Re: Explained in a way that even sock puppets can understand

"JTEM" <jtem01@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:f3b2dfd5-55d7-40a3-bb87-54186d18edf9@s12g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
> "Lars Wilson" <siaxa...@embarqmail.com> wrote:
>
>> WHERE BIBLE AND SECULAR HISTORY
>
> It's like this, sock puppet...
>
> Say you've got a lot of holes in your garden, and
> you wanted to get rid of them. One way a normal
> person would never go about this is by heading
> out to the garden, digging new holes and using the
> soil to fill in the old holes.
>
> Why? Because you'd end up with the same number
> of holes you began with!
>
> The same is true for all of you crystal-hugging
> alternative history freaks. Your "New" timelines
> create as many problems as they solve. See,
> you need a "new" timeline in order to shoehorn
> in a literally true bible, making up for your lack
> of religious faith. But by doing so you are in
> effect orphaning every single religious "fact" that
> you thumpers currently cling to as "Evidence"
> for a literally true bible. Everything.
>
No. It's a PROBLEM when Plato is being consulted
on a math problem 3 years before he is born, or he has
50+ year-older brothers still at home discussing philosophy
with Socrates, meaning Plato's mother must have gave birth
to him in her sixties!! That's a PROBLEM.

When the timeline is corrected, Plato is 25 years old and his brothers
on 7+ years old than he is, meaning his mother would have bore her
children in the normal birth period for women in her 20s and 30s.

No. The PROBLEMS are with the revised timeline. They disappear
with the corrections.

BUT, in case you want to give just ONE EXAMPLE of how many new
problems this creates, be my guest. You seem to know clearly about this,
so why not just list the five off the top of year head out of the many I'm
sure you think this revision causes.

But in case you don't actually have any examples to share with us, we'll all
understand it's just you running off at the mouth with nothing to show for
it. That's the reputation you're developing/have now JTEM! All talk and no
substantiation.

I QUOTE. I give references. I'm covered.

Dave2002