In article <1169653013.620794.326660@v33g2000cwv.googlegroups .com>,
"george" <223remi@gmail.com> wrote:
> The goal of this high-volume program is to improve my clean (current
> 1RM about 100kg). And if I want to do other things (squat, dl, bench) I
> am supposed to do it on other days.
>
> On paper, it looks just too easy... Any comments?
>
> Here it is, it table format:
>
> http://tinypic.com/view/?pic=2i91g01
>
Nothing wrong with it.
IMO there are really only a few worthwhile assistance exercises.
Anything from the blocks or hang is just fine. Hi-pulls. Front squats or
squats. You could also argue power cleans.
If you break down the movement and the adaptations into functional
adaptations and say all the movements have to be specific to the clean
than you really have everything.
Hang clean and clean from the blocks are technique exercises to focus on
maximal vertical extension.
Hi-pulls are a strength exercise focusing on pull.
Front squat is a strength exercise focusing on catch and recovery to
stand.
I'd argue for the power clean as a speed exercise to focus on bar speed.
I know there are a number of articles which dispute this and feel the
technique is too different, including some written by the great lifter
and coach Tommy Kono. But so many great lifters have used the power
clean with good results.
--
Keith