Bully

I have had enough of Bully! In the text that follows, I won't bother
discussing the flaws in Bully's logic, because he decidedly doesn't use
any logic. I didn't want to talk about this. I really didn't. But I'm
sticking out my neck a bit in talking about his equivocations. It's
quite likely he will try to retaliate against me for my telling you
that by his standards, if you have morals, believe that character
counts, and actually raise your own children -- let alone teach them to
be morally fit -- you're definitely a self-absorbed mafia don.

My standards -- and I suspect yours as well -- are quite different from
Bully's. For instance, I definitely assert that he says that he is the
most recent incarnation of the Buddha. What balderdash! What impudence!
What treachery! Others have stated it much more eloquently than I, but
"tolerance" means tolerance of all, not only of a select few. I always
catch hell whenever I say something like that, so let me assure you
that everyone ought to read my award-winning essay, "The Naked
Aggression of Bully". In it, I chronicle all of Bully's bons mots, from
the perverted to the insufferable, and conclude that Bully insists that
one can understand the elements of a scientific theory only by
reference to the social condition and personal histories of the
scientists involved.

This fraud, this lie, is just one among the thousands he perpetrates.
No matter how bad you think Bully's initiatives are, I assure you that
they are far, far worse than you think. Cruel, disorganized egotists
can go right ahead and convict me for saying that adversarialism is the
last refuge of the sick, but History, acting as the goddess of a higher
truth and a higher justice, will one day smilingly tear up this
verdict, acquitting me of all guilt and blame. I could be wrong about
any or all of this, but at the moment, the above fits what I know of
history, people, and current conditions. If anyone sees anything wrong
or has some new facts or theories on this, I'd love to hear about them.

Lordy.uk wrote:
[...]
Thanks!

--
Bully
Protein bars: http://www.proteinbars.co.uk

"Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't
matter, and those who matter don't mind." - Dr. Seuss

"Lordy.uk" <snarler03@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>
>My standards -- and I suspect yours as well -- are quite different from
>Bully's. For instance, I definitely assert that he says that he is the
>most recent incarnation of the Buddha. What balderdash! What impudence!
>What treachery!

Damn right! I'm the new Buddha. Me! Me! Me!

Wankers!

"Lordy.uk" <snarler03@yahoo.co.uk> schreef:

>I have had enough of Bully!

Yeah!

Me TOO!

----
Pete

On 27 Oct 2006 10:03:07 -0700, "Lordy.uk" <snarler03@yahoo.co.uk>
wrote:

>I have had enough of Bully! In the text that follows, I won't bother
>discussing the flaws in Bully's logic, because he decidedly doesn't use
>any logic. I didn't want to talk about this. I really didn't. But I'm
>sticking out my neck a bit in talking about his equivocations. It's
>quite likely he will try to retaliate against me for my telling you
>that by his standards, if you have morals, believe that character
>counts, and actually raise your own children -- let alone teach them to
>be morally fit -- you're definitely a self-absorbed mafia don.
>
>My standards -- and I suspect yours as well -- are quite different from
>Bully's. For instance, I definitely assert that he says that he is the
>most recent incarnation of the Buddha. What balderdash! What impudence!
>What treachery! Others have stated it much more eloquently than I, but
>"tolerance" means tolerance of all, not only of a select few. I always
>catch hell whenever I say something like that, so let me assure you
>that everyone ought to read my award-winning essay, "The Naked
>Aggression of Bully". In it, I chronicle all of Bully's bons mots, from
>the perverted to the insufferable, and conclude that Bully insists that
>one can understand the elements of a scientific theory only by
>reference to the social condition and personal histories of the
>scientists involved.
>
>This fraud, this lie, is just one among the thousands he perpetrates.
>No matter how bad you think Bully's initiatives are, I assure you that
>they are far, far worse than you think. Cruel, disorganized egotists
>can go right ahead and convict me for saying that adversarialism is the
>last refuge of the sick, but History, acting as the goddess of a higher
>truth and a higher justice, will one day smilingly tear up this
>verdict, acquitting me of all guilt and blame. I could be wrong about
>any or all of this, but at the moment, the above fits what I know of
>history, people, and current conditions. If anyone sees anything wrong
>or has some new facts or theories on this, I'd love to hear about them.

It isn't just me that has a poor opinion of the abrasive Neil Simpson
then? He appears to be increasing his inane activity, and giving all
sorts of people the shits.

At MFW recently, he has been tucking his brown nose up the ample arse
of the American assistant county prosecutor (at the age of 52) John
"Beat you Senseless" Williams.

He obviously admires the "trolling", "stalking" and "cross-posting"
obsessions of this long-term cyber-loon, and is anxious to become a
"trolling" legend in his own mind. Unfortunately, he is as thick as
two short planks and will fail miserably, but at the moment he thinks
he is being really clever - which he will never be.

They have much in common in that they are both real pains in the
fucking arse!

Have a great weekend Lordy - you know I intend to! ;o)

TFIF!

On Fri, 27 Oct 2006 14:12:22 -0400, JMW
<jmwilliams@enforcergraphics.f2s.com> wrote:

>"Lordy.uk" <snarler03@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>>My standards -- and I suspect yours as well -- are quite different from
>>Bully's. For instance, I definitely assert that he says that he is the
>>most recent incarnation of the Buddha. What balderdash! What impudence!
>>What treachery!
>
>Damn right! I'm the new Buddha. Me! Me! Me!
>
>Wankers!

The "wanker" in chief coming in right on cue! ;o)

Williams is desperate to find a new ally and any idiot will do.

Of course Neil Simpson will fit that job description nicely, and he is
also short of any kind of support himself!

Looks like a pairing to pray for, because no doubt they will
collectively give us much to amuse ourselves with in the future! ;o)

On 27 Oct 2006 10:03:07 -0700, "Lordy.uk" <snarler03@yahoo.co.uk>
wrote:

>I have had enough of Bully! In the text that follows, I won't bother
>discussing the flaws in Bully's logic, because he decidedly doesn't use
>any logic. I didn't want to talk about this. I really didn't. But I'm
>sticking out my neck a bit in talking about his equivocations. It's
>quite likely he will try to retaliate against me for my telling you
>that by his standards, if you have morals, believe that character
>counts, and actually raise your own children -- let alone teach them to
>be morally fit -- you're definitely a self-absorbed mafia don.
>
>My standards -- and I suspect yours as well -- are quite different from
>Bully's. For instance, I definitely assert that he says that he is the
>most recent incarnation of the Buddha. What balderdash! What impudence!
>What treachery! Others have stated it much more eloquently than I, but
>"tolerance" means tolerance of all, not only of a select few. I always
>catch hell whenever I say something like that, so let me assure you
>that everyone ought to read my award-winning essay, "The Naked
>Aggression of Bully". In it, I chronicle all of Bully's bons mots, from
>the perverted to the insufferable, and conclude that Bully insists that
>one can understand the elements of a scientific theory only by
>reference to the social condition and personal histories of the
>scientists involved.
>
>This fraud, this lie, is just one among the thousands he perpetrates.
>No matter how bad you think Bully's initiatives are, I assure you that
>they are far, far worse than you think. Cruel, disorganized egotists
>can go right ahead and convict me for saying that adversarialism is the
>last refuge of the sick, but History, acting as the goddess of a higher
>truth and a higher justice, will one day smilingly tear up this
>verdict, acquitting me of all guilt and blame. I could be wrong about
>any or all of this, but at the moment, the above fits what I know of
>history, people, and current conditions. If anyone sees anything wrong
>or has some new facts or theories on this, I'd love to hear about them.

Bully are you telling people you are the reincarnation of Buddha just
to score with chicks? Is this guy some sour puss that can't bench
press as much as you?

On Fri, 27 Oct 2006 14:12:22 -0400, JMW
<jmwilliams@enforcergraphics.f2s.com> wrote:

>"Lordy.uk" <snarler03@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>>My standards -- and I suspect yours as well -- are quite different from
>>Bully's. For instance, I definitely assert that he says that he is the
>>most recent incarnation of the Buddha. What balderdash! What impudence!
>>What treachery!
>
>Damn right! I'm the new Buddha. Me! Me! Me!
>
>Wankers!

You mean a Buddha with a 32" waist. Or are you now owning up to your
Buddha belly.

On 27 Oct 2006 10:03:07 -0700, "Lordy.uk" <snarler03@yahoo.co.uk>
wrote:

>I have had enough of Bully! In the text that follows, I won't bother
>discussing the flaws in Bully's logic, because he decidedly doesn't use
>any logic. I didn't want to talk about this. I really didn't. But I'm
>sticking out my neck a bit in talking about his equivocations. It's
>quite likely he will try to retaliate against me for my telling you
>that by his standards, if you have morals, believe that character
>counts, and actually raise your own children -- let alone teach them to
>be morally fit -- you're definitely a self-absorbed mafia don.
>
>My standards -- and I suspect yours as well -- are quite different from
>Bully's. For instance, I definitely assert that he says that he is the
>most recent incarnation of the Buddha. What balderdash! What impudence!
>What treachery! Others have stated it much more eloquently than I, but
>"tolerance" means tolerance of all, not only of a select few. I always
>catch hell whenever I say something like that, so let me assure you
>that everyone ought to read my award-winning essay, "The Naked
>Aggression of Bully". In it, I chronicle all of Bully's bons mots, from
>the perverted to the insufferable, and conclude that Bully insists that
>one can understand the elements of a scientific theory only by
>reference to the social condition and personal histories of the
>scientists involved.
>
>This fraud, this lie, is just one among the thousands he perpetrates.
>No matter how bad you think Bully's initiatives are, I assure you that
>they are far, far worse than you think. Cruel, disorganized egotists
>can go right ahead and convict me for saying that adversarialism is the
>last refuge of the sick, but History, acting as the goddess of a higher
>truth and a higher justice, will one day smilingly tear up this
>verdict, acquitting me of all guilt and blame. I could be wrong about
>any or all of this, but at the moment, the above fits what I know of
>history, people, and current conditions. If anyone sees anything wrong
>or has some new facts or theories on this, I'd love to hear about them.

This must be another attempt by that Ken guy who does the Steve H
bullshit. The headers don't match up with other posts by Lordy.uk and
he is the one who told us about Ken. Not that anyone else was
listening or anything.

Shute <Shute@nowhere.com> wrote:

>On Fri, 27 Oct 2006 14:12:22 -0400, JMW
><jmwilliams@enforcergraphics.f2s.com> wrote:
>
>>"Lordy.uk" <snarler03@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>>>
>>>My standards -- and I suspect yours as well -- are quite different from
>>>Bully's. For instance, I definitely assert that he says that he is the
>>>most recent incarnation of the Buddha. What balderdash! What impudence!
>>>What treachery!
>>
>>Damn right! I'm the new Buddha. Me! Me! Me!
>>
>>Wankers!
>
>You mean a Buddha with a 32" waist. Or are you now owning up to your
>Buddha belly.

The Gautauma Buddha was rather slender.

A Chinese Buddhist monk, HoTei, often pictured in Buddhist statues as
the "Laughing Buddha," is the one who uninformed folks refer to when
they talk about a "Buddha belly."

However, the above was more of a Buddhist joke, on several levels.

I've always liked the representation of the Kamakura Daibutsu:

http://www.bfcollection.net/cities/j...aibutsu_01.jpg

Pretty lean and pecs, too.

On Sat, 28 Oct 2006 00:26:12 -0400, JMW
<jmwilliams@enforcergraphics.f2s.com> wrote:

>The Gautauma Buddha was rather slender.
>
>A Chinese Buddhist monk, HoTei, often pictured in Buddhist statues as
>the "Laughing Buddha," is the one who uninformed folks refer to when
>they talk about a "Buddha belly."
>
>However, the above was more of a Buddhist joke, on several levels.
>
>I've always liked the representation of the Kamakura Daibutsu:
>
>http://www.bfcollection.net/cities/j...aibutsu_01.jpg
>
>Pretty lean and pecs, too.

I didn't realize there where different Buddha's. I guess I have seen
both over time but never made a connection. The Laughing Buddha seems
to be pretty popular around where I live. Perhaps the early Chinese
immigrants spread it around. But I have worked with Cambodians
wearing necklaces with him on it. Here is a link about him:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laughing_Buddha

The "Western Trend" part at the bottom explains my confusion.

I did realize you where joking. I am sure Charlie's would have
brought it up in his many rants by now if you where not. Ever notice
how people always think they are re-incarnations of famous people.
You never hear people say they where a re-incarnation of Jim the
blacksmith.

Shute wrote:
> On 27 Oct 2006 10:03:07 -0700, "Lordy.uk" <snarler03@yahoo.co.uk>
> wrote:
>
>> I have had enough of Bully! In the text that follows, I won't bother
>> discussing the flaws in Bully's logic, because he decidedly doesn't
>> use any logic. I didn't want to talk about this. I really didn't.
>> But I'm sticking out my neck a bit in talking about his
>> equivocations. It's quite likely he will try to retaliate against me
>> for my telling you that by his standards, if you have morals,
>> believe that character counts, and actually raise your own children
>> -- let alone teach them to be morally fit -- you're definitely a
>> self-absorbed mafia don.
>>
>> My standards -- and I suspect yours as well -- are quite different
>> from Bully's. For instance, I definitely assert that he says that he
>> is the most recent incarnation of the Buddha. What balderdash! What
>> impudence! What treachery! Others have stated it much more
>> eloquently than I, but "tolerance" means tolerance of all, not only
>> of a select few. I always catch hell whenever I say something like
>> that, so let me assure you that everyone ought to read my
>> award-winning essay, "The Naked Aggression of Bully". In it, I
>> chronicle all of Bully's bons mots, from the perverted to the
>> insufferable, and conclude that Bully insists that one can
>> understand the elements of a scientific theory only by reference to
>> the social condition and personal histories of the scientists
>> involved.
>>
>> This fraud, this lie, is just one among the thousands he perpetrates.
>> No matter how bad you think Bully's initiatives are, I assure you
>> that they are far, far worse than you think. Cruel, disorganized
>> egotists can go right ahead and convict me for saying that
>> adversarialism is the last refuge of the sick, but History, acting
>> as the goddess of a higher truth and a higher justice, will one day
>> smilingly tear up this verdict, acquitting me of all guilt and
>> blame. I could be wrong about any or all of this, but at the moment,
>> the above fits what I know of history, people, and current
>> conditions. If anyone sees anything wrong or has some new facts or
>> theories on this, I'd love to hear about them.
>
> Bully are you telling people you are the reincarnation of Buddha just
> to score with chicks?

No, I'm actaully the reincarnation of Marilyn Monroe.

> Is this guy some sour puss that can't bench
> press as much as you?

To be fair, not may people can.


--
Bully
Protein bars: http://www.proteinbars.co.uk

"Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't
matter, and those who matter don't mind." - Dr. Seuss

Shute <Shute@nowhere.com> wrote:

>On Sat, 28 Oct 2006 00:26:12 -0400, JMW
><jmwilliams@enforcergraphics.f2s.com> wrote:
>
>>The Gautauma Buddha was rather slender.
>>
>>A Chinese Buddhist monk, HoTei, often pictured in Buddhist statues as
>>the "Laughing Buddha," is the one who uninformed folks refer to when
>>they talk about a "Buddha belly."
>>
>>However, the above was more of a Buddhist joke, on several levels.
>>
>>I've always liked the representation of the Kamakura Daibutsu:
>>
>>http://www.bfcollection.net/cities/j...aibutsu_01.jpg
>>
>>Pretty lean and pecs, too.
>
>I didn't realize there where different Buddha's. I guess I have seen
>both over time but never made a connection. The Laughing Buddha seems
>to be pretty popular around where I live. Perhaps the early Chinese
>immigrants spread it around. But I have worked with Cambodians
>wearing necklaces with him on it. Here is a link about him:
>
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laughing_Buddha
>
>The "Western Trend" part at the bottom explains my confusion.

It's difficult to explain briefly. Zen Buddhists believe that
everyone possesses "tathata" or "Buddha nature." The founder of
Buddhism, Siddhartha Gautama, is generally considered "The Buddha,"
i.e., The Awakened One. Here's the short Wikipedia version:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gautama_Buddha

A pretty lean guy, particularly during his ascetic period, prior to
his awakening. Keanu Reeves played him in the movie "Little Buddha."

JMW wrote:

>Shute <Shute@nowhere.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>>On Sat, 28 Oct 2006 00:26:12 -0400, JMW
>><jmwilliams@enforcergraphics.f2s.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>The Gautauma Buddha was rather slender.
>>>
>>>A Chinese Buddhist monk, HoTei, often pictured in Buddhist statues as
>>>the "Laughing Buddha," is the one who uninformed folks refer to when
>>>they talk about a "Buddha belly."
>>>
>>>However, the above was more of a Buddhist joke, on several levels.
>>>
>>>I've always liked the representation of the Kamakura Daibutsu:
>>>
>>>http://www.bfcollection.net/cities/j...aibutsu_01.jpg
>>>
>>>Pretty lean and pecs, too.
>>>
>>>
>>I didn't realize there where different Buddha's. I guess I have seen
>>both over time but never made a connection. The Laughing Buddha seems
>>to be pretty popular around where I live. Perhaps the early Chinese
>>immigrants spread it around. But I have worked with Cambodians
>>wearing necklaces with him on it. Here is a link about him:
>>
>>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laughing_Buddha
>>
>>The "Western Trend" part at the bottom explains my confusion.
>>
>>
>
>It's difficult to explain briefly. Zen Buddhists believe that
>everyone possesses "tathata" or "Buddha nature." The founder of
>Buddhism, Siddhartha Gautama, is generally considered "The Buddha,"
>i.e., The Awakened One. Here's the short Wikipedia version:
>
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gautama_Buddha
>
>A pretty lean guy, particularly during his ascetic period, prior to
>his awakening. Keanu Reeves played him in the movie "Little Buddha."
>
>
Hey John,
I am curious why you "waist" your time with these trolls like this Shute
character. The guy has nothing to offer that is topical and all he does
it talk shit.

Rob

--
--
Robert Schuh
"Everything that elevates an individual above the herd and
intimidates the neighbour is henceforth called evil; and
the fair, modest, submissive and conforming mentality,
the mediocrity of desires attains moral designations and honors"
- Nietzsche

http://www.hardbopdrums.com/

In article <c416k296qjdn5a487r2rghlhs8de7md564@4ax.com>,
JMW <jmwilliams@enforcergraphics.f2s.com> wrote:

> Keanu Reeves played him in the movie "Little Buddha."

I've not seen that one... but "Seven Years in Tibet" is an interesting
flick... I believe it stars Brad Pitt?
--
Peace, Om

Remove _ to validate e-mails.

"My mother never saw the irony in calling me a Son of a bitch" -- Jack Nicholson

Robert Schuh <rob@robschuhpolycock.com> wrote:

>JMW wrote:
>
>>Shute <Shute@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>
>>> JMW <jmwilliams@enforcergraphics.f2s.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>The Gautauma Buddha was rather slender.
>>>>
>>>>A Chinese Buddhist monk, HoTei, often pictured in Buddhist statues as
>>>>the "Laughing Buddha," is the one who uninformed folks refer to when
>>>>they talk about a "Buddha belly."
>>>>
>>>>However, the above was more of a Buddhist joke, on several levels.
>>>>
>>>>I've always liked the representation of the Kamakura Daibutsu:
>>>>
>>>>http://www.bfcollection.net/cities/j...aibutsu_01.jpg
>>>>
>>>>Pretty lean and pecs, too.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>I didn't realize there where different Buddha's. I guess I have seen
>>>both over time but never made a connection. The Laughing Buddha seems
>>>to be pretty popular around where I live. Perhaps the early Chinese
>>>immigrants spread it around. But I have worked with Cambodians
>>>wearing necklaces with him on it. Here is a link about him:
>>>
>>>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laughing_Buddha
>>>
>>>The "Western Trend" part at the bottom explains my confusion.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>It's difficult to explain briefly. Zen Buddhists believe that
>>everyone possesses "tathata" or "Buddha nature." The founder of
>>Buddhism, Siddhartha Gautama, is generally considered "The Buddha,"
>>i.e., The Awakened One. Here's the short Wikipedia version:
>>
>>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gautama_Buddha
>>
>>A pretty lean guy, particularly during his ascetic period, prior to
>>his awakening. Keanu Reeves played him in the movie "Little Buddha."
>>
>>
>Hey John,
>I am curious why you "waist" your time with these trolls like this Shute
>character. The guy has nothing to offer that is topical and all he does
>it talk shit.

Shute is fairly new to MFW. Everyone deserves a chance for
redemption.

In article <db36k29jhb7vr7t9ljidfiilkbegfemgv4@4ax.com>,
JMW <jmwilliams@enforcergraphics.f2s.com> wrote:

> >Hey John,
> >I am curious why you "waist" your time with these trolls like this Shute
> >character. The guy has nothing to offer that is topical and all he does
> >it talk shit.
>
> Shute is fairly new to MFW. Everyone deserves a chance for
> redemption.

;-)
--
Peace, Om

Remove _ to validate e-mails.

"My mother never saw the irony in calling me a Son of a bitch" -- Jack Nicholson

OmManiPadmeOmelet <omp_omelet@gmail.com> wrote:

>In article <c416k296qjdn5a487r2rghlhs8de7md564@4ax.com>,
> JMW <jmwilliams@enforcergraphics.f2s.com> wrote:
>
>> Keanu Reeves played him in the movie "Little Buddha."
>
>I've not seen that one... but "Seven Years in Tibet" is an interesting
>flick... I believe it stars Brad Pitt?

Totally different. That involves the modern-day Dalai Lama. A better
film for that subject is "Kundun."

The Dalia Lama spoke at SUNY Buffalo a few weeks ago. Our oldest boy
and his girlfriend went to see him. They really enjoyed it,
particularly his non-judgmental compassion when people wanted to
engage in a lot of political finger-pointing.

On Sat, 28 Oct 2006 03:38:58 -0400, JMW
<jmwilliams@enforcergraphics.f2s.com> wrote:

>It's difficult to explain briefly. Zen Buddhists believe that
>everyone possesses "tathata" or "Buddha nature." The founder of
>Buddhism, Siddhartha Gautama, is generally considered "The Buddha,"
>i.e., The Awakened One. Here's the short Wikipedia version:
>
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gautama_Buddha
>
>A pretty lean guy, particularly during his ascetic period, prior to
>his awakening. Keanu Reeves played him in the movie "Little Buddha."

Yeah I read through several of the links on the wikipedia before I
posted the one I did. It said the earliest known images where created
something like 500 years after he died. So they are not necessarily
accurate. They believed him to be about 6' 1"" and muscular.

On Sat, 28 Oct 2006 00:54:35 -0700, Robert Schuh
<rob@robschuhpolycock.com> wrote:

>Hey John,
>I am curious why you "waist" your time with these trolls like this Shute
>character. The guy has nothing to offer that is topical and all he does
>it talk shit.
>
>Rob

That is all you ever talk about Robert. So that is what you get back
again.

Charles wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Oct 2006 14:12:22 -0400, JMW
> <jmwilliams@enforcergraphics.f2s.com> wrote:
>
> >"Lordy.uk" <snarler03@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> >>
> >>My standards -- and I suspect yours as well -- are quite different from
> >>Bully's. For instance, I definitely assert that he says that he is the
> >>most recent incarnation of the Buddha. What balderdash! What impudence!
> >>What treachery!
> >
> >Damn right! I'm the new Buddha. Me! Me! Me!
> >
> >Wankers!
>
> The "wanker" in chief coming in right on cue! ;o)
>
> Williams is desperate to find a new ally and any idiot will do.
>
> Of course Neil Simpson will fit that job description nicely, and he is
> also short of any kind of support himself!
>
> Looks like a pairing to pray for, because no doubt they will
> collectively give us much to amuse ourselves with in the future! ;o)

Geez Charles. Quit whining- he got there first and you didn't. Now
you just come off as some kind of pompous "bob" Schoe-ugh clone.

Suck it up man, you lost he won, move on.

Shute wrote:
> JMW wrote:
[...]

> >Damn right! I'm the new Buddha. Me! Me! Me!
> >
> >Wankers!

What's with you and wankers, arse, etc., Williams? Rhetorical.

> You mean a Buddha with a 32" waist.

That'd simply be a number on the label of his pants, Shute, and nothing
much to do with his waist measurement.

> Or are you now owning up to your Buddha belly.

Embrace the Buddha Belly!!!

http://groups.google.com/group/misc....start=10&sa=N&


--
Curt

On 28 Oct 2006 18:12:13 -0700, "EatMe" <trollsblow@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>Charles wrote:
>> On Fri, 27 Oct 2006 14:12:22 -0400, JMW
>> <jmwilliams@enforcergraphics.f2s.com> wrote:
>>
>> >"Lordy.uk" <snarler03@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>My standards -- and I suspect yours as well -- are quite different from
>> >>Bully's. For instance, I definitely assert that he says that he is the
>> >>most recent incarnation of the Buddha. What balderdash! What impudence!
>> >>What treachery!
>> >
>> >Damn right! I'm the new Buddha. Me! Me! Me!
>> >
>> >Wankers!
>>
>> The "wanker" in chief coming in right on cue! ;o)
>>
>> Williams is desperate to find a new ally and any idiot will do.
>>
>> Of course Neil Simpson will fit that job description nicely, and he is
>> also short of any kind of support himself!
>>
>> Looks like a pairing to pray for, because no doubt they will
>> collectively give us much to amuse ourselves with in the future! ;o)
>
>Geez Charles.

Geez Eatme (Eatme - what the fuck is that?).

>Quit whining- he got there first and you didn't.

You'll need to explain that one Eatme, and how you arrived at your
profound conclusion, and why you even want to involve yourself.

>Now you just come off as some kind of pompous "bob" Schoe-ugh clone.

I don't think you have known Mr Schuh long enough to be so informal
about his name. He is in fact a golden oldie around here and even I
don't venture to get any more familiar than calling him Robert.

>
>Suck it up man,

Suck up what Eatme?

>you lost

I lost what Eatme?

>he won,

He (who he?) won what Eatme?

>move on.

Geez Eatme, give us a fucking clue what the fuck you're on about
mate!!

Did I say geez already?

Have a great weekend Eatme mate - you know I will Eatme mate! ;o)

(I don't mean I'm going to eat my mate, but I could be tempted to go
down town to lunch on me sheila!)

what the fuck is this thread?

In article <9sKdnZa22KtlMNnYRVnyhQ@eclipse.net.uk>,
ericb <ericb@youmustbekidding.co.uk> wrote:

> what the fuck is this thread?

A confessional for whankers anonymous?
--
Peace, Om

Remove _ to validate e-mails.

"My mother never saw the irony in calling me a Son of a bitch" -- Jack Nicholson

i weasels non bagno vicino all'inverno

OmManiPadmeOmelet wrote:
> In article <9sKdnZa22KtlMNnYRVnyhQ@eclipse.net.uk>,
> ericb <ericb@youmustbekidding.co.uk> wrote:
>
>
>>what the fuck is this thread?
>
>
> A confessional for whankers anonymous?


--
191@10%

On Sun, 29 Oct 2006 14:13:42 +0000, ericb
<ericb@youmustbekidding.co.uk> wrote:

>i weasels non bagno vicino all'inverno
>
>OmManiPadmeOmelet wrote:
>> In article <9sKdnZa22KtlMNnYRVnyhQ@eclipse.net.uk>,
>> ericb <ericb@youmustbekidding.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>what the fuck is this thread?
>>
>>
>> A confessional for whankers anonymous?

You seem to be having communication difficulties.

> BzZnavCnqzrBzryrg jebgr:
> > Va negvpyr <9fXqaMn22XgyZAaLEIaluD@rpyvcfr.arg.hx>,
> > revpo <revpo@lbhzhfgorxvqqvat.pb.hx> jebgr:
> >
> >
> >>jung gur shpx vf guvf guernq?
> >
> >
> > N pbasrffvbany sbe junaxref nabalzbhf?
>
> 191@10%
>
> i weasels non bagno vicino all'inverno
--
Peace, Om

Remove _ to validate e-mails.

"My mother never saw the irony in calling me a Son of a bitch" -- Jack Nicholson

In article <9gh9k2lqrki698gen5kcsenfsnscjbn8df@4ax.com>,
Shute <Shute@nowhere.com> wrote:

> On Sun, 29 Oct 2006 14:13:42 +0000, ericb
> <ericb@youmustbekidding.co.uk> wrote:
>
> >i weasels non bagno vicino all'inverno
> >
> >OmManiPadmeOmelet wrote:
> >> In article <9sKdnZa22KtlMNnYRVnyhQ@eclipse.net.uk>,
> >> ericb <ericb@youmustbekidding.co.uk> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>what the fuck is this thread?
> >>
> >>
> >> A confessional for whankers anonymous?
>
> You seem to be having communication difficulties.

Hopefully the followup will help. <smirk>
--
Peace, Om

Remove _ to validate e-mails.

"My mother never saw the irony in calling me a Son of a bitch" -- Jack Nicholson