The Achilles heel of John "Whiny Bitch"Williams!

Following the latest ultimatum made to me by the psychotic John
Williams, I am now in something of a quandary.

Every nerve and sinew about my being, urges me to post gratuitously,
immediately and in great volume, about the subject which he is
hyper-sensitive and anxious to avoid. Everyone that knows him will be
aware that if the situation were reversed, he would be pressing home
such an advantage vindictively and obsessively, with scant regard for
the sensitivities or concerns of his victims.

Whereas hitherto I have reserved such sensitive and personal input for
the purpose only of retaliation to his attacks upon me, it would now
appear that if I don't make early responses of this kind that I am
submitting to his bullying and blackmail.

I can think of no good reason why he should attempt to gag me by while
allowing himself carte blanche to indulge in his repeated lies,
caricatures and innuendo about me.This is not because I am in the
least bit sensitive or concerned about what he says and does, but
because of the inequity contained in such an arrangement.

Accordingly, each and every time John Williams indulges himself in
ways that impugn my integrity and reputation (and I will be the sole
arbiter of that), I will immediately and without further notice to
him, post by way of retaliation any of the plethora of posts contained
in the Usenet archives, which refer to the person he is allegedly
attempting to protect, although I do believe his concern is more to do
with the preservation of his own fragile and discredited dignity.

Further to the above, I may extend that counter ultimatum to include
Williams' conduct toward other contributors to MFW, if I consider his
stalking and bullying go beyond the bounds of common decency and
propriety.

I look forward to him taking the actions he proposes, and undertake to
post copies of all his threatened correspondence on my web sit at
www.fitnwell.net.

I have taken informal advantage of the abundance of the high level
legal facilities and advice available to me. The considered opinion of
those consulted is one of great amusement, although they can't
understand why I persist in engaging such a guttersnipe. They are
appalled that as a US Attorney at Law he should conduct his affairs in
such an unprofessional and scandalous manner.

You should be aware John Williams of the penalty of cost of fruitless
litigation! You don't have a leg to stand on - so sue and be damned!

Is this cocksucker *really* a lawyer, an ADA no less?
Absolutely unfathomable, incomprehensible to me that a person w/ this degree
of pathology/disorder can function in the pubic interest. Or function
period.
I would imagine that TBR has gotta be on public assistance. And, laughing
all the way to the midnight check cashing place.

jmw could be impersonating *another* jmw as well.
Sheeit, I could say I am any one of 1000s of liars in NYC, and who would be
able to tell the diff, to say I'm not? Posted articles/resume or not....
Unless a real investigation was mounted by the person being impersonated.
I knew a cocksucker that did this. He was, in fact, a lawyer, on the verge
of being disbarred, and hobbled along impersonating other lawyers.
Until the judges got familiar w/ his face.
He is, finally, disbarred.

Why not just send all this shit to the state bar association, their conduct
commitee, ethics board, alladatshit. Including the Public Defender's
office, who don't like prosecutors anyway, and would probably greatly enjoy
running with this particular ball.
And of course to jmw's effing boss?? To the mayor's office? To the US DAs
office, who I'm sure would be sensitive to an individual state's
transgressions/negligence, regarding employee mental health, etc.
All these people in all of these offices are all cocksuckers themselves, and
LIVE to hunt down other cocksuckers.
Cocksuckers feeding on cocksuckers.
A beautiful thing, when you think about it.

Also, realize that where there is smoke there is generally fire, and I'm
sure this not jmw's only pathology or achille's heel, and that when people
start looking more into the details of the life of this bizarre muthafucka,
they will find a lot more than erratic, bizarre and unethical postings to
ngs.
--
------
Mr. P.V.'d (formerly Droll Troll), Yonkers, NY

Stop Corruption in Congress & Send the Ultimate Message:
Absolutely Vote, but NOT for a Democrat or a Republican.
Ending Corruption in Congress is the *Single Best Way*
to Materially Improve Your Family's Life.
The Solution is so simple--and inexpensive!

entropic3.14decay at optonline2.718 dot net; remove pi and e to reply--ie,
all d'numbuhs

"Charles" <jrh@msn.com> wrote in message
news:ja3bl25ceoggjfpgnmgt3k51idpc5rlg5e@4ax.com...
>
> Following the latest ultimatum made to me by the psychotic John
> Williams, I am now in something of a quandary.
>
> Every nerve and sinew about my being, urges me to post gratuitously,
> immediately and in great volume, about the subject which he is
> hyper-sensitive and anxious to avoid. Everyone that knows him will be
> aware that if the situation were reversed, he would be pressing home
> such an advantage vindictively and obsessively, with scant regard for
> the sensitivities or concerns of his victims.
>
> Whereas hitherto I have reserved such sensitive and personal input for
> the purpose only of retaliation to his attacks upon me, it would now
> appear that if I don't make early responses of this kind that I am
> submitting to his bullying and blackmail.
>
> I can think of no good reason why he should attempt to gag me by while
> allowing himself carte blanche to indulge in his repeated lies,
> caricatures and innuendo about me.This is not because I am in the
> least bit sensitive or concerned about what he says and does, but
> because of the inequity contained in such an arrangement.
>
> Accordingly, each and every time John Williams indulges himself in
> ways that impugn my integrity and reputation (and I will be the sole
> arbiter of that), I will immediately and without further notice to
> him, post by way of retaliation any of the plethora of posts contained
> in the Usenet archives, which refer to the person he is allegedly
> attempting to protect, although I do believe his concern is more to do
> with the preservation of his own fragile and discredited dignity.
>
> Further to the above, I may extend that counter ultimatum to include
> Williams' conduct toward other contributors to MFW, if I consider his
> stalking and bullying go beyond the bounds of common decency and
> propriety.
>
> I look forward to him taking the actions he proposes, and undertake to
> post copies of all his threatened correspondence on my web sit at
> www.fitnwell.net.
>
> I have taken informal advantage of the abundance of the high level
> legal facilities and advice available to me. The considered opinion of
> those consulted is one of great amusement, although they can't
> understand why I persist in engaging such a guttersnipe. They are
> appalled that as a US Attorney at Law he should conduct his affairs in
> such an unprofessional and scandalous manner.
>
> You should be aware John Williams of the penalty of cost of fruitless
> litigation! You don't have a leg to stand on - so sue and be damned!
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

For those who disagree w/ the thrust of my notion, that we are all
inherently PV'd, think about your tax dollars going to pay jmw's
salary--assuming he is not an impersonator.
Now, if paying the likes of a jmw to jail the innocent, set free the guilty,
all while he's playing on the Internet isn't a Grand Insertion, clear up to
the ileocecal valve of the Tax Payer, I don't know what is.
goodgawd....
--
------
Mr. P.V.'d (formerly Droll Troll), Yonkers, NY

Stop Corruption in Congress & Send the Ultimate Message:
Absolutely Vote, but NOT for a Democrat or a Republican.
Ending Corruption in Congress is the *Single Best Way*
to Materially Improve Your Family's Life.
The Solution is so simple--and inexpensive!

entropic3.14decay at optonline2.718 dot net; remove pi and e to reply--ie,
all d'numbuhs

"Charles" <jrh@msn.com> wrote in message
news:ja3bl25ceoggjfpgnmgt3k51idpc5rlg5e@4ax.com...
>
> Following the latest ultimatum made to me by the psychotic John
> Williams, I am now in something of a quandary.
>
> Every nerve and sinew about my being, urges me to post gratuitously,
> immediately and in great volume, about the subject which he is
> hyper-sensitive and anxious to avoid. Everyone that knows him will be
> aware that if the situation were reversed, he would be pressing home
> such an advantage vindictively and obsessively, with scant regard for
> the sensitivities or concerns of his victims.
>
> Whereas hitherto I have reserved such sensitive and personal input for
> the purpose only of retaliation to his attacks upon me, it would now
> appear that if I don't make early responses of this kind that I am
> submitting to his bullying and blackmail.
>
> I can think of no good reason why he should attempt to gag me by while
> allowing himself carte blanche to indulge in his repeated lies,
> caricatures and innuendo about me.This is not because I am in the
> least bit sensitive or concerned about what he says and does, but
> because of the inequity contained in such an arrangement.
>
> Accordingly, each and every time John Williams indulges himself in
> ways that impugn my integrity and reputation (and I will be the sole
> arbiter of that), I will immediately and without further notice to
> him, post by way of retaliation any of the plethora of posts contained
> in the Usenet archives, which refer to the person he is allegedly
> attempting to protect, although I do believe his concern is more to do
> with the preservation of his own fragile and discredited dignity.
>
> Further to the above, I may extend that counter ultimatum to include
> Williams' conduct toward other contributors to MFW, if I consider his
> stalking and bullying go beyond the bounds of common decency and
> propriety.
>
> I look forward to him taking the actions he proposes, and undertake to
> post copies of all his threatened correspondence on my web sit at
> www.fitnwell.net.
>
> I have taken informal advantage of the abundance of the high level
> legal facilities and advice available to me. The considered opinion of
> those consulted is one of great amusement, although they can't
> understand why I persist in engaging such a guttersnipe. They are
> appalled that as a US Attorney at Law he should conduct his affairs in
> such an unprofessional and scandalous manner.
>
> You should be aware John Williams of the penalty of cost of fruitless
> litigation! You don't have a leg to stand on - so sue and be damned!
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

On Sat, 11 Nov 2006 15:15:03 -0500, "Proctologically Violated©®"
<entropic3.14decay@optonline2.718.net> wrote:
"Charles" <jrh@msn.com> wrote in message
news:ja3bl25ceoggjfpgnmgt3k51idpc5rlg5e@4ax.com...
>
>> Following the latest ultimatum made to me by the psychotic John
>> Williams, I am now in something of a quandary.
>
>> Every nerve and sinew about my being, urges me to post gratuitously,
>> immediately and in great volume, about the subject which he is
>> hyper-sensitive and anxious to avoid. Everyone that knows him will be
>> aware that if the situation were reversed, he would be pressing home
>> such an advantage vindictively and obsessively, with scant regard for
>> the sensitivities or concerns of his victims.
>
>> Whereas hitherto I have reserved such sensitive and personal input for
>> the purpose only of retaliation to his attacks upon me, it would now
>> appear that if I don't make early responses of this kind that I am
>> submitting to his bullying and blackmail.
>
>> I can think of no good reason why he should attempt to gag me by while
>> allowing himself carte blanche to indulge in his repeated lies,
>> caricatures and innuendo about me.This is not because I am in the
>> least bit sensitive or concerned about what he says and does, but
>> because of the inequity contained in such an arrangement.
>
>> Accordingly, each and every time John Williams indulges himself in
>> ways that impugn my integrity and reputation (and I will be the sole
>> arbiter of that), I will immediately and without further notice to
>> him, post by way of retaliation any of the plethora of posts contained
>> in the Usenet archives, which refer to the person he is allegedly
>> attempting to protect, although I do believe his concern is more to do
>> with the preservation of his own fragile and discredited dignity.
>
>> Further to the above, I may extend that counter ultimatum to include
>> Williams' conduct toward other contributors to MFW, if I consider his
>> stalking and bullying go beyond the bounds of common decency and
>> propriety.
>
>> I look forward to him taking the actions he proposes, and undertake to
>> post copies of all his threatened correspondence on my web sit at
>> www.fitnwell.net.
>
>> I have taken informal advantage of the abundance of the high level
>> legal facilities and advice available to me. The considered opinion of
>> those consulted is one of great amusement, although they can't
>> understand why I persist in engaging such a guttersnipe. They are
>> appalled that as a US Attorney at Law he should conduct his affairs in
>> such an unprofessional and scandalous manner.
>
>> You should be aware John Williams of the penalty of cost of fruitless
>> litigation! You don't have a leg to stand on - so sue and be damned!

>Is this cocksucker *really* a lawyer, an ADA no less?
>Absolutely unfathomable, incomprehensible to me that a person w/ this degree
>of pathology/disorder can function in the pubic interest. Or function
>period.
>I would imagine that TBR has gotta be on public assistance. And, laughing
>all the way to the midnight check cashing place.
>
>jmw could be impersonating *another* jmw as well.
>Sheeit, I could say I am any one of 1000s of liars in NYC, and who would be
>able to tell the diff, to say I'm not? Posted articles/resume or not....
>Unless a real investigation was mounted by the person being impersonated.
>I knew a cocksucker that did this. He was, in fact, a lawyer, on the verge
>of being disbarred, and hobbled along impersonating other lawyers.
>Until the judges got familiar w/ his face.
>He is, finally, disbarred.
>
>Why not just send all this shit to the state bar association, their conduct
>commitee, ethics board, alladatshit. Including the Public Defender's
>office, who don't like prosecutors anyway, and would probably greatly enjoy
>running with this particular ball.
>And of course to jmw's effing boss?? To the mayor's office? To the US DAs
>office, who I'm sure would be sensitive to an individual state's
>transgressions/negligence, regarding employee mental health, etc.
>All these people in all of these offices are all cocksuckers themselves, and
>LIVE to hunt down other cocksuckers.
>Cocksuckers feeding on cocksuckers.
>A beautiful thing, when you think about it.
>
>Also, realize that where there is smoke there is generally fire, and I'm
>sure this not jmw's only pathology or achille's heel, and that when people
>start looking more into the details of the life of this bizarre muthafucka,
>they will find a lot more than erratic, bizarre and unethical postings to
>ngs.

Amen to that!

The man is a raving loony but he doesn't like a taste of his own
medicine! ;o)

On Sat, 11 Nov 2006 15:15:03 -0500, "Proctologically Violated©®"
<entropic3.14decay@optonline2.718.net> wrote:

>Is this cocksucker *really* a lawyer, an ADA no less?
>Absolutely unfathomable, incomprehensible to me that a person w/ this degree
>of pathology/disorder can function in the pubic interest. Or function
>period.
>I would imagine that TBR has gotta be on public assistance. And, laughing
>all the way to the midnight check cashing place.
>
>jmw could be impersonating *another* jmw as well.
>Sheeit, I could say I am any one of 1000s of liars in NYC, and who would be
>able to tell the diff, to say I'm not? Posted articles/resume or not....
>Unless a real investigation was mounted by the person being impersonated.

Without a court order and something like a cashed check or credit card
it is very difficult to definitively establish who someone is. It is
not really all that hard to believe that JMW, or anyone here, is a
complete fake, phony, and fraud.

--
Is this thing on?

Charles wrote:

>Following the latest ultimatum made to me by the psychotic John
>Williams, I am now in something of a quandary.
>
>Every nerve and sinew about my being, urges me to post gratuitously,
>immediately and in great volume, about the subject which he is
>hyper-sensitive and anxious to avoid. Everyone that knows him will be
>aware that if the situation were reversed, he would be pressing home
>such an advantage vindictively and obsessively, with scant regard for
>the sensitivities or concerns of his victims.
>
>Whereas hitherto I have reserved such sensitive and personal input for
>the purpose only of retaliation to his attacks upon me, it would now
>appear that if I don't make early responses of this kind that I am
>submitting to his bullying and blackmail.
>
>I can think of no good reason why he should attempt to gag me by while
>allowing himself carte blanche to indulge in his repeated lies,
>caricatures and innuendo about me.This is not because I am in the
>least bit sensitive or concerned about what he says and does, but
>because of the inequity contained in such an arrangement.
>
>Accordingly, each and every time John Williams indulges himself in
>ways that impugn my integrity and reputation (and I will be the sole
>arbiter of that), I will immediately and without further notice to
>him, post by way of retaliation any of the plethora of posts contained
>in the Usenet archives, which refer to the person he is allegedly
>attempting to protect, although I do believe his concern is more to do
>with the preservation of his own fragile and discredited dignity.
>
>Further to the above, I may extend that counter ultimatum to include
>Williams' conduct toward other contributors to MFW, if I consider his
>stalking and bullying go beyond the bounds of common decency and
>propriety.
>
>I look forward to him taking the actions he proposes, and undertake to
>post copies of all his threatened correspondence on my web sit at
>www.fitnwell.net.
>
>I have taken informal advantage of the abundance of the high level
>legal facilities and advice available to me. The considered opinion of
>those consulted is one of great amusement, although they can't
>understand why I persist in engaging such a guttersnipe. They are
>appalled that as a US Attorney at Law he should conduct his affairs in
>such an unprofessional and scandalous manner.
>
>You should be aware John Williams of the penalty of cost of fruitless
>litigation! You don't have a leg to stand on - so sue and be damned!
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Why don't you just get a fucking life? What a pathetic piece of shit you
are.

--
--
Robert Schuh
"Everything that elevates an individual above the herd and
intimidates the neighbour is henceforth called evil; and
the fair, modest, submissive and conforming mentality,
the mediocrity of desires attains moral designations and honors"
- Nietzsche

http://www.hardbopdrums.com/

Proctologically Violated©® wrote:

>Is this cocksucker *really* a lawyer, an ADA no less?
>Absolutely unfathomable, incomprehensible to me that a person w/ this degree
>of pathology/disorder can function in the pubic interest. Or function
>period.
>I would imagine that TBR has gotta be on public assistance. And, laughing
>all the way to the midnight check cashing place.
>
>jmw could be impersonating *another* jmw as well.
>Sheeit, I could say I am any one of 1000s of liars in NYC, and who would be
>able to tell the diff, to say I'm not? Posted articles/resume or not....
>Unless a real investigation was mounted by the person being impersonated.
>I knew a cocksucker that did this. He was, in fact, a lawyer, on the verge
>of being disbarred, and hobbled along impersonating other lawyers.
>Until the judges got familiar w/ his face.
>He is, finally, disbarred.
>
>Why not just send all this shit to the state bar association, their conduct
>commitee, ethics board, alladatshit. Including the Public Defender's
>office, who don't like prosecutors anyway, and would probably greatly enjoy
>running with this particular ball.
>And of course to jmw's effing boss?? To the mayor's office? To the US DAs
>office, who I'm sure would be sensitive to an individual state's
>transgressions/negligence, regarding employee mental health, etc.
>All these people in all of these offices are all cocksuckers themselves, and
>LIVE to hunt down other cocksuckers.
>Cocksuckers feeding on cocksuckers.
>A beautiful thing, when you think about it.
>
>Also, realize that where there is smoke there is generally fire, and I'm
>sure this not jmw's only pathology or achille's heel, and that when people
>start looking more into the details of the life of this bizarre muthafucka,
>they will find a lot more than erratic, bizarre and unethical postings to
>ngs.
>
>
Why don't YOU get a fucking life, post your real name and quit being a
whining little cunt? You fucking anonymous cowards are what fucks up
Usenet. Your own lives are so fucking sad that all you do is talk shit
about people who have real lives. I would bet ANY amount of money that
you are either 125 lbs with 9" arms or a big fat piece of shit. I would
lean more towards you being a fat piece of shit. If you are going to
talk shit, post your fucking name. Pussy.

--
--
Robert Schuh
"Everything that elevates an individual above the herd and
intimidates the neighbour is henceforth called evil; and
the fair, modest, submissive and conforming mentality,
the mediocrity of desires attains moral designations and honors"
- Nietzsche

http://www.hardbopdrums.com/

"Proctologically Violated©®" <entropic3.14decay@optonline2.718.net>
wrote:

>For those who disagree w/ the thrust of my notion, that we are all
>inherently PV'd, think about your tax dollars going to pay jmw's
>salary--assuming he is not an impersonator.

Speaking of impersonations, I must have missed your post telling us
where you got a BS in Physics, a BS in Chemistry, an MS in Nutrition,
an MS in Biochemistry, and were studying for a PhD in Enzyme Kinetics.

What were the institutions of higher learning that bestowed those
degrees upon you?

"Proctologically Violated©®" <entropic3.14decay@optonline2.718.net>
wrote:
>
>Sheeit, I could say I am any one of 1000s of liars in NYC

Nobody would have a problem believing *that*.

Joe Humble <joehumble@earthlink.net> wrote:

>On Sat, 11 Nov 2006 15:15:03 -0500, "Proctologically Violated©®"
><entropic3.14decay@optonline2.718.net> wrote:
>
>>Is this cocksucker *really* a lawyer, an ADA no less?
>>Absolutely unfathomable, incomprehensible to me that a person w/ this degree
>>of pathology/disorder can function in the pubic interest. Or function
>>period.
>>I would imagine that TBR has gotta be on public assistance. And, laughing
>>all the way to the midnight check cashing place.
>>
>>jmw could be impersonating *another* jmw as well.
>>Sheeit, I could say I am any one of 1000s of liars in NYC, and who would be
>>able to tell the diff, to say I'm not? Posted articles/resume or not....
>>Unless a real investigation was mounted by the person being impersonated.
>
>Without a court order and something like a cashed check or credit card
>it is very difficult to definitively establish who someone is. It is
>not really all that hard to believe that JMW, or anyone here, is a
>complete fake, phony, and fraud.

Anyone can convince himself/herself of anything. Some can even pass
polygraphs by self-delusion. Just because you're a cipher doesn't
mean everyone else is, Mike.

Robert Schuh <rob@robschuhpolycock.com> wrote:

>Proctologically Violated©® wrote:
>>
>>Also, realize that where there is smoke there is generally fire, and I'm
>>sure this not jmw's only pathology or achille's heel, and that when people
>>start looking more into the details of the life of this bizarre muthafucka,
>>they will find a lot more than erratic, bizarre and unethical postings to
>>ngs.
>>
>>
>Why don't YOU get a fucking life, post your real name and quit being a
>whining little cunt? You fucking anonymous cowards are what fucks up
>Usenet.

Kristopher Hogg of Yonkers, New York, inventor of the revolutionary
HoloBarre System:

http://www.erols.com/physical

"Charles" <jrh@msn.com> wrote in message
news:ja3bl25ceoggjfpgnmgt3k51idpc5rlg5e@4ax.com...
>
> Following the latest ultimatum made to me by the psychotic John
> Williams, I am now in something of a quandary.
>
> Every nerve and sinew about my being, urges me to post gratuitously,
> immediately and in great volume, about the subject which he is
> hyper-sensitive and anxious to avoid. Everyone that knows him will be

shouldn't it be "everyone *who* knows him?

> aware that if the situation were reversed, he would be pressing home
> such an advantage vindictively and obsessively, with scant regard for
> the sensitivities or concerns of his victims.
>
> Whereas hitherto I have reserved such sensitive and personal input for
> the purpose only of retaliation to his attacks upon me, it would now
> appear that if I don't make early responses of this kind that I am
> submitting to his bullying and blackmail.
>
> I can think of no good reason why he should attempt to gag me by while
> allowing himself carte blanche to indulge in his repeated lies,
> caricatures and innuendo about me.This is not because I am in the
> least bit sensitive or concerned about what he says and does, but
> because of the inequity contained in such an arrangement.
>
> Accordingly, each and every time John Williams indulges himself in
> ways that impugn my integrity and reputation (and I will be the sole
> arbiter of that), I will immediately and without further notice to
> him, post by way of retaliation any of the plethora of posts contained
> in the Usenet archives, which refer to the person he is allegedly
> attempting to protect, although I do believe his concern is more to do
> with the preservation of his own fragile and discredited dignity.
>
> Further to the above, I may extend that counter ultimatum to include
> Williams' conduct toward other contributors to MFW, if I consider his
> stalking and bullying go beyond the bounds of common decency and
> propriety.
>
> I look forward to him taking the actions he proposes, and undertake to
> post copies of all his threatened correspondence on my web sit at
> www.fitnwell.net.
>
> I have taken informal advantage of the abundance of the high level
> legal facilities and advice available to me. The considered opinion of
> those consulted is one of great amusement, although they can't
> understand why I persist in engaging such a guttersnipe. They are
> appalled that as a US Attorney at Law he should conduct his affairs in
> such an unprofessional and scandalous manner.
>
> You should be aware John Williams of the penalty of cost of fruitless
> litigation! You don't have a leg to stand on - so sue and be damned!
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

"David" <forgotwhy@yahoo.com.au> wrote
> "Charles" <jrh@msn.com> wrote >>
>> Following the latest ultimatum made to me by the psychotic John
>> Williams, I am now in something of a quandary.
>>
>> Every nerve and sinew about my being, urges me to post gratuitously,
>> immediately and in great volume, about the subject which he is
>> hyper-sensitive and anxious to avoid. Everyone that knows him will be
>
> shouldn't it be "everyone *who* knows him?

OMG! You've been Curtified

David
the atheist jew one, not the net spelling/grammar nanny one

"David Cohen" <sammiesdad@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:zew5h.5320$0r.481@newsread1.news.pas.earthlin k.net...
>
> "David" <forgotwhy@yahoo.com.au> wrote
>> "Charles" <jrh@msn.com> wrote >>
>>> Following the latest ultimatum made to me by the psychotic John
>>> Williams, I am now in something of a quandary.
>>>
>>> Every nerve and sinew about my being, urges me to post gratuitously,
>>> immediately and in great volume, about the subject which he is
>>> hyper-sensitive and anxious to avoid. Everyone that knows him will be
>>
>> shouldn't it be "everyone *who* knows him?
>
> OMG! You've been Curtified
>
> David
> the atheist jew one, not the net spelling/grammar nanny one
you're just jealous 'cause you're not smart like me . . . (or is it "I"?)

Cohen wrote:
> "David" wrote
[...]

> > shouldn't it be "everyone *who* knows him?
>
> OMG! You've been Curtified

I'm like the Borg. You're next, macher!

Resistance is futile.

> David
> the atheist jew one, not the net spelling/grammar nanny one

--
Curt

Since I never brought it up, no need to defend it--esp not to the likes of
you.
Oh, let's see, brainiac, you were sposed to do some calorie calcs of lifts,
seein as how smart you are....
Do you have a clue even how to begin?
Where did you do your paralegal studies?
--
------
Mr. P.V.'d (formerly Droll Troll), Yonkers, NY

Stop Corruption in Congress & Send the Ultimate Message:
Absolutely Vote, but NOT for a Democrat or a Republican.
Ending Corruption in Congress is the *Single Best Way*
to Materially Improve Your Family's Life.
The Solution is so simple--and inexpensive!

entropic3.14decay at optonline2.718 dot net; remove pi and e to reply--ie,
all d'numbuhs

"JMW" <jmwilliams@enforcergraphics.f2s.com> wrote in message
news:mo0dl29ipvv9nfb3edmhl6hm3s7bjbi7m1@4ax.com...
> "Proctologically Violated©®" <entropic3.14decay@optonline2.718.net>
> wrote:
>
>>For those who disagree w/ the thrust of my notion, that we are all
>>inherently PV'd, think about your tax dollars going to pay jmw's
>>salary--assuming he is not an impersonator.
>
> Speaking of impersonations, I must have missed your post telling us
> where you got a BS in Physics, a BS in Chemistry, an MS in Nutrition,
> an MS in Biochemistry, and were studying for a PhD in Enzyme Kinetics.
>
> What were the institutions of higher learning that bestowed those
> degrees upon you?
>

On Sat, 11 Nov 2006 19:08:25 -0700, Robert Schuh
<rob@robschuhpolycock.com> wrote:

>Charles wrote:
>
>>Following the latest ultimatum made to me by the psychotic John
>>Williams, I am now in something of a quandary.
>>
>>Every nerve and sinew about my being, urges me to post gratuitously,
>>immediately and in great volume, about the subject which he is
>>hyper-sensitive and anxious to avoid. Everyone that knows him will be
>>aware that if the situation were reversed, he would be pressing home
>>such an advantage vindictively and obsessively, with scant regard for
>>the sensitivities or concerns of his victims.
>>
>>Whereas hitherto I have reserved such sensitive and personal input for
>>the purpose only of retaliation to his attacks upon me, it would now
>>appear that if I don't make early responses of this kind that I am
>>submitting to his bullying and blackmail.
>>
>>I can think of no good reason why he should attempt to gag me by while
>>allowing himself carte blanche to indulge in his repeated lies,
>>caricatures and innuendo about me.This is not because I am in the
>>least bit sensitive or concerned about what he says and does, but
>>because of the inequity contained in such an arrangement.
>>
>>Accordingly, each and every time John Williams indulges himself in
>>ways that impugn my integrity and reputation (and I will be the sole
>>arbiter of that), I will immediately and without further notice to
>>him, post by way of retaliation any of the plethora of posts contained
>>in the Usenet archives, which refer to the person he is allegedly
>>attempting to protect, although I do believe his concern is more to do
>>with the preservation of his own fragile and discredited dignity.
>>
>>Further to the above, I may extend that counter ultimatum to include
>>Williams' conduct toward other contributors to MFW, if I consider his
>>stalking and bullying go beyond the bounds of common decency and
>>propriety.
>>
>>I look forward to him taking the actions he proposes, and undertake to
>>post copies of all his threatened correspondence on my web sit at
>>www.fitnwell.net.
>>
>>I have taken informal advantage of the abundance of the high level
>>legal facilities and advice available to me. The considered opinion of
>>those consulted is one of great amusement, although they can't
>>understand why I persist in engaging such a guttersnipe. They are
>>appalled that as a US Attorney at Law he should conduct his affairs in
>>such an unprofessional and scandalous manner.
>>
>>You should be aware John Williams of the penalty of cost of fruitless
>>litigation! You don't have a leg to stand on - so sue and be damned!
>>
>>
>Why don't you just get a fucking life? What a pathetic piece of shit you
>are.
>

We are indeed grateful to you for this further well thought out
contribution.

However, with the greatest respect, you appear to have completely
overlooked the catalyst in this ongoing and distasteful situation.

Accordingly, and again with the greatest respect, I suggest you go
stick a steroid loaded needle down the eye of your diminutive dick,
and see if you can't inject some sense into your malformed sick self.

Other than that, do have a great Sunday - I intend to! ;o)

Not 9" arms, a 9" dick--which you should remember.
--
------
Mr. P.V.'d (formerly Droll Troll), Yonkers, NY

Stop Corruption in Congress & Send the Ultimate Message:
Absolutely Vote, but NOT for a Democrat or a Republican.
Ending Corruption in Congress is the *Single Best Way*
to Materially Improve Your Family's Life.
The Solution is so simple--and inexpensive!

entropic3.14decay at optonline2.718 dot net; remove pi and e to reply--ie,
all d'numbuhs

"Robert Schuh" <rob@robschuhpolycock.com> wrote in message
news:Lov5h.47987$3y3.45206@newsfe07.phx...
> Proctologically Violated©® wrote:
>
>>Is this cocksucker *really* a lawyer, an ADA no less?
>>Absolutely unfathomable, incomprehensible to me that a person w/ this
>>degree of pathology/disorder can function in the pubic interest. Or
>>function period.
>>I would imagine that TBR has gotta be on public assistance. And, laughing
>>all the way to the midnight check cashing place.
>>
>>jmw could be impersonating *another* jmw as well.
>>Sheeit, I could say I am any one of 1000s of liars in NYC, and who would
>>be able to tell the diff, to say I'm not? Posted articles/resume or
>>not....
>>Unless a real investigation was mounted by the person being impersonated.
>>I knew a cocksucker that did this. He was, in fact, a lawyer, on the
>>verge of being disbarred, and hobbled along impersonating other lawyers.
>>Until the judges got familiar w/ his face.
>>He is, finally, disbarred.
>>
>>Why not just send all this shit to the state bar association, their
>>conduct commitee, ethics board, alladatshit. Including the Public
>>Defender's office, who don't like prosecutors anyway, and would probably
>>greatly enjoy running with this particular ball.
>>And of course to jmw's effing boss?? To the mayor's office? To the US
>>DAs office, who I'm sure would be sensitive to an individual state's
>>transgressions/negligence, regarding employee mental health, etc.
>>All these people in all of these offices are all cocksuckers themselves,
>>and LIVE to hunt down other cocksuckers.
>>Cocksuckers feeding on cocksuckers.
>>A beautiful thing, when you think about it.
>>
>>Also, realize that where there is smoke there is generally fire, and I'm
>>sure this not jmw's only pathology or achille's heel, and that when people
>>start looking more into the details of the life of this bizarre
>>muthafucka, they will find a lot more than erratic, bizarre and unethical
>>postings to ngs.
>>
> Why don't YOU get a fucking life, post your real name and quit being a
> whining little cunt? You fucking anonymous cowards are what fucks up
> Usenet. Your own lives are so fucking sad that all you do is talk shit
> about people who have real lives. I would bet ANY amount of money that you
> are either 125 lbs with 9" arms or a big fat piece of shit. I would lean
> more towards you being a fat piece of shit. If you are going to talk shit,
> post your fucking name. Pussy.
>
> --
> --
> Robert Schuh
> "Everything that elevates an individual above the herd and
> intimidates the neighbour is henceforth called evil; and
> the fair, modest, submissive and conforming mentality,
> the mediocrity of desires attains moral designations and honors"
> - Nietzsche
>
> http://www.hardbopdrums.com/
>

On Sun, 12 Nov 2006 12:55:50 +1000, "David" <forgotwhy@yahoo.com.au>
wrote:

>
>"Charles" <jrh@msn.com> wrote in message
>news:ja3bl25ceoggjfpgnmgt3k51idpc5rlg5e@4ax.com.. .
>>
>> Following the latest ultimatum made to me by the psychotic John
>> Williams, I am now in something of a quandary.
>>
>> Every nerve and sinew about my being, urges me to post gratuitously,
>> immediately and in great volume, about the subject which he is
>> hyper-sensitive and anxious to avoid. Everyone that knows him will be
>
>shouldn't it be "everyone *who* knows him?

It may be who is that, or alternatively, that is who, but whoever that
is or isn't or who is that or not, does not alter the fact that he who
is the focal point of this discussion or those that who know him, know
who that is.

HTH!

How the fuck are ya Oz? I thought you'd been and gone and died mate.
Nice to see ya back (and ya front),and trust you had a good weekend.

I've still got all day Sunday to come! ;o)

>
>> aware that if the situation were reversed, he would be pressing home
>> such an advantage vindictively and obsessively, with scant regard for
>> the sensitivities or concerns of his victims.
>>
>> Whereas hitherto I have reserved such sensitive and personal input for
>> the purpose only of retaliation to his attacks upon me, it would now
>> appear that if I don't make early responses of this kind that I am
>> submitting to his bullying and blackmail.
>>
>> I can think of no good reason why he should attempt to gag me by while
>> allowing himself carte blanche to indulge in his repeated lies,
>> caricatures and innuendo about me.This is not because I am in the
>> least bit sensitive or concerned about what he says and does, but
>> because of the inequity contained in such an arrangement.
>>
>> Accordingly, each and every time John Williams indulges himself in
>> ways that impugn my integrity and reputation (and I will be the sole
>> arbiter of that), I will immediately and without further notice to
>> him, post by way of retaliation any of the plethora of posts contained
>> in the Usenet archives, which refer to the person he is allegedly
>> attempting to protect, although I do believe his concern is more to do
>> with the preservation of his own fragile and discredited dignity.
>>
>> Further to the above, I may extend that counter ultimatum to include
>> Williams' conduct toward other contributors to MFW, if I consider his
>> stalking and bullying go beyond the bounds of common decency and
>> propriety.
>>
>> I look forward to him taking the actions he proposes, and undertake to
>> post copies of all his threatened correspondence on my web sit at
>> www.fitnwell.net.
>>
>> I have taken informal advantage of the abundance of the high level
>> legal facilities and advice available to me. The considered opinion of
>> those consulted is one of great amusement, although they can't
>> understand why I persist in engaging such a guttersnipe. They are
>> appalled that as a US Attorney at Law he should conduct his affairs in
>> such an unprofessional and scandalous manner.
>>
>> You should be aware John Williams of the penalty of cost of fruitless
>> litigation! You don't have a leg to stand on - so sue and be damned!

On Sun, 12 Nov 2006 03:30:08 -0500, "Proctologically Violated©®"
<entropic3.14decay@optonline2.718.net> wrote:
"Robert Schuh" <rob@robschuhpolycock.com> wrote in message
news:Lov5h.47987$3y3.45206@newsfe07.phx...
> Proctologically Violated©® wrote:
>
>>Is this cocksucker *really* a lawyer, an ADA no less?
>>Absolutely unfathomable, incomprehensible to me that a person w/ this
>>degree of pathology/disorder can function in the pubic interest. Or
>>function period.
>>I would imagine that TBR has gotta be on public assistance. And, laughing
>>all the way to the midnight check cashing place.
>>
>>jmw could be impersonating *another* jmw as well.
>>Sheeit, I could say I am any one of 1000s of liars in NYC, and who would
>>be able to tell the diff, to say I'm not? Posted articles/resume or
>>not....
>>Unless a real investigation was mounted by the person being impersonated.
>>I knew a cocksucker that did this. He was, in fact, a lawyer, on the
>>verge of being disbarred, and hobbled along impersonating other lawyers.
>>Until the judges got familiar w/ his face.
>>He is, finally, disbarred.
>>
>>Why not just send all this shit to the state bar association, their
>>conduct commitee, ethics board, alladatshit. Including the Public
>>Defender's office, who don't like prosecutors anyway, and would probably
>>greatly enjoy running with this particular ball.
>>And of course to jmw's effing boss?? To the mayor's office? To the US
>>DAs office, who I'm sure would be sensitive to an individual state's
>>transgressions/negligence, regarding employee mental health, etc.
>>All these people in all of these offices are all cocksuckers themselves,
>>and LIVE to hunt down other cocksuckers.
>>Cocksuckers feeding on cocksuckers.
>>A beautiful thing, when you think about it.
>>
>>Also, realize that where there is smoke there is generally fire, and I'm
>>sure this not jmw's only pathology or achille's heel, and that when people
>>start looking more into the details of the life of this bizarre
>>muthafucka, they will find a lot more than erratic, bizarre and unethical
>>postings to ngs.
>>
> Why don't YOU get a fucking life, post your real name and quit being a
> whining little cunt? You fucking anonymous cowards are what fucks up
> Usenet. Your own lives are so fucking sad that all you do is talk shit
> about people who have real lives. I would bet ANY amount of money that you
> are either 125 lbs with 9" arms or a big fat piece of shit. I would lean
> more towards you being a fat piece of shit. If you are going to talk shit,
> post your fucking name. Pussy.

>Not 9" arms, a 9" dick--which you should remember.

As opposed to Bobby Schuh, who is a 5' 6" dick! ;o)

Curt wrote:
> Cohen wrote:
> > "David" wrote
> [...]
>
> > > shouldn't it be "everyone *who* knows him?
> >
> > OMG! You've been Curtified
>
> I'm like the Borg. You're next, macher!
>
> Resistance is futile.

Turtis of Borg

"Charles" <jrh@msn.com> wrote in message
news:2vmdl29og3bp76m817qnrfkoqd0nu9941p@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 12 Nov 2006 12:55:50 +1000, "David" <forgotwhy@yahoo.com.au>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Charles" <jrh@msn.com> wrote in message
>>news:ja3bl25ceoggjfpgnmgt3k51idpc5rlg5e@4ax.com. ..
>>>
>>> Following the latest ultimatum made to me by the psychotic John
>>> Williams, I am now in something of a quandary.
>>>
>>> Every nerve and sinew about my being, urges me to post gratuitously,
>>> immediately and in great volume, about the subject which he is
>>> hyper-sensitive and anxious to avoid. Everyone that knows him will be
>>
>>shouldn't it be "everyone *who* knows him?
>
> It may be who is that, or alternatively, that is who, but whoever that
> is or isn't or who is that or not, does not alter the fact that he who
> is the focal point of this discussion or those that who know him, know
> who that is.

I don't think it is correct to say "who is that" but perhaps "to whom is
that" or "whoever he is or isn't"
or simply 'whatever'

>
> HTH!
>
> How the fuck are ya Oz? I thought you'd been and gone and died mate.
> Nice to see ya back (and ya front),and trust you had a good weekend.
>
> I've still got all day Sunday to come! ;o)
>

Ya just thought it was time to make a 'contribution' or you might well have
thought I had more important things to do!



>>
>>> aware that if the situation were reversed, he would be pressing home
>>> such an advantage vindictively and obsessively, with scant regard for
>>> the sensitivities or concerns of his victims.
>>>
>>> Whereas hitherto I have reserved such sensitive and personal input for
>>> the purpose only of retaliation to his attacks upon me, it would now
>>> appear that if I don't make early responses of this kind that I am
>>> submitting to his bullying and blackmail.
>>>
>>> I can think of no good reason why he should attempt to gag me by while
>>> allowing himself carte blanche to indulge in his repeated lies,
>>> caricatures and innuendo about me.This is not because I am in the
>>> least bit sensitive or concerned about what he says and does, but
>>> because of the inequity contained in such an arrangement.
>>>
>>> Accordingly, each and every time John Williams indulges himself in
>>> ways that impugn my integrity and reputation (and I will be the sole
>>> arbiter of that), I will immediately and without further notice to
>>> him, post by way of retaliation any of the plethora of posts contained
>>> in the Usenet archives, which refer to the person he is allegedly
>>> attempting to protect, although I do believe his concern is more to do
>>> with the preservation of his own fragile and discredited dignity.
>>>
>>> Further to the above, I may extend that counter ultimatum to include
>>> Williams' conduct toward other contributors to MFW, if I consider his
>>> stalking and bullying go beyond the bounds of common decency and
>>> propriety.
>>>
>>> I look forward to him taking the actions he proposes, and undertake to
>>> post copies of all his threatened correspondence on my web sit at
>>> www.fitnwell.net.
>>>
>>> I have taken informal advantage of the abundance of the high level
>>> legal facilities and advice available to me. The considered opinion of
>>> those consulted is one of great amusement, although they can't
>>> understand why I persist in engaging such a guttersnipe. They are
>>> appalled that as a US Attorney at Law he should conduct his affairs in
>>> such an unprofessional and scandalous manner.
>>>
>>> You should be aware John Williams of the penalty of cost of fruitless
>>> litigation! You don't have a leg to stand on - so sue and be damned!
>

On Sun, 12 Nov 2006 19:23:24 +1000, "David" <forgotwhy@yahoo.com.au>
wrote:

>
>"Charles" <jrh@msn.com> wrote in message
>news:2vmdl29og3bp76m817qnrfkoqd0nu9941p@4ax.com.. .
>> On Sun, 12 Nov 2006 12:55:50 +1000, "David" <forgotwhy@yahoo.com.au>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"Charles" <jrh@msn.com> wrote in message
>>>news:ja3bl25ceoggjfpgnmgt3k51idpc5rlg5e@4ax.com ...
>>>>
>>>> Following the latest ultimatum made to me by the psychotic John
>>>> Williams, I am now in something of a quandary.
>>>>
>>>> Every nerve and sinew about my being, urges me to post gratuitously,
>>>> immediately and in great volume, about the subject which he is
>>>> hyper-sensitive and anxious to avoid. Everyone that knows him will be
>>>
>>>shouldn't it be "everyone *who* knows him?
>>
>> It may be who is that, or alternatively, that is who, but whoever that
>> is or isn't or who is that or not, does not alter the fact that he who
>> is the focal point of this discussion or those that who know him, know
>> who that is.
>
>I don't think it is correct to say "who is that" but perhaps "to whom is
>that" or "whoever he is or isn't"
>or simply 'whatever'
>
>>
>> HTH!
>>
>> How the fuck are ya Oz? I thought you'd been and gone and died mate.
>> Nice to see ya back (and ya front),and trust you had a good weekend.
>>
>> I've still got all day Sunday to come! ;o)
>>
>
>Ya just thought it was time to make a 'contribution' or you might well have
>thought I had more important things to do!
>

More important than endlessly exchanging puerile insults?

Never! ;o)

Nice to hear from you, and let's have more of that great sense of
humour. Curt's fighting a losing battle on the humour front and Cohen
is too absorbed with his new chum Poop Shute! ;o)

In article <1163322998.420004.120890@f16g2000cwb.googlegroups .com>,
"JMW" <jmwilliams_56@yahoo.com> wrote:

> Curt wrote:
> > Cohen wrote:
> > > "David" wrote
> > [...]
> >
> > > > shouldn't it be "everyone *who* knows him?
> > >
> > > OMG! You've been Curtified
> >
> > I'm like the Borg. You're next, macher!
> >
> > Resistance is futile.
>
> Turtis of Borg

Turtis 6 of 9?
--
Peace, Om

Remove _ to validate e-mails.

"My mother never saw the irony in calling me a Son of a bitch" -- Jack Nicholson

Charles wrote:
[...]

> Curt's fighting a losing battle on the humour front

LOSING?

If there's laughter going on then nobody loses. ;o)

Enjoy your Sunday, my friend!

--
Curt

Omelet wrote:
> "JMW" wrote:
[...]

> > Turtis of Borg
>
> Turtis 6 of 9?

Om, when it comes to Jeri Ryan, I doubt anyone would argue with "6 of
9". ;o)

http://www.celebsinc.com/pictures/Je...i_ryan_012.jpg

> Peace, Om

--
Curt

John Williams wrote:
> Curt wrote:
> > Cohen wrote: