Since Black people are also involved in the mental illness scam, you
may wonder why would they go along with having more blacks being
schizophrenic? I am positive that mental illness is a scam and positive
the mind can be manipulated but this is just an explanation that I came
up with for the racial difference in schizophrenics. I have pondered
that issue and came to the conclusion that black people wanted to have
sex with white people and the psych industry is able to manipulate minds
so that white people who would normally not want to have sex with black
people are ""brainwashed" into doing so. This is not mental illness
since it is seen as "normal" through the promotion of Hollywood as a
"deal" to integrate black people with white people. Television shows
slowly made black people being couple with white people appear
acceptable and that would flow into other media outlet. Looking at the
history of white and black relation, white people do not want to have
sex with blacks. Blacks were brought to the USA for slavery and it was
acceptable to white people at the time. Black people were weak and were
sold as slave to those willing to pay the price. Black people were
"slower" to white people in terms of knowledge about weapons, farming,
etc, so they lost to white people and were looked at as uneducated and
dumb at the time. Black people were property to white people and not
even considered "people" at the time. Black people were treated unequal
to white and it was acceptable to the white people at the time. Black
people weren't allowed to vote and it was acceptable to the white people
at the time. White people wanted to segregate themselves from blacks
such as barring them from entering some stores which was acceptable at
the time. In other words, white people do not like black people as the
examples demonstrate. In the history of mankind, white people having sex
with black people is a new phenomenon because it is manipulation. White
people are being brainwashed to have sex with black people and black
people benefited because they became integrated with white people who
were in charge of the country at the time. This "deal" may explain why
black people who are in the mental illness scam would go along with
having more black schizophrenics. The victims of the mental illness scam
are also white people who were brainwashed to have sex with black people
to create a mix race which gave the perception of accepting black people
into a white country. Black people are not "good" looking to white
people free from mind manipulation as the history of white people and
black people relation shows. It is mind manipulation that the psych
industry does that allowed the dark skin black to become "attractive" to
white people. Whether you like the outcome or not, manipulating
someone's mind is criminal.

What about a man's penis size, the "myth" that is spread about black
men would it be a factor for white women to mix with black men?
According to research on penis, "Men the world over have similar size
penises. You see men of all races and nationalities on naturist (nudist)
beaches in Europe and they are all about the same size."
<http://destroypsychiatry.org/links/What_is_the_average_penis_size_by_race_or_national ity_of_male_human_beings.html>
People do discriminate with who they have sex with. Why don't you people
who are heterosexual have sex with homosexual, would you be called
homophobic because you discriminate? Suppose a heterosexual man refuses
to have sex with a homosexual man, can he be blamed for discriminating?
The same can be said about homosexual, why don't you have sex with
heterosexual, would you be called heterophobic because you discriminate?
Suppose a homosexual man refuses to have sex with a heterosexual woman,
can he be blamed for discriminating? Take for instance the history of
the presidents of the USA from George Washington with wife Martha
Dandridge Custis Washington to the current mix black president Barack
Hussein Obama with wife Michelle Obama, all follow the logical path of
discrimination in regards to choosing a sexual partner. The question to
explore is how did dark skin black in the USA came to mix with the white
people in the USA who brought them in the country by way of slavery when
people do practice discrimination in regards to sex like all the
presidents of the USA. Would we consider the president of a country like
the USA be poor in judgment in comparison to the average person?

In a natural state, white people in the USA from a historical viewpoint
have demonstrated their dislike of black people. Since white people from
a historical viewpoint were in charge of the country that would mean
that the treatments given to black people were done so because white
people wanted to do it as nobody were forcing white people to behave in
such a manner. The treatments were very negative-black people were like
property where they can be traded from a historical viewpoint. This is
the true nature of how white people feel towards black people. Countries
do have war with each other, people in the same country can also have
war with each other, but when you enslaved a whole group of people for
the sake of being slave, that isn't war, it is how you feel about the
group. White people were dominating as a race compared to black people
so white people used their domination to serve their purpose. The nature
of white people wanting to have sex with black people given the dislike
of black people doesn't make sense. The USA at the time had enough white
people that there wasn't a need to mix with black people so the mixing
of the race is manipulation. As logical people wouldn't it make sense to
mix with someone closer to your own appearance? Personally, I would
rather mix with white people than black people given the two choices as
white people are closer in appearance to me in terms of hair and skin
than black people. Personal preference isn't racism because we are
talking about sex. Sex is an individual preference and we can treat one
another fairly in other aspect of our lives.

Let us take a look into the beauty pageant industry. Does anyone
believe that "we are all beautiful inside" coming out from a contestant
from a Miss Universe contest? Why isn't there an overweight well
educated women winning in these competition? It is because people see
beauty on the outside so anyone who gives an answer "we are all
beautiful inside" from a Miss Universe contest is a liar. In the Miss
Universe contest, each country selects its best to represent it so we
are comparing the best of the best. So when the judges of the contest
are light skin who select a dark skin winner, then the light skin
judges are saying their kind is uglier since this is a beauty contest.
When an outcome like this happens then we have to question why would
that be the case? There can be manipulation at work since the best of
your own kind is judged to be uglier.

Creating mental illness involves manipulating the mind so it means
symptoms. Symptoms are just reaction to what is being done to the
person. The symptoms for mental illness is a negative type of symptoms
but to integrate black people with white people, positive symptoms are
used. The mind can be made to feel "attraction" to another person or
feel "love" or other emotions. Is it logical to feel "attraction" to
someone you find "ugly?" Then it is a manipulation of your mind. People
who are victims are not aware of the manipulation since they think with
phrase like "love is blind". But people can see so they are not blind so
why should love be blind? Is it logical to love what you don't find
attractive? People don't analyze their emotions because that too should
have logic to them. So those of you black people who were diagnosed as
schizophrenics don't benefit much because you are seen as "crazy" and
not many people want to integrate with "crazy". Until the mental illness
scam ends, you will be seen as "crazy" and always will be "crazy"
because the psych industry does not offer a cure. Since more blacks are
schizophrenics than other racial group, it is racist in that regard to
those blacks affected but those black people who are not schizophrenic
benefited from the mental illness scam in a different way at the expense
of the white people brainwashed to have sex with black people to create
an acceptance of dark skin black people in a white country that did not
like them. When a person is targeted because of race then it is racism.
There are cases where black people in the USA are racist towards a
lesser minority group like Asian which would be racism since racism
against the majority group which is white would create a backlash. The
point to understand is that the majority group gets the advantage and
black people can be racist as well.

Black people gain knowledge being in a white country due to white
people. Black people as a group in their own country still perform
poorly in comparison to those in the United States. This is how it is
today for those in Africa where commercial is being shown about starving
black children whose country is still backward in comparison to the US
and many other major countries. According to The Organisation for
Economic Cooperation and Development "Africa remains a desperately poor
continent. Poverty and disease are widespread, and sub-Saharan Africa
has the world’s highest illiteracy. Conflict is also a threat." This is
with the help of US economic aid to Africa. There are also economic aid
given to other countries as well. Giving the current US economic issues,
why isn't the citizens of the USA given priority instead of sending
economic aid to foreign countries. So there is a benefit to black people
living in the United States as oppose to living in Africa. So if I was a
black person, I would benefit most living in the US than in Africa. I
read in an article that "A record 46 million Americans were living in
poverty in 2010, pushing the U.S. poverty rate to its highest level
since 1993, according to a government report." I suppose many US
citizens are in debt as well and so is the country. Although our current
mix black president Obama is doing a poor job of helping the USA, it is
still better than Africa to live in so all you people "keep hope alive"
as we will survive through the Obama years. If I wasn't living in the
USA, I would live in China. As a group, the Chinese do better than the
Blacks in Africa by comparing the two countries - China is better than
Africa. The USA would benefit more having more Chinese but why would
they want to live in the USA if their country is doing fine? So is it
wrong to do comparison? No, it is how we come to know who is better than
someone else. It is how the world operate.

I would guess that the psych industry resorted to promoting mixing the
race in the period of the civil rights in the USA when the dark skin
blacks were approaching equality in rights so there needs to be a way to
control them. Mixing the dark skin black produced a light skin child
that looked less threatening and closer to being white so it is more
"attractive" than the dark skin child. The general attitude is that
light skin black is more attractive compared to dark skin black. This
only supports the rationalization that manipulation is at work when a
dark skin black is having sex with a white person because light skin
black is considered better looking since it is closer to being white so
why would a white person sex with someone who is dark skin black? It is
an observation of the USA that all the presidents of the USA practice
discrimination in choosing a sexual partner so it brings the question of
why would a country with a majority of white people mix with the dark
skin blacks who are not liked as history of the USA showed. Consider
that people practice discrimination in choosing a sexual partner.
Consider that there is no shortage of white people in the USA so that
would eliminate the needs to mix. Consider that there is no physical
advantage to mix with black people as the penis research demonstrates
just to eliminate the possibility because penis commentaries are in
movies, tv, etc. Consider that there is no mental advantage either
because white people are in charge so white people have the advantage.
Consider that black people are not liked at each point in history from
slavery to segregation. This is the question for the readers to ponder
how did white people and black people came to mix given the few examples
above.

Many women whether light skin blacks or dark skin blacks make their
hair look straighten similar to white people by using product called
relaxer. In the natural state, black hair is hard so it needs to be
"relaxed" so the hair will feel softer using chemicals. Is changing
one's identity an acknowledgment of someone being seen better looking?
It would be logical because it takes time to straighten one's hair and
it not what you are "born" with as a black person. Are black women
saying something about their hair when they want to look like all the
other women whose hair isn't like black people? So, why would black
women do this to their hair when black men don't seem to do it?
Generally speaking, the black men I seen have a short haircut but it is
not straighten. When someone alters herself as a group to look like
another group, it reminds me of the polygenist, Christoph Meiners who
splits mankind into two divisions, the "beautiful White race" and the
"ugly Black race". So when black people alter themselves to the "white
race" they are admitting that they are the "ugly race". Meiners is
logical seeing himself as the "beautiful white race" because he is white
so you black people should see yourself as the "beautiful black race"
because you are black. Black people can counter Meiners by not altering
themselves at all from their traits. Take another approach, suppose you
are a black person and said "black is the most beautiful race", I would
accept that you are logical in your perception because you are black.
Suppose you are a white person and said "white is the most beautiful
race", I would accept that you are logical in your perception because
you are white. When a person of one race find another race to be "more
beautiful" than his own, then you have to wonder what is wrong with the
person because the logical perception is one's own race.

Besides logical perception of one's own race as "more beautiful", there
is also an expectation of being being loyal to the country that one
resides in. This is logical because why would you be loyal to another
country unless your a spy for it. It is because the country you resides
in is considered as "your own". For a hypothetical example, the mix
black president Obama has African heritage but the logical expectation
is that he is loyal to the United States and the USA comes first before
Africa such as the problems of its citizens. The concepts of logical
perception and logical loyalty are simple and those are the expected
behaviors. The USA has a diverse population of races but the black race
came to the USA by way of slavery from a historical perspective. Other
races came to the USA seeking a better life not because they were slave.
This is an important point to remember.

So the theory is, the psych industry gave black people the ability to
integrate with white people in the USA using unethical method that gave
rise to a mix black president called Obama and black a may one day
return the favor of "slavery" to the white people because people do
remember history as it is available with a touch of a keystroke but I
suppose that is not likely with a white majority. You may find it
amusing but white people did enslave black people and if black people
had the same opportunity, why would it be different? Suppose black
people had the opportunity to enslave white people and didn't do so,
what does that say about white people who took the opportunity to
enslave black people? Suppose black people had the opportunity and did
enslave white people, are black people any worse since white people did
the same to them? I can only tell you what I find as truth according to
history. At the time of slavery in USA, it was a religious country with
people who ran the country of that religion which is Christianity. One
can say there is a separation of church and state but the people who ran
the country and the people who voted for them go to the same church. So
according to the bible to which these people follow, it was acceptable
to enslave black people. So how different is the bible from the days of
slavery to today? So in the eyes of "God" based on Christianity, it is
acceptable to enslave black people. But since white people have not been
enslaved by black people, in the eyes of "God" according to
Christianity, it remains a question whether it is acceptable to enslave
white people. How different of an interpretation of the bible can one
get since the same bible is used and the religion of Christianity is
based on Jesus Christ? Considering how much efforts have been invested
into the religion of Jesus Christ, there should be one definitive view
by Jesus Christ and that would be the view by anyone who follows Jesus
Christ. One cannot say an individual such as Jesus Christ who died long
ago, his opinions or viewpoints would change since he is already dead.

So the believers of Jesus Christ found it acceptable to enslave black
people and the same bible still exists, so the rational is still the
same. The USA at the time of slavery would have opposed slavery if the
religion of Jesus Christ opposed it at the time because the people were
of that religion but that was not the case. Also in the religion of
Jesus Christ, there is no female pope. Based on the Christianity, women
are not qualified to be pope or be the "head" of the religion? How many
religions based on the belief of an afterlife would allow a woman to be
in "charge" of it? What does that say about women and their role in
religion? Women today want equal rights to men and where do they come up
with such notion when religion treats them differently because religion
represents "God" and women are seen by "God" as unqualified to be in
"charge" of religion? The Catholic church considers itself the "one true
faith" which means all other "faiths" are false like Jewish, Islam,
Scientology, etc. Since the Catholic church exists then no other
religions are necessary because it is the "one true faith". The concept
of "one true faith" comes from using the Law of Non-Contradiction which
implies when two propositions contradict one another both cannot be true
which means that there cannot be any contradiction. I would accept that
the Law of Non-Contradiction is logical but the concept of an afterlife
which the Catholic church believes in contradicts the concept of no
afterlife which I have wrote extensively on; therefore, both cannot be
correct. Because the world which we live in is logical then the Law of
Non-Contradiction would support the belief of no afterlife so any
religion that is based on an afterlife is false by the Law of
Non-Contradiction.

The Law of Non-Contradiction is interesting in that it is simple to
understand and yet effective to use in an argument and it sounds
authoritative. The Law of Non-Contradiction dictates that the followers
of any religion should have the same interpretation because different
interpretations cannot all be true. The Law of Non-Contradiction would
say that only "one true faith" should exists for the believers of an
afterlife yet there are so many, so the common man should ask, why
haven't the believers in an afterlife eliminated all the other "false"
faiths. The promoters of an afterlife are inefficient and confusing to
the followers of such a belief. Those in charge of the belief in an
afterlife are doing a poor job for their followers. Years and years yet
there is no "one true faith" for the believers of an afterlife because
so many exists so one has to wonder will there be such a "one true
faith" for the believers of an afterlife? Perhaps the believers of an
afterlife should compete their faith against one another and let the
best of the faiths be chosen. It is by logic that a competition should
exists as not to offend the real “one true faith” of the afterlife
believers because their time would have spent worshiping the wrong faith
and they would suffer in an afterlife. The logic of the afterlife
believers is cruel because if their believers worship the wrong faith,
then they would suffer in an afterlife. The cruelty continues to this
very days as so many different faiths of the afterlife believers exist
but only one can be correct by the Law of Non-Contradiction. If a
religion existed based on the belief of no afterlife, all followers from
men, women, homosexual, etc, would be given a fair chance to be in
"charge" of the religion because logic would choose the one most
qualified as it is based on a logical belief of "God". The belief of an
afterlife is illogical so it is based on an illogical belief of "God".
Suppose there were several no afterlife faiths as there are the
afterlife faiths, the promoters of the no afterlife faith would be seen
not as wicked because their followers would not suffer in an afterlife
because they don't believe in it. The believers of no afterlife would
divide people less because everyone is given a fair chance to be in
"charge" if such a religion existed.

Psychiatry is no better. Samuel Adolphus Cartwright most well-known for
describing a condition called "drapetomania", or the desire of slave to
flee from servitude. Drapetomania is described as a mental disorder akin
to alienation. This is how the field of psychiatry develops, by making
up "things". Since slavery existed, a condition called "drapetomania"
was created to keep them from escaping which would be a natural
response. Therefore, when slaves escape, it was due to "mental disorder"
not because the slaves wanted to escape. To the credit of modern day
psychiatry, chemicals are used to "create" symptoms so that more "mental
disorder" would be created. Psychiatry has advanced in its deception.

Who is more evil as a group, black people or white people? Is someone
better or worse taking advantage of his position in life? Are people
that different from one another in thinking since we are all logical?
People can range from evil to good and that may affect their decision.
People who are good would perform acts in their life which would be
"good". People who are evil would perform acts in their life which would
be "evil". That is the extreme of the two behaviors. Mental illness is a
scam and it is evil so the people in the scam would be towards the group
into doing "evil" acts. But that is just a thought in comparison to
where I am 100% confident that mental illness is a scam. Although I am
only 100% confident that mental illness is a scam, it doesn't mean what
has been said is wrong either but I am not an insider in the mental
illness scam so I can only make conjecture. When the mental illness scam
ends all races can benefit because the deception of the psych industry
is to spread its mental illness around to every race so that it looks
like an illness when there is no definitive cause for the illness like
schizophrenia because mental illness is a scam. So if your Asian, White,
Black, homosexual, heterosexual, etc, who was diagnosed mentally ill, I
care that much that I have called the FBI <http://www.fbi.gov> director
a scumbag. I am 100% confident mental illness is a scam and anybody is
welcome to tell the FBI <http://www.fbi.gov> director what I said about
him and I would encourage the behavior because I am that confident. I
care that much that I have challenged the whole psych industry
<http://www.destroypsychiatry.org/index2.html> because I am 100%
confident mental illness is a scam. So if anyone has doubt about what I
say, I suggest the person takes a reading comprehension course because I
am 100% confident mental illness is a scam.



http://www.destroypsychiatry.org/psyracist.html