JustGB wrote:
> admin@ng2000.com wrote:
>> The North American Menopause Society says bioidentical hormone
>> treatments might not be the best way to combat the symptoms of
>> menopause. The Early Show medical correspondent Dr. Emily Senay
>> explains the controversy.
>>
>> ===
>> Just one of Today's Top 10 Menopause Consumer News Stories:
>> http://www.ng2000.com/fw.php?tp=menopause
>
> This might be a better link directly to the story
>
> http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/...n2361388.shtml
I'm having a mixed reaction. On one hand, she points out that
there have been no clinical trials of bioidenticals, so there is
no direct information re their potential - helpful or harmful.
And suggests that people avoid programs like those pushed by
Suzanne Sommers. She spouts the standard line, take FDA approved
drugs only in the least amount and shortest time necessary to
help overcome severe hot flashes etc.
However. It can also be construed that she (and NAMS) is
directing consumers back into the Big Pharm fold - take only
those drugs that are manufactured by the major companies, which
have sought FDA approval for their drugs. That's always a
suspicion when NAMS is involved.
I found the comments following the article to be fascinating.
Most boil down to, "Don't even think of trying to take my
bioidenticals away from me!"
FurPaw
--
Better dead than Red.
To reply, unleash the dog.