On Fri, 8 Aug 2008 15:31:56 +0000 (UTC), GPS <georgeps@xmission.com>
wrote:
>Third_LOOP_Left wrote:
>> War with Iran
>> Act I: keep the commies busy while wou move the blockade fleet into
>> position.
>>
>> As the dog-and-pony show called diplomacy runs it's inevitable
>> course to failure the real war with iran begins.
>>
>> The USA and "friends" are moving a massive naval blockade fleet into
>> the Gulf.
>>
>> http://europebusines.blogspot.com/20...-for-iran.html
>> But them damn iranians have some friends like russia who don't want to
>> see that happen, so you got to give them commies something to do to
>> keep them busy, I know, a war would help. Let's see how do you do
>> that, I got an idea:
>>
>> http://aftermathnews.wordpress.com/2...aims-invasion/
>> Enjoy the olympics!
>>
>> PS A blockade is an act of war.
>
>I agree.
Thank you for your support. The more that know, the better, spead the
word.
>The US wants to invade Iran for some reason unbeknowst to me.
Let me count the ways....
It's not the US that wants the war, it's your evil-meniacial
overlords. The War will fix the economy, is reason for some.
The War will reap billions for all those industries we have stock in,
is reason for some. Them muslims are crazy self destructive radicals,
is reason for some. Iran is/will be a financial superpower, is reason
for some. WW III will acheive all our dastardly plans is the probable
real reason.
>They have claimed many things over the years, such as that Iran is part of some
>Axis of Evil.
You have to assess who tells you what and why. The "axis of evil" came
out of the mouth of Bush, a complusive liar.
>The US has had ships off the coast of Iran for years.
>I'm not kidding -- literally years...
It's one thing to have a cop car parked accross the street to keep an
eye on things. But when half the police force is parked outside with
guns drawn, and sirens blaring it's quite a different situation.
Let's access Iran's situation.
South- Water, and 5+ carrier battlegroups
East-Iraq, gazoobles of forces there.
North-Allies busy fighting a war against a democratic enemy.
West-Afganistan-NATO in it's full glory.
And the leader of the free world, the cumplusive liar, telling the
world what to think. I'd be nervous too. I say we give them nukes and
fast, then they can we an ally on the war on terror like Pakistan.
Cause everyone knows the rule with nukes, use-em, cease to exist.
>Now with the defense spending at levels greater than during the cold war
>(Clinton reduced the defense spending a great deal in order to pay down
>the national debt), that doesn't even include the cost of the wars the
>US is in now, I fear the US may be inviting World War 3.
Not "inviting", "inventing" is more like it.
>I don't think Obama or McCain are going to have a valid solution for
>this, especially if Bush has started the invasion and war with Iran
>already.
You should find out what war powers the president can assume, and
while your at it find out who in your country is allow to declare war,
cause it ain't the president.
>All while the news on the TV is scripted, and the leaders continue to
>manipulate the US public. This is not some conspiracy theory either.
>See this: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/20/wa...20generals.htm
>and http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z4wQ4u4OriE
The mockingbird has such a nice voice, liar, but a nice voice.
>The US administration has scripted the US news and television, just as
>they have in nations like Iraq and Afghanistan. Those of you outside of
>the US, please don't blame the US population for being so naive, and
>stupid about what is actually going on, we don't have good sources of
>information, other than the Internet, and sources from other nations.
Impeach your president, agree to the world court, and we'll put the
bastard on trial for war crimes.
>Now in the US they are seizing laptops, memory cards, and anything that
>might have information at airports. The Department of Homeland Security
>protects you from yourself, and I believe will ultimately lead to even
>more fascism, thus self destruction. They are violating the rights of
>Americans that many people died for. They put Senator Ted Kennedy on
>the no fly list. It took an act of Congress to get him off.
Yet people feel more secure.
"Anyone who will give up a little freedom for more security,....."
>The experience for Ted Kennedy:
>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...2004Aug19.html
Poor fella is having a hell of a time, he's got bigger problems now.
>The "no fly" list is growing by over 20 thousand names a month. What
>does that tell you? There is no oversight of that list either. You
>can't determine if you're on the list, unless you fly.
I'm sorta afarid to go to the US at the moment after that stunt Texas
just pulled.
>We need peace. Peace of mind, and peace with our neighbors.
It's yours, but you got to take it before it's too late for all of us.
Brian
________________________________
All I want to say to you is:
de-do-do-do, de-da-da-da
IRAN act i 
Linear Mode
