300 diet?

hey there-does any1 know the diet the dudes were on when they were
doing their training for this movie? did it involve steroids and th e
like?
Cheers

"snakecharmer" <validatpart@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1175977185.774508.200750@y80g2000hsf.googlegr oups.com...
> hey there-does any1 know the diet the dudes were on when they were
> doing their training for this movie? did it involve steroids and th e
> like?
> Cheers

I didn't see it but I doubt it- reportedly Mark Twight was involved in the
training- also associated with www.gymjones.com

"snakecharmer" <validatpart@yahoo.co.uk> writes:

> hey there-does any1 know the diet the dudes were on when they were
> doing their training for this movie? did it involve steroids and th e
> like?
> Cheers

I haven't read it, since I am already a Spartan, but I saw this the
other day:

http://www.sixpacknow.com/300_movie_...n_workout.html

On 7 Apr, 21:56, Steven Vasilogianis <steven.vasilogia...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> "snakecharmer" <validatp...@yahoo.co.uk> writes:
> > hey there-does any1 know the diet the dudes were on when they were
> > doing their training for this movie? did it involve steroids and th e
> > like?
> > Cheers
>
> I haven't read it, since I am already a Spartan, but I saw this the
> other day:
>
> http://www.sixpacknow.com/300_movie_...n_workout.html
That must be exhausting!being a Spartan

On 7 Apr 2007 13:19:45 -0700, "snakecharmer" <validatpart@yahoo.co.uk>
wrote:

>hey there-does any1 know the diet the dudes were on when they were
>doing their training for this movie? did it involve steroids and th e
>like?
>Cheers

I think it involved computers. Most of the images where created or
altered by computers.

On Apr 7, 3:19 pm, "snakecharmer" <validatp...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> hey there-does any1 know the diet the dudes were on when they were
> doing their training for this movie? did it involve steroids and th e
> like?
> Cheers

Actually it was, for the most part, done through calorie deficit.

Look it up.

Involves non-immediate gratification and no drugs. Most folks look
like obese turds because of that simple fact.

HTH.

snakecharmer wrote:

> hey there-does any1 know the diet
> the dudes were on when they were
> doing their training for this movie?
> did it involve steroids and th e like?
> Cheers

No info here, but a bit of opinion, fwiw.

I assume that some of the actors were not on any specific diet, but
were simply chosen for their role because of their appearance. Broad
shoulders, visible abs, lean, and not entirely gruesome. Seems like a
no-brainer there, right?

But, yes, Google reveals:

http://300themovie.warnerbros.com/february.html

--
Curt

"ATP*" <waxwingslain@azurepane.com> wrote:
>"snakecharmer" <validatpart@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>> hey there-does any1 know the diet the dudes were on when they were
>> doing their training for this movie? did it involve steroids and th e
>> like?
>> Cheers
>
>I didn't see it but I doubt it- reportedly Mark Twight was involved in the
>training- also associated with www.gymjones.com

It also helps to have a little make-up outlining your musculature.
Look at some of the stills.

"JMW" <jmwilliams@enforcergraphics.f2s.com> wrote in message
news:2geg131hm5nvm9hdhsodk4ctgsfhplev0s@4ax.com...
> "ATP*" <waxwingslain@azurepane.com> wrote:
>>"snakecharmer" <validatpart@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>>> hey there-does any1 know the diet the dudes were on when they were
>>> doing their training for this movie? did it involve steroids and th e
>>> like?
>>> Cheers
>>
>>I didn't see it but I doubt it- reportedly Mark Twight was involved in the
>>training- also associated with www.gymjones.com
>
> It also helps to have a little make-up outlining your musculature.
> Look at some of the stills.

The 300 program:
http://www.gymjones.com/knowledge.php?id=35

"ATP*" <waxwingslain@azurepane.com> wrote:
>"JMW" <jmwilliams@enforcergraphics.f2s.com> wrote:
>> "ATP*" <waxwingslain@azurepane.com> wrote:
>>>"snakecharmer" <validatpart@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>>>> hey there-does any1 know the diet the dudes were on when they were
>>>> doing their training for this movie? did it involve steroids and th e
>>>> like?
>>>> Cheers
>>>
>>>I didn't see it but I doubt it- reportedly Mark Twight was involved in the
>>>training- also associated with www.gymjones.com
>>
>> It also helps to have a little make-up outlining your musculature.
>> Look at some of the stills.
>
>The 300 program:
>http://www.gymjones.com/knowledge.php?id=35

I've watched the video of the workout. They still used make-up to
create muscular definition, and if you look closely at the stills, you
can tell. They were creating comic book images, just like in "Sin
City."

JMW <jmwilli...@enforcergraphics.f2s.com> wrote:
> "ATP*" <waxwingsl...@azurepane.com> wrote:
> >"snakecharmer" <validatp...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> >> hey there-does any1 know the diet
> >> the dudes were on when they were
> >> doing their training for this movie?
[...]

> > I didn't see it but I doubt it- reportedly
> > Mark Twight was involved in the
> > training- also associated with
> > www.gymjones.com
>
> It also helps to have a little make-up
> outlining your musculature.

Hey, good enough for Sandow, good enough for movie Spartans.

http://www.sandowmuseum.com/index.html

> Look at some of the stills.

I haven't looked, but I wouldn't be surprised. Obviously, the actors
were selected - at least in part - for their physical appearance. Some
enhancement of those attributes for the big screen wouldn't be unheard
of.

--
Curt

"JMW" <jmwilliams@enforcergraphics.f2s.com> wrote in message
news:c1vg13dtonbk53gs7oufhamgar9t68opa7@4ax.com...
> "ATP*" <waxwingslain@azurepane.com> wrote:
>>"JMW" <jmwilliams@enforcergraphics.f2s.com> wrote:
>>> "ATP*" <waxwingslain@azurepane.com> wrote:
>>>>"snakecharmer" <validatpart@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>> hey there-does any1 know the diet the dudes were on when they were
>>>>> doing their training for this movie? did it involve steroids and th e
>>>>> like?
>>>>> Cheers
>>>>
>>>>I didn't see it but I doubt it- reportedly Mark Twight was involved in
>>>>the
>>>>training- also associated with www.gymjones.com
>>>
>>> It also helps to have a little make-up outlining your musculature.
>>> Look at some of the stills.
>>
>>The 300 program:
>>http://www.gymjones.com/knowledge.php?id=35
>
> I've watched the video of the workout. They still used make-up to
> create muscular definition, and if you look closely at the stills, you
> can tell. They were creating comic book images, just like in "Sin
> City."

Not disagreeing with you, just posted the link for further
information/discussion. Twight commented that effort and results varied
widely among the cast members, so some probably needed the makeup more than
others.

"JMW" <jmwilliams@enforcergraphics.f2s.com> wrote in message
news:c1vg13dtonbk53gs7oufhamgar9t68opa7@4ax.com...
> "ATP*" <waxwingslain@azurepane.com> wrote:
>>"JMW" <jmwilliams@enforcergraphics.f2s.com> wrote:
>>> "ATP*" <waxwingslain@azurepane.com> wrote:
>>>>"snakecharmer" <validatpart@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>> hey there-does any1 know the diet the dudes were on when they were
>>>>> doing their training for this movie? did it involve steroids and th e
>>>>> like?
>>>>> Cheers
>>>>
>>>>I didn't see it but I doubt it- reportedly Mark Twight was involved in
>>>>the
>>>>training- also associated with www.gymjones.com
>>>
>>> It also helps to have a little make-up outlining your musculature.
>>> Look at some of the stills.
>>
>>The 300 program:
>>http://www.gymjones.com/knowledge.php?id=35
>
> I've watched the video of the workout. They still used make-up to
> create muscular definition, and if you look closely at the stills, you
> can tell. They were creating comic book images, just like in "Sin
> City."

When the trailer first started appearing on TV, my kids and I argued over
whether it was real humans (them) or animation (me). Now my 14-year-old is
trying to find a friend's parent to take him to see it, which I've told him
is fine if he can arrange it but so far, he's struck out.

There's a nice thread on Bryce Lane's board about someone who saw the movie
with his wife, noticed how his wife was ogling (my word, not his) the
physiques on the screen, and he used this as motivation to train harder.
That's the only positive thing I've heard come out of this movie.

-S-
http://www.kbnj.com

Steve Freides wrote:
[...]

re 300

> <snip> my 14-year-old is trying to
> find a friend's parent to take him to
> see it, which I've told him is fine if
> he can arrange it but so far, he's
> struck out.

You refuse to take your son to a movie? But it's okay if a friend's
parent does the job?

> There's a nice thread on Bryce
> Lane's board

About parents shirking their responsibilities?

> about someone who saw the
> movie with his wife, noticed how
> his wife was ogling (my word, not
> his) the physiques on the screen,
> and he used this as motivation to
> train harder.
> That's the only positive thing I've
> heard come out of this movie.

What, that the movie inspired someone's wife to begin "ogling" (your
word, not mine) someone other than her husband?

Regardless, you should see the movie before allowing your child to see
the movie. An opinion. One shared, btw:

http://au.answers.yahoo.com/question...AAFDejv&show=7
aka http://tinyurl.com/2txxz3

--
Curt

"Steve Freides" <steve@fridayscomputer.com> wrote:
>"JMW" <jmwilliams@enforcergraphics.f2s.com> wrote:
>> "ATP*" <waxwingslain@azurepane.com> wrote:
>>>"JMW" <jmwilliams@enforcergraphics.f2s.com> wrote:
>>>> "ATP*" <waxwingslain@azurepane.com> wrote:
>>>>>"snakecharmer" <validatpart@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>>> hey there-does any1 know the diet the dudes were on when they were
>>>>>> doing their training for this movie? did it involve steroids and th e
>>>>>> like?
>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>
>>>>>I didn't see it but I doubt it- reportedly Mark Twight was involved in
>>>>>the
>>>>>training- also associated with www.gymjones.com
>>>>
>>>> It also helps to have a little make-up outlining your musculature.
>>>> Look at some of the stills.
>>>
>>>The 300 program:
>>>http://www.gymjones.com/knowledge.php?id=35
>>
>> I've watched the video of the workout. They still used make-up to
>> create muscular definition, and if you look closely at the stills, you
>> can tell. They were creating comic book images, just like in "Sin
>> City."
>
>When the trailer first started appearing on TV, my kids and I argued over
>whether it was real humans (them) or animation (me). Now my 14-year-old is
>trying to find a friend's parent to take him to see it, which I've told him
>is fine if he can arrange it but so far, he's struck out.
>
>There's a nice thread on Bryce Lane's board about someone who saw the movie
>with his wife, noticed how his wife was ogling (my word, not his) the
>physiques on the screen, and he used this as motivation to train harder.
>That's the only positive thing I've heard come out of this movie.

You have to have an appreciation of the genre. It has nothing to do
with history; it's about graphic novels. They seem to be the newest
source material for films. Some of the films have been quite dismal
("League of Extraordinary Gentlemen," the first "The Punisher") or
mediocre ("V for Vendetta," the second "The Punisher"), while others
are more true to the original ("Sin City," "300"). If one is
unfamiliar with graphic novels, or considers himself/herself "above"
that medium, one will probably not appreciate the films generated from
them. I have no problem is admitting that I enjoy them.

Zack Snyder is now slated to direct "Watchmen," which has been on the
Hollywood burner since the late 1980s, and it appears that "Magdalena"
and "Black Hole" are also in pre-production. HBO may make a series of
"Preacher," which, if done properly, would be bold even for them. And
I'm still holding out hopes for "Transmetropolitan."

On Sat, 07 Apr 2007 13:19:45 -0700, snakecharmer wrote:

> hey there-does any1 know the diet the dudes were on when they were
> doing their training for this movie? did it involve steroids and th e
> like?
> Cheers


i,m not sure about the diet, but a lot has been written about the workout
they used. Here are a few articles on that workout, and variations of it
from Josh Hillis :

http://joshsgarage.typepad.com/artic...miller_mo.html
http://joshsgarage.typepad.com/artic...0_workout.html
http://joshsgarage.typepad.com/artic...appens_wh.html
http://joshsgarage.typepad.com/artic...r_client_.html
http://joshsgarage.typepad.com/artic...stest_300.html
http://joshsgarage.typepad.com/artic...ss_expert.html
http://joshsgarage.typepad.com/artic...wipers_fr.html
http://joshsgarage.typepad.com/artic...day_photo.html
http://joshsgarage.typepad.com/artic...does_spar.html

The short description is that it used full body movements with plenty of
reps. No exercises that isolate specific muscle groups, like curls or leg
extensions, were used. And the workout was done in a timed circuit.

Diet is just to help get the person's level of body fat down enough so
that all of the muscle can be seen. Mr. Hillis has numerous articles, and
book about that. His speciality seems to be helping people loose those
last few pounds of fat so their hard built muscle can shine through. He
has some really interesting articles on His site :
http://joshsgarage.typepad.com/

"JMW" <jmwilliams@enforcergraphics.f2s.com> wrote in message
news:1i6i13luhl8mmf61ndp2kipktt27sj1bl8@4ax.com...
> "Steve Freides" <steve@fridayscomputer.com> wrote:
>>"JMW" <jmwilliams@enforcergraphics.f2s.com> wrote:
>>> "ATP*" <waxwingslain@azurepane.com> wrote:
>>>>"JMW" <jmwilliams@enforcergraphics.f2s.com> wrote:
>>>>> "ATP*" <waxwingslain@azurepane.com> wrote:
>>>>>>"snakecharmer" <validatpart@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>>>> hey there-does any1 know the diet the dudes were on when they
>>>>>>> were
>>>>>>> doing their training for this movie? did it involve steroids and
>>>>>>> th e
>>>>>>> like?
>>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I didn't see it but I doubt it- reportedly Mark Twight was
>>>>>>involved in
>>>>>>the
>>>>>>training- also associated with www.gymjones.com
>>>>>
>>>>> It also helps to have a little make-up outlining your musculature.
>>>>> Look at some of the stills.
>>>>
>>>>The 300 program:
>>>>http://www.gymjones.com/knowledge.php?id=35
>>>
>>> I've watched the video of the workout. They still used make-up to
>>> create muscular definition, and if you look closely at the stills,
>>> you
>>> can tell. They were creating comic book images, just like in "Sin
>>> City."
>>
>>When the trailer first started appearing on TV, my kids and I argued
>>over
>>whether it was real humans (them) or animation (me). Now my
>>14-year-old is
>>trying to find a friend's parent to take him to see it, which I've
>>told him
>>is fine if he can arrange it but so far, he's struck out.
>>
>>There's a nice thread on Bryce Lane's board about someone who saw the
>>movie
>>with his wife, noticed how his wife was ogling (my word, not his) the
>>physiques on the screen, and he used this as motivation to train
>>harder.
>>That's the only positive thing I've heard come out of this movie.
>
> You have to have an appreciation of the genre. It has nothing to do
> with history; it's about graphic novels. They seem to be the newest
> source material for films. Some of the films have been quite dismal
> ("League of Extraordinary Gentlemen," the first "The Punisher") or
> mediocre ("V for Vendetta," the second "The Punisher"), while others
> are more true to the original ("Sin City," "300"). If one is
> unfamiliar with graphic novels, or considers himself/herself "above"
> that medium, one will probably not appreciate the films generated from
> them. I have no problem is admitting that I enjoy them.

Too new for me, simply not enough time in my day to get into something
new like this. Above? I don't know enough about them to have formed an
opinion and, truth be told, I get to see maybe one or two new movies a
year. This one is not going to make my very short list.

I just asked my wife is she could remember the last movie we saw
together without the kids, and it was "LA Condfidential" when it first
came out (she guesses, by which birthday of hers it was, that this was
about 9 years ago) and neither of us liked it. OTOH, we watched
"Singing In The Rain" when it came on TV a few days ago in its entirely,
and my 14 year old liked it.

> Zack Snyder is now slated to direct "Watchmen," which has been on the
> Hollywood burner since the late 1980s, and it appears that "Magdalena"
> and "Black Hole" are also in pre-production. HBO may make a series of
> "Preacher," which, if done properly, would be bold even for them. And
> I'm still holding out hopes for "Transmetropolitan."

It's the tampering with reality in a way that's not always obvious that
bothers me.

Just call me old, or at least old-fashioned.

-S-
http://www.kbnj.com

In article <1i6i13luhl8mmf61ndp2kipktt27sj1bl8@4ax.com>, JMW
<jmwilliams@enforcergraphics.f2s.com> wrote:


> If one is
> unfamiliar with graphic novels, or considers himself/herself "above"
> that medium, one will probably not appreciate the films generated from
> them.

Guilty as charged.

--
Will @ www.BrinkZone.com

"It twas ever thus! " - Mr Natural

On 10 Apr, 14:08, willbr...@comcast.net (Will Brink) wrote:
> In article <1i6i13luhl8mmf61ndp2kipktt27sj1...@4ax.com>, JMW
>
> <jmwilli...@enforcergraphics.f2s.com> wrote:
> > If one is
> > unfamiliar with graphic novels, or considers himself/herself "above"
> > that medium, one will probably not appreciate the films generated from
> > them.
>
> Guilty as charged.
>
> --
> Will @www.BrinkZone.com
>
> "It twas ever thus! " - Mr Natural

Nice to know asking a question can result in two dudes having a beef
over fuck all-great NG

In article <1176236877.658525.131800@r34g2000cwr.googlegroups .com>,
"whitedogshitman" <validatpart@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:

> On 10 Apr, 14:08, willbr...@comcast.net (Will Brink) wrote:
> > In article <1i6i13luhl8mmf61ndp2kipktt27sj1...@4ax.com>, JMW
> >
> > <jmwilli...@enforcergraphics.f2s.com> wrote:
> > > If one is
> > > unfamiliar with graphic novels, or considers himself/herself "above"
> > > that medium, one will probably not appreciate the films generated from
> > > them.
> >
> > Guilty as charged.
> >
> > --
> > Will @www.BrinkZone.com
> >
> > "It twas ever thus! " - Mr Natural
>
> Nice to know asking a question can result in two dudes having a beef
> over fuck all-great NG

We take the misc. part of the name to heart here. If ya don't like it,
don't let the screen door hit you in the ass on the way out.

--
Will @ www.BrinkZone.com

"It twas ever thus! " - Mr Natural

On 8 Apr 2007 08:01:13 -0700, "Curt" <curtjames@gmail.com> wrote:

>Steve Freides wrote:
>[...]
>
>re 300
>
>> <snip> my 14-year-old is trying to
>> find a friend's parent to take him to
>> see it, which I've told him is fine if
>> he can arrange it but so far, he's
>> struck out.
>
>You refuse to take your son to a movie? But it's okay if a friend's
>parent does the job?
>
>> There's a nice thread on Bryce
>> Lane's board
>
>About parents shirking their responsibilities?
>
>> about someone who saw the
>> movie with his wife, noticed how
>> his wife was ogling (my word, not
>> his) the physiques on the screen,
>> and he used this as motivation to
>> train harder.
>> That's the only positive thing I've
>> heard come out of this movie.
>
>What, that the movie inspired someone's wife to begin "ogling" (your
>word, not mine) someone other than her husband?
>
>Regardless, you should see the movie before allowing your child to see
>the movie. An opinion. One shared, btw:
>
>http://au.answers.yahoo.com/question...AAFDejv&show=7
>aka http://tinyurl.com/2txxz3

Hey curt don't spoil it for the poor kid. I got to see some of the
best movies with other kids parents. That was how I saw my first set
of onscreen boobies at age 11. Of course kids today probably get
exposed much younger with cable, DVD and the like. The first time I
saw Conan was at a friend of a friends house.

Will Brink wrote:
> In article <1176236877.658525.131800@r34g2000cwr.googlegroups .com>,
> "whitedogshitman" <validatpart@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>
> > On 10 Apr, 14:08, willbr...@comcast.net (Will Brink) wrote:
> > > In article <1i6i13luhl8mmf61ndp2kipktt27sj1...@4ax.com>, JMW
> > >
> > > <jmwilli...@enforcergraphics.f2s.com> wrote:
> > > > If one is
> > > > unfamiliar with graphic novels, or considers himself/herself "above"
> > > > that medium, one will probably not appreciate the films generated from
> > > > them.
> > >
> > > Guilty as charged.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Will @www.BrinkZone.com
> > >
> > > "It twas ever thus! " - Mr Natural
> >
> > Nice to know asking a question can result in two dudes having a beef
> > over fuck all-great NG
>
> We take the misc. part of the name to heart here. If ya don't like it,
> don't let the screen door hit you in the ass on the way out.
>
> --
> Will @ www.BrinkZone.com
>
> "It twas ever thus! " - Mr Natural

Better to have it hit my ass than have it shoved up it-lycra clad fag

In article <1176379577.860412.17440@e65g2000hsc.googlegroups. com>,
"whitedogshitman" <validatpart@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:

> Will Brink wrote:
> > In article <1176236877.658525.131800@r34g2000cwr.googlegroups .com>,
> > "whitedogshitman" <validatpart@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> >
> > > On 10 Apr, 14:08, willbr...@comcast.net (Will Brink) wrote:
> > > > In article <1i6i13luhl8mmf61ndp2kipktt27sj1...@4ax.com>, JMW
> > > >
> > > > <jmwilli...@enforcergraphics.f2s.com> wrote:
> > > > > If one is
> > > > > unfamiliar with graphic novels, or considers himself/herself "above"
> > > > > that medium, one will probably not appreciate the films generated from
> > > > > them.
> > > >
> > > > Guilty as charged.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Will @www.BrinkZone.com
> > > >
> > > > "It twas ever thus! " - Mr Natural
> > >
> > > Nice to know asking a question can result in two dudes having a beef
> > > over fuck all-great NG
> >
> > We take the misc. part of the name to heart here. If ya don't like it,
> > don't let the screen door hit you in the ass on the way out.
> >
> > --
> > Will @ www.BrinkZone.com
> >
> > "It twas ever thus! " - Mr Natural
>
> Better to have it hit my ass

You still here? Thought you an your whining were taking your toys and leaving.

> than have it shoved up it-lycra clad fag

I prefer the pink and yellow spandex actually. Now don't go away mad, just
go away.

--
Will @ www.BrinkZone.com

"It twas ever thus! " - Mr Natural

On Apr 7, 4:49 pm, "ATP*" <waxwingsl...@azurepane.com> wrote:
> "snakecharmer" <validatp...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
>
> news:1175977185.774508.200750@y80g2000hsf.googlegr oups.com...
>
> > hey there-does any1 know the diet the dudes were on when they were
> > doing their training for this movie? did it involve steroids and th e
> > like?
> > Cheers
>
> I didn't see it but I doubt it- reportedly Mark Twight was involved in the
> training- also associated with www.gymjones.com

yeah. his gym is so exclusive that there's a complete website
dedicated to explaining how you can't train there unless you're
invited. just like i don't have to explain the concept of karma to
the crazy asian exchange students that nearly burned down our
apartment building yesterday, i'm not going to point out the irony.

along with that, there is a whole page with bios of all the
douchefaces that enjoy training in a gym where "There's no AC, no
comfortable spot to sit and there are no mirrors." that's real
fucking hardcore, guys.

here's another nugget:

"If you send a message be prepared for a clear, honest and perhaps
abrupt answer.
Not all questions merit an answer so you may not receive a reply."

maybe you guys haven't experienced it, but i've had just about enough
of all the elitist dildoeheads at my gym. do we really need more?

On 12 Apr, 14:47, willbr...@comcast.net (Will Brink) wrote:
> In article <1176379577.860412.17...@e65g2000hsc.googlegroups. com>,
>
>
>
> "whitedogshitman" <validatp...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> > Will Brink wrote:
> > > In article <1176236877.658525.131...@r34g2000cwr.googlegroups .com>,
> > > "whitedogshitman" <validatp...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>
> > > > On 10 Apr, 14:08, willbr...@comcast.net (Will Brink) wrote:
> > > > > In article <1i6i13luhl8mmf61ndp2kipktt27sj1...@4ax.com>, JMW
>
> > > > > <jmwilli...@enforcergraphics.f2s.com> wrote:
> > > > > > If one is
> > > > > > unfamiliar with graphic novels, or considers himself/herself "above"
> > > > > > that medium, one will probably not appreciate the films generated from
> > > > > > them.
>
> > > > > Guilty as charged.
>
> > > > > --
> > > > > Will @www.BrinkZone.com
>
> > > > > "It twas ever thus! " - Mr Natural
>
> > > > Nice to know asking a question can result in two dudes having a beef
> > > > over fuck all-great NG
>
> > > We take the misc. part of the name to heart here. If ya don't like it,
> > > don't let the screen door hit you in the ass on the way out.
>
> > > --
> > > Will @www.BrinkZone.com
>
> > > "It twas ever thus! " - Mr Natural
>
> > Better to have it hit my ass
>
> You still here? Thought you an your whining were taking your toys and leaving.
>
> > than have it shoved up it-lycra clad fag
>
> I prefer the pink and yellow spandex actually. Now don't go away mad, just
> go away.
>
> --
> Will @www.BrinkZone.com
>
> "It twas ever thus! " - Mr Natural

You replied -Bitch, now get back down on your knees and toss my salad.

"whitedogshitman" <validatpart@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1176401669.900099.190140@l77g2000hsb.googlegr oups.com...
> On 12 Apr, 14:47, willbr...@comcast.net (Will Brink) wrote:
>> In article <1176379577.860412.17...@e65g2000hsc.googlegroups. com>,
>>
>>
>>
>> "whitedogshitman" <validatp...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>> > Will Brink wrote:
>> > > In article <1176236877.658525.131...@r34g2000cwr.googlegroups .com>,
>> > > "whitedogshitman" <validatp...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>> > > > On 10 Apr, 14:08, willbr...@comcast.net (Will Brink) wrote:
>> > > > > In article <1i6i13luhl8mmf61ndp2kipktt27sj1...@4ax.com>, JMW
>>
>> > > > > <jmwilli...@enforcergraphics.f2s.com> wrote:
>> > > > > > If one is
>> > > > > > unfamiliar with graphic novels, or considers himself/herself
>> > > > > > "above"
>> > > > > > that medium, one will probably not appreciate the films
>> > > > > > generated from
>> > > > > > them.
>>
>> > > > > Guilty as charged.
>>
>> > > > > --
>> > > > > Will @www.BrinkZone.com
>>
>> > > > > "It twas ever thus! " - Mr Natural
>>
>> > > > Nice to know asking a question can result in two dudes having a
>> > > > beef
>> > > > over fuck all-great NG
>>
>> > > We take the misc. part of the name to heart here. If ya don't like
>> > > it,
>> > > don't let the screen door hit you in the ass on the way out.
>>
>> > > --
>> > > Will @www.BrinkZone.com
>>
>> > > "It twas ever thus! " - Mr Natural
>>
>> > Better to have it hit my ass
>>
>> You still here? Thought you an your whining were taking your toys and
>> leaving.
>>
>> > than have it shoved up it-lycra clad fag
>>
>> I prefer the pink and yellow spandex actually. Now don't go away mad,
>> just
>> go away.
>>
>> --
>> Will @www.BrinkZone.com
>>
>> "It twas ever thus! " - Mr Natural
>
> You replied -Bitch, now get back down on your knees and toss my salad.
>

Who is this 3rd grade pussy?

--
Robert Schuh
"Everything that elevates an individual above the herd and
intimidates the neighbour is henceforth called evil; and
the fair, modest, submissive and conforming mentality,
the mediocrity of desires attains moral designations and honors"
- Nietzsche

http://www.hardbopdrums.com/

In article <vzvTh.167044$p17.154829@newsfe11.phx>, "Hard Bop Drums"
<nospam@hardbopdrums.com> wrote:


> >
>
> Who is this 3rd grade pussy?

Just the usual anonymous little kid playing 'net tough guy. You know the type.

--
Will @ www.BrinkZone.com

"It twas ever thus! " - Mr Natural

Shute wrote:
[...]

> Hey curt don't spoil it for the poor kid.
> I got to see some of the best movies
> with other kids parents. <snip>

That's true. Where would entertainment be without poor parenting?

;o)

--
Curt

Robert Sc(huh?) wrote:
[...]

> Who is this 3rd grade pussy?

You're an idiot 'bert. I mean, what does that even mean? No, of
course, the guy you're asking about is an idiot, too, but he's not
using 3rd graders as a pejorative. What, you didn't attend grade
school? You sprung forth, fully formed as an "EIGHT BILLION SCORE ON
YOUR SAT VERBAL" god?

Idiot.

Oh, come ON! SOMEONE not KF'ed by Sc(huh?)'s gotta think that's worth
a repeat.

Pretty please?

--
Curt

On 13 Apr, 01:54, "Curt" <curtja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Robert Sc(huh?) wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > Who is this 3rd grade pussy?
>
> You're an idiot 'bert. I mean, what does that even mean? No, of
> course, the guy you're asking about is an idiot, too, but he's not
> using 3rd graders as a pejorative. What, you didn't attend grade
> school? You sprung forth, fully formed as an "EIGHT BILLION SCORE ON
> YOUR SAT VERBAL" god?
>
> Idiot.
>
> Oh, come ON! SOMEONE not KF'ed by Sc(huh?)'s gotta think that's worth
> a repeat.
>
> Pretty please?
>
> --
> Curt

Well ,you twats are responding-that counts as grooming in a court of
law-be careful as your fag status may be upgraded/downgraded to that
of nonce.

On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 17:34:58 -0400, willbrink@comcast.net (Will Brink) wrote:

>In article <1176236877.658525.131800@r34g2000cwr.googlegroups .com>,
>"whitedogshitman" <validatpart@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> On 10 Apr, 14:08, willbr...@comcast.net (Will Brink) wrote:
>> > In article <1i6i13luhl8mmf61ndp2kipktt27sj1...@4ax.com>, JMW
>> >
>> > <jmwilli...@enforcergraphics.f2s.com> wrote:
>> > > If one is
>> > > unfamiliar with graphic novels, or considers himself/herself "above"
>> > > that medium, one will probably not appreciate the films generated from
>> > > them.
>> >
>> > Guilty as charged.
>> >
>> > --
>> > Will @www.BrinkZone.com
>> >
>> > "It twas ever thus! " - Mr Natural
>>
>> Nice to know asking a question can result in two dudes having a beef
>> over fuck all-great NG
>
>We take the misc. part of the name to heart here. If ya don't like it,
>don't let the screen door hit you in the ass on the way out.

We take the periods to heart, too -- each thread should have at least two female participants.