Beware of ExRx.net calculator

Was checking out my miserable pushup performance on their calc.

For the helluvit, I kept changing the age, to see what the calc would give
as an average.
It turns out that if you are 6 months old, you should be banging out 60-70
pushups!!
Only 6 if you are 100.

Clearly, the program is simply extrapolating a formula, not true data
comparison.
Hopefully, it's somewhat valid for ages 20-60, but I wonder about that, as
they don't give their source, formula, etc.
--
------
Mr. P.V.'d (formerly Droll Troll), Yonkers, NY

Stop Corruption in Congress & Send the Ultimate Message:
Absolutely Vote, but NOT for a Democrat or a Republican.
Ending Corruption in Congress is the *Single Best Way*
to Materially Improve Your Family's Life.
The Solution is so simple--and inexpensive!

entropic3.14decay at optonline2.718 dot net; remove pi and e to reply--ie,
all d'numbuhs

Proctologically Violated©® wrote:
> Was checking out my miserable pushup performance on their calc.
>
> For the helluvit, I kept changing the age, to see what the calc would
> give as an average.
> It turns out that if you are 6 months old, you should be banging out
> 60-70 pushups!!
> Only 6 if you are 100.
>
> Clearly, the program is simply extrapolating a formula, not true data
> comparison.
> Hopefully, it's somewhat valid for ages 20-60, but I wonder about
> that, as they don't give their source, formula, etc.

URL of calculator page pls?

--
Bully
Protein bars: http://www.proteinbars.co.uk

"Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't
matter, and those who matter don't mind." - Dr. Seuss

http://www.exrx.net/Calculators/PushUps.html

among many other exercises/activities
--
------
Mr. P.V.'d (formerly Droll Troll), Yonkers, NY

Stop Corruption in Congress & Send the Ultimate Message:
Absolutely Vote, but NOT for a Democrat or a Republican.
Ending Corruption in Congress is the *Single Best Way*
to Materially Improve Your Family's Life.
The Solution is so simple--and inexpensive!

entropic3.14decay at optonline2.718 dot net; remove pi and e to reply--ie,
all d'numbuhs

"Bully" <bully1@proteinbars.co.ok> wrote in message
news:4t7ktfF11q33mU1@mid.individual.net...
> Proctologically Violated©® wrote:
>> Was checking out my miserable pushup performance on their calc.
>>
>> For the helluvit, I kept changing the age, to see what the calc would
>> give as an average.
>> It turns out that if you are 6 months old, you should be banging out
>> 60-70 pushups!!
>> Only 6 if you are 100.
>>
>> Clearly, the program is simply extrapolating a formula, not true data
>> comparison.
>> Hopefully, it's somewhat valid for ages 20-60, but I wonder about
>> that, as they don't give their source, formula, etc.
>
> URL of calculator page pls?
>
> --
> Bully
> Protein bars: http://www.proteinbars.co.uk
>
> "Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't
> matter, and those who matter don't mind." - Dr. Seuss
>
>
>

Proctologically Violated©®:

> Was checking out my miserable pushup performance on their calc.

Just for shits and giggles though?

--
Jock

On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 03:45:43 -0500, "Proctologically Violated©®"
<entropic3.14decay@optonline2.718.net> wrote:

>Was checking out my miserable pushup performance on their calc.
>
>For the helluvit, I kept changing the age, to see what the calc would give
>as an average.
>It turns out that if you are 6 months old, you should be banging out 60-70
>pushups!!
>Only 6 if you are 100.
>
>Clearly, the program is simply extrapolating a formula, not true data
>comparison.
>Hopefully, it's somewhat valid for ages 20-60, but I wonder about that, as
>they don't give their source, formula, etc.

How do you know that data isn't accurate. Kids are pretty strong for
their own body weight. They certainly get more exercise than adults
do. And only those with very strong constitution make it to 100. The
data was also taking back in the 70's. I suspect that people of that
time where more in shape then people of today. The 100 yr old grew up
in a very different time then people of today.

Shute wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 03:45:43 -0500, "Proctologically Violated©®"
> <entropic3.14decay@optonline2.718.net> wrote:
>
>> Was checking out my miserable pushup performance on their calc.
>>
>> For the helluvit, I kept changing the age, to see what the calc
>> would give as an average.
>> It turns out that if you are 6 months old, you should be banging out
>> 60-70 pushups!!
>> Only 6 if you are 100.
>>
>> Clearly, the program is simply extrapolating a formula, not true data
>> comparison.
>> Hopefully, it's somewhat valid for ages 20-60, but I wonder about
>> that, as they don't give their source, formula, etc.
>
> How do you know that data isn't accurate. Kids are pretty strong for
> their own body weight. They certainly get more exercise than adults
> do. And only those with very strong constitution make it to 100. The
> data was also taking back in the 70's. I suspect that people of that
> time where more in shape then people of today. The 100 yr old grew up
> in a very different time then people of today.

Here's the code use if you are interested:

function calc (form) {
var S, StandDev, PercRegress, Zscore, PE
S=form.Sex.options[form.Sex.selectedIndex].value
if (S == "Male") {
form.PopulationAverage.value =
Math.round(70.592*Math.pow(10,-0.010502*form.Age.value))
}
if (S == "Female") {
form.PopulationAverage.value =
Math.round(35.405-0.49*form.Age.value)
}
if (S == "Male" && form.Repetitions.value<=form.PopulationAverage.val ue) {
StandDev =
179.35*Math.pow(form.Age.value,-0.69961)
}
if (S == "Male" && form.Repetitions.value>form.PopulationAverage.valu e) {
StandDev =
14.5
}
if (S == "Female" && form.Repetitions.value<=form.PopulationAverage.val ue)
{
StandDev =
28.155-0.39*form.Age.value
}
if (S == "Female" && form.Repetitions.value>form.PopulationAverage.valu e)
{
StandDev =
22.279+0.084286*form.Age.value-0.0028571*Math.pow(form.Age.value,2)
}
Zscore = (form.Repetitions.value-form.PopulationAverage.value)/StandDev
PE= Math.exp(-1.8355027*(Math.abs(Zscore)-0.23073201))
PercRegress= -0.41682992*(PE-1)/(PE+1)+0.58953708
if (Zscore > 0) {
form.Score.value =
Math.round(PercRegress*100)
}
if (Zscore <= 0) {
form.Score.value =
Math.round((1-PercRegress)*100)
}
if (Zscore >= 1) {
form.Rating.value ="Excellent"
}
if (Zscore < 1 && Zscore >= 0.5) {
form.Rating.value ="Good"
}
if (Zscore < 0.5 && Zscore >= -0.5) {
form.Rating.value ="Average"
}
if (Zscore < -0.5 && Zscore >= -1) {
form.Rating.value ="Fair"
}
if (Zscore < -1) {
form.Rating.value ="Poor"
}
}

--
Bully
Protein bars: http://www.proteinbars.co.uk

"Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't
matter, and those who matter don't mind." - Dr. Seuss

Bully wrote:
> Shute wrote:
> > On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 03:45:43 -0500, "Proctologically Violated©®"
> > <entropic3.14decay@optonline2.718.net> wrote:
> >
> >> Was checking out my miserable pushup performance on their calc.
> >>
> >> For the helluvit, I kept changing the age, to see what the calc
> >> would give as an average.
> >> It turns out that if you are 6 months old, you should be banging out
> >> 60-70 pushups!!
> >> Only 6 if you are 100.
> >>
> >> Clearly, the program is simply extrapolating a formula, not true data
> >> comparison.
> >> Hopefully, it's somewhat valid for ages 20-60, but I wonder about
> >> that, as they don't give their source, formula, etc.
> >
> > How do you know that data isn't accurate. Kids are pretty strong for
> > their own body weight. They certainly get more exercise than adults
> > do. And only those with very strong constitution make it to 100. The
> > data was also taking back in the 70's. I suspect that people of that
> > time where more in shape then people of today. The 100 yr old grew up
> > in a very different time then people of today.
>
> Here's the code use if you are interested:
>
> function calc (form) {
> var S, StandDev, PercRegress, Zscore, PE
> S=form.Sex.options[form.Sex.selectedIndex].value
> if (S == "Male") {
> form.PopulationAverage.value =
> Math.round(70.592*Math.pow(10,-0.010502*form.Age.value))
> }
> if (S == "Female") {
> form.PopulationAverage.value =
> Math.round(35.405-0.49*form.Age.value)

I wonder why the math for the male average is more complicated than the
female average and I wonder how they came up with that algorithm

--
Jerry

On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 15:55:31 -0000, "Bully" <bully1@proteinbars.co.ok>
wrote:

>Shute wrote:
>> On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 03:45:43 -0500, "Proctologically Violated©®"
>> <entropic3.14decay@optonline2.718.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Was checking out my miserable pushup performance on their calc.
>>>
>>> For the helluvit, I kept changing the age, to see what the calc
>>> would give as an average.
>>> It turns out that if you are 6 months old, you should be banging out
>>> 60-70 pushups!!
>>> Only 6 if you are 100.
>>>
>>> Clearly, the program is simply extrapolating a formula, not true data
>>> comparison.
>>> Hopefully, it's somewhat valid for ages 20-60, but I wonder about
>>> that, as they don't give their source, formula, etc.
>>
>> How do you know that data isn't accurate. Kids are pretty strong for
>> their own body weight. They certainly get more exercise than adults
>> do. And only those with very strong constitution make it to 100. The
>> data was also taking back in the 70's. I suspect that people of that
>> time where more in shape then people of today. The 100 yr old grew up
>> in a very different time then people of today.
>
>Here's the code use if you are interested:
>
>function calc (form) {
>var S, StandDev, PercRegress, Zscore, PE
>S=form.Sex.options[form.Sex.selectedIndex].value
> if (S == "Male") {
> form.PopulationAverage.value =
> Math.round(70.592*Math.pow(10,-0.010502*form.Age.value))
>}
> if (S == "Female") {
> form.PopulationAverage.value =
> Math.round(35.405-0.49*form.Age.value)
>}
> if (S == "Male" && form.Repetitions.value<=form.PopulationAverage.val ue) {
> StandDev =
> 179.35*Math.pow(form.Age.value,-0.69961)
>}
> if (S == "Male" && form.Repetitions.value>form.PopulationAverage.valu e) {
> StandDev =
> 14.5
>}
> if (S == "Female" && form.Repetitions.value<=form.PopulationAverage.val ue)
>{
> StandDev =
> 28.155-0.39*form.Age.value
>}
> if (S == "Female" && form.Repetitions.value>form.PopulationAverage.valu e)
>{
> StandDev =
> 22.279+0.084286*form.Age.value-0.0028571*Math.pow(form.Age.value,2)
>}
>Zscore = (form.Repetitions.value-form.PopulationAverage.value)/StandDev
>PE= Math.exp(-1.8355027*(Math.abs(Zscore)-0.23073201))
>PercRegress= -0.41682992*(PE-1)/(PE+1)+0.58953708
> if (Zscore > 0) {
> form.Score.value =
> Math.round(PercRegress*100)
>}
> if (Zscore <= 0) {
> form.Score.value =
> Math.round((1-PercRegress)*100)
>}
> if (Zscore >= 1) {
> form.Rating.value ="Excellent"
>}
> if (Zscore < 1 && Zscore >= 0.5) {
> form.Rating.value ="Good"
>}
> if (Zscore < 0.5 && Zscore >= -0.5) {
> form.Rating.value ="Average"
>}
> if (Zscore < -0.5 && Zscore >= -1) {
> form.Rating.value ="Fair"
>}
> if (Zscore < -1) {
> form.Rating.value ="Poor"
>}
>}

I hate web page designers. Why are they quoting a study if they are
just going to do something like that? I assumed they where linking
back to the actual data. Which would make a lot more sense if you are
going to quote a study.

"Shute" <Shute@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:sj3um2tggt0anhchfdupc0nrfipv9md6pm@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 15:55:31 -0000, "Bully" <bully1@proteinbars.co.ok>
> wrote:
>
>>Shute wrote:
>>> On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 03:45:43 -0500, "Proctologically Violated©®"
>>> <entropic3.14decay@optonline2.718.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Was checking out my miserable pushup performance on their calc.
>>>>
>>>> For the helluvit, I kept changing the age, to see what the calc
>>>> would give as an average.
>>>> It turns out that if you are 6 months old, you should be banging out
>>>> 60-70 pushups!!
>>>> Only 6 if you are 100.
>>>>
>>>> Clearly, the program is simply extrapolating a formula, not true data
>>>> comparison.
>>>> Hopefully, it's somewhat valid for ages 20-60, but I wonder about
>>>> that, as they don't give their source, formula, etc.
>>>
>>> How do you know that data isn't accurate. Kids are pretty strong for
>>> their own body weight. They certainly get more exercise than adults
>>> do. And only those with very strong constitution make it to 100. The
>>> data was also taking back in the 70's. I suspect that people of that
>>> time where more in shape then people of today. The 100 yr old grew up
>>> in a very different time then people of today.
>>
>>Here's the code use if you are interested:
>>
>>function calc (form) {
>>var S, StandDev, PercRegress, Zscore, PE
>>S=form.Sex.options[form.Sex.selectedIndex].value
>> if (S == "Male") {
>> form.PopulationAverage.value =
>> Math.round(70.592*Math.pow(10,-0.010502*form.Age.value))
>>}
>> if (S == "Female") {
>> form.PopulationAverage.value =
>> Math.round(35.405-0.49*form.Age.value)
>>}
>> if (S == "Male" && form.Repetitions.value<=form.PopulationAverage.val ue)
>> {
>> StandDev =
>> 179.35*Math.pow(form.Age.value,-0.69961)
>>}
>> if (S == "Male" && form.Repetitions.value>form.PopulationAverage.valu e)
>> {
>> StandDev =
>> 14.5
>>}
>> if (S == "Female" &&
>> form.Repetitions.value<=form.PopulationAverage.val ue)
>>{
>> StandDev =
>> 28.155-0.39*form.Age.value
>>}
>> if (S == "Female" &&
>> form.Repetitions.value>form.PopulationAverage.valu e)
>>{
>> StandDev =
>> 22.279+0.084286*form.Age.value-0.0028571*Math.pow(form.Age.value,2)
>>}
>>Zscore = (form.Repetitions.value-form.PopulationAverage.value)/StandDev
>>PE= Math.exp(-1.8355027*(Math.abs(Zscore)-0.23073201))
>>PercRegress= -0.41682992*(PE-1)/(PE+1)+0.58953708
>> if (Zscore > 0) {
>> form.Score.value =
>> Math.round(PercRegress*100)
>>}
>> if (Zscore <= 0) {
>> form.Score.value =
>> Math.round((1-PercRegress)*100)
>>}
>> if (Zscore >= 1) {
>> form.Rating.value ="Excellent"
>>}
>> if (Zscore < 1 && Zscore >= 0.5) {
>> form.Rating.value ="Good"
>>}
>> if (Zscore < 0.5 && Zscore >= -0.5) {
>> form.Rating.value ="Average"
>>}
>> if (Zscore < -0.5 && Zscore >= -1) {
>> form.Rating.value ="Fair"
>>}
>> if (Zscore < -1) {
>> form.Rating.value ="Poor"
>>}
>>}
>
> I hate web page designers. Why are they quoting a study if they are
> just going to do something like that? I assumed they where linking
> back to the actual data. Which would make a lot more sense if you are
> going to quote a study.

My original point.
I mean, c'mon, 70 pushups at 6 months old?
I think DAT beats "troneatronics".

And is age the only valid variable? At least BMI?
Shute, how'd you get the code?
--
------
Mr. P.V.'d (formerly Droll Troll), Yonkers, NY

Stop Corruption in Congress & Send the Ultimate Message:
Absolutely Vote, but NOT for a Democrat or a Republican.
Ending Corruption in Congress is the *Single Best Way*
to Materially Improve Your Family's Life.
The Solution is so simple--and inexpensive!

entropic3.14decay at optonline2.718 dot net; remove pi and e to reply--ie,
all d'numbuhs



>
>
>

Proctologically Violated©® wrote:
> "Shute" <Shute@nowhere.com> wrote in message
> news:sj3um2tggt0anhchfdupc0nrfipv9md6pm@4ax.com...
>> On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 15:55:31 -0000, "Bully"
>> <bully1@proteinbars.co.ok> wrote:
>>
>>> Shute wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 03:45:43 -0500, "Proctologically Violated©®"
>>>> <entropic3.14decay@optonline2.718.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Was checking out my miserable pushup performance on their calc.
>>>>>
>>>>> For the helluvit, I kept changing the age, to see what the calc
>>>>> would give as an average.
>>>>> It turns out that if you are 6 months old, you should be banging
>>>>> out 60-70 pushups!!
>>>>> Only 6 if you are 100.
>>>>>
>>>>> Clearly, the program is simply extrapolating a formula, not true
>>>>> data comparison.
>>>>> Hopefully, it's somewhat valid for ages 20-60, but I wonder about
>>>>> that, as they don't give their source, formula, etc.
>>>>
>>>> How do you know that data isn't accurate. Kids are pretty strong
>>>> for their own body weight. They certainly get more exercise than
>>>> adults do. And only those with very strong constitution make it
>>>> to 100. The data was also taking back in the 70's. I suspect
>>>> that people of that time where more in shape then people of today.
>>>> The 100 yr old grew up in a very different time then people of
>>>> today.
>>>
>>> Here's the code use if you are interested:
>>>
>>> function calc (form) {
>>> var S, StandDev, PercRegress, Zscore, PE
>>> S=form.Sex.options[form.Sex.selectedIndex].value
>>> if (S == "Male") {
>>> form.PopulationAverage.value =
>>> Math.round(70.592*Math.pow(10,-0.010502*form.Age.value))
>>> }
>>> if (S == "Female") {
>>> form.PopulationAverage.value =
>>> Math.round(35.405-0.49*form.Age.value)
>>> }
>>> if (S == "Male" &&
>>> form.Repetitions.value<=form.PopulationAverage.val ue) {
>>> StandDev =
>>> 179.35*Math.pow(form.Age.value,-0.69961)
>>> }
>>> if (S == "Male" &&
>>> form.Repetitions.value>form.PopulationAverage.valu e) {
>>> StandDev =
>>> 14.5
>>> }
>>> if (S == "Female" &&
>>> form.Repetitions.value<=form.PopulationAverage.val ue)
>>> {
>>> StandDev =
>>> 28.155-0.39*form.Age.value
>>> }
>>> if (S == "Female" &&
>>> form.Repetitions.value>form.PopulationAverage.valu e)
>>> {
>>> StandDev =
>>> 22.279+0.084286*form.Age.value-0.0028571*Math.pow(form.Age.value,2)
>>> } Zscore =
>>> (form.Repetitions.value-form.PopulationAverage.value)/StandDev PE=
>>> Math.exp(-1.8355027*(Math.abs(Zscore)-0.23073201))
>>> PercRegress= -0.41682992*(PE-1)/(PE+1)+0.58953708
>>> if (Zscore > 0) {
>>> form.Score.value =
>>> Math.round(PercRegress*100)
>>> }
>>> if (Zscore <= 0) {
>>> form.Score.value =
>>> Math.round((1-PercRegress)*100)
>>> }
>>> if (Zscore >= 1) {
>>> form.Rating.value ="Excellent"
>>> }
>>> if (Zscore < 1 && Zscore >= 0.5) {
>>> form.Rating.value ="Good"
>>> }
>>> if (Zscore < 0.5 && Zscore >= -0.5) {
>>> form.Rating.value ="Average"
>>> }
>>> if (Zscore < -0.5 && Zscore >= -1) {
>>> form.Rating.value ="Fair"
>>> }
>>> if (Zscore < -1) {
>>> form.Rating.value ="Poor"
>>> }
>>> }
>>
>> I hate web page designers. Why are they quoting a study if they are
>> just going to do something like that? I assumed they where linking
>> back to the actual data. Which would make a lot more sense if you
>> are going to quote a study.
>
> My original point.
> I mean, c'mon, 70 pushups at 6 months old?
> I think DAT beats "troneatronics".
>
> And is age the only valid variable? At least BMI?
> Shute, how'd you get the code?

He didn't, I did; via a rudimentary understanding of the structure of web
sites.

--
Bully
Protein bars: http://www.proteinbars.co.uk

"Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't
matter, and those who matter don't mind." - Dr. Seuss

On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 14:48:45 -0500, "Proctologically Violated©®"
<entropic3.14decay@optonline2.718.net> wrote:

>
>"Shute" <Shute@nowhere.com> wrote in message
>news:sj3um2tggt0anhchfdupc0nrfipv9md6pm@4ax.com.. .
>> On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 15:55:31 -0000, "Bully" <bully1@proteinbars.co.ok>
>> wrote:
>> I hate web page designers. Why are they quoting a study if they are
>> just going to do something like that? I assumed they where linking
>> back to the actual data. Which would make a lot more sense if you are
>> going to quote a study.
>
>My original point.
>I mean, c'mon, 70 pushups at 6 months old?
>I think DAT beats "troneatronics".
>
>And is age the only valid variable? At least BMI?
>Shute, how'd you get the code?

That is why I would have used the actual data. It can't be consistent
strictly by age. It wouldn't surprise me if the ages 24-35 where
worse than ages above and below. I would be interested in other
information like race and weight. I have seen things like education
level have an effect on their obesity level.

I didn't post the code, Bully did. Just click on view/source in your
web browser.

On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 19:53:31 -0000, "Bully" <bully1@proteinbars.co.ok>
wrote:

>He didn't, I did; via a rudimentary understanding of the structure of web
>sites.

And if they where using decent code they wouldn't have done it that
way.

Shute wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 14:48:45 -0500, "Proctologically Violated©®"
> <entropic3.14decay@optonline2.718.net> wrote:
>
>>
>> "Shute" <Shute@nowhere.com> wrote in message
>> news:sj3um2tggt0anhchfdupc0nrfipv9md6pm@4ax.com...
>>> On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 15:55:31 -0000, "Bully"
>>> <bully1@proteinbars.co.ok> wrote:
>>> I hate web page designers. Why are they quoting a study if they are
>>> just going to do something like that? I assumed they where linking
>>> back to the actual data. Which would make a lot more sense if you
>>> are going to quote a study.
>>
>> My original point.
>> I mean, c'mon, 70 pushups at 6 months old?
>> I think DAT beats "troneatronics".
>>
>> And is age the only valid variable? At least BMI?
>> Shute, how'd you get the code?
>
> That is why I would have used the actual data. It can't be consistent
> strictly by age. It wouldn't surprise me if the ages 24-35 where
> worse than ages above and below. I would be interested in other
> information like race and weight. I have seen things like education
> level have an effect on their obesity level.
>
> I didn't post the code, Bully did. Just click on view/source in your
> web browser.

View Source will only show the HTML. You then need to look at the Javascript
that is called and pull that up!

--
Bully
Protein bars: http://www.proteinbars.co.uk

"Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't
matter, and those who matter don't mind." - Dr. Seuss

"Bully" <bully1@proteinbars.co.ok> wrote in message
news:4t8vqdF12rprhU1@mid.individual.net...
> Shute wrote:
>> On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 14:48:45 -0500, "Proctologically Violated©®"
>> <entropic3.14decay@optonline2.718.net> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> "Shute" <Shute@nowhere.com> wrote in message
>>> news:sj3um2tggt0anhchfdupc0nrfipv9md6pm@4ax.com...
>>>> On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 15:55:31 -0000, "Bully"
>>>> <bully1@proteinbars.co.ok> wrote:
>>>> I hate web page designers. Why are they quoting a study if they are
>>>> just going to do something like that? I assumed they where linking
>>>> back to the actual data. Which would make a lot more sense if you
>>>> are going to quote a study.
>>>
>>> My original point.
>>> I mean, c'mon, 70 pushups at 6 months old?
>>> I think DAT beats "troneatronics".
>>>
>>> And is age the only valid variable? At least BMI?
>>> Shute, how'd you get the code?
>>
>> That is why I would have used the actual data. It can't be consistent
>> strictly by age. It wouldn't surprise me if the ages 24-35 where
>> worse than ages above and below. I would be interested in other
>> information like race and weight. I have seen things like education
>> level have an effect on their obesity level.
>>
>> I didn't post the code, Bully did. Just click on view/source in your
>> web browser.
>
> View Source will only show the HTML. You then need to look at the
> Javascript that is called and pull that up!

Way beyond my ability/phobias.
--
------
Mr. P.V.'d (formerly Droll Troll), Yonkers, NY

Stop Corruption in Congress & Send the Ultimate Message:
Absolutely Vote, but NOT for a Democrat or a Republican.
Ending Corruption in Congress is the *Single Best Way*
to Materially Improve Your Family's Life.
The Solution is so simple--and inexpensive!

entropic3.14decay at optonline2.718 dot net; remove pi and e to reply--ie,
all d'numbuhs


>
> --
> Bully
> Protein bars: http://www.proteinbars.co.uk
>
> "Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't
> matter, and those who matter don't mind." - Dr. Seuss
>
>
>

On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 21:10:50 -0000, "Bully" <bully1@proteinbars.co.ok>
wrote:

>Shute wrote:
>> On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 14:48:45 -0500, "Proctologically Violated©®"
>> <entropic3.14decay@optonline2.718.net> wrote:

>> I didn't post the code, Bully did. Just click on view/source in your
>> web browser.
>
>View Source will only show the HTML. You then need to look at the Javascript
>that is called and pull that up!

OK I missed that. Usually java script that simple is in with the
HTML.

http://www.exrx.net/Calculators/pushup.js

On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 16:21:54 -0500, "Proctologically Violated©®"
<entropic3.14decay@optonline2.718.net> wrote:

>Way beyond my ability/phobias.

I thought bully was just pulling your leg. But I guess he was right
about needing the basic skill.