All your house are belong to us

I just wanted to say "Speaker Pelosi" out loud a few times.

Speaker Pelosi. Aaaah. That feels good.

Dally (trolling? who, me?)

Dally wrote:
> I just wanted to say "Speaker Pelosi" out loud a few times.

Why?



> Speaker Pelosi. Aaaah. That feels good.
>
> Dally (trolling? who, me?)



--
Bully
Protein bars: http://www.proteinbars.co.uk

"Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't
matter, and those who matter don't mind." - Dr. Seuss

In article <4rh0ebFqdi75U1@mid.individual.net>,
Dally <Dally@myself.com> wrote:

> I just wanted to say "Speaker Pelosi" out loud a few times.
>
> Speaker Pelosi. Aaaah. That feels good.
>
> Dally (trolling? who, me?)

So long as she supports the Second Amendment.......
--
Peace, Om

Remove _ to validate e-mails.

"My mother never saw the irony in calling me a Son of a bitch" -- Jack Nicholson

Omelet wrote:
> In article <4rh0ebFqdi75U1@mid.individual.net>,
> Dally <Dally@myself.com> wrote:
>
>> I just wanted to say "Speaker Pelosi" out loud a few times.
>>
>> Speaker Pelosi. Aaaah. That feels good.
>>
>> Dally (trolling? who, me?)
>
> So long as she supports the Second Amendment.......

I don't know about that.
I'd just be happy if she realized that laws that make sense
in an urban area like SF or Miami don't make sense for some
dude living in a cabin in the white mountains.

"Dally" <Dally@myself.com> wrote in message
news:4rh0ebFqdi75U1@mid.individual.net...
>I just wanted to say "Speaker Pelosi" out loud a few times.
>
> Speaker Pelosi. Aaaah. That feels good.
>
> Dally (trolling? who, me?)

On the bright side, "Speaker Pelosi" will pretty much kill Hillary's shot.

ranieri wrote:
> "Dally" <Dally@myself.com> wrote in message
> news:4rh0ebFqdi75U1@mid.individual.net...
>> I just wanted to say "Speaker Pelosi" out loud a few times.
>>
>> Speaker Pelosi. Aaaah. That feels good.
>>
>> Dally (trolling? who, me?)
>
> On the bright side, "Speaker Pelosi" will pretty much kill Hillary's shot.

Anyone that thinks HC had any chance of even winning the Dem primary is
a lunatic. HC even running sets up another Republican president.
The only supporters for HC are fat soccer moms and fags. Basically the
audience of a cher concert. LOL

ranieri wrote:
> "Dally" <Dally@myself.com> wrote in message
> news:4rh0ebFqdi75U1@mid.individual.net...
> >I just wanted to say "Speaker Pelosi" out loud a few times.
> >
> > Speaker Pelosi. Aaaah. That feels good.
> >
> > Dally (trolling? who, me?)
>
> On the bright side, "Speaker Pelosi" will pretty much kill Hillary's shot.

<bully impression>

Why?

</bully impression>

--
Curt

"Curt" <curtjames@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1163104042.807188.275970@h48g2000cwc.googlegr oups.com...
> ranieri wrote:
>> "Dally" <Dally@myself.com> wrote in message
>> news:4rh0ebFqdi75U1@mid.individual.net...
>> >I just wanted to say "Speaker Pelosi" out loud a few times.
>> >
>> > Speaker Pelosi. Aaaah. That feels good.
>> >
>> > Dally (trolling? who, me?)
>>
>> On the bright side, "Speaker Pelosi" will pretty much kill Hillary's
>> shot.
>
> <bully impression>
>
> Why?
>
> </bully impression>
>

As a country, I just don't think we're ready for 2 of the 3 most powerful
people in the country to be strident, menopausal man-haters. One will do
nicely, thanks.

> As a country, I just don't think we're ready for 2 of the 3 most powerful
> people in the country to be strident, menopausal man-haters. One will do
> nicely, thanks.

Amen to that. There is real science indicating that menopause seriously
alters women. There should be assurances that women around "that time"
be monitored and put on estrogen therapy in order to be OKd for the
necessary security clearances. Not just political leaders either. I am
sure the shareholders of companies led by female CEOs would like similar
assurances, especially after fiascos such as Carly Fiorina at HP. While
us humans are civilized animals there is no denying nature its due!

"Dally" <Dally@myself.com> wrote
>I just wanted to say "Speaker Pelosi" out loud a few times.

I'll join you. "SPEAKER PELOSI"

Just practicing. In two years, when you and I review all the things
Democratic control of the Congress has caused, and who is to blame, I want
to be well practiced.

"SPEAKER PELOSI"

> Speaker Pelosi. Aaaah. That feels good.

Does it bother you that every Islamic terrorist in the world agrees with
you?

> Dally (trolling? who, me?)

I don't think you're trolling. You honestly believe Democratic control of
Congress is a good thing. That's fine. I'll wait two years. Speaker Pelosi
and Leader Reid (that's my Harry , show me your stuff!

BTW, your choice of header..."All your house are belong to us...was
ironically amusing. Tell me why.

David

David Cohen wrote:
> "Dally" <Dally@myself.com> wrote
>
>>I just wanted to say "Speaker Pelosi" out loud a few times.
>
>
> I'll join you. "SPEAKER PELOSI"
>
> Just practicing. In two years, when you and I review all the things
> Democratic control of the Congress has caused, and who is to blame, I want
> to be well practiced.
>
> "SPEAKER PELOSI"

That is a downside. Last time we had the Presidency the nation got
hynotized and paralyzed by a blow job. (But peace and prosperity.) The
time before that, rampant inflation (but damn if that Middle East Peace
Treaty didn't save a couple million lives.)

Face it, Bush needs some checks and balances. He's throwing the baby
out with the bathwater. Read non-U.S. based press, like the Economist
or BBC news or anything from Australia. We've lost the moral high
ground. We can't spread democracy via torture and concentration camps
and the abrogation of habeous corpus. Our constitution works because of
checks and balances and Congress was not checking Bush. Whether Bush
was working for YOUR interests is another topic for another day, but I'm
just grateful that the amount of damage he can continue to do to us.
He's taken us from somewhat hated to thoroughly hated. He's taken us
from budget surplusses to huge deficits. Perhaps most unforgiveably for
me, he's taken a Republican Congress and made it stand for MORE
Government, for MORE Spending, for LESS entreprenurial support. He may
call himself a Republican, but as a Main Street business owner and
member of the Chamber of Commerce I can tell you that he's not any sort
of Republican *I've* ever seen.

>>Speaker Pelosi. Aaaah. That feels good.
>
>
> Does it bother you that every Islamic terrorist in the world agrees with
> you?

Oooh, scary. Does it bother you that we're about to hand Iraq over to
Iran? Go ahead, show me any scenario in which this does not happen?
Play it through. Pay particular attention to how, twenty years ago,
Iran got 800,000 people killed fighting for a section of Iraq and the
only thing that's changed since then is that their strong leader was
deposed and Iran now has the bomb and the "democratic majority" in Iraq
align with the Ayatollah. Go ahead, explain how this can be saved.

>>Dally (trolling? who, me?)
>
>
> I don't think you're trolling. You honestly believe Democratic control of
> Congress is a good thing. That's fine. I'll wait two years. Speaker Pelosi
> and Leader Reid (that's my Harry , show me your stuff!
>
> BTW, your choice of header..."All your house are belong to us...was
> ironically amusing. Tell me why.

It doesn't mean what you think it means. It's not terrorists taking
over bases. (By the way, the term "terrorist" doesn't actually apply to
insurgents fighting off an invasion of their country. "Terrorists"
means something different.)

Anyway, here: read up on it.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/All_you...e_belong_to_us

Dally

Cohen wrote:
[...]

> Does it bother you that every Islamic terrorist in
> the world agrees with you?

You've got a hotline, Cohen, to the Islamic terrorists of the world? If
not, what magazines do you currently subscribe to. I need to
edjuhmikate myself on these issues.
>
> <snip> believe Democratic control of Congress is
> a good thing. That's fine. I'll wait two years. <snip>

THREE *HUNDRED* ~*BIIIIIIIILLIIIIIIION*~ DOLLARS!

How long will it take the Democratic control of the Congress to amass
that kind of debt?

--
Curt

ranieri wrote:
[...]

> As a country, I just don't think we're ready for 2 of the
> 3 most powerful people in the country to be strident,
> menopausal man-haters. One will do nicely, thanks.

Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld?

GIMME THE PSYCHO BITCHES FROM HELL, YO!!!!!

--
Curt

"Dally" <Dally@myself.com> wrote in message
news:4rhnfrFr706tU1@mid.individual.net...
> David Cohen wrote:

>> BTW, your choice of header..."All your house are belong to us...was
>> ironically amusing. Tell me why.
>
> It doesn't mean what you think it means. It's not terrorists taking over
> bases. (By the way, the term "terrorist" doesn't actually apply to
> insurgents fighting off an invasion of their country. "Terrorists" means
> something different.)

Nope. Not even close.

Here's a hint: rhymes with kocialism.

David

TheGist wrote:
[...]

re "As a country, I just don't think we're ready for 2 of the 3 most
powerful people in the country to be strident, menopausal man-haters.
One will do nicely, thanks."

> Amen to that. There is real science indicating that menopause seriously
> alters women. <snip>

And there's real science indicating that an IED seriously alters
soldiers.

Can't believe that Hanny or what'shisname, where's he been lately? The
guy with the weird hair. (Like I'm one to talk.) Anyway, can't believe
that our Pro Nuke 'Em contingent wouldn't want Hillary in the highest
office.

Wouldn't she be the one to push the button?

And would THAT cost $300 billion?

Related:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...050901502.html
aka http://tinyurl.com/flb83

Hmm.

--
Curt

Cohen wrote:

> Nope. Not even close.
>
> Here's a hint: rhymes with kocialism.

You remind me why I couldn't stand Ari Fleischer. Talk without actually
saying ANYTHING.

No hints, please. Just say what you have to say. THANKS!

> David

--
Curt

Curt wrote:
> Cohen wrote:
>
>
>>Nope. Not even close.
>>
>>Here's a hint: rhymes with kocialism.
>
>
> You remind me why I couldn't stand Ari Fleischer. Talk without actually
> saying ANYTHING.
>
> No hints, please. Just say what you have to say. THANKS!

He means that a liberal Democrat will thrust us into socialism and the
madding crowds will own his house.

Scary concept. But can't happen. Won't happen.

David, you misunderstand the social welfare movement. Capitalism
demands that each party negotiate vigorously on their own behalf. If a
worker doesn't want to accept that wage, they go elsewhere to get what
they're worth. But what happens when one party has more power than the
other? Capitalism quickly exploits resources. Whether it's polluting
the environment (because it's cheaper and more profitable to do so for
any individual company) or leaving the crippled and infirm to die,
capitalism becomes a great evil if it doesn't have a safety net.

Both sides are required: market forces, greed is good, advocating for
your own best interests. It's what makes us vibrant and resourceful and
inventive. It's what gets us and keeps us ahead. But you ALSO have to
have the safety net.

Two tax bills got passed last year. I've been studying them at seminars
this month and they stink. Do you remember the "thousand points of
light" that said the government doesn't have to help poor people because
all the rich people will volunteer and give to charity? Well, guess
what. The income tax deduction for money put in the plate at Church or
dropped in the Salvation Army kettle has been killed off. There are
still income tax deductions for people who want to make charitable gifts
directly from their massive IRAs if their income is too high to want to
take a RMD, but charitable contributions typically made my middle class
people have just been largely wiped out.

If people don't ADVOCATE for social services, they don't happen. And if
they don't happen, then, well, there but for the Grace of God go I. Or
you. Tragedy can strike anyone and it's hubris to imagine otherwise.
No, I'm not in favor of crack babies or welfare queens. No one is. But
some abuse of the system is inevitable and we just keep it to a dull
roar (as opposed to the implosion that was communism.) You CAN'T throw
the baby out with the bathwater. You've GOT to help the needy. Because
it's not human to do otherwise.

But it's always a yin and yang thing. It never goes too far in either
direction. So relax and let the good kind people do their thing. You
really need them to be advocating for social services, even if you hate
to treat crack babies. Because the poor and the needy are NOT going
away, even (especially) under capitalism.

Dally

"Dally" <Dally@myself.com> wrote
> Curt wrote:
>> Cohen wrote:
>>
>>>Nope. Not even close.
>>>
>>>Here's a hint: rhymes with kocialism.
>>
>>
>> You remind me why I couldn't stand Ari Fleischer. Talk without actually
>> saying ANYTHING.
>>
>> No hints, please. Just say what you have to say. THANKS!
>
> He means that a liberal Democrat will thrust us into socialism and the
> madding crowds will own his house.

No. He means there is an amusing ironic connection between "all your house
are belong to us" and a dedicated socialist like Pelosi. We are already a
socialist nation, for the most part, and Democratic control of any part of
The Government will simply move us further, and faster, in that direction.

> Scary concept. But can't happen. Won't happen.

Yes, it is. Already has happened. Did.

Started big time with FDR. Has been steamrolling along, through every
administration, Democrat and Republican, ever since.

But it does keep you in business, figuring out the insane, ever changing,
tax code, and it keeps me in business, providing medical care to those who
can not pay for it nor earned it.

David

Curt wrote:
> ranieri wrote:
>> "Dally" <Dally@myself.com> wrote in message
>> news:4rh0ebFqdi75U1@mid.individual.net...
>>> I just wanted to say "Speaker Pelosi" out loud a few times.
>>>
>>> Speaker Pelosi. Aaaah. That feels good.
>>>
>>> Dally (trolling? who, me?)
>>
>> On the bright side, "Speaker Pelosi" will pretty much kill Hillary's
>> shot.
>
> <bully impression>
>

Who gives a fuck?

>
> </bully impression>

IFYPFY

To be honest though, if she's half as nutty as the last guy you voted in, I
guess we should!!!

--
Bully
Protein bars: http://www.proteinbars.co.uk

"Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't
matter, and those who matter don't mind." - Dr. Seuss

Dally wrote:
> David Cohen wrote:
>> "Dally" <Dally@myself.com> wrote
>>
>>> I just wanted to say "Speaker Pelosi" out loud a few times.
>>
>>
>> I'll join you. "SPEAKER PELOSI"
>>
>> Just practicing. In two years, when you and I review all the things
>> Democratic control of the Congress has caused, and who is to blame,
>> I want to be well practiced.
>>
>> "SPEAKER PELOSI"
>
> That is a downside. Last time we had the Presidency the nation got
> hynotized and paralyzed by a blow job. (But peace and prosperity.) The
> time before that, rampant inflation (but damn if that Middle East
> Peace Treaty didn't save a couple million lives.)
>
> Face it, Bush needs some checks and balances. He's throwing the baby
> out with the bathwater. Read non-U.S. based press, like the Economist
> or BBC news or anything from Australia. We've lost the moral high
> ground.

Are you implying be this that you [US presumably] ever held the moral high
ground?

[...]
> Dally



--
Bully
Protein bars: http://www.proteinbars.co.uk

"Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't
matter, and those who matter don't mind." - Dr. Seuss

"Bully" <bully1@proteinbars.co.ok> wrote:
>Dally wrote:
>>
>> Face it, Bush needs some checks and balances. He's throwing the baby
>> out with the bathwater. Read non-U.S. based press, like the Economist
>> or BBC news or anything from Australia. We've lost the moral high
>> ground.
>
>Are you implying be this that you [US presumably] ever held the moral high
>ground?

Nope. We just hold all the cards.

"Bully" <bully1@proteinbars.co.ok> wrote
> Dally wrote:
>> David Cohen wrote:
>>> "Dally" <Dally@myself.com> wrote
>>>
>>>> I just wanted to say "Speaker Pelosi" out loud a few times.
>>>
>>>
>>> I'll join you. "SPEAKER PELOSI"
>>>
>>> Just practicing. In two years, when you and I review all the things
>>> Democratic control of the Congress has caused, and who is to blame,
>>> I want to be well practiced.
>>>
>>> "SPEAKER PELOSI"
>>
>> That is a downside. Last time we had the Presidency the nation got
>> hynotized and paralyzed by a blow job. (But peace and prosperity.) The
>> time before that, rampant inflation (but damn if that Middle East
>> Peace Treaty didn't save a couple million lives.)
>>
>> Face it, Bush needs some checks and balances. He's throwing the baby
>> out with the bathwater. Read non-U.S. based press, like the Economist
>> or BBC news or anything from Australia. We've lost the moral high
>> ground.
>
> Are you implying be this that you [US presumably] ever held the moral high
> ground?

Bully, mein Freund, haben Sie ein kurzes Gedächtnis.

What? You're not a native German speaker? My mistake

David

David Cohen wrote:
> "Bully" <bully1@proteinbars.co.ok> wrote
>> Dally wrote:
>>> David Cohen wrote:
>>>> "Dally" <Dally@myself.com> wrote
>>>>
>>>>> I just wanted to say "Speaker Pelosi" out loud a few times.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I'll join you. "SPEAKER PELOSI"
>>>>
>>>> Just practicing. In two years, when you and I review all the things
>>>> Democratic control of the Congress has caused, and who is to blame,
>>>> I want to be well practiced.
>>>>
>>>> "SPEAKER PELOSI"
>>>
>>> That is a downside. Last time we had the Presidency the nation got
>>> hynotized and paralyzed by a blow job. (But peace and prosperity.)
>>> The time before that, rampant inflation (but damn if that Middle
>>> East Peace Treaty didn't save a couple million lives.)
>>>
>>> Face it, Bush needs some checks and balances. He's throwing the
>>> baby out with the bathwater. Read non-U.S. based press, like the
>>> Economist or BBC news or anything from Australia. We've lost the
>>> moral high ground.
>>
>> Are you implying be this that you [US presumably] ever held the
>> moral high ground?
>
> Bully, mein Freund, haben Sie ein kurzes Gedächtnis.
>
> What? You're not a native German speaker? My mistake
>
> David

Of course not. We won THAT war, remember?

--
Bully
Protein bars: http://www.proteinbars.co.uk

"Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't
matter, and those who matter don't mind." - Dr. Seuss

"Bully" <bully1@proteinbars.co.ok> wrote
> David Cohen wrote:
>> "Bully" <bully1@proteinbars.co.ok> wrote
>>> Dally wrote:
>>>> David Cohen wrote:
>>>>> "Dally" <Dally@myself.com> wrote
>>>>>
>>>>>> I just wanted to say "Speaker Pelosi" out loud a few times.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'll join you. "SPEAKER PELOSI"
>>>>>
>>>>> Just practicing. In two years, when you and I review all the things
>>>>> Democratic control of the Congress has caused, and who is to blame,
>>>>> I want to be well practiced.
>>>>>
>>>>> "SPEAKER PELOSI"
>>>>
>>>> That is a downside. Last time we had the Presidency the nation got
>>>> hynotized and paralyzed by a blow job. (But peace and prosperity.)
>>>> The time before that, rampant inflation (but damn if that Middle
>>>> East Peace Treaty didn't save a couple million lives.)
>>>>
>>>> Face it, Bush needs some checks and balances. He's throwing the
>>>> baby out with the bathwater. Read non-U.S. based press, like the
>>>> Economist or BBC news or anything from Australia. We've lost the
>>>> moral high ground.
>>>
>>> Are you implying be this that you [US presumably] ever held the
>>> moral high ground?
>>
>> Bully, mein Freund, haben Sie ein kurzes Gedächtnis.
>>
>> What? You're not a native German speaker? My mistake

> Of course not. We won THAT war, remember?

Indeed. I like to think the US had the moral high ground in that one.

David

David Cohen wrote:
> "Bully" <bully1@proteinbars.co.ok> wrote
>> David Cohen wrote:
>>> "Bully" <bully1@proteinbars.co.ok> wrote
>>>> Dally wrote:
>>>>> David Cohen wrote:
>>>>>> "Dally" <Dally@myself.com> wrote
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I just wanted to say "Speaker Pelosi" out loud a few times.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'll join you. "SPEAKER PELOSI"
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Just practicing. In two years, when you and I review all the
>>>>>> things Democratic control of the Congress has caused, and who is
>>>>>> to blame, I want to be well practiced.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "SPEAKER PELOSI"
>>>>>
>>>>> That is a downside. Last time we had the Presidency the nation
>>>>> got hynotized and paralyzed by a blow job. (But peace and
>>>>> prosperity.) The time before that, rampant inflation (but damn if
>>>>> that Middle East Peace Treaty didn't save a couple million lives.)
>>>>>
>>>>> Face it, Bush needs some checks and balances. He's throwing the
>>>>> baby out with the bathwater. Read non-U.S. based press, like the
>>>>> Economist or BBC news or anything from Australia. We've lost the
>>>>> moral high ground.
>>>>
>>>> Are you implying be this that you [US presumably] ever held the
>>>> moral high ground?
>>>
>>> Bully, mein Freund, haben Sie ein kurzes Gedächtnis.
>>>
>>> What? You're not a native German speaker? My mistake
>
>> Of course not. We won THAT war, remember?
>
> Indeed. I like to think the US had the moral high ground in that one.
>
> David

What, with your boys over-here, over-paid etc.?

--
Bully
Protein bars: http://www.proteinbars.co.uk

"Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't
matter, and those who matter don't mind." - Dr. Seuss

On Fri, 10 Nov 2006 01:09:46 GMT, "David Cohen"
<sammiesdad@earthlink.net> wrote:

>
>"Dally" <Dally@myself.com> wrote in message
>news:4rhnfrFr706tU1@mid.individual.net...
>> David Cohen wrote:
>
>>> BTW, your choice of header..."All your house are belong to us...was
>>> ironically amusing. Tell me why.
>>
>> It doesn't mean what you think it means. It's not terrorists taking over
>> bases. (By the way, the term "terrorist" doesn't actually apply to
>> insurgents fighting off an invasion of their country. "Terrorists" means
>> something different.)
>
>Nope. Not even close.
>
>Here's a hint: rhymes with kocialism.
>

Is that a political euphemism for strict adherence to the dietary laws
of Judaism?

Have a great weekend Cohen - you know I intend to! ;o)

TFIF!

"Bully" <bully1@proteinbars.co.ok> wrote
> David Cohen wrote:
>> "Bully" <bully1@proteinbars.co.ok> wrote
>>> David Cohen wrote:
>>>> "Bully" <bully1@proteinbars.co.ok> wrote
>>>>> Dally wrote:
>>>>>> David Cohen wrote:
>>>>>>> "Dally" <Dally@myself.com> wrote
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I just wanted to say "Speaker Pelosi" out loud a few times.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'll join you. "SPEAKER PELOSI"
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Just practicing. In two years, when you and I review all the
>>>>>>> things Democratic control of the Congress has caused, and who is
>>>>>>> to blame, I want to be well practiced.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "SPEAKER PELOSI"
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That is a downside. Last time we had the Presidency the nation
>>>>>> got hynotized and paralyzed by a blow job. (But peace and
>>>>>> prosperity.) The time before that, rampant inflation (but damn if
>>>>>> that Middle East Peace Treaty didn't save a couple million lives.)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Face it, Bush needs some checks and balances. He's throwing the
>>>>>> baby out with the bathwater. Read non-U.S. based press, like the
>>>>>> Economist or BBC news or anything from Australia. We've lost the
>>>>>> moral high ground.
>>>>>
>>>>> Are you implying be this that you [US presumably] ever held the
>>>>> moral high ground?
>>>>
>>>> Bully, mein Freund, haben Sie ein kurzes Gedächtnis.
>>>>
>>>> What? You're not a native German speaker? My mistake
>>
>>> Of course not. We won THAT war, remember?
>>
>> Indeed. I like to think the US had the moral high ground in that one.
>>
>> David
>
> What, with your boys over-here, over-paid etc.?

Funny, you don't look French.

David

"Charles" <jrh@msn.com> wrote
> "David Cohen" <sammiesdad@earthlink.net> wrote:
>>"Dally" <Dally@myself.com> wrote
>>> David Cohen wrote:
>>
>>>> BTW, your choice of header..."All your house are belong to us...was
>>>> ironically amusing. Tell me why.
>>>
>>> It doesn't mean what you think it means. It's not terrorists taking
>>> over
>>> bases. (By the way, the term "terrorist" doesn't actually apply to
>>> insurgents fighting off an invasion of their country. "Terrorists"
>>> means
>>> something different.)
>>
>>Nope. Not even close.
>>
>>Here's a hint: rhymes with kocialism.
>>
>
> Is that a political euphemism for strict adherence to the dietary laws
> of Judaism?

It's a political euphemism for The Government requiring strict adherence to
the dietary laws of Judaism because it's the best diet for the most people,
and productive members of society will pay for the kosher food of the
parasites.

David

David Cohen wrote:
> "Bully" <bully1@proteinbars.co.ok> wrote
>> David Cohen wrote:
>>> "Bully" <bully1@proteinbars.co.ok> wrote
>>>> David Cohen wrote:
>>>>> "Bully" <bully1@proteinbars.co.ok> wrote
>>>>>> Dally wrote:
>>>>>>> David Cohen wrote:
>>>>>>>> "Dally" <Dally@myself.com> wrote
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I just wanted to say "Speaker Pelosi" out loud a few times.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'll join you. "SPEAKER PELOSI"
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Just practicing. In two years, when you and I review all the
>>>>>>>> things Democratic control of the Congress has caused, and who
>>>>>>>> is to blame, I want to be well practiced.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "SPEAKER PELOSI"
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That is a downside. Last time we had the Presidency the nation
>>>>>>> got hynotized and paralyzed by a blow job. (But peace and
>>>>>>> prosperity.) The time before that, rampant inflation (but damn
>>>>>>> if that Middle East Peace Treaty didn't save a couple million
>>>>>>> lives.) Face it, Bush needs some checks and balances. He's throwing
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> baby out with the bathwater. Read non-U.S. based press, like
>>>>>>> the Economist or BBC news or anything from Australia. We've
>>>>>>> lost the moral high ground.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Are you implying be this that you [US presumably] ever held the
>>>>>> moral high ground?
>>>>>
>>>>> Bully, mein Freund, haben Sie ein kurzes Gedächtnis.
>>>>>
>>>>> What? You're not a native German speaker? My mistake
>>>
>>>> Of course not. We won THAT war, remember?
>>>
>>> Indeed. I like to think the US had the moral high ground in that
>>> one. David
>>
>> What, with your boys over-here, over-paid etc.?
>
> Funny, you don't look French.
>
> David

I bloody smell it today. They're sneaking garlic into everything these day,
everything!

--
Bully
Protein bars: http://www.proteinbars.co.uk

"Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't
matter, and those who matter don't mind." - Dr. Seuss

On Fri, 10 Nov 2006 09:01:38 GMT, "David Cohen"
<sammiesdad@earthlink.net> wrote:

>
>"Charles" <jrh@msn.com> wrote
>> "David Cohen" <sammiesdad@earthlink.net> wrote:
>>>"Dally" <Dally@myself.com> wrote
>>>> David Cohen wrote:
>>>
>>>>> BTW, your choice of header..."All your house are belong to us...was
>>>>> ironically amusing. Tell me why.
>>>>
>>>> It doesn't mean what you think it means. It's not terrorists taking
>>>> over
>>>> bases. (By the way, the term "terrorist" doesn't actually apply to
>>>> insurgents fighting off an invasion of their country. "Terrorists"
>>>> means
>>>> something different.)
>>>
>>>Nope. Not even close.
>>>
>>>Here's a hint: rhymes with kocialism.
>>>
>>
>> Is that a political euphemism for strict adherence to the dietary laws
>> of Judaism?
>
>It's a political euphemism for The Government requiring strict adherence to
>the dietary laws of Judaism because it's the best diet for the most people,
>and productive members of society will pay for the kosher food of the
>parasites.
>

"Let them eat cake", as it was suggested that Marie Antoinette once
famously said.

On a more serious note Cohen, I am personally deeply saddened at the
transformation of the two houses to Democratic control. The loony left
wing liberal majority will now set about their social engineering
agenda, to the disadvantage of the American people, who turned on
President Bush as a knee-jerk reaction to the parlous situation in
Iraq.

However, now it's up to the Democrats to come up with a solution to
Iraq, and if they are successful in that endeavour then I too will
applaud them!

HAGW!

TFIF!

"Charles" <jrh@msn.com> wrote
> "David Cohen" <sammiesdad@earthlink.net> wrote:
>>"Charles" <jrh@msn.com> wrote
>>> "David Cohen" <sammiesdad@earthlink.net> wrote:
>>>>"Dally" <Dally@myself.com> wrote
>>>>> David Cohen wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> BTW, your choice of header..."All your house are belong to us...was
>>>>>> ironically amusing. Tell me why.
>>>>>
>>>>> It doesn't mean what you think it means. It's not terrorists taking
>>>>> over
>>>>> bases. (By the way, the term "terrorist" doesn't actually apply to
>>>>> insurgents fighting off an invasion of their country. "Terrorists"
>>>>> means
>>>>> something different.)
>>>>
>>>>Nope. Not even close.
>>>>
>>>>Here's a hint: rhymes with kocialism.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Is that a political euphemism for strict adherence to the dietary laws
>>> of Judaism?
>>
>>It's a political euphemism for The Government requiring strict adherence
>>to
>>the dietary laws of Judaism because it's the best diet for the most
>>people,
>>and productive members of society will pay for the kosher food of the
>>parasites.
>>
> "Let them eat cake", as it was suggested that Marie Antoinette once
> famously said.
>
> On a more serious note Cohen, I am personally deeply saddened at the
> transformation of the two houses to Democratic control. The loony left
> wing liberal majority will now set about their social engineering
> agenda, to the disadvantage of the American people, who turned on
> President Bush as a knee-jerk reaction to the parlous situation in
> Iraq.

For at least the next two years, they don't have a veto proof super
majority. They can try all kinds of shit, but the looniest of it will be
vetoed. After that, who knows?

> However, now it's up to the Democrats to come up with a solution to
> Iraq, and if they are successful in that endeavour then I too will
> applaud them!

As will I.

'Course, I had the answer on September 12, 2001, but nobody listened to me.

David

"David Cohen" <sammiesdad@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:%hY4h.5082$ig4.3684@newsread2.news.pas.earthl ink.net...
>
> "Charles" <jrh@msn.com> wrote
>> "David Cohen" <sammiesdad@earthlink.net> wrote:
>>>"Charles" <jrh@msn.com> wrote
>>>> "David Cohen" <sammiesdad@earthlink.net> wrote:
>>>>>"Dally" <Dally@myself.com> wrote
>>>>>> David Cohen wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> BTW, your choice of header..."All your house are belong to us...was
>>>>>>> ironically amusing. Tell me why.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It doesn't mean what you think it means. It's not terrorists taking
>>>>>> over
>>>>>> bases. (By the way, the term "terrorist" doesn't actually apply to
>>>>>> insurgents fighting off an invasion of their country. "Terrorists"
>>>>>> means
>>>>>> something different.)
>>>>>
>>>>>Nope. Not even close.
>>>>>
>>>>>Here's a hint: rhymes with kocialism.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Is that a political euphemism for strict adherence to the dietary laws
>>>> of Judaism?
>>>
>>>It's a political euphemism for The Government requiring strict adherence
>>>to
>>>the dietary laws of Judaism because it's the best diet for the most
>>>people,
>>>and productive members of society will pay for the kosher food of the
>>>parasites.
>>>
>> "Let them eat cake", as it was suggested that Marie Antoinette once
>> famously said.
>>
>> On a more serious note Cohen, I am personally deeply saddened at the
>> transformation of the two houses to Democratic control. The loony left
>> wing liberal majority will now set about their social engineering
>> agenda, to the disadvantage of the American people, who turned on
>> President Bush as a knee-jerk reaction to the parlous situation in
>> Iraq.
>
> For at least the next two years, they don't have a veto proof super
> majority. They can try all kinds of shit, but the looniest of it will be
> vetoed. After that, who knows?
>
>> However, now it's up to the Democrats to come up with a solution to
>> Iraq, and if they are successful in that endeavour then I too will
>> applaud them!
>
> As will I.
>
> 'Course, I had the answer on September 12, 2001, but nobody listened to
> me.
>
> David
>
Genocide is not the answer.

Bully wrote:
> Curt wrote:
> > ranieri wrote:
[...]

> >> <snip>"Speaker Pelosi" will pretty much kill
> >> Hillary's shot.<snip>
>
> Who gives a fuck?
> <snip>
>
> To be honest though, if she's half as nutty as the
> last guy you voted in,

Not me, but one can never be sure what a candidate - and those
surrounding them - will do.

> I guess we should!!!

Always.

> Bully
> Protein bars: http://www.proteinbars.co.uk

Curt
Sports bars: http://www.alsbar.com/

--

"ATP*" <waxwingslain@azurepane.com> wrote
> "David Cohen" <sammiesdad@earthlink.net> wrote >>
>> "Charles" <jrh@msn.com> wrote
>>> "David Cohen" <sammiesdad@earthlink.net> wrote:
>>>>"Charles" <jrh@msn.com> wrote
>>>>
>>> On a more serious note Cohen, I am personally dee