of person who is able to maintain a weightloss seems right.

2% win

Some say 5%, but that is for a shorter period of study time.

Although "they" say yo-yo dieting is bad for you. IMHO the alternative may
be a steady gain into the range of morbid obesity.
Yo-yo diets become the lesser evil.

"Prisoner at War" <prisoner_at_war@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1178744063.090369.12380@q75g2000hsh.googlegro ups.com...
[snip]
>There were a very few who did not get fat again, but they made staying
>thin their life's work, becoming Weight Watchers lecturers, for
>example, and, always, counting calories and maintaining themselves in
>a permanent state of starvation.

[snip]


Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-10-2007, 04:14 AM
XXXXgizzieXXXX
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: "Genes Take Charge, and Diets Fall by the Wayside"


"Prisoner at War" <prisoner_at_war@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> Dr. Stunkard ended up with 540 adults whose average age was 40. They
> had been adopted when they were very young - 55 percent had been
> adopted in the first month of life and 90 percent were adopted in the
> first year of life. His conclusions, published in The New England
> Journal of Medicine in 1986, were unequivocal. The adoptees were as
> fat as their biological parents, and how fat they were had no relation
> to how fat their adoptive parents were.


Over the years, I've seen many shows with "seperated at birth" twins, and
iun every single case, when reunited as adults, both were either "thin",
"normal" or "fat". Nature, not nurture.


--
XXXXXXgizzieXXXXXX



Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-10-2007, 04:14 AM
Del Cecchi
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: "Genes Take Charge, and Diets Fall by the Wayside"


"XXXXgizzieXXXX" <xxgizziexx@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:B6OdnZM6QJn0Hd_bnZ2dnUVZ_rSjnZ2d@comcast.com. ..
>
> "Prisoner at War" <prisoner_at_war@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> Dr. Stunkard ended up with 540 adults whose average age was 40. They
>> had been adopted when they were very young - 55 percent had been
>> adopted in the first month of life and 90 percent were adopted in the
>> first year of life. His conclusions, published in The New England
>> Journal of Medicine in 1986, were unequivocal. The adoptees were as
>> fat as their biological parents, and how fat they were had no relation
>> to how fat their adoptive parents were.

>
> Over the years, I've seen many shows with "seperated at birth" twins,
> and iun every single case, when reunited as adults, both were either
> "thin", "normal" or "fat". Nature, not nurture.
>
>
> --
> XXXXXXgizzieXXXXXX
>

You all might be interested in the "Minnesota Twins Family Study"
http://www.psych.umn.edu/psylabs/mtfs/
(no relation to the Minnesota Twins baseball team) and the many
publications using the data.


>



Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-10-2007, 02:08 PM
Bully
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: "Genes Take Charge, and Diets Fall by the Wayside"

In news:B6OdnZM6QJn0Hd_bnZ2dnUVZ_rSjnZ2d@comcast.com,
XXXXgizzieXXXX <xxgizziexx@comcast.net> typed:
> "Prisoner at War" <prisoner_at_war@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> Dr. Stunkard ended up with 540 adults whose average age was 40. They
>> had been adopted when they were very young - 55 percent had been
>> adopted in the first month of life and 90 percent were adopted in the
>> first year of life. His conclusions, published in The New England
>> Journal of Medicine in 1986, were unequivocal. The adoptees were as
>> fat as their biological parents, and how fat they were had no
>> relation to how fat their adoptive parents were.

>
> Over the years, I've seen many shows


How many shows?

> with "seperated at birth"
> twins, and iun every single case, when reunited as adults, both were
> either "thin", "normal" or "fat". Nature, not nurture.




--
Bully
Protein bars: http://www.proteinbars.co.uk

"A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees
the opportunity in every difficulty." Sir Winston Churchill


Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-11-2007, 08:28 PM
Tachyglossus
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: "Genes Take Charge, and Diets Fall by the Wayside"

"Bully" <bully62@proteinbars.co.ok> wrote in message
news:5afsefF2oqm7oU1@mid.individual.net...
> In news:B6OdnZM6QJn0Hd_bnZ2dnUVZ_rSjnZ2d@comcast.com,
> XXXXgizzieXXXX <xxgizziexx@comcast.net> typed:
>> "Prisoner at War" <prisoner_at_war@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>> Dr. Stunkard ended up with 540 adults whose average age was 40. They
>>> had been adopted when they were very young - 55 percent had been
>>> adopted in the first month of life and 90 percent were adopted in the
>>> first year of life. His conclusions, published in The New England
>>> Journal of Medicine in 1986, were unequivocal. The adoptees were as
>>> fat as their biological parents, and how fat they were had no
>>> relation to how fat their adoptive parents were.

>>
>> Over the years, I've seen many shows

>
> How many shows?
>
>> with "seperated at birth"
>> twins, and iun every single case, when reunited as adults, both were
>> either "thin", "normal" or "fat". Nature, not nurture.


I saw a TV programme a while back in which some identical twins were of very
different weights -- and where one of each pair had antibodies to the 'fat
virus', and the other didn't.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/854584.stm

T.



Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
There is a video out I saw called "Loose Change" blew me away..google it, also "Hijacking Catastrophe"..tells all riceowlex@yahoo.com misc.fitness.weights 0 04-29-2007 02:27 PM
"LA Fitness" AND "Body of Change" Personal Training is a Major Scam and Rip Off! Beware! steven5000@gmail.com misc.fitness.weights 0 03-02-2007 04:29 AM
"Friends are born, not made." !!!! By: "Henry Brooks Adams" studyjokes@yahoo.com alt.support.arthritis 1 02-02-2007 01:47 PM
Anyone here typed the words "miserable failure" into "I'm feeling lucky" on Google? Wayne misc.fitness.weights 59 01-01-2007 03:20 AM
"'03 sees fall in breast cancer rate" Mike alt.support.cancer.breast 0 12-16-2006 01:24 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:41 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0
     
   
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41