OT Straight women and gay men have similar brains

And so do lesbians and straight women - according to a new study.

Who knew?

http://www.bulletinboards.com/TreeMs...Calling=No&x=x

On Jun 16, 1:27�pm, bevjo...@live.com wrote:
> And so do lesbians and straight women - according to a new study.
>
> Who knew?
>
How about heterosexual and homosexual men? Or Eunuchs? And what
definition of "similar" is being used? It all seems very subjective to
me. One wonders if this study could be replicated by other researchers
on a different group of people, to eliminate bias?

In article
<3b9ff9cd-80b3-458c-b373-f00cf5ef1d00@b1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>,
bevjonas@live.com wrote:

> And so do lesbians and straight women - according to a new study.

Does that mean that only straight men have abberant brains? Hmmmm....

Priscilla

On Jun 17, 8:51�am, "Priscilla H. Ballou" <vze23...@verizon.net>
wrote:
> In article
> <3b9ff9cd-80b3-458c-b373-f00cf5ef1...@b1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>,
>
> �bevjo...@live.com wrote:
> > And so do lesbians and straight women - according to a new study.
>
> Does that mean that only straight men have abberant brains? �Hmmmm.....

And would these "findings" apply to the animal Kingdom, such as cats
and dogs and other pets? <G>

(Pause to contemplate the idea that Fluffy, being female, is non-
abberant)

Priscilla H. Ballou <vze23t8n@verizon.net> wrote:

> In article
> <3b9ff9cd-80b3-458c-b373-f00cf5ef1d00@b1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>,
> bevjonas@live.com wrote:
>
> > And so do lesbians and straight women - according to a new study.

Typo. It's lesbians and straight men. Rather small sample to reach any
conclusion with.

> Does that mean that only straight men have abberant brains? Hmmmm....

No, some straight women do, too. (What the F is a window treatment? Is
it a massage for pane removal?)

--
Keera in Norway * Think big and then ask for more.
http://home.online.no/~kafox/

On Jun 18, 7:48�am, thinkbig.shrinkto...@online.no (Keera Ann Fox)
wrote:
> Priscilla H. Ballou <vze23...@verizon.net> wrote:
>
> > In article
> > <3b9ff9cd-80b3-458c-b373-f00cf5ef1...@b1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>,
> > �bevjo...@live.com wrote:
>
> > > And so do lesbians and straight women - according to a new study.
>
> Typo. It's lesbians and straight men. Rather small sample to reach any
> conclusion with.
>
> > Does that mean that only straight men have abberant brains? �Hmmmm....
>
> No, some straight women do, too. (What the F is a window treatment? Is
> it a massage for pane removal?)

Perhaps it is a technique to make things Perfectly Clear?

no, you mean lesbians and STRAIGHT MEN
<bevjonas@live.com> wrote in message
news:3b9ff9cd-80b3-458c-b373-f00cf5ef1d00@b1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
> And so do lesbians and straight women - according to a new study.
>
> Who knew?
>
> http://www.bulletinboards.com/TreeMs...Calling=No&x=x
>

In article <1iiqp5d.ukrijr1q4sp8gN%thinkbig.shrinktofit@onlin e.no>,
thinkbig.shrinktofit@online.no (Keera Ann Fox) wrote:

> Priscilla H. Ballou <vze23t8n@verizon.net> wrote:
>
> > In article
> > <3b9ff9cd-80b3-458c-b373-f00cf5ef1d00@b1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>,
> > bevjonas@live.com wrote:
> >
> > > And so do lesbians and straight women - according to a new study.
>
> Typo. It's lesbians and straight men. Rather small sample to reach any
> conclusion with.

Oh, now that is total pish-tosh. Lesbians are about as different from
straight men as one can be!

Now that there's more freedom for trans people to come out of the closet
and even transition, there is a growing number of people who previously
identified as lesbians who are now identifying as FTMs. Once that gets
sorted out, I think they might want to do that study again.

Priscilla, queer female by birth and nature

Priscilla H. Ballou <vze23t8n@verizon.net> wrote:

> In article <1iiqp5d.ukrijr1q4sp8gN%thinkbig.shrinktofit@onlin e.no>,
> thinkbig.shrinktofit@online.no (Keera Ann Fox) wrote:
>
> > Priscilla H. Ballou <vze23t8n@verizon.net> wrote:
> >
> > > In article
> > > <3b9ff9cd-80b3-458c-b373-f00cf5ef1d00@b1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>,
> > > bevjonas@live.com wrote:
> > >
> > > > And so do lesbians and straight women - according to a new study.
> >
> > Typo. It's lesbians and straight men. Rather small sample to reach any
> > conclusion with.
>
> Oh, now that is total pish-tosh. Lesbians are about as different from
> straight men as one can be!
>
> Now that there's more freedom for trans people to come out of the closet
> and even transition, there is a growing number of people who previously
> identified as lesbians who are now identifying as FTMs. Once that gets
> sorted out, I think they might want to do that study again.
>
> Priscilla, queer female by birth and nature

Exactly. The sample's too small and humans too flexible (and confused)
for the study to be conclusive. I myself can see the attraction of women
though I still seek men, so I consider myself a heterosexual-dominant
bi-sexual. If there is such a thing.

--
Keera in Norway * Think big and then ask for more.
http://home.online.no/~kafox/

In article <1iit2vy.10zrrev1m6ic1aN%thinkbig.shrinktofit@onli ne.no>,
thinkbig.shrinktofit@online.no (Keera Ann Fox) wrote:

> Exactly. The sample's too small and humans too flexible (and confused)
> for the study to be conclusive. I myself can see the attraction of women
> though I still seek men, so I consider myself a heterosexual-dominant
> bi-sexual. If there is such a thing.

Yeah, it's called a Kinsey 2. ;-)

Priscilla, a Kinsey 4

On Jun 23, 3:02�pm, "Priscilla H. Ballou" <vze23...@verizon.net>
wrote:
> In article <1iit2vy.10zrrev1m6ic1aN%thinkbig.shrinkto...@onli ne.no>,
> �thinkbig.shrinkto...@online.no (Keera Ann Fox) wrote:
>
> > Exactly. The sample's too small and humans too flexible (and confused)
> > for the study to be conclusive. I myself can see the attraction of women
> > though I still seek men, so I consider myself a heterosexual-dominant
> > bi-sexual. If there is such a thing.
>
> Yeah, it's called a Kinsey 2. �;-)
>
> Priscilla, a Kinsey 4

I suppose I am a Kinsey 0? <g>

Priscilla H. Ballou <vze23t8n@verizon.net> wrote:

> In article <1iit2vy.10zrrev1m6ic1aN%thinkbig.shrinktofit@onli ne.no>,
> thinkbig.shrinktofit@online.no (Keera Ann Fox) wrote:
>
> > Exactly. The sample's too small and humans too flexible (and confused)
> > for the study to be conclusive. I myself can see the attraction of women
> > though I still seek men, so I consider myself a heterosexual-dominant
> > bi-sexual. If there is such a thing.
>
> Yeah, it's called a Kinsey 2. ;-)
>
> Priscilla, a Kinsey 4

I learned something new. Thanks!

--
Keera in Norway * Think big and then ask for more.
http://home.online.no/~kafox/