When you know

When you do know you will find that the Jewish God is synonymous with idiot.
Advance intelligence that existed way before you humans or any deity sees
your Jewish God rather like you humans see the mentally retarded or the
village idiot.
He is not that good a God which is why you suffer and are miserable and your
Earth is so ugly.
But then you get what you deserve eh?
We certainly would not want to be your God.
We do find you very amusing though.
We experience much laughter at humans.
See joke re Judy.
YIKES! Who would ever want to be friends with HER??????
THE BORG

"THE BORG" <Borg@outthere.com> wrote in message
news:6Uxmj.19895$g%2.6520@newsfe4-gui.ntli.net...
> When you do know you will find that the Jewish God is synonymous with
> idiot.
> Advance intelligence that existed way before you humans or any deity sees
> your Jewish God rather like you humans see the mentally retarded or the
> village idiot.
> He is not that good a God which is why you suffer and are miserable and
> your Earth is so ugly.
> But then you get what you deserve eh?
> We certainly would not want to be your God.
> We do find you very amusing though.
> We experience much laughter at humans.
> See joke re Judy.
> YIKES! Who would ever want to be friends with HER??????
> THE BORG
>
Sorry Judy - no we love you very much - we have been friends for so long eh
Cue violins and much laughter.
It is great watching how horrible and nasty and wicked you all are while we
are all good and pure and innocent.
We do not blame any of you if simple things happen in our life.
We are not like big strong bully Miki who would blame a little flower if his
dick fell off.
Which we hope it does!
HA HA HA!
THE BORG

THE BORG wrote:
> When you do know you will find that the Jewish God is synonymous with idiot.
> Advance intelligence that existed way before you humans or any deity sees
> your Jewish God rather like you humans see the mentally retarded or the
> village idiot.
> He is not that good a God which is why you suffer and are miserable and your
> Earth is so ugly.
> But then you get what you deserve eh?
> We certainly would not want to be your God.
> We do find you very amusing though.
> We experience much laughter at humans.
> See joke re Judy.
> YIKES! Who would ever want to be friends with HER??????
> THE BORG


I'll pray for you BORG. I can tell you're hurting a lot.

On 26 sij, 04:41, "THE BORG" <B...@outthere.com> wrote:
> "THE BORG" <B...@outthere.com> wrote in message
>
> news:6Uxmj.19895$g%2.6520@newsfe4-gui.ntli.net...> When you do know you will find that the Jewish God is synonymous with
> > idiot.
> > Advance intelligence that existed way before you humans or any deity sees
> > your Jewish God rather like you humans see the mentally retarded or the
> > village idiot.
> > He is not that good a God which is why you suffer and are miserable and
> > your Earth is so ugly.
> > But then you get what you deserve eh?
> > We certainly would not want to be your God.
> > We do find you very amusing though.
> > We experience much laughter at humans.
> > See joke re Judy.
> > YIKES! *Who would ever want to be friends with HER??????
> > THE BORG
>
> Sorry Judy - no we love you very much - we have been friends for so long eh
> Cue violins and much laughter.
> It is great watching how horrible and nasty and wicked you all are while we
> are all good and pure and innocent.
> We do not blame any of you if simple things happen in our life.
> We are not like big strong bully Miki who would blame a little flower if his
> dick fell off.
> Which we hope it does!
> HA HA HA!
> THE BORG

There is no such thing as Jewish God. He is God of Abraham. Abraham
fathered Ismael (father of Arabs) and Ishak (father of Israelites and
Edomites).

"Marvin Barley" <mtodorov3_69@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:10e1a848-b664-4226-8b1e-eb19e0cdbe88@1g2000hsl.googlegroups.com...

>There is no such thing as Jewish God. He is God of Abraham. Abraham
>fathered Ismael (father of Arabs) and Ishak (father of Israelites and
>Edomites).

And, as a result of the destruction of the genealogical records in the
Temple of Jerusalem, no one alive has a clue who the Sons of Abraham are. So
whose God _is_ He?

Miki

On 26 Jan, 17:18, "Miki Kocic" <relapcc...@yahoo.ca> wrote:
> "Marvin Barley" <mtodorov3...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:10e1a848-b664-4226-8b1e-eb19e0cdbe88@1g2000hsl.googlegroups.com...
>
> >There is no such thing as Jewish God. He is God of Abraham. Abraham
> >fathered Ismael (father of Arabs) and Ishak (father of Israelites and
> >Edomites).
>
> And, as a result of the destruction of the genealogical records in the
> Temple of Jerusalem, no one alive has a clue who the Sons of Abraham are. So
> whose God _is_ He?
>
> Miki

Sometimes writings can be like maps. And not just maps, but of a
journey.
Because of the open accesses and unscrupulousness, which would have
been known then,
perhaps the proofs of these things, are in a different format.?

On 26 Jan, 17:33, Judy <jal...@easynet.co.uk> wrote:

>
> Sometimes writings can be like maps. And not just maps, but of a
> journey.
> Because of the open accesses and unscrupulousness, which would have
> been known then,
> perhaps the proofs of these things, are in a different format.?


Normally accepted proofs would be made unnacceptable in a period of
vying powers.

the truth of whatever people are looking for must have been written in
the situation. Because the only thing that wasn't capable of being
completely lost, was the situation of a complete system which was
being undermined (?) but not overpowered.

Judy, for once what you're saying makes sense to me on its face.

There definitely were competing powers. But as George can likely attest,
there was a feeling of inhibition among the Biblical Jews who didn't convert
to Christianity. Who would dare say he is a Son of Abraham when no living
Priest could back him up--and when the risk existed that the _Priest's_
truthfulness would be challenged by the unscrupulous and power-hungry? That
was likely worse for the genuine Sons of Abraham than for ambitious
impostors.

It's not controversial that, by the 4th century CE, the Jewish leaders had
expunged from the Torah all writings not originally written in Hebrew while
the writer lived in Palestine. That's why the Catholic and Protestant Old
Testaments are different--the Catholics use the pre-4th-century Torah while
the Protestants use the post. Bibles other than the Ignatius etc. generally
have several books missing, such as Tobit.

Miki

"Judy" <jalees@easynet.co.uk> wrote in message
news:440bb6fe-bff1-4908-9f2b-fd07c668189f@i3g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
> On 26 Jan, 17:33, Judy <jal...@easynet.co.uk> wrote:
>
>>
>> Sometimes writings can be like maps. And not just maps, but of a
>> journey.
>> Because of the open accesses and unscrupulousness, which would have
>> been known then,
>> perhaps the proofs of these things, are in a different format.?
>
>
> Normally accepted proofs would be made unnacceptable in a period of
> vying powers.
>
> the truth of whatever people are looking for must have been written in
> the situation. Because the only thing that wasn't capable of being
> completely lost, was the situation of a complete system which was
> being undermined (?) but not overpowered.
>
>
>
>
>
>

On 26 Jan, 22:48, "Miki Kocic" <relapcc...@yahoo.ca> wrote:
> Judy, for once what you're saying makes sense to me on its face.
>
> There definitely were competing powers. But as George can likely attest,
> there was a feeling of inhibition among the Biblical Jews who didn't convert
> to Christianity. Who would dare say he is a Son of Abraham when no living
> Priest could back him up--and when the risk existed that the _Priest's_
> truthfulness would be challenged by the unscrupulous and power-hungry? That
> was likely worse for the genuine Sons of Abraham than for ambitious
> impostors.
>
> It's not controversial that, by the 4th century CE, the Jewish leaders had
> expunged from the Torah all writings not originally written in Hebrew while
> the writer lived in Palestine. That's why the Catholic and Protestant Old
> Testaments are different--the Catholics use the pre-4th-century Torah while
> the Protestants use the post. Bibles other than the Ignatius etc. generally
> have several books missing, such as Tobit.
>
> Miki

Miki
It's handy that it makes sense to you for once.
But it is for me now that I write these things.
Conversation has long been one-sided.
But even with your message, I could not find a way of responding,
other than what I already said.
For the moment anyway.

best wishes
Judy