Biceps!

On Dec 7, 3:17 pm, Prisoner at War <prisoner_at_...@yahoo.com> wrote:
[...]

> <snip> the jury's still out on this.

No, it's in. You've been found guilty of being a stubborn,
argumentative, racist, homophobic idiot.

--

On Dec 7, 3:27 pm, geek_girl <sarah.brilli...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Dec 7, 2:17 pm, Prisoner at War <prisoner_at_...@yahoo.com> wrote:
[...]

> > Okay, you little shiksa,
>
> Wrong on both counts, shlemiel.

Not to pick a nit, but a shlemiel is the guy who always spills the
soup; a shlimazel is the guy the soup spills on. With that in mind,
perhaps... I should STFU. ;o)

--

On Dec 7, 8:34 pm, Curt <curtja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Dec 7, 3:27 pm, geek_girl <sarah.brilli...@gmail.com> wrote:> On Dec 7, 2:17 pm, Prisoner at War <prisoner_at_...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > > Okay, you little shiksa,
>
> > Wrong on both counts, shlemiel.
>
> Not to pick a nit, but a shlemiel is the guy who always spills the
> soup; a shlimazel is the guy the soup spills on. With that in mind,
> perhaps... I should STFU. ;o)
>

I'm glad you brought that up, Curt. A shlemiel may indeed be a soup
spiller, but that's not the only definition. In fact, I happen to have
Leo Rosten's _The New Joys of Yiddish_ right here, and the first
definition he gives for shlemiel is "A foolish person; a simpleton." I
believe that does apply here. IOW, perhaps you should STFU.

On Dec 7, 4:15 pm, Hobbes <khobman...@yahoo.com> wrote:
[...]

> <snip> I see no point in suffering a fool any longer.

YOU'RE NO FUN, KEITH HOBBES! YOU ARE NO FUN!!! )

--

LOL, little pussy whiteboy following me around telling me to STFU...go
make a snowman, snowflake!



On Dec 7, 9:14 pm, Curt <curtja...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> I'm getting t-shirts made up: PERHAPS YOU SHOULD STFU.
>
> --

Jesus Fucking Christ, whose kid brother is this?

Someone give him a quarter for ice cream already!



On Dec 7, 9:26 pm, Curt <curtja...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Could you rephrase that? Because I think you just wrote something
> exceptionally embarrassing and I'd love for you to verify that
> suspicion. Tia.
>
> [...]
>
> --

Cunt, I don't take orders from cunts.

Maybe you should butch up!



On Dec 7, 9:08 pm, Curt <curtja...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> PaW, you can't read? See those words? Right there, idiot, "perhaps you
> should STFU."
>
> Tia.
>
> --

On Dec 7, 4:15 pm, Hobbes <khobman...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
> My expertise doesn't reside in deity - it does reside in a Bachelor of
> Science in Kinesiology (Honours). (Well, actually soon to be - I'm two
> classes away.)

Bwahahahahahahahahaha! And Bush has an MBA from Harvard, for all the
good it's doing this economy.

You are one world-class moron, Keith Hobbes! You should ask your
university for a refund!

ROTFLOL!!

> Already taken it. The Bachelor of Science is my second degree. You on
> the other hand don't seem to understand that I was accusing you of being
> ignorant, not being illogical.

***I'm*** accusing you of being illogical, grandpa.

> Having said that - I'm done with this thread and PAW. I see no point in
> suffering a fool any longer.

No need in getting your ass kicked, you mean! Bye-bye, sore loser.
Next time you use a keyboard, wear a helmet.

> --
> Keith

I think I'll have to stop responding to you so that you don't
embarrass yourself with corny put-downs.

I mean, really, you're embarrassing yourself, Cunt; not me.

Typically clueless liberal.


On Dec 7, 9:28 pm, Curt <curtja...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Brain growth? Or, hey, lack thereof. Because that would make sense.
>
> --

Real brilliant, Cunt.

You know why conservatives keep winning elections, despite all the
shit they do?

My God...thank goodness you weren't around to harangue anyone during
the social protest movements of the '60s and '70s...you really are
clueless as to how boring you are, how uninspired, how absolutely
devoid of original thought....

Well, those who can't, teach. And those who can't teach -- erm, do
you teach gym, by chance?




On Dec 7, 9:18 pm, Curt <curtja...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Change?
>
> Actually, I suspect you've always been an idiot. I'm only just now
> recognizing what an ass you happen to be.
>
> --

On Dec 7, 3:00 pm, "Uncle Bob" <unclebobru...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> BECAUSE ECTOMORPHS ARE TALLER AND SKINNIER THAN ENDO/MESOMORPHS !!!
>
> Damn...

OR MAYBE IT'S BECAUSE THEY'VE STUNTED THEIR GROWTH DOING WEIGHTS SINCE
AGE EIGHT!!!

Fuck...

> Ehhh.... muscular stress = muscular stress... the muscles cant tell the
> difference between body weight or weight made of iron...

Part of the problem may be that weight-lifting kids are prone to
really stacking up the bar with plate after plate...certainly one can
only do so much "work" with calisthenics, whereas with weights, kids
could even injure themselves, in addition to the possibility of
stunting their growth....

> Yes.

Ah, who'd have thought that Spengler's "Decline of The West" would
occur in the midst of Asian porn and Muslim insurrection...LOL!!

> I did.
>
> Pressed things overhead before the age of 10.
>
> 6 feet, whih is more than my older brothers.

And when I say "Americans voted GW President" you can find an American
who didn't, too, but that wouldn't disprove the statement.

> Likw what?

Stunt their height.

> Than let them exercise WITH caution!

Yes -- so just do calisthenics. Why mess with weights?

> Arnold started lifing heavy at 14.
>
> Serge and Sergio even younger.
>
> All three are not midgets,,,

And there are many who are short, and also started young. You know
that, so quit complaining.

> --
> Pete

Prisoner at War wrote:
>
> Time-out, folks -- just a word from your sponsor:
>
> Growing bodies are delicate. Serious weight-training could stunt
> eventual height. No need to build the rest of the house while Mother
> Nature is still laying the foundations. Calisthenics will do just
> fine for teenagers.
>
> "Logic" has nothing to do with it.

Well, that's true.

> It simply is what it is. And the
> jury's still out, so until then, why chance it: the teenage years are
> the only time for height gains, while there's another decade or two or
> three later on for mass gains.
>
> Now, back to your regularly-scheduled mutual ass-scratching....

Thanks so much for your contribution.

--
hz -- sci.logic subscriber

Prisoner at War wrote:
> Cunt, I don't take orders from cunts.
>
> Maybe you should butch up!
>
>
>
> On Dec 7, 9:08 pm, Curt <curtja...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> PaW, you can't read? See those words? Right there, idiot, "perhaps you
>> should STFU."
>>
>> Tia.
>>
>> --
>

Plonk, I am sick of your crap. You never once attempted to supply
evidence to support your "opinion" as was requested very early on in
this thread.



--
Bob Volkmer

On Dec 8, 1:44 am, herbzet <herb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Well, that's true.

Yeah, like, it's "logical" that instead of drinking milk you can
simply take calcium tablets, Vitamin D pills, etc. -- but the real
world doesn't work that way. The body has its own logic -- which is
to say, there are axioms which we do not know about. You can prove
anything by logic, depending on your axioms.

> Thanks so much for your contribution.

Just trying to keep the posers honest.

> --
> hz -- sci.logic subscriber

Neither has the other side of the debate.

You know why?

Because there's no definitive evidence anyway!

So all I'm saying is, why chance it, you have only the teenage years
to get your height, whereas decades after that for packing on mass.

But don't let any of that stop you from dusting off the ol' message
filters.

Just say you want to believe what you want to believe. No need for
"evidence" and all that other bullshit.

Damned idiots. Pussies and old farts on the one hand, advising
pussies and old farts on the other.

I'm the only real lifter here, and the only one out of all the know-it-
alls who actually looks like a lifter, too.



On Dec 8, 2:10 am, rev <m...@volkmer.biz> wrote:
>
>
> Plonk, I am sick of your crap. You never once attempted to supply
> evidence to support your "opinion" as was requested very early on in
> this thread.
>
> --
> Bob Volkmer

On Dec 8, 2:08 am, Prisoner at War <prisoner_at_...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Dec 8, 1:44 am, herbzet <herb...@gmail.com> wrote:

re PaW's comments being unrelated to logic

> > Well, that's true.
>
> Yeah, like, it's "logical" that instead of drinking milk you can
> simply take calcium tablets, Vitamin D pills, etc. -- but the real
> world doesn't work that way. The body has its own logic -- which is
> to say, there are axioms which we do not know about. You can prove
> anything by logic, depending on your axioms.
>
> > Thanks so much for your contribution.
>
> Just trying to keep the posers honest.

[X] inability to recognize sarcasm

Keep up the good work, PaW.

--

On Dec 8, 2:17 am, latina_liebha...@yahoo.com wrote:
[...]

> I'm the only real lifter here, and the only one out of all the
> know-it-alls who actually looks like a lifter, too.

And Robert Schuh spake and it was true:

"POST YOUR PICS YOU ANONYMOUS LOSER!"

Or something like that. ;o)

[...]

--

On Fri, 7 Dec 2007 08:19:53 -0800 (PST), Prisoner at War <prisoner_at_war@yahoo.com> wrote:

>On Dec 7, 10:53 am, geek_girl <sarah.brilli...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Self-selection, doofus. Do you actually *know* any short people who
>> started lifting when they were teenagers? If so, perhaps you should
>> ask them why they started lifting, and whether or not they have non-
>> lifting family members who are also short. If not, perhaps you should
>> STFU.
>
>
>Hey, you're so smart, how come you haven't authored the definitive
>study on this, then?

Dude.

You haven't been here long.

SJ is the definitive study on EVERYTHING, dammit.

On Fri, 7 Dec 2007 12:42:39 -0800 (PST), Prisoner at War <prisoner_at_war@yahoo.com> wrote:

>Which is what I'd said: from afar, over the transom, you observe that
>my observations aren't as good as yours.
>
>Fucking brilliant. If there's proof that the female sex is
>intellectually inferior, you are it.

She is indeed Brilliant.

On Fri, 7 Dec 2007 12:26:06 -0800 (PST), geek_girl <sarah.brilliant@gmail.com> wrote:

>> Please grow up and get over yourself. Here's a clue: take the duct
>> tape off your eyes and put it over your mouth.
>
>I'm plenty grown up, but I'll never get over myself. And really, I
>don't think you want to know where the duct tape actually is.

jpegs please

On Fri, 7 Dec 2007 09:18:08 -0800 (PST), geek_girl <sarah.brilliant@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Dec 7, 10:37 am, Hobbes <khobman...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> In article
>> <0e835bc1-0d6b-40f0-aa3d-79615dcf3...@o42g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>,
>>
>>
>>
>> geek_girl <sarah.brilli...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > On Dec 7, 9:27 am, Prisoner at War <prisoner_at_...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> > > On Dec 6, 2:29 pm, "Uncle Bob" <unclebobru...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > > > BasketBall = Heavy Impact
>>
>> > > > Weightlifting/Powerlifting/Bodybuilding = ZERO mpact.
>>
>> > > It's not simply about "impact." The observation is that muscle-heads
>> > > in high school are shorter than regular, even slim, kids.
>> > > Coincidental correlation or incidental causation?
>>
>> > Self-selection, doofus. Do you actually *know* any short people who
>> > started lifting when they were teenagers? If so, perhaps you should
>> > ask them why they started lifting, and whether or not they have non-
>> > lifting family members who are also short. If not, perhaps you should
>> > STFU.
>>
>> He doesn't seem to follow ideas too well.
>
>Logic is a tool of the patriarchal hegemony. He's just being a
>feminist.

It's nothing you need worry your pretty little head about... how 'bout you go make us some sammiches
instead?

On Fri, 7 Dec 2007 12:36:26 -0800 (PST), geek_girl <sarah.brilliant@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Dec 7, 2:30 pm, Prisoner at War <prisoner_at_...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> Time-out, folks -- just a word from your sponsor:
>>
>> Growing bodies are delicate.
>
>*snort*
>
>I'm so sorry your mommy wouldn't let you play. She meant well. Really,
>she did.

False. If she had meant well, she would have chosen abortion.

On Dec 8, 3:13 pm, Lucas Buck <sbcp...@earthlink.NOSPAM.net> wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Dec 2007 09:18:08 -0800 (PST), geek_girl <sarah.brilli...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On Dec 7, 10:37 am, Hobbes <khobman...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> In article
> >> <0e835bc1-0d6b-40f0-aa3d-79615dcf3...@o42g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>,
>
> >> geek_girl <sarah.brilli...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > On Dec 7, 9:27 am, Prisoner at War <prisoner_at_...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> > > On Dec 6, 2:29 pm, "Uncle Bob" <unclebobru...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> > > > BasketBall = Heavy Impact
>
> >> > > > Weightlifting/Powerlifting/Bodybuilding = ZERO mpact.
>
> >> > > It's not simply about "impact." The observation is that muscle-heads
> >> > > in high school are shorter than regular, even slim, kids.
> >> > > Coincidental correlation or incidental causation?
>
> >> > Self-selection, doofus. Do you actually *know* any short people who
> >> > started lifting when they were teenagers? If so, perhaps you should
> >> > ask them why they started lifting, and whether or not they have non-
> >> > lifting family members who are also short. If not, perhaps you should
> >> > STFU.
>
> >> He doesn't seem to follow ideas too well.
>
> >Logic is a tool of the patriarchal hegemony. He's just being a
> >feminist.
>
> It's nothing you need worry your pretty little head about... how 'bout you go make us some sammiches
> instead?

Sammiches? You want *sammiches*? But I just spent four hours making
you lasagna, you ungrateful bastard!

On Dec 8, 3:00 pm, Lucas Buck <sbcp...@earthlink.NOSPAM.net> wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Dec 2007 12:26:06 -0800 (PST), geek_girl <sarah.brilli...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Please grow up and get over yourself. Here's a clue: take the duct
> >> tape off your eyes and put it over your mouth.
>
> >I'm plenty grown up, but I'll never get over myself. And really, I
> >don't think you want to know where the duct tape actually is.
>
> jpegs please

It's not pretty, but if you insist...

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v1...n/ducttape.jpg

On Dec 8, 6:36 pm, geek_girl <sarah.brilli...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Dec 8, 3:00 pm, Lucas Buck <sbcp...@earthlink.NOSPAM.net> wrote:
> > On Fri, 7 Dec 2007 12:26:06 -0800 (PST), geek_girl <sarah.brilli...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> Please grow up and get over yourself. Here's a clue: take the duct
> > >> tape off your eyes and put it over your mouth.
>
> > >I'm plenty grown up, but I'll never get over myself. And really, I
> > >don't think you want to know where the duct tape actually is.
>
> > jpegs please
>
> It's not pretty, but if you insist...
>
> http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v1...n/ducttape.jpg

Seeeeexy!

--

"geek_girl" <sarah.brilliant@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:65496134-3c9a-458f-8b8f-8c1017aa2772@j20g2000hsi.googlegroups.com...
> On Dec 7, 3:05 pm, Prisoner at War <prisoner_at_...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> On Dec 7, 3:35 pm, Hobbes <khobman...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> > You reallu have no expertise or even background knowledge about what
>> > you
>> > are talking about.
>>
>> I've never claimed to be an expert, unlike you -- but I know you're
>> not God, so maybe you could do with a little humility, all the same.
>
> He's not God, but he *is* an expert.
>
>>
>> > You were unaware of what lifts were contested in
>> > weightlfiting as compared to powerlifting.
>>
>> Wow, that's like saying someone isn't American because he didn't know
>> what the capital of Montana is.
>
> No, no it's not. Analogy really isn't your forte. But please, keep
> trying. Your attempts amuse me.
>
>> Please, go back to school. Ask for the "Logic 101" course.
>
> Mmm, this irony is delicious! And there's plenty for everyone.

I think you know by now that you are dealing with a moron. PAW is a fat ass
bigot with a double digit IQ. I think you will find life in MFW far easier
if you just kill file dolts like him.


--
Robert Schuh
"Everything that elevates an individual above the herd and
intimidates the neighbour is henceforth called evil; and
the fair, modest, submissive and conforming mentality,
the mediocrity of desires attains moral designations and honors"
- Nietzsche

http://www.hardbopdrums.com/

On Dec 9, 10:52 pm, "Rob Schuh" <noone...@hardbopdrums.com> wrote:
[...]

> I think you know by now that you are dealing with a moron. <snip>
> is a fat ass bigot with a double digit IQ. I think you will find life in
> MFW far easier if you just kill file dolts like him.

What good's a kill file if it's just a flag to wave around, you idiot?
You've protested that you have me kill filed on more than one occasion
only to turn around and ask a question about me, who I have problems
with, yadayada.

Yeah, kill file. BFHD, 'bert. Like it helps you so much.

It's much more fun to stick those so-called morons with sharp sticks,
'bert. I learned that from one of my bestestest online buddies. Hmmm.
He had a think for imaginary kill files, too.

--
Curt

On Sat, 8 Dec 2007 15:15:12 -0800 (PST), geek_girl <sarah.brilliant@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Dec 8, 3:13 pm, Lucas Buck <sbcp...@earthlink.NOSPAM.net> wrote:
>> On Fri, 7 Dec 2007 09:18:08 -0800 (PST), geek_girl <sarah.brilli...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >On Dec 7, 10:37 am, Hobbes <khobman...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> >> In article
>> >> <0e835bc1-0d6b-40f0-aa3d-79615dcf3...@o42g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>,
>>
>> >> geek_girl <sarah.brilli...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> > On Dec 7, 9:27 am, Prisoner at War <prisoner_at_...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> >> > > On Dec 6, 2:29 pm, "Uncle Bob" <unclebobru...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >> > > > BasketBall = Heavy Impact
>>
>> >> > > > Weightlifting/Powerlifting/Bodybuilding = ZERO mpact.
>>
>> >> > > It's not simply about "impact." The observation is that muscle-heads
>> >> > > in high school are shorter than regular, even slim, kids.
>> >> > > Coincidental correlation or incidental causation?
>>
>> >> > Self-selection, doofus. Do you actually *know* any short people who
>> >> > started lifting when they were teenagers? If so, perhaps you should
>> >> > ask them why they started lifting, and whether or not they have non-
>> >> > lifting family members who are also short. If not, perhaps you should
>> >> > STFU.
>>
>> >> He doesn't seem to follow ideas too well.
>>
>> >Logic is a tool of the patriarchal hegemony. He's just being a
>> >feminist.
>>
>> It's nothing you need worry your pretty little head about... how 'bout you go make us some sammiches
>> instead?
>
>Sammiches? You want *sammiches*? But I just spent four hours making
>you lasagna, you ungrateful bastard!

So, make some garlic bread so we can have lasagna sammiches!!

On Sat, 8 Dec 2007 15:36:22 -0800 (PST), geek_girl <sarah.brilliant@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Dec 8, 3:00 pm, Lucas Buck <sbcp...@earthlink.NOSPAM.net> wrote:
>> On Fri, 7 Dec 2007 12:26:06 -0800 (PST), geek_girl <sarah.brilli...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> Please grow up and get over yourself. Here's a clue: take the duct
>> >> tape off your eyes and put it over your mouth.
>>
>> >I'm plenty grown up, but I'll never get over myself. And really, I
>> >don't think you want to know where the duct tape actually is.
>>
>> jpegs please
>
>It's not pretty, but if you insist...
>
>http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v1...n/ducttape.jpg

Your lawn needs a little work.

On Dec 16, 6:12 pm, Lucas Buck <sbcp...@earthlink.NOSPAM.net> wrote:
> On Sat, 8 Dec 2007 15:36:22 -0800 (PST), geek_girl <sarah.brilli...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On Dec 8, 3:00 pm, Lucas Buck <sbcp...@earthlink.NOSPAM.net> wrote:
> >> On Fri, 7 Dec 2007 12:26:06 -0800 (PST), geek_girl <sarah.brilli...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> Please grow up and get over yourself. Here's a clue: take the duct
> >> >> tape off your eyes and put it over your mouth.
>
> >> >I'm plenty grown up, but I'll never get over myself. And really, I
> >> >don't think you want to know where the duct tape actually is.
>
> >> jpegs please
>
> >It's not pretty, but if you insist...
>
> >http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v1...n/ducttape.jpg
>
> Your lawn needs a little work.

That's one of those Arizona lawns. And, no, I have no clue where g_g
resides.

--