On Wed, 6 Dec 2006 20:32:14 +1000, "David" <forgotwhy@yahoo.com.au>
wrote:
>Now this person needs constant validation - chimes in almost every post and
>every subject and is generally a pain in the ass.
>
>I think we all know exactly who it is that I am referring to.
>
>Could it be Bully?
Emphatically!
>It could be but it isn't.
>
It should be, as there is no-one else who fits that description so
accurately!! ;o)
"Charles" <jrh@msn.com> wrote in message
news:987dn2tf9lo4pchn5ndkrrsbel443mpftq@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 6 Dec 2006 20:32:14 +1000, "David" <forgotwhy@yahoo.com.au>
> wrote:
>
>>Now this person needs constant validation - chimes in almost every post
>>and
>>every subject and is generally a pain in the ass.
>>
>>I think we all know exactly who it is that I am referring to.
>>
>>Could it be Bully?
>
> Emphatically!
>
>>It could be but it isn't.
>>
>
> It should be, as there is no-one else who fits that description so
> accurately!! ;o)
On Wed, 6 Dec 2006 20:38:48 +1000, "David" <forgotwhy@yahoo.com.au>
wrote:
>
>"Charles" <jrh@msn.com> wrote in message
>news:987dn2tf9lo4pchn5ndkrrsbel443mpftq@4ax.com.. .
>> On Wed, 6 Dec 2006 20:32:14 +1000, "David" <forgotwhy@yahoo.com.au>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>Now this person needs constant validation - chimes in almost every post
>>>and
>>>every subject and is generally a pain in the ass.
>>>
>>>I think we all know exactly who it is that I am referring to.
>>>
>>>Could it be Bully?
>>
>> Emphatically!
>>
>>>It could be but it isn't.
>>>
>>
>> It should be, as there is no-one else who fits that description so
>> accurately!! ;o)
>
>ok, so it shall be written
>
A decisive victory for common sense and social democracy! ;o)
David wrote:
> "Charles" <jrh@msn.com> wrote in message
> news:987dn2tf9lo4pchn5ndkrrsbel443mpftq@4ax.com...
>> On Wed, 6 Dec 2006 20:32:14 +1000, "David" <forgotwhy@yahoo.com.au>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Now this person needs constant validation - chimes in almost every
>>> post and
>>> every subject and is generally a pain in the ass.
>>>
>>> I think we all know exactly who it is that I am referring to.
>>>
>>> Could it be Bully?
>>
>> Emphatically!
>>
>>> It could be but it isn't.
>>>
>>
>> It should be, as there is no-one else who fits that description so
>> accurately!! ;o)
>
> ok, so it shall be written