 |  | | Certainty of Chance. Discuss Certainty of Chance, on Health Forums.
| | 
02-20-2008, 07:56 PM
| | | Certainty of Chance I believe in it. DO YOU?!? | 
02-20-2008, 07:56 PM
| | | Re: Certainty of Chance On Feb 20, 12:57 pm, CosmicWatchmaker <derekkeep...@btinternet.com>
wrote:
> I believe in it. DO YOU?!?
I absolutely do.
People are always talking about how everything happens for a reason...
I don't believe it.
They are forgeting the wild card, chance.
Everything does not happen for a reason, methinks | 
02-20-2008, 07:56 PM
| | | Re: Certainty of Chance On 20 Feb, 19:22, Gelly <Gell...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Feb 20, 12:57 pm, CosmicWatchmaker <derekkeep...@btinternet.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I believe in it. DO YOU?!?
>
> I absolutely do.
>
> People are always talking about how everything happens for a reason...
> I don't believe it.
>
> They are forgeting the wild card, chance.
>
> Everything does not happen for a reason, methinks
I saw a progamme called the system with Derren Brown a few weeks back.
It was about how he sent out thousands of emails predicting the
winners of horse races and out of the 7,776 people, one person won
five times in a row, purely by chance, but she was convinced by the
fact she had won five times in a row that there was a system which
could accurately predict the winner of every race and she was so sure
it was true she gambled 4 grand on the next predicted winner. Which
didn't win. Which shows how easily a belief system is set up.
For example, if we watched TV and found out some one had won the Lotto
we would not be surprised, but if we won it we would think there was
some greater reason behind it. The only thing that makes it seem like
it wasn't chance is the fact it is experienced by us.
Similarly, if when playing a board game you get three sixes in a row,
you will think wow! I'm really lucky - but the chances of you rolling
any other three number combination are the same.
The only thing that is certain is uncertainty, i.e. Chance. | 
02-21-2008, 12:12 AM
| | | Re: Certainty of Chance The great quantum physicist Dr. Hugh Everett proved, from
Schrodinger's Equation, that there is a probability timeline sideways in
time for every possibility.
Look in the Gospel of John. It says that Judas hung himself before
Jesus was crucified. And then, a few pages further in the Bible, in Acts
it says that Judas fell, burst open, spilling his intestines out, and of
course died, in the field he bought with the rat money he got for
turning Jesus in to the cops, after Jesus resurrected, and even after
Jesus ascended into heaven.
The Bible isn't wrong! Both things happened on different
timelines. This was called "kyros" time. Yet today, sci-fi movie makers
still present time as one straight line only. I suspect that this is a
secret that is being suppressed. We have yet to see some sci-fi with
this sixth dimension out in the open and used for what it is. | 
02-21-2008, 11:13 AM
| | | Re: Certainty of Chance
"Miguel Alberto" <gellie618@webtv.net> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:5100-47BCBDD7-101@storefull-3132.bay.webtv.net...
> The great quantum physicist Dr. Hugh Everett proved, from
> Schrodinger's Equation, that there is a probability timeline sideways in
> time for every possibility.
Is there a possibility for nonpossibilety?
> Look in the Gospel of John. It says that Judas hung himself before
> Jesus was crucified. And then, a few pages further in the Bible, in Acts
> it says that Judas fell, burst open, spilling his intestines out, and of
> course died, in the field he bought with the rat money he got for
> turning Jesus in to the cops, after Jesus resurrected, and even after
> Jesus ascended into heaven.
> The Bible isn't wrong! Both things happened on different
> timelines. This was called "kyros" time. Yet today, sci-fi movie makers
> still present time as one straight line only. I suspect that this is a
> secret that is being suppressed. We have yet to see some sci-fi with
> this sixth dimension out in the open and used for what it is.
> | 
02-21-2008, 11:13 AM
| | | Re: Certainty of Chance On 20 Feb, 15:55, gellie...@webtv.net (Miguel Alberto) wrote:
> * * * The great quantum physicist Dr. Hugh Everett proved, from
> Schrodinger's Equation, that there is a probability timeline sideways in
> time for every possibility.
> * * * Look in the Gospel of John. It says that Judas hung himself before
> Jesus was crucified. And then, a few pages further in the Bible, in Acts
> it says that Judas fell, burst open, spilling his intestines out, and of
> course died, in the field he bought with the rat money he got for
> turning Jesus in to the cops, after Jesus resurrected, and even after
> Jesus ascended into heaven.
> * * * The Bible isn't wrong! Both things happened on different
> timelines. This was called "kyros" time. Yet today, sci-fi movie makers
> still present time as one straight line only. I suspect that this is a
> secret that is being suppressed. We have yet to see some sci-fi with
> this sixth dimension out in the open and used for what it is.
I must say that this all sounds rather convenient. | 
02-21-2008, 01:59 PM
| | | Re: Certainty of Chance The possibility for nonpossibility remains out there is a eighth
dimensional direction in the null set, {Ø}. | 
02-21-2008, 10:25 PM
| | | Re: Certainty of Chance er, um, can you be any more rigorous?
"Miguel Alberto" <gellie618@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:3047-47BD5EED-6@storefull-3136.bay.webtv.net...
The possibility for nonpossibility remains out there is a eighth
dimensional direction in the null set, {Ø}. | 
02-22-2008, 02:38 PM
| | | Re: Certainty of Chance Rigorously, (n)X(1/n)^[-1+1] = ø, yet, [-1+1] = ln [(n)X(1/n)],
which is the same as saying S= ln W, entropy is the natural logarithm
of the thermodynamic probability, therefore, the entropy production
rate, EPR, defines the reciprocal hyperbola. That's nature's victory
against government. Ultimately, government ain't got a chance. | 
02-23-2008, 12:21 AM
| | | Re: Certainty of Chance This is totally shit!
Yiannis
"Miguel Alberto" <gellie618@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:5101-47BEBF08-33@storefull-3132.bay.webtv.net...
Rigorously, (n)X(1/n)^[-1+1] = ø, yet, [-1+1] = ln [(n)X(1/n)],
which is the same as saying S= ln W, entropy is the natural logarithm
of the thermodynamic probability, therefore, the entropy production
rate, EPR, defines the reciprocal hyperbola. That's nature's victory
against government. Ultimately, government ain't got a chance. | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT. The time now is 03:42 AM. | | | |  |