dkw12002@yahoo.com wrote:
> Holly cow, what a argumentative group. Let's see, body fat. I am 11%
> body fat and that is quite low for men and I would not want to go
> lower. Women need somewhat higher body fat. I never said you should be
> so low as 4-6 percent. Where did THAT come from?
That's what you'd have to be at to lose the subcutaneous abdominal fat.
People doing photo shoots of six packs get that low for the photo shoot.
> Anyway, my point about loose skin is that one should get down to their
> ideal weight before any surgery is performed.
No, you said that they just need to lose more fat. Then you offensively
said,
> Here's what I mean. When you see those horrible concentration films
> from WWII, you never ever see those skinny, starved bodies with a bunch
> of loose, flabby skin hanging off them. Why? Surely a few of them were
> fat before they became prisoners, yet through starvation, they lost all
> the weight and all the extra skin.
So, a.) you're using data from holocaust victims and
b.) you're INFERRING you've seen all versions of pannus because
apparently you've had the opportunity to view people's naked starving
body and you've assumed that you've seen all versions of naked starved
bodies from your data set.
You're really, really, really offensive as well as stupid.
> You infer far too much and try to counter points that I didn't even try
> to make. It makes me think you know I'm probably right, but you don't
> like the facts anyway. LOL dkw
I thought it was quite amazing that you took this as a form of agreeing
with you. You are absolutely completely 100% wrong.
Dally