FurPaw <furrealpawdog@gmail.com> wrote in
news:kN6dndPpLM_KSffbnZ2dnUVZ_jidnZ2d@comcast.com:
> So your doctor gives you a prescription for Prozac. Why might
> he/she choose this drug? Maybe last week the sales rep from Eli
> Lilly had looked at your doctor's prescribing habits and used
>
What I find most disturbing about this whole thing is that it indicates
that doctors think that the information they get from drug reps is
reliable except for this sort of thing.
If they can't or won't take the time to investigate drugs for themselves,
and their association can't or won't do it either, why are they whining
about Big Pharm? Big Pharm has found a way to make their sales pitches a
little better. Good for them. The AMA makes megabucks selling the
information to Big Pharm. Hooray. But none of that relieves the doctor
of his responsibility to prescribe responsibly.
Laws to keep prescribing information private are missing the point
entirely: doctors are completely ignorant about what they're prescribing
except for what they're told by drug reps. That's the scandal, not how
the drug reps try to push their product.
The bottom line is just what it's always been: you have to be your own
doctor. It's just a damn shame that you have to pay the doctor so much
so that you can go tell him what to prescribe for you.
Chak
--
Because we don't think about future generations, they will never forget
us.
--Henrik Tikkanen