you should be payed.

1.if you are childless, you should be payed for that.

2.if you are wifeless, you should be payed for that.

3.if you practice international communication helping birds,oxen and
wrestlers
you should be payed for that.

kohath133 wrote:
> 1.if you are childless, you should be payed for that.
>
> 2.if you are wifeless, you should be payed for that.
>
> 3.if you practice international communication helping birds,oxen and
> wrestlers
> you should be payed for that.
>

Two out of three - I don't have kids nor do I have a wife. How much are
you willing to give me?

--
My heart drive crashed.
Dispel The Darkness to email.
valfreyja457@THEDARKNESSgmail.com

"Freyja" <valfreyja457@THEDARKNESSgmail.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:g3sm05$of$1@aioe.org...
> kohath133 wrote:
>> 1.if you are childless, you should be payed for that.
>>
>> 2.if you are wifeless, you should be payed for that.
>>
>> 3.if you practice international communication helping birds,oxen and
>> wrestlers
>> you should be payed for that.
>>
>
> Two out of three - I don't have kids nor do I have a wife. How much are
> you willing to give me?
>
> --
> My heart drive crashed.
> Dispel The Darkness to email.
> valfreyja457@THEDARKNESSgmail.com

Are you a female without a wife? Freyja is a germanic godess of the ancient
times.

"If THEY wont allow you a death, THEY owe you a living."

rainbowguardian wrote:
> "Freyja" <valfreyja457@THEDARKNESSgmail.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
> news:g3sm05$of$1@aioe.org...
>> kohath133 wrote:
>>> 1.if you are childless, you should be payed for that.
>>>
>>> 2.if you are wifeless, you should be payed for that.
>>>
>>> 3.if you practice international communication helping birds,oxen and
>>> wrestlers
>>> you should be payed for that.
>>>
>> Two out of three - I don't have kids nor do I have a wife. How much are
>> you willing to give me?
>>
>> --
>> My heart drive crashed.
>> Dispel The Darkness to email.
>> valfreyja457@THEDARKNESSgmail.com
>
> Are you a female without a wife? Freyja is a germanic godess of the ancient
> times.
>
>

That's right. I was hoping someone would deduce that.

--
My heart drive crashed.
Dispel The Darkness to email.
valfreyja457@THEDARKNESSgmail.com

On Wed, 25 Jun 2008 06:48:36 -0400, Miguel Alberto wrote:

> "If THEY wont allow you a death, THEY owe you a living."

It is possible to die at any time,
Many of the meds they provide facilitate that choice,

We choose to live, maybe at times it seems we are only living for our
loved ones. Stop moaning about existence there are plenty who would
rather us dead. Instead moan about the inner demons that persecute us,
or the medicines that are less than ideal. Claiming to want death
is playing into the hands that would kill us all.



--
For your health and therefore happiness,
and for thier health.

Ignorance does not free you
whether it be the Mystic Law,
or the Law of the Land.

http://www.meat.org/index-1.asp?c=mymbagn0508

http://www.petatv.com/tvpopup/Prefs....reasons&chgpre

Whatever your spiritual belief from Vodon to Atheism
from Judaism to Jainism this CANNOT BE RIGHT.

May the truth set us ALL free.

But, "THEY wont allow anyone a death". With any potentially fatal
condition, THEY struggle to prevent death. With any suicide attempt,
THEY struggle to prevent death, and then THEY prosecute for the illegal
suicide attempt, which ends up in commitment.
As long as suicide is illegal, and easy painless suicides are kept
unavailable, if you want death and THEIR policy is not to allow death,
THEY we you a living!

It used to be almost propagandized on TV, when the occasion arose,
that the Chinese decree that "if you save a person's life, you owe them
a living". I don't hear that expressed in the media anymore. I wonder
why?
Why did they ever make such a fuss about it to begin with? Perhaps
it was the predominance of bleeding heart liberals in the Twentieth
Century. But, it IS a Chinese axiom.
Also, look at the Chinese Kang Xi 71'st radical for "no". It is a
combination of the 43rd radical for "disabled" and the 48th radical for
"work": the "disabled" "work"? "No"!


http://community.webtv.net/mpereira/TheSecretsofthe

"Michael A. Pereira" <mpereira@webtv.net> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:5339-4868AE7F-840@storefull-3135.bay.webtv.net...
> It used to be almost propagandized on TV, when the occasion arose,
> that the Chinese decree that "if you save a person's life, you owe them
> a living". I don't hear that expressed in the media anymore. I wonder

I think it is rather: "If you save a persons live, THEY owe you a living"

> why?
> Why did they ever make such a fuss about it to begin with? Perhaps
> it was the predominance of bleeding heart liberals in the Twentieth
> Century. But, it IS a Chinese axiom.
> Also, look at the Chinese Kang Xi 71'st radical for "no". It is a
> combination of the 43rd radical for "disabled" and the 48th radical for
> "work": the "disabled" "work"? "No"!
>
>
> http://community.webtv.net/mpereira/TheSecretsofthe
>

No! I remember that too. The Chinese said, "If you save someone's
life YOU owe THEM a living". Did Confuscius say that?