<!-- google_ad_section_start -->Recommendations for Digital Scale?<!-- google_ad_section_end -->
Health Forums

Go Back   Health Forums > Fitness and Nutrition > Diet > alt.support.diet

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-09-2006, 08:14 AM
Matty \(I Weighed More Than Jared From Subway\)
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Recommendations for Digital Scale?



Seeing as how the doctor's office I visit for my monthly weigh-ins still
hasn't had their scale fixed (3 weeks and counting), I told my wife that if
we had some extra money this month we should look into getting a digital
scale for home.

I have been reluctant to do so because of my personality, sometimes I get
obsessed with things and thought that by having a scale at home I'd being
weighing in everyday and obsessing about the gain or loss (I know weight
fluctuates daily but when I get in a tizzy, rationality goes out the
window).

I did notice that most scales go up to 280lbs, which was the other reason
for not getting one earlier - I weighed too much.

Can anyone recommend a model or models and what to look for. Before it is
said, I know I can Google the information but I would rather get opinions
from people that have actually used the scale(s).

On my Yourself!Fitness program one of the little loading screen tidbits
mentioned that 75% of those in a study showed that they maintained weight
loss by weighing themselves on a weekly basis. So that's another positive
for getting a home scale.

I am so excited to see so many new posters in this group! Welcome!


Matty (I weighed more than Jared from Subway)
481/248/225
(starting weight/current weight/goal weight)

First mini goal achieved - 104lbs lost 10/26/04
Second mini goal achieved - 137lbs lost 01/28/05
Third mini goal achieved - 183lbs lost 09/30/05
Fourth mini goal achieved - 204lbs total lost 01/30/06
Fifth mini goal achieved - 233lbs total lost by 08/31/06
Sixt mini goal - 256lbs total lost by 02/24/2007


Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-09-2006, 08:14 AM
Del Cecchi
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Recommendations for Digital Scale?

Matty (I Weighed More Than Jared From Subway) wrote:
> Seeing as how the doctor's office I visit for my monthly weigh-ins still
> hasn't had their scale fixed (3 weeks and counting), I told my wife that if
> we had some extra money this month we should look into getting a digital
> scale for home.
>
> I have been reluctant to do so because of my personality, sometimes I get
> obsessed with things and thought that by having a scale at home I'd being
> weighing in everyday and obsessing about the gain or loss (I know weight
> fluctuates daily but when I get in a tizzy, rationality goes out the
> window).
>
> I did notice that most scales go up to 280lbs, which was the other reason
> for not getting one earlier - I weighed too much.
>
> Can anyone recommend a model or models and what to look for. Before it is
> said, I know I can Google the information but I would rather get opinions
> from people that have actually used the scale(s).
>
> On my Yourself!Fitness program one of the little loading screen tidbits
> mentioned that 75% of those in a study showed that they maintained weight
> loss by weighing themselves on a weekly basis. So that's another positive
> for getting a home scale.
>
> I am so excited to see so many new posters in this group! Welcome!
>
>
> Matty (I weighed more than Jared from Subway)
> 481/248/225
> (starting weight/current weight/goal weight)
>
> First mini goal achieved - 104lbs lost 10/26/04
> Second mini goal achieved - 137lbs lost 01/28/05
> Third mini goal achieved - 183lbs lost 09/30/05
> Fourth mini goal achieved - 204lbs total lost 01/30/06
> Fifth mini goal achieved - 233lbs total lost by 08/31/06
> Sixt mini goal - 256lbs total lost by 02/24/2007
>
>

Note that some digital scales seem to store previous values of weight
internally and redisplay the old value instead of a new value for a
period of time, or something like that. So if you weigh and then drink
some water and weigh again the reading will be the same. I think they
do it so the scale appears more accurate. This seems especially to
affect small changes.



--
Del Cecchi
"This post is my own and doesn’t necessarily represent IBM’s positions,
strategies or opinions.”
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-09-2006, 08:14 AM
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Recommendations for Digital Scale?

Matty (I Weighed More Than Jared From Subway) <Idontthinkso@spammy.net> kirjoitti 20.10.2006:
> I did notice that most scales go up to 280lbs, which was the other reason
> for not getting one earlier - I weighed too much.
>
> Can anyone recommend a model or models and what to look for.


I bought a Beurer GSXXL (max 200 kg) a couple of months ago. It has
worked fairly well.

--
183/171/85 kg
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-09-2006, 08:14 AM
Beverly
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Recommendations for Digital Scale?

I've always been pleased with Tanita scales. They're reliable and about as
accurate as any other brand. www.tanita.com

I have one similar to this model. It weighs and measures body fat in .2
increments.
http://www.amazon.com/Tanita-BF680-S...?ie=UTF8&s=hpc

Beverly






"Matty (I Weighed More Than Jared From Subway)" <Idontthinkso@spammy.net>
wrote in message news:12jhenfeok5564d@corp.supernews.com...
>
>
> Seeing as how the doctor's office I visit for my monthly weigh-ins still
> hasn't had their scale fixed (3 weeks and counting), I told my wife that

if
> we had some extra money this month we should look into getting a digital
> scale for home.
>
> I have been reluctant to do so because of my personality, sometimes I get
> obsessed with things and thought that by having a scale at home I'd being
> weighing in everyday and obsessing about the gain or loss (I know weight
> fluctuates daily but when I get in a tizzy, rationality goes out the
> window).
>
> I did notice that most scales go up to 280lbs, which was the other reason
> for not getting one earlier - I weighed too much.
>
> Can anyone recommend a model or models and what to look for. Before it is
> said, I know I can Google the information but I would rather get opinions
> from people that have actually used the scale(s).
>
> On my Yourself!Fitness program one of the little loading screen tidbits
> mentioned that 75% of those in a study showed that they maintained weight
> loss by weighing themselves on a weekly basis. So that's another positive
> for getting a home scale.
>
> I am so excited to see so many new posters in this group! Welcome!
>
>
> Matty (I weighed more than Jared from Subway)
> 481/248/225
> (starting weight/current weight/goal weight)
>
> First mini goal achieved - 104lbs lost 10/26/04
> Second mini goal achieved - 137lbs lost 01/28/05
> Third mini goal achieved - 183lbs lost 09/30/05
> Fourth mini goal achieved - 204lbs total lost 01/30/06
> Fifth mini goal achieved - 233lbs total lost by 08/31/06
> Sixt mini goal - 256lbs total lost by 02/24/2007
>
>



Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-09-2006, 08:14 AM
Bill Eitner
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Recommendations for Digital Scale?

Scale weight is only one measure, and it's the
most misleading. The reason it's popular is
because it's an easy measurement to make. I'm
probably not telling you anything you don't
already know. So, with that in mind, if you
think about it, there's no need to get too
fancy as far as a scale goes. I use a Health-O-
Meter HAP200 analog scale that works fine.
I bought it because of its high capacity (400+)
and reasonable price 4 years ago. It's a good
solid scale at a good price.
--
Matty (I Weighed More Than Jared From Subway) wrote:
> Seeing as how the doctor's office I visit for my monthly weigh-ins still
> hasn't had their scale fixed (3 weeks and counting), I told my wife that if
> we had some extra money this month we should look into getting a digital
> scale for home.
>
> I have been reluctant to do so because of my personality, sometimes I get
> obsessed with things and thought that by having a scale at home I'd being
> weighing in everyday and obsessing about the gain or loss (I know weight
> fluctuates daily but when I get in a tizzy, rationality goes out the
> window).
>
> I did notice that most scales go up to 280lbs, which was the other reason
> for not getting one earlier - I weighed too much.
>
> Can anyone recommend a model or models and what to look for. Before it is
> said, I know I can Google the information but I would rather get opinions
> from people that have actually used the scale(s).
>
> On my Yourself!Fitness program one of the little loading screen tidbits
> mentioned that 75% of those in a study showed that they maintained weight
> loss by weighing themselves on a weekly basis. So that's another positive
> for getting a home scale.
>
> I am so excited to see so many new posters in this group! Welcome!
>
>
> Matty (I weighed more than Jared from Subway)
> 481/248/225
> (starting weight/current weight/goal weight)
>
> First mini goal achieved - 104lbs lost 10/26/04
> Second mini goal achieved - 137lbs lost 01/28/05
> Third mini goal achieved - 183lbs lost 09/30/05
> Fourth mini goal achieved - 204lbs total lost 01/30/06
> Fifth mini goal achieved - 233lbs total lost by 08/31/06
> Sixt mini goal - 256lbs total lost by 02/24/2007
>
>

Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-09-2006, 08:14 AM
Anssi Saari
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Recommendations for Digital Scale?

"Matty \(I Weighed More Than Jared From Subway\)" <Idontthinkso@spammy.net> writes:

> Can anyone recommend a model or models and what to look for. Before it is
> said, I know I can Google the information but I would rather get opinions
> from people that have actually used the scale(s).


Well, probably what's in shops around here in Finland isn't what's in
shops around there. Tanita for example doesn't seem to have a real
distributor for their consumer scales. But there are some things that
can be annoying in a digital scale:

1. Consistency. I once had this scale where if I weighed myself twice
in a row, sometimes I was suddenly a kilo heavier or lighter. Just by
stepping off and on again.

2. Superfast measuring. Some digital scales freeze the display very
quickly at some figure or another. Personal preference, but I like to
see the figure vary if I sway on the scale.

3. Weird batteries. Preferably get a scale that uses batteries that
are commonly available.

4. What happens when the battery is low? For example, my old Rowenta
scale starts showing higher numbers for a while and then only later
starts displaying the low battery indicator. This is probably
impossible to find out beforehand.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-09-2006, 08:14 AM
nkd_one
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Recommendations for Digital Scale?

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/cus...=3760901&s=hpc

i have this one from target...it goes to 330...the weight will change
from where you put your feet like a pound...other than that great scale
at a good price
Matty (I Weighed More Than Jared From Subway) wrote:
> Seeing as how the doctor's office I visit for my monthly weigh-ins still
> hasn't had their scale fixed (3 weeks and counting), I told my wife that if
> we had some extra money this month we should look into getting a digital
> scale for home.
>
> I have been reluctant to do so because of my personality, sometimes I get
> obsessed with things and thought that by having a scale at home I'd being
> weighing in everyday and obsessing about the gain or loss (I know weight
> fluctuates daily but when I get in a tizzy, rationality goes out the
> window).
>
> I did notice that most scales go up to 280lbs, which was the other reason
> for not getting one earlier - I weighed too much.
>
> Can anyone recommend a model or models and what to look for. Before it is
> said, I know I can Google the information but I would rather get opinions
> from people that have actually used the scale(s).
>
> On my Yourself!Fitness program one of the little loading screen tidbits
> mentioned that 75% of those in a study showed that they maintained weight
> loss by weighing themselves on a weekly basis. So that's another positive
> for getting a home scale.
>
> I am so excited to see so many new posters in this group! Welcome!
>
>
> Matty (I weighed more than Jared from Subway)
> 481/248/225
> (starting weight/current weight/goal weight)
>
> First mini goal achieved - 104lbs lost 10/26/04
> Second mini goal achieved - 137lbs lost 01/28/05
> Third mini goal achieved - 183lbs lost 09/30/05
> Fourth mini goal achieved - 204lbs total lost 01/30/06
> Fifth mini goal achieved - 233lbs total lost by 08/31/06
> Sixt mini goal - 256lbs total lost by 02/24/2007


Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-09-2006, 08:14 AM
Matty
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Recommendations for Digital Scale?


Got a digital scale last night -
http://www.amazon.com/Taylor-5571P-P...380768?ie=UTF8.
Needed to as the scale I use at the doctor's office has been broken for
the past 3 weeks. My worst fears have been confirmed, I gained 8lbs
over the past 7 weeks(yes I was wearing the same clothes as I do when I
go to the doctor's office). I know again that I really cannot compare
readings between the two scales, but I tend to think that this is an
accurate reading since it is in line with what the traditional beam
scales showed.

Now I have been going over in calories a little more than usual
(100cal-200cal), but cannot think of how that could cause an 8lb gain.
Must be miscalculating calories again. Need to get more strict in the
weighing and measuring, thought I'd learned that lesson once already. I
think I may increase my exercise time as well, possibly add another day
of jogging and biking to the schedule.

Am I a little, teensy bit depressed? Sure, but I will continue to press
on towards the goal. At least I will be able to track my progress at
home weekly as well as check the doctor's scale monthly...

Matty (I weighed more than Jared from Subway)
481/256/225
(starting weight/current weight/goal weight)


First mini goal achieved - 104lbs lost 10/26/04
Second mini goal achieved - 137lbs lost 01/28/05
Third mini goal achieved - 183lbs lost 09/30/05
Fourth mini goal achieved - 204lbs total lost 01/30/06
Fifth mini goal - 239lbs total lost by 01/31/07

Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-09-2006, 08:14 AM
Phil M.
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Recommendations for Digital Scale?

Matty wrote:

> Can anyone recommend a model or models and what to look for. Before it
> is said, I know I can Google the information but I would rather get
> opinions from people that have actually used the scale(s).


I think most people that have used the Tanita scales are satisfied with
them. I've had my Tanita TBF-551 for over 8 years. I recently bought an
Omron handheld BF monitor <http://tinyurl.com/qc9dn> for measuring BF%
and use the Tanita for weight only. The Omron is much more accurate for
BF%. Maybe the newer Tanitas are better. I like the accuracy of the
Tanita because I sometimes weigh myself after running to make sure that
I've been hydrating properly.

--
Phil M.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-09-2006, 08:14 AM
teachrmama
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Recommendations for Digital Scale?


"Phil M." <pmarg@charter.net> wrote in message
news:Xns986368FFF8C72seilogramp@216.77.188.18...
> Matty wrote:
>
>> Can anyone recommend a model or models and what to look for. Before it
>> is said, I know I can Google the information but I would rather get
>> opinions from people that have actually used the scale(s).

>
> I think most people that have used the Tanita scales are satisfied with
> them. I've had my Tanita TBF-551 for over 8 years. I recently bought an
> Omron handheld BF monitor <http://tinyurl.com/qc9dn> for measuring BF%
> and use the Tanita for weight only. The Omron is much more accurate for
> BF%. Maybe the newer Tanitas are better. I like the accuracy of the
> Tanita because I sometimes weigh myself after running to make sure that
> I've been hydrating properly.


My daughter has recently taken up running 5Ks. How do you check to see if
you are hydrating properly before when running? It's one of the things I am
concerned about with her, as well as her eating properly before she runs to
give her optimal energy.


Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 11-09-2006, 08:14 AM
teachrmama
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Recommendations for Digital Scale?


"Anssi Saari" <as@sci.fi> wrote in message
news:vg3d58look9.fsf@pepper.modeemi.cs.tut.fi...
> "Matty \(I Weighed More Than Jared From Subway\)"
> <Idontthinkso@spammy.net> writes:
>
>> Can anyone recommend a model or models and what to look for. Before it is
>> said, I know I can Google the information but I would rather get opinions
>> from people that have actually used the scale(s).

>
> Well, probably what's in shops around here in Finland isn't what's in
> shops around there. Tanita for example doesn't seem to have a real
> distributor for their consumer scales. But there are some things that
> can be annoying in a digital scale:
>
> 1. Consistency. I once had this scale where if I weighed myself twice
> in a row, sometimes I was suddenly a kilo heavier or lighter. Just by
> stepping off and on again.
>
> 2. Superfast measuring. Some digital scales freeze the display very
> quickly at some figure or another. Personal preference, but I like to
> see the figure vary if I sway on the scale.
>
> 3. Weird batteries. Preferably get a scale that uses batteries that
> are commonly available.
>
> 4. What happens when the battery is low? For example, my old Rowenta
> scale starts showing higher numbers for a while and then only later
> starts displaying the low battery indicator. This is probably
> impossible to find out beforehand.


Ooooh--now *that* would be unnerving! I can't imagine how shocking it would
be to see the numbers start climbing just because the scale battery was low!


Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11-09-2006, 08:14 AM
Bill Eitner
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Recommendations for Digital Scale?

Anssi Saari wrote:
> "Matty \(I Weighed More Than Jared From Subway\)" <Idontthinkso@spammy.net> writes:
>
>> Can anyone recommend a model or models and what to look for. Before it is
>> said, I know I can Google the information but I would rather get opinions
>> from people that have actually used the scale(s).

>
> Well, probably what's in shops around here in Finland isn't what's in
> shops around there. Tanita for example doesn't seem to have a real
> distributor for their consumer scales. But there are some things that
> can be annoying in a digital scale:
>
> 1. Consistency. I once had this scale where if I weighed myself twice
> in a row, sometimes I was suddenly a kilo heavier or lighter. Just by
> stepping off and on again.
>
> 2. Superfast measuring. Some digital scales freeze the display very
> quickly at some figure or another. Personal preference, but I like to
> see the figure vary if I sway on the scale.
>
> 3. Weird batteries. Preferably get a scale that uses batteries that
> are commonly available.
>
> 4. What happens when the battery is low? For example, my old Rowenta
> scale starts showing higher numbers for a while and then only later
> starts displaying the low battery indicator. This is probably
> impossible to find out beforehand.


These are excellent points, and are part of the reason why
I recommended an analog scale. I had a digital scale and
prefer the analog scale I have now due to some of the items
mentioned above. Body weight is only one measure and is
the most misleading. Tracking the trend over a period of
time is the only real info that can be gained by regular
weighing. Any decent scale can handle that. It doesn't
have to be expensive and/or digital. It doesn't have to
be accurate to show whether the trend is upward or downward.
In other words, a relative scale of say 1-100 would be just
as useful as pounds or kilos.

A full length mirror, a tailors tape, skinfold calipers,
pieces of clothing that are too small; those are tools
that are of more use and that provide more direct feedback.
--
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 11-09-2006, 08:14 AM
Phil M.
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Recommendations for Digital Scale?

teachrmama@iwon.com wrote:

> My daughter has recently taken up running 5Ks. How do you check to
> see if you are hydrating properly before when running? It's one of
> the things I am concerned about with her, as well as her eating
> properly before she runs to give her optimal energy.


The 5k distance doesn't normally require too much extra concern. However,
in training for a 5k it may be that you're running for an hour or more. One
way to make sure you're maintaining proper hydration is to check the color
of your urine and compare the tint to this chart http://tinyurl.com/co5ah.
If your urine is light straw colored, you're drinking enough. The more you
drink regularly, rather than waiting to be thirsty, the more you'll have
onboard when you start your run. Plain water is perfect for a 5k. No need
for extra electolytes or carbohydrates. When the time running gets into the
3+ hour range, then the dangers of hyponatremia start to come into play. In
which case it is extremely important to get enough sodium, usually via a
sports drink or sodium capsules. But for a 5k, if you're hydrating on a
regular basis and you're getting enough sodium in your diet, then there is
little need for concern.

Since you asked, and since the topic if this post is about digital scales,
here's some information from the book, "Performing In Extreme
Environments."


Finding Your Sweat Rate

1. Record body weight before and after 1 hour of exercise or rest in heat.
2. Calculate the difference (D) between these rates.
3. If clothing is wet, the increase in clothing weight should be noted
by weighing it before and after heat exposure. This increase in weight
represents sweat that was produced but remained in the fabric, and
should be added to D (step 2 above). If nude body weight is taken, this
step can be ignored.
4. The weight of fluid consumed during step 1 should be added to D.
5. The weight of urine lost during step 1 should be subracted from D.
6. Your hourly sweat rate (in kg/h) equals D (step 2), after correcting
for the items in steps 3-5.
7. Weight loss should be replaced by consuming 1 L of fluid for each
kilogram of body weight that was lost.

According to the book, the typical water loss for a marathoner
(5:00-10:00/mi pace) is 1-1.5 L/h. For me personally, I'll drink about 20-
32 oz of something about 2 hours before a run/race. That will allow the
extra fluids to be urinated before the start. Then 10 minutes before
starting I'll have 12-20 oz of sports drink. That will ensure the fluid is
used and not cause the urge to urinate while running. During hot weather
conditions I'll drink about 12 oz of sports drink every 20-30 minutes,
depending on the heat, intensity, and duration of the run.

--
Phil M.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 11-09-2006, 08:14 AM
teachrmama
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Recommendations for Digital Scale?

Thank you very much, Phil! =c)

"Phil M." <pmarg@charter.net> wrote in message
news:Xns9863B3F4E3A42seilogramp@216.77.188.18...
> teachrmama@iwon.com wrote:
>
>> My daughter has recently taken up running 5Ks. How do you check to
>> see if you are hydrating properly before when running? It's one of
>> the things I am concerned about with her, as well as her eating
>> properly before she runs to give her optimal energy.

>
> The 5k distance doesn't normally require too much extra concern. However,
> in training for a 5k it may be that you're running for an hour or more.
> One
> way to make sure you're maintaining proper hydration is to check the color
> of your urine and compare the tint to this chart http://tinyurl.com/co5ah.
> If your urine is light straw colored, you're drinking enough. The more you
> drink regularly, rather than waiting to be thirsty, the more you'll have
> onboard when you start your run. Plain water is perfect for a 5k. No need
> for extra electolytes or carbohydrates. When the time running gets into
> the
> 3+ hour range, then the dangers of hyponatremia start to come into play.
> In
> which case it is extremely important to get enough sodium, usually via a
> sports drink or sodium capsules. But for a 5k, if you're hydrating on a
> regular basis and you're getting enough sodium in your diet, then there is
> little need for concern.
>
> Since you asked, and since the topic if this post is about digital scales,
> here's some information from the book, "Performing In Extreme
> Environments."
>
>
> Finding Your Sweat Rate
>
> 1. Record body weight before and after 1 hour of exercise or rest in heat.
> 2. Calculate the difference (D) between these rates.
> 3. If clothing is wet, the increase in clothing weight should be noted
> by weighing it before and after heat exposure. This increase in weight
> represents sweat that was produced but remained in the fabric, and
> should be added to D (step 2 above). If nude body weight is taken, this
> step can be ignored.
> 4. The weight of fluid consumed during step 1 should be added to D.
> 5. The weight of urine lost during step 1 should be subracted from D.
> 6. Your hourly sweat rate (in kg/h) equals D (step 2), after correcting
> for the items in steps 3-5.
> 7. Weight loss should be replaced by consuming 1 L of fluid for each
> kilogram of body weight that was lost.
>
> According to the book, the typical water loss for a marathoner
> (5:00-10:00/mi pace) is 1-1.5 L/h. For me personally, I'll drink about 20-
> 32 oz of something about 2 hours before a run/race. That will allow the
> extra fluids to be urinated before the start. Then 10 minutes before
> starting I'll have 12-20 oz of sports drink. That will ensure the fluid is
> used and not cause the urge to urinate while running. During hot weather
> conditions I'll drink about 12 oz of sports drink every 20-30 minutes,
> depending on the heat, intensity, and duration of the run.
>
> --
> Phil M.



Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 11-09-2006, 08:14 AM
Karen
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Recommendations for Digital Scale?

Tanita is the weigh to go

Karen




"Matty (I Weighed More Than Jared From Subway)"
<Idontthinkso@spammy.net> wrote in message news> Seeing as how the doctor's
office I visit for my monthly weigh-ins still
> hasn't had their scale fixed (3 weeks and counting), I told my wife that
> if




Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
headphone recommendations LFM alt.support.diet 2 11-09-2006 08:14 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:16 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0
     
   
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41