Dear CuckooCat....

Since you wrote....
> I have 1083 unread posts here and will try and > catch up tomorrow, but
if I miss something,
> because my server is being wonky

One thing you maybe missed was the question about whether everyone at the
recent meet had been at a previous meet.

On Wed, 08 Aug 2007 18:45:26 -0400, "angry_quitter"
<angry.quitter@argh.com> wrote:

>Since you wrote....
>> I have 1083 unread posts here and will try and > catch up tomorrow, but
>if I miss something,
>> because my server is being wonky
>
>One thing you maybe missed was the question about whether everyone at the
>recent meet had been at a previous meet.

Stop trying to stir up trouble again. Looks like you're living up to
your user name.

Cat and everyone else on this planet have a right to invite whomever
they wish to THEIR party.

Now go take a break and don't come back until you can play nice with
everyone.

Because *I* said so.

--
BessieBee

"If you want the rainbow, you got to put up with the rain"
Steven Wright

On Wed, 08 Aug 2007 18:45:26 -0400, "angry_quitter"
<angry.quitter@argh.com> wrote:

>Since you wrote....
>> I have 1083 unread posts here and will try and > catch up tomorrow, but
>if I miss something,
>> because my server is being wonky
>
>One thing you maybe missed was the question about whether everyone at the
>recent meet had been at a previous meet.

Stop trying to stir up trouble again. Looks like you're living up to
your user name.

Cat and everyone else on this planet have a right to invite whomever
they wish to THEIR party.

Now go take a break and don't come back until you can play nice with
everyone.

Because *I* said so.

--
BessieBee

"If you want the rainbow, you got to put up with the rain"
Steven Wright

>Stop trying to stir up trouble again. Looks like you're living up to
>your user name.
>
>Cat and everyone else on this planet have a right to invite whomever
>they wish to THEIR party.

I never said they didn't have the right. The question is still there.

>Now go take a break and don't come back until you can play nice with
>everyone.
>
>Because *I* said so.

You're not the boss of me.

>Stop trying to stir up trouble again. Looks like you're living up to
>your user name.
>
>Cat and everyone else on this planet have a right to invite whomever
>they wish to THEIR party.

I never said they didn't have the right. The question is still there.

>Now go take a break and don't come back until you can play nice with
>everyone.
>
>Because *I* said so.

You're not the boss of me.

angry_quitter wrote:
> Since you wrote....
>
>>I have 1083 unread posts here and will try and > catch up tomorrow, but
>
> if I miss something,
>
>>because my server is being wonky
>
>
> One thing you maybe missed was the question about whether everyone at the
> recent meet had been at a previous meet.
>
What the hell is your problem??? Who cares. People can have private
parties. I have been to meets where there were private meets within a
open meet. So what? Get over yourself.
Debbie VOF (grumpy today)

angry_quitter wrote:
> Since you wrote....
>
>>I have 1083 unread posts here and will try and > catch up tomorrow, but
>
> if I miss something,
>
>>because my server is being wonky
>
>
> One thing you maybe missed was the question about whether everyone at the
> recent meet had been at a previous meet.
>
What the hell is your problem??? Who cares. People can have private
parties. I have been to meets where there were private meets within a
open meet. So what? Get over yourself.
Debbie VOF (grumpy today)

In looking at the anonymous "angry_quitter"'s profile, I see that he/
she/it has a history of attempting to foster division within the
group. I think it's a shame that someone feels the need to hide behind
a screen name instead of posting using their real name. Regardless, I
think it's best if we all ignore he/she/it.

In looking at the anonymous "angry_quitter"'s profile, I see that he/
she/it has a history of attempting to foster division within the
group. I think it's a shame that someone feels the need to hide behind
a screen name instead of posting using their real name. Regardless, I
think it's best if we all ignore he/she/it.

On Wed, 08 Aug 2007 19:13:31 -0400, "angry_quitter"
<angry.quitter@argh.com> wrote:

>You're not the boss of me.

Sounds like something I would have said when I was 12.

Piss off.

--
BessieBee

"If you want the rainbow, you got to put up with the rain"
Steven Wright

On Wed, 08 Aug 2007 19:13:31 -0400, "angry_quitter"
<angry.quitter@argh.com> wrote:

>You're not the boss of me.

Sounds like something I would have said when I was 12.

Piss off.

--
BessieBee

"If you want the rainbow, you got to put up with the rain"
Steven Wright

On Wed, 08 Aug 2007 23:22:01 -0000, writer272002
<writer272002@gmail.com> wrote:

>I think it's a shame that someone feels the need to hide behind
>a screen name instead of posting using their real name. Regardless, I
>think it's best if we all ignore he/she/it.

Well, writer272002, BessieBee here. I agree! Posters like us should
*always* use our real names!!! :-)

I'm in a pissy mood tonight and perfectly willing to take on a
miserable little pup like "angry." I could even use a few
<whisper>curse words.</whisper>

It's not much fun to have a battle of wits with an unarmed
person,though. Still, a little practice is good. :-)

--
BessieBee

"If you want the rainbow, you got to put up with the rain"
Steven Wright

On Wed, 08 Aug 2007 23:22:01 -0000, writer272002
<writer272002@gmail.com> wrote:

>I think it's a shame that someone feels the need to hide behind
>a screen name instead of posting using their real name. Regardless, I
>think it's best if we all ignore he/she/it.

Well, writer272002, BessieBee here. I agree! Posters like us should
*always* use our real names!!! :-)

I'm in a pissy mood tonight and perfectly willing to take on a
miserable little pup like "angry." I could even use a few
<whisper>curse words.</whisper>

It's not much fun to have a battle of wits with an unarmed
person,though. Still, a little practice is good. :-)

--
BessieBee

"If you want the rainbow, you got to put up with the rain"
Steven Wright

Dear angry_quitter/sock_puppet...

It is because of people like YOU that we have PRIVATE meets.

G'day.

Cat



"angry_quitter" <angry.quitter@argh.com> wrote in message
news:801cc56674d53902a13de38fe8ba8930@localhost.ta lkaboutsupport.com...
> Since you wrote....
>> I have 1083 unread posts here and will try and > catch up tomorrow, but
> if I miss something,
>> because my server is being wonky
>
> One thing you maybe missed was the question about whether everyone at the
> recent meet had been at a previous meet.
>

Dear angry_quitter/sock_puppet...

It is because of people like YOU that we have PRIVATE meets.

G'day.

Cat



"angry_quitter" <angry.quitter@argh.com> wrote in message
news:801cc56674d53902a13de38fe8ba8930@localhost.ta lkaboutsupport.com...
> Since you wrote....
>> I have 1083 unread posts here and will try and > catch up tomorrow, but
> if I miss something,
>> because my server is being wonky
>
> One thing you maybe missed was the question about whether everyone at the
> recent meet had been at a previous meet.
>

>Dear angry_quitter/sock_puppet...
>
>It is because of people like YOU that we have PRIVATE meets.
>
>G'day.
>
>Cat

Answer the question. Did YOU LIE to Sue?

>Dear angry_quitter/sock_puppet...
>
>It is because of people like YOU that we have PRIVATE meets.
>
>G'day.
>
>Cat

Answer the question. Did YOU LIE to Sue?

On Aug 8, 7:04 pm, BessieBee <BessieBee@I_dont_smoke_anymore.com>
wrote:
> On Wed, 08 Aug 2007 18:45:26 -0400, "angry_quitter"
>
> <angry.quit...@argh.com> wrote:
> >Since you wrote....
> >> I have 1083 unread posts here and will try and > catch up tomorrow, but
> >if I miss something,
> >> because my server is being wonky
>
> >One thing you maybe missed was the question about whether everyone at the
> >recent meet had been at a previous meet.
>
> Stop trying to stir up trouble again. Looks like you're living up to
> your user name.
>
> Cat and everyone else on this planet have a right to invite whomever
> they wish to THEIR party.
>
> Now go take a break and don't come back until you can play nice with
> everyone.
>
> Because *I* said so.
>
> --
> BessieBee
>
> "If you want the rainbow, you got to put up with the rain"
> Steven Wright

I think it's best not to give people like this any attention. Just
ignore him/her trouble maker.
In the same group as a spammer.

Lizzy

On Aug 8, 7:04 pm, BessieBee <BessieBee@I_dont_smoke_anymore.com>
wrote:
> On Wed, 08 Aug 2007 18:45:26 -0400, "angry_quitter"
>
> <angry.quit...@argh.com> wrote:
> >Since you wrote....
> >> I have 1083 unread posts here and will try and > catch up tomorrow, but
> >if I miss something,
> >> because my server is being wonky
>
> >One thing you maybe missed was the question about whether everyone at the
> >recent meet had been at a previous meet.
>
> Stop trying to stir up trouble again. Looks like you're living up to
> your user name.
>
> Cat and everyone else on this planet have a right to invite whomever
> they wish to THEIR party.
>
> Now go take a break and don't come back until you can play nice with
> everyone.
>
> Because *I* said so.
>
> --
> BessieBee
>
> "If you want the rainbow, you got to put up with the rain"
> Steven Wright

I think it's best not to give people like this any attention. Just
ignore him/her trouble maker.
In the same group as a spammer.

Lizzy

Awwwww, I finally got my own troll.
How cute!

Buh-bye now. Into the bit-bucket with you.

CatGrinning




"angry_quitter" <angry.quitter@argh.com> wrote drivel

Awwwww, I finally got my own troll.
How cute!

Buh-bye now. Into the bit-bucket with you.

CatGrinning




"angry_quitter" <angry.quitter@argh.com> wrote drivel

>Awwwww, I finally got my own troll.
>How cute!
>
>Buh-bye now. Into the bit-bucket with you.
>
>CatGrinning

Dodging the question pretty much answers it.

You didn't have to lie.

angry_quitter_getting_the_last_laugh

>Awwwww, I finally got my own troll.
>How cute!
>
>Buh-bye now. Into the bit-bucket with you.
>
>CatGrinning

Dodging the question pretty much answers it.

You didn't have to lie.

angry_quitter_getting_the_last_laugh

"angry_quitter" <angry.quitter@argh.com> wrote in message
news:632f5311ddbf761ca81be044fb65f14f@localhost.ta lkaboutsupport.com...
> >Dear angry_quitter/sock_puppet...
>>
>>It is because of people like YOU that we have PRIVATE meets.
>>
>>G'day.
>>
>>Cat
>
> Answer the question. Did YOU LIE to Sue?
>

I'd say that question is none of your fucking business, skippy. Answer this
question; were you dropped repeatedly on your head when you were younger?

Go have a meet with yourself. At least you'll be with someone who gives a
shit what you think. Christ. Posting from talkaboutsupport.com, no less.
Fucking coward.

Lee
OOF

--
Hawaiian trapped in a Minnesotan's body

"angry_quitter" <angry.quitter@argh.com> wrote in message
news:632f5311ddbf761ca81be044fb65f14f@localhost.ta lkaboutsupport.com...
> >Dear angry_quitter/sock_puppet...
>>
>>It is because of people like YOU that we have PRIVATE meets.
>>
>>G'day.
>>
>>Cat
>
> Answer the question. Did YOU LIE to Sue?
>

I'd say that question is none of your fucking business, skippy. Answer this
question; were you dropped repeatedly on your head when you were younger?

Go have a meet with yourself. At least you'll be with someone who gives a
shit what you think. Christ. Posting from talkaboutsupport.com, no less.
Fucking coward.

Lee
OOF

--
Hawaiian trapped in a Minnesotan's body

"writer272002" <writer272002@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1186615321.520195.291570@d55g2000hsg.googlegr oups.com...
> In looking at the anonymous "angry_quitter"'s profile, I see that he/
> she/it has a history of attempting to foster division within the
> group. I think it's a shame that someone feels the need to hide behind
> a screen name instead of posting using their real name. Regardless, I
> think it's best if we all ignore he/she/it.
>

He/she/it. I vote for "it". And a name change to something more
appropriate, like, from angry_quitter to angry_troller.

What a stickhead.

Lee
OOF

--
Hawaiian trapped in a Minnesotan's body

"writer272002" <writer272002@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1186615321.520195.291570@d55g2000hsg.googlegr oups.com...
> In looking at the anonymous "angry_quitter"'s profile, I see that he/
> she/it has a history of attempting to foster division within the
> group. I think it's a shame that someone feels the need to hide behind
> a screen name instead of posting using their real name. Regardless, I
> think it's best if we all ignore he/she/it.
>

He/she/it. I vote for "it". And a name change to something more
appropriate, like, from angry_quitter to angry_troller.

What a stickhead.

Lee
OOF

--
Hawaiian trapped in a Minnesotan's body

Once upon a time, angry_quitter said:

>I just had some bullshit with onions for breakfast, with some
>1967. Pisseau du Cow at room temperature.

Dear AS3ers. The best you can do with horse turds like this one is
completely ignore him. What the shitface is doing is the very
definition of trolling: Stirring up trouble behind a false name or
anonimity.

Some of you might find it enjoyable to argue with it, but it is just
what it feeds on: attention. And at least some of the newcomers might
not understand what's it about and get scared off the group.

Remember: An ignored troll is no troll.

Yes, I have replied this time too, but I hope the goal justifies the
deed.

--
Tihomir *I don't smoke anymore*
Remove my shirt to E-mail me.
IRC chat: #nosmokers at irc.starlink.org

.... Henry Ford, with all his money...never owned a Caddy!

Once upon a time, angry_quitter said:

>I just had some bullshit with onions for breakfast, with some
>1967. Pisseau du Cow at room temperature.

Dear AS3ers. The best you can do with horse turds like this one is
completely ignore him. What the shitface is doing is the very
definition of trolling: Stirring up trouble behind a false name or
anonimity.

Some of you might find it enjoyable to argue with it, but it is just
what it feeds on: attention. And at least some of the newcomers might
not understand what's it about and get scared off the group.

Remember: An ignored troll is no troll.

Yes, I have replied this time too, but I hope the goal justifies the
deed.

--
Tihomir *I don't smoke anymore*
Remove my shirt to E-mail me.
IRC chat: #nosmokers at irc.starlink.org

.... Henry Ford, with all his money...never owned a Caddy!

Tihomir <tgrebenashirt@inet.hr> wrote in
news:f9eg55$6vg$1@stable.tornevall.net:

> Once upon a time, angry_quitter said:
>
>>I just had some bullshit with onions for breakfast, with some
>>1967. Pisseau du Cow at room temperature.
>
> Dear AS3ers. The best you can do with horse turds like this one
> is.....<cut>
.......
And at least some of the newcomers might not understand what's it about
and get scared off the group.
>

Gonna take a lot more than an angry quitter's rant to scare this new
quitter off!!!! My general rule is:

Take What Is Needed
Leave the Rest

Wayne
4D, 20H, 31m.

Tihomir <tgrebenashirt@inet.hr> wrote in
news:f9eg55$6vg$1@stable.tornevall.net:

> Once upon a time, angry_quitter said:
>
>>I just had some bullshit with onions for breakfast, with some
>>1967. Pisseau du Cow at room temperature.
>
> Dear AS3ers. The best you can do with horse turds like this one
> is.....<cut>
.......
And at least some of the newcomers might not understand what's it about
and get scared off the group.
>

Gonna take a lot more than an angry quitter's rant to scare this new
quitter off!!!! My general rule is:

Take What Is Needed
Leave the Rest

Wayne
4D, 20H, 31m.

On Thu, 09 Aug 2007 11:52:40 GMT, Wayne <dloansarranger@cox.net>
wrote:

>Gonna take a lot more than an angry quitter's rant to scare this new
>quitter off!!!! My general rule is:
>
> Take What Is Needed
> Leave the Rest
>
>Wayne
>4D, 20H, 31m.

Very well said, Wayne. Welcome to AS3!
--
BessieBee

"If you want the rainbow, you got to put up with the rain"
Steven Wright

On Thu, 09 Aug 2007 11:52:40 GMT, Wayne <dloansarranger@cox.net>
wrote:

>Gonna take a lot more than an angry quitter's rant to scare this new
>quitter off!!!! My general rule is:
>
> Take What Is Needed
> Leave the Rest
>
>Wayne
>4D, 20H, 31m.

Very well said, Wayne. Welcome to AS3!
--
BessieBee

"If you want the rainbow, you got to put up with the rain"
Steven Wright

OK, BessieBee, you *do* have a point.
But people know who we are. I'm Ashley. You're Leslie.

OK, BessieBee, you *do* have a point.
But people know who we are. I'm Ashley. You're Leslie.

On Thu, 09 Aug 2007 10:19:42 -0700, writer272002
<writer272002@gmail.com> wrote:

>OK, BessieBee, you *do* have a point.
>But people know who we are. I'm Ashley. You're Leslie.
>
>

That *was* my point - people know who we are.

I was just being sarcastic/flippant/smart mouth. Certainly no dig
intended!!! ;-)

--
BessieBee

"If you want the rainbow, you got to put up with the rain"
Steven Wright

On Thu, 09 Aug 2007 10:19:42 -0700, writer272002
<writer272002@gmail.com> wrote:

>OK, BessieBee, you *do* have a point.
>But people know who we are. I'm Ashley. You're Leslie.
>
>

That *was* my point - people know who we are.

I was just being sarcastic/flippant/smart mouth. Certainly no dig
intended!!! ;-)

--
BessieBee

"If you want the rainbow, you got to put up with the rain"
Steven Wright

This group can delude itself all it wants. That doesn't change the facts or
the truth.

I'm not a troll, not trying to stir up trouble, not wanting attention and
certainly not ranting. I merely pointed out a question CuckooCat seemed to
want to gloss over.

Here are some more facts for you. I have every right to protect my
anonymity. There are a lot of damaged people on Usenet. Ahem.

I have every write to ask the question I did. It is my business. The
question was first raised in a public forum. Pressing for a public answer
to a public question in a public forum is completely within my rights.

Here are my final facts for you. When Sue expressed hurt at the semi
secret meet being rubbed in her face, she was attacked and lied to. That
didn't have to happen. The people who replied could have done it
differently. They could have disagreed with her reaction without attacking
and lying. They could also choose to be honest now and apologize.

This group can delude itself all it wants. That doesn't change the facts or
the truth.

I'm not a troll, not trying to stir up trouble, not wanting attention and
certainly not ranting. I merely pointed out a question CuckooCat seemed to
want to gloss over.

Here are some more facts for you. I have every right to protect my
anonymity. There are a lot of damaged people on Usenet. Ahem.

I have every write to ask the question I did. It is my business. The
question was first raised in a public forum. Pressing for a public answer
to a public question in a public forum is completely within my rights.

Here are my final facts for you. When Sue expressed hurt at the semi
secret meet being rubbed in her face, she was attacked and lied to. That
didn't have to happen. The people who replied could have done it
differently. They could have disagreed with her reaction without attacking
and lying. They could also choose to be honest now and apologize.

Facts? You have no way of knowing what has been said between
Cat and her DH. If they want to have a meet with people they already
have seen at other meets they can do so. Them making any exception
they deem fit doesn't change a thing. In your interpretation of the truth
Sue was lied to, in mine she wasn't. There were real life friends as well.
Are you really so anal you think Cat should have said the meet was for
people they already meet at other meets with the exception of some
kids and spouses and some real life friends etc? Wake the fuck up!

Do you really think that is anyone else's business what she does in her
own home? Fuck off. Apologize for what? For not opening her sock
drawer for everyone? This is none of your fucking business unless Cat
decides she wants it to be.

My final facts? Google your own name and see what you post in this
group. Really think anyone needs to account themselves to you? Pressing
for an answer? You have to be joking. Please don't use Sue for your nasty
agenda, she deserves better.

One more thing. No, not everyone could be there. Still, some people here
want to know about the meet and would like to see pictures, others will
want to skip it. Take what you want and leave the rest.

My email is on the quit list. I suggest that if anyone would like to babble
about this some more they email me. That or to ask me how my vacation
or my birthday was or summin summin.

--
Batman: "That's life, Robin, full of ups and downs. It ill befits any of us
to become to confident."
-
"angry_quitter" <> schreef in bericht ...
> This group can delude itself all it wants. That doesn't change the facts
> or
> the truth.
>
> I'm not a troll, not trying to stir up trouble, not wanting attention and
> certainly not ranting. I merely pointed out a question CuckooCat seemed to
> want to gloss over.
>
> Here are some more facts for you. I have every right to protect my
> anonymity. There are a lot of damaged people on Usenet. Ahem.
>
> I have every write to ask the question I did. It is my business. The
> question was first raised in a public forum. Pressing for a public answer
> to a public question in a public forum is completely within my rights.
>
> Here are my final facts for you. When Sue expressed hurt at the semi
> secret meet being rubbed in her face, she was attacked and lied to. That
> didn't have to happen. The people who replied could have done it
> differently. They could have disagreed with her reaction without attacking
> and lying. They could also choose to be honest now and apologize.
>