The shape of all that is possible

If you take a cube that is 100x100x100, and you could manipulate atoms,
you could create every possible situation in that cube.

It would have part of every being, every action you might ever do within
that 100x100x100 cube.

--------------------
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|-------------------

Is the cube a trap? Is the cube joy? It's everything.

I've often wondered if the cube would have the same number of good
visions as bad visions.

I could see visions of every person on earth, every possible person on
earth. Everything that is possible within these 3 dimensions.

Billions of happy endings, and billions of sad endings.

Could this be the Yin and Yang of ancient times?


George

No, it isn't the Yang and Yin. Yang is the patriarchal perception
of repelling like polarities, Yin is the patriarchal perception of
attracting opposite polarities.
There are impossibilties. If you take a square frame with hinges
at its vertices, it will fold up into a straight line. If you take a
trianguar frame with hinges at its vertices, it wont budge.
It is impossible to make that triangle fold up, in flat timespace,
and in any other timespace with a pi value more than two. At the event
horizon of a black hole, where the value of pi is two, and inside the
black hole, where the value of pi is less than two, you can fold up the
triangle.
But, the eternal impossibility is to be able to fold up the
triangle here in flat timespace, or any timespace with a pi value more
than two.
Check out the May 2003 issue of Scientific American's article "The
Multiverse". In our universe there are about 10 to the 120th power
components. Every possible combination of these exists on thier own
probability timelines and are infinitely repeated. There are infinite
dimensions. Your cube is a limitation.

Miguel Lahunkun wrote:
> No, it isn't the Yang and Yin. Yang is the patriarchal perception
> of repelling like polarities, Yin is the patriarchal perception of
> attracting opposite polarities.

It's also often used to represent good and evil, or balance, as I
understand it.


> There are impossibilties. If you take a square frame with hinges
> at its vertices, it will fold up into a straight line. If you take a
> trianguar frame with hinges at its vertices, it wont budge.
> It is impossible to make that triangle fold up, in flat timespace,
> and in any other timespace with a pi value more than two. At the event
> horizon of a black hole, where the value of pi is two, and inside the
> black hole, where the value of pi is less than two, you can fold up the
> triangle.
> But, the eternal impossibility is to be able to fold up the
> triangle here in flat timespace, or any timespace with a pi value more
> than two.
> Check out the May 2003 issue of Scientific American's article "The
> Multiverse". In our universe there are about 10 to the 120th power
> components. Every possible combination of these exists on thier own
> probability timelines and are infinitely repeated. There are infinite
> dimensions. Your cube is a limitation.

Yes, that's an unproven *theory*, that I've read about actually.

The fact remains that you can see everything in our current 3 dimensions
in that cube, given enough time, that could happen in a 100x100x100 area
in our current dimension.

You don't even need to manipulate atoms. You could use voxels (3D
pixels essentially) and simulate it on a computer, though sorting out
the garbage would be difficult, and sheer amount of computation is mind
boggling.


Or essentially if my mathematics is correct: 100^100^100 unique images
or if you prefer the power of 100 to 100 to 100 images.


George

Check out other answers I have just posted here today, and answers
about that "good": "evil":: "positive": "negative":: "white": "black",
lying propaganda. My co-conspirators and I have "been there done that",
and we have been beyond the "plastic curtain", to be informed of the
real facts. We returned armed with truth.

Miguel Lahunkun wrote:
> Check out other answers I have just posted here today, and answers
> about that "good": "evil":: "positive": "negative":: "white": "black",
> lying propaganda. My co-conspirators and I have "been there done that",
> and we have been beyond the "plastic curtain", to be informed of the
> real facts. We returned armed with truth.


I fail to see how you misinterpreting some words takes you beyond the
"plastic curtain" (whatever that may be).

Cite your sources. Let's make this more scientific...

George

"Miguel Lahunkun" <gellie418@webtv.net> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:11506-477E16EB-2543@storefull-3134.bay.webtv.net...
> No, it isn't the Yang and Yin. Yang is the patriarchal perception
> of repelling like polarities, Yin is the patriarchal perception of
> attracting opposite polarities.
> There are impossibilties. If you take a square frame with hinges

An impossibility can also be a possinility.

> at its vertices, it will fold up into a straight line. If you take a
> trianguar frame with hinges at its vertices, it wont budge.
> It is impossible to make that triangle fold up, in flat timespace,
> and in any other timespace with a pi value more than two. At the event
> horizon of a black hole, where the value of pi is two, and inside the
> black hole, where the value of pi is less than two, you can fold up the
> triangle.
> But, the eternal impossibility is to be able to fold up the
> triangle here in flat timespace, or any timespace with a pi value more
> than two.
> Check out the May 2003 issue of Scientific American's article "The
> Multiverse". In our universe there are about 10 to the 120th power
> components. Every possible combination of these exists on thier own
> probability timelines and are infinitely repeated. There are infinite
> dimensions. Your cube is a limitation.
>

Are you in England? There was an Iron Curtain. There is a "Plastic
Curtain" around the oxymoron deceptively called the "Free World".
In 1985 I was in that part of Romania know as Transylvania with my
cousin and the American Institute of Archaeology. We translated the old
books of Gheorghe Rakoczy and learned most of the facts, kept secret
(suppressed) by the cartel of secret lodges, in the "Free World". that
we have now published in http://groups.yahoo.com/group/alchemy61/ today.
As far as I know, only Dr. Stanislav Grof, from Prague,
Czechoslovakia, http://www.holotropic.com has dared to publish the
supreme secret, and kept it published.
We have sort of a chip on our shoulders, an up raised middle
finger of defiance, until we can live in an honestly and actually free
country where WE can enjoy or natural individualities.

Better hope not. Some horrible states could be maintained forever
that way. Fortuantely, triangles can't swivel on their vertices.

O
/ \
O _ O

Wow, that triangle didn't work out too well. Let's try it again:
O
/ \
O_O
The O's depict hinges at the vertices of this triangle. I used to
have a bag of tricks at my lectures. It was delibrately a carpet bag
(another upraised middle finger). I had a square of four strips of
copper with holes at the ends fastened into the square shape by eyelets
that allowed swivelling. The square would collapse into a line. Strips
fastened into a triangle, like this, wouldn't budge.
In this bag I also had a book, a ball, and a plumb bob. I showed
how the ball could only be balanced on the book when it was at perfct
90° angles (orthogonal) to the hanging plumb bob. This shows the
othogonality necesssary for captivity, and its tremendous improbability
in the universe. That's why there are such tremendous spaces between
things in outer space. It's true Liberty. Us Dambusters are going to
make it that way there. The Second Law of Thermodynamics is on our side.
Entropy rules!
Also, there were two clear plastic disks with arrowed circles
painted on them to show how opposite circulations (polairties) when
facing each other, like head on tails, are confluent; and, like
circulations (polairties) repel. And, of course, things prefer the Easy
Way, Vama Margh in Sanskrit, the real Vama Margh.
Oh ya, people here are asking me for my references. Long before I
became a Christian, my Ashram helped me escape. from an A.P.B. for a
paper of committment, to Tamil Nadu in India. I learned much real
science there, as well as a lot of "sacred cows".
And, I got copies of the unpublished writings of Gheorghe Rakoczy
in Romania (Transylvania). Of course, you may not find these anywhere
but http://groups.yahoo.com/group/alchemy61/ They are suppressed here
behind the "Plastic Curtain". Try it, it works, that's enough.