[OT] Camou eyeshadow

How could I have lived for nearly 62 years without this?

http://www.bellasugar.com/808144

FurPaw
--
We can be absolutely certain only about things we do not understand.
-Eric Hoffer

To reply, unleash the dog.

"FurPaw" <furrealpawdog@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:hfq0mj$uqi$1@news.eternal-september.org...
> How could I have lived for nearly 62 years without this?
>
> http://www.bellasugar.com/808144

Rather easily. ;-)

I'd have the huge urge to blend the colors together more - the lines of
demarcation are too defined, IMO!

Cathy

On Dec 9, 9:24�pm, FurPaw <furrealpaw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> How could I have lived for nearly 62 years without this?
>
> http://www.bellasugar.com/808144
>
> FurPaw
> --
> We can be absolutely certain only about things we do not understand.
> -Eric Hoffer
>
> To reply, unleash the dog.

And I've lived 65 years without it <G>

x-no-archive: Yes

FurPaw wrote:
> How could I have lived for nearly 62 years without this?
>
> http://www.bellasugar.com/808144
>

Some folks just have waaaaaay to much time on their hands.

:-)

Susan

"Susan" <susan@nothanks.org> wrote in message
news:7ofbaaF3q9pgaU1@mid.individual.net...
> x-no-archive: Yes
>
> FurPaw wrote:
>> How could I have lived for nearly 62 years without this?
>>
>> http://www.bellasugar.com/808144
>>
>
> Some folks just have waaaaaay to much time on their hands.
>
> :-)
>
> Susan

The ones who designed it or the ones who wear it? Or both? ;-)

Cathy

Cathy wrote:
> "Susan" <susan@nothanks.org> wrote in message
> news:7ofbaaF3q9pgaU1@mid.individual.net...
>> x-no-archive: Yes
>>
>> FurPaw wrote:
>>> How could I have lived for nearly 62 years without this?
>>>
>>> http://www.bellasugar.com/808144
>>>
>> Some folks just have waaaaaay to much time on their hands.
>>
>> :-)
>>
>> Susan
>
> The ones who designed it or the ones who wear it? Or both? ;-)
>
> Cathy

Or those who follow a link seen on Facebook and post it to a
newsgroup? :-P

FurPaw

--
We can be absolutely certain only about things we do not understand.
-Eric Hoffer

To reply, unleash the dog.

Susan wrote:
> x-no-archive: Yes
>
> FurPaw wrote:
>> How could I have lived for nearly 62 years without this?
>>
>> http://www.bellasugar.com/808144
>>
>
> Some folks just have waaaaaay to much time on their hands.
>
> :-)
>
> Susan


8~) Some have too much *money* on their hands, too!
If had an extra $30 ...

2 CD's
or several paperbacks
or a jug of my favorite protein powder
or a handbag on sale at JC Penney
or, hell, the bell-ringer's kettle!

But hey, to each her own!

--
pax,
ruth

Save trees AND money! Buy used books!
http://stores.ebay.com/Noir-and-More-Books-and-Trains

x-no-archive: yes

Cathy wrote:
>
> The ones who designed it or the ones who wear it? Or both? ;-)
>

Yes to BOTH!

Susan

Susan wrote:
> x-no-archive: Yes
>
> FurPaw wrote:
>> How could I have lived for nearly 62 years without this?
>>
>> http://www.bellasugar.com/808144
>>
>
> Some folks just have waaaaaay to much time on their hands.
>
>

Well, I think this is aimed at those who have too little time on their
hands!

--
Jette Goldie
jette.goldie@gmail.com
http://www.flickr.com/photos/wolfette/
http://www.jette.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/
http://wolfette.livejournal.com/
("reply to" is spamblocked - use the email addy in sig)

"FurPaw" <furrealpawdog@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:hfu6j3$6f7$1@news.eternal-september.org...
> Cathy wrote:
>> "Susan" <susan@nothanks.org> wrote in message
>> news:7ofbaaF3q9pgaU1@mid.individual.net...
>>> x-no-archive: Yes
>>>
>>> FurPaw wrote:
>>>> How could I have lived for nearly 62 years without this?
>>>>
>>>> http://www.bellasugar.com/808144
>>>>
>>> Some folks just have waaaaaay to much time on their hands.
>>>
>>> :-)
>>>
>>> Susan
>>
>> The ones who designed it or the ones who wear it? Or both? ;-)
>>
>> Cathy
>
> Or those who follow a link seen on Facebook and post it to a newsgroup?
> :-P

Oh, yes, then there are those. Well... ;-P

Cathy

On Dec 11, 8:46�am, Susan <su...@nothanks.org> wrote:
> x-no-archive: Yes
>
> FurPaw wrote:
> > How could I have lived for nearly 62 years without this?
>
> >http://www.bellasugar.com/808144
>
> Some folks just have waaaaaay to much time on their hands.
>

People with too much time on their hands could also participate in the
Annual Haggis Hunt, now in progress at

http://haggishunt.scotsman.com/

Cathy <clfr@roadrunner.com> wrote:

> "FurPaw" <furrealpawdog@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:hfq0mj$uqi$1@news.eternal-september.org...
> > How could I have lived for nearly 62 years without this?

I know I managed. :-)

I'm someone who used to blend three eyeshadows to get a certain look. As
I got older, I simplified my make-up bag. These pads would be excellent
for those few times I want to wear fancier make-up for a party, in
one-off current-fashion colors.

> > http://www.bellasugar.com/808144
>
> Rather easily. ;-)

The camouflage is gimmicky, but check out the other photos; the other
examples are regular eye make-up.

> I'd have the huge urge to blend the colors together more - the lines of
> demarcation are too defined, IMO!

I kept wondering how you were supposed to blend that, but realized after
seeing the other pics, that it's supposed to look like that.

--
Keera in Norway
http://kafox.blogspot.com/

"FurPaw" <furrealpawdog@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:hfq0mj$uqi$1@news.eternal-september.org...
> How could I have lived for nearly 62 years without this?
>
> http://www.bellasugar.com/808144
>
> FurPaw
> --
> We can be absolutely certain only about things we do not understand.
> -Eric Hoffer
>
> To reply, unleash the dog.

Avon had a similar gimmick. A friend of mine boughy some from an Avon Rep
friend of hers and gave me two packs (sometihng like 6 or 8 press-ons for
about $7). I didn't like the shades (very frosty) but I tried it out of
curiosity. It's harder than blending your own. First the colors don't
come out evenly, then because eyes aren't even, and neither are my fingers,
the stupid things go on lopsided. I mean, to make it look good, the
different colors have to be on the exact same spots of your two eye (i.e. my
angles weren't exact, so one side had the middle shade--it waas a 3 shae
desigh--higher than the other. I tried it a second time, and decided it
certainly wasn't worth the inconvenience, never mind the cost.

What looks good in theory doesn't always work in practice.

"Jette Goldie" <jgoldie247@btinternet.com> wrote in message
news:hfuemf$k8n$1@news.eternal-september.org...
> Susan wrote:
>> x-no-archive: Yes
>>
>> FurPaw wrote:
>>> How could I have lived for nearly 62 years without this?
>>>
>>> http://www.bellasugar.com/808144
>>>
>>
>> Some folks just have waaaaaay to much time on their hands.
>>
>
> Well, I think this is aimed at those who have too little time on their
> hands!
>
> --

See my earlier post. This is way more time=consuming.


> Jette Goldie
> jette.goldie@gmail.com
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/wolfette/
> http://www.jette.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/
> http://wolfette.livejournal.com/
> ("reply to" is spamblocked - use the email addy in sig)

"Peahen" <peahen1955@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:hg37ju$v14$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>
> "FurPaw" <furrealpawdog@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:hfq0mj$uqi$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>> How could I have lived for nearly 62 years without this?
>>
>> http://www.bellasugar.com/808144
>>
>> FurPaw
>> --
>> We can be absolutely certain only about things we do not understand.
>> -Eric Hoffer
>>
>> To reply, unleash the dog.
>
> Avon had a similar gimmick. A friend of mine boughy some from an Avon Rep
> friend of hers and gave me two packs (sometihng like 6 or 8 press-ons for
> about $7). I didn't like the shades (very frosty) but I tried it out of
> curiosity. It's harder than blending your own. First the colors don't
> come out evenly, then because eyes aren't even, and neither are my
> fingers, the stupid things go on lopsided. I mean, to make it look good,
> the different colors have to be on the exact same spots of your two eye
> (i.e. my angles weren't exact, so one side had the middle shade--it waas a
> 3 shae desigh--higher than the other. I tried it a second time, and
> decided it certainly wasn't worth the inconvenience, never mind the cost.
>
> What looks good in theory doesn't always work in practice.
>

My typos prove my point about the shaky fingers. ;-)