THIS is considered a "plus-size" model?!?!?

jenius wrote:
> On Jun 7, 3:13 pm, Astaroth <a...@b.c> wrote:
>> "Becoming something you're not [was LH]"
>> <lfkkhjsssssssss...@lhhhhggd.com> wrote in news:lfkkhjssssssssssik-
>> 93FC75.14545807062...@newsclstr02.news.prodigy.com :
>>
>>> In article
>>> <bf446d4f-757c-4a0c-a68a-0e3569b50...@m36g2000hse.googlegroups.com>,
>>> Jason Todd <janklowic...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>> America's Next Top Model Winner Whitney Thompson...
>>>> http://www.nypost.com/tv/galleries/0...el/photo01.htm
>>> Conclusion: rubenesque
>> Rubens' fatty paintings lend no more dignity to the not-quite-morbidly
>> porky than the term "BBW" does.
>>
>> That the armies of the nigh-obese have co-opted the guy's name and
>> career just to make themselves feel better about their flab is
>> unforgivable.
>>
>>> but statuesque.
>> Besides insane fetishists, no respectable sculptor would create a statue
>> with those proportions.
>
> this is not statuesque, rubenesque, or plus, this is what a woman
> should be, not some stick figure. all this is pure crap. jenius

YOU!!! are pure crap!!!

you will find no tribesmen or nomads that look like her. she is a big
fat fattypants.

humans were not meant to look like that. so much fat is ONLY a sign of
inaction and gluttony. those gut rolls and lipid-stuffed extremities are
like a scarlet letter.

there is no good reason for anyone to be so fat.

humans were not meant to be fat, period.

--
the flower of alicia
"accept everyone as they are." - guru myanwu

On Thu, 12 Jun 2008 00:08:45 +0100, martin <usenet1@etiqa.co.uk>wrote:

>flower alicia wrote:
>
>> YOU!!! are pure crap!!!
>>
>> you will find no tribesmen or nomads that look like her. she is a big
>> fat fattypants.
>>
>> humans were not meant to look like that. so much fat is ONLY a sign of
>> inaction and gluttony. those gut rolls and lipid-stuffed extremities are
>> like a scarlet letter.
>>
>> there is no good reason for anyone to be so fat.
>>
>> humans were not meant to be fat, period.
>
>How old are you? Let's all see a picture of you naked

IAWTP about seeing your nude pics

"martin" <usenet1@etiqa.co.uk> wrote in message
news:48505afd$0$26086$db0fefd9@news.zen.co.uk...
> flower alicia wrote:
>
>> YOU!!! are pure crap!!!
>>
>> you will find no tribesmen or nomads that look like her. she is a big fat
>> fattypants.
>>
>> humans were not meant to look like that. so much fat is ONLY a sign of
>> inaction and gluttony. those gut rolls and lipid-stuffed extremities are
>> like a scarlet letter.
>>
>> there is no good reason for anyone to be so fat.
>>
>> humans were not meant to be fat, period.
>
> How old are you? Let's all see a picture of you naked

She's probably anorexic.

>>

** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **

On Wed, 11 Jun 2008 16:02:54 -0700, flower alicia
<tobloomasarosedoes@theflowerofalicia.com> wrote:

>jenius wrote:
>> On Jun 7, 3:13 pm, Astaroth <a...@b.c> wrote:
>>> "Becoming something you're not [was LH]"
>>> <lfkkhjsssssssss...@lhhhhggd.com> wrote in news:lfkkhjssssssssssik-
>>> 93FC75.14545807062...@newsclstr02.news.prodigy.com :
>>>
>>>> In article
>>>> <bf446d4f-757c-4a0c-a68a-0e3569b50...@m36g2000hse.googlegroups.com>,
>>>> Jason Todd <janklowic...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>> America's Next Top Model Winner Whitney Thompson...
>>>>> http://www.nypost.com/tv/galleries/0...el/photo01.htm
>>>> Conclusion: rubenesque
>>> Rubens' fatty paintings lend no more dignity to the not-quite-morbidly
>>> porky than the term "BBW" does.
>>>
>>> That the armies of the nigh-obese have co-opted the guy's name and
>>> career just to make themselves feel better about their flab is
>>> unforgivable.
>>>
>>>> but statuesque.
>>> Besides insane fetishists, no respectable sculptor would create a statue
>>> with those proportions.
>>
>> this is not statuesque, rubenesque, or plus, this is what a woman
>> should be, not some stick figure. all this is pure crap. jenius
>
>YOU!!! are pure crap!!!
>
>you will find no tribesmen or nomads that look like her. she is a big
>fat fattypants.
>
and you know this HOW, brain stem?

>humans were not meant to look like that. so much fat is ONLY a sign of
>inaction and gluttony. those gut rolls and lipid-stuffed extremities are
>like a scarlet letter.

YOu should an "A" for ASSWIPE.

>
>there is no good reason for anyone to be so fat.

There is no reason for your brain to be out unsupervised-it is simple
too small.


>
>humans were not meant to be fat, period.

They weren't meant to be stupid but you are abusing the privilege.

LV-posted from SSFA

"I rode a tank and held a general's rank
When the blitzkrieg raged and the bodies stank."

---Sympathy for the Devil-The Rolling Stones
--------------------------------------------
"A fanatic cannot change his mind and will not
change the subject."

---Winston Churchill
----------------------------------------------
Tired of being harassed on Usenet? Join my group
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/antiCHU
"I am mad as hell and I will not take it anymore!"

---Network

Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
----------------------------------------------------------
http://www.usenet.com

On Wed, 11 Jun 2008 16:02:54 -0700, flower alicia
<tobloomasarosedoes@theflowerofalicia.com> wrote:

>jenius wrote:
>> On Jun 7, 3:13 pm, Astaroth <a...@b.c> wrote:
>>> "Becoming something you're not [was LH]"
>>> <lfkkhjsssssssss...@lhhhhggd.com> wrote in news:lfkkhjssssssssssik-
>>> 93FC75.14545807062...@newsclstr02.news.prodigy.com :
>>>
>>>> In article
>>>> <bf446d4f-757c-4a0c-a68a-0e3569b50...@m36g2000hse.googlegroups.com>,
>>>> Jason Todd <janklowic...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>> America's Next Top Model Winner Whitney Thompson...
>>>>> http://www.nypost.com/tv/galleries/0...el/photo01.htm
>>>> Conclusion: rubenesque
>>> Rubens' fatty paintings lend no more dignity to the not-quite-morbidly
>>> porky than the term "BBW" does.
>>>
>>> That the armies of the nigh-obese have co-opted the guy's name and
>>> career just to make themselves feel better about their flab is
>>> unforgivable.
>>>
>>>> but statuesque.
>>> Besides insane fetishists, no respectable sculptor would create a statue
>>> with those proportions.
>>
>> this is not statuesque, rubenesque, or plus, this is what a woman
>> should be, not some stick figure. all this is pure crap. jenius
>
>YOU!!! are pure crap!!!
>
>you will find no tribesmen or nomads that look like her. she is a big
>fat fattypants.
>
>humans were not meant to look like that. so much fat is ONLY a sign of
>inaction and gluttony. those gut rolls and lipid-stuffed extremities are
>like a scarlet letter.
>
>there is no good reason for anyone to be so fat.
>
>humans were not meant to be fat, period.

Snookums, if you think this woman is fat, you're a fucking idiot.

On Jun 11, 7:02 pm, flower alicia
<tobloomasarosed...@theflowerofalicia.com> wrote:
> jenius wrote:
> > On Jun 7, 3:13 pm, Astaroth <a...@b.c> wrote:
> >> "Becoming something you're not [was LH]"
> >> <lfkkhjsssssssss...@lhhhhggd.com> wrote in news:lfkkhjssssssssssik-
> >> 93FC75.14545807062...@newsclstr02.news.prodigy.com :
>
> >>> In article
> >>> <bf446d4f-757c-4a0c-a68a-0e3569b50...@m36g2000hse.googlegroups.com>,
> >>> Jason Todd <janklowic...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >>>> America's Next Top Model Winner Whitney Thompson...
> >>>>http://www.nypost.com/tv/galleries/0...el/photo01.htm
> >>> Conclusion: rubenesque
> >> Rubens' fatty paintings lend no more dignity to the not-quite-morbidly
> >> porky than the term "BBW" does.
>
> >> That the armies of the nigh-obese have co-opted the guy's name and
> >> career just to make themselves feel better about their flab is
> >> unforgivable.
>
> >>> but statuesque.
> >> Besides insane fetishists, no respectable sculptor would create a statue
> >> with those proportions.
>
> > this is not statuesque, rubenesque, or plus, this is what a woman
> > should be, not some stick figure. all this is pure crap. jenius
>
> YOU!!! are pure crap!!!
>
> you will find no tribesmen or nomads that look like her. she is a big
> fat fattypants.
>
> humans were not meant to look like that. so much fat is ONLY a sign of
> inaction and gluttony. those gut rolls and lipid-stuffed extremities are
> like a scarlet letter.
>
> there is no good reason for anyone to be so fat.
>
> humans were not meant to be fat, period.
>
> --
> the flower of alicia
> "accept everyone as they are." - guru myanwu

Are you looking at the same picture as the rest of us?

THIS

http://www.nypost.com/tv/galleries/0...el/photo01.jpg

is NOT fat.

flower alicia wrote:

> YOU!!! are pure crap!!!
>
> you will find no tribesmen or nomads that look like her. she is a big
> fat fattypants.
>
> humans were not meant to look like that. so much fat is ONLY a sign of
> inaction and gluttony. those gut rolls and lipid-stuffed extremities are
> like a scarlet letter.
>
> there is no good reason for anyone to be so fat.
>
> humans were not meant to be fat, period.

Here you go, some 'normal' shaped women for you to have a go at

http://blogs.timesunion.com/lizfunk/...06/lizdove.jpg

and one for the ladies (from the same ad range)

http://radio.weblogs.com/0107064/MyImages/dove-boys.jpg
>

On Jun 11, 7:08*pm, martin <usen...@etiqa.co.uk> wrote:
> flower alicia wrote:
> > YOU!!! are pure crap!!!
>
> > you will find no tribesmen or nomads that look like her. she is a big
> > fat fattypants.
>
> > humans were not meant to look like that. so much fat is ONLY a sign of
> > inaction and gluttony. those gut rolls and lipid-stuffed extremities are
> > like a scarlet letter.
>
> > there is no good reason for anyone to be so fat.
>
> > humans were not meant to be fat, period.
>
> How old are you? Let's all see a picture of you naked
>
Please, no naked trolls.

Ragnar

>>>> In article
>>>> <bf446d4f-757c-4a0c-a68a-0e3569b50...@m36g2000hse.googlegroups.com>,
>>>> Jason Todd <janklowic...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> America's Next Top Model Winner Whitney Thompson...
>>>>> http://www.nypost.com/tv/galleries/0...el/photo01.htm

I would hit it.

tom

--
We do what we must because we can.

On Thu, 12 Jun 2008, martin wrote:

> Here you go, some 'normal' shaped women for you to have a go at
>
> http://blogs.timesunion.com/lizfunk/...06/lizdove.jpg

From top left, would, probably would if i could reach, might, would,
would, oh go on then, would, would, would twice, wouldn't, would until she
broke, would if there was nothing good on telly.

tom

--
We do what we must because we can.

On Jun 11, 6:02 pm, flower alicia <tobloomasarosed...> wrote:
>
> YOU!!! are pure crap!!!
>
> you will find no tribesmen or nomads that look like her. she is a big
> fat fattypants.
>
> humans were not meant to look like that. [...]


Fat is easy to estimate. If you look pregnant and aren't, then you are
fat. Otherwise don't worry.

Tom Anderson wrote:
>>>>> In article
>>>>> <bf446d4f-757c-4a0c-a68a-0e3569b50...@m36g2000hse.googlegroups.com>,
>>>>> Jason Todd <janklowic...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> America's Next Top Model Winner Whitney Thompson...
>>>>>> http://www.nypost.com/tv/galleries/0...el/photo01.htm
>
> I would hit it.
>
> tom
>

B0Gger?

Dnia 2008-06-12 Tom Anderson napisa³(a):
>>>>> In article
>>>>> <bf446d4f-757c-4a0c-a68a-0e3569b50...@m36g2000hse.googlegroups.com>,
>>>>> Jason Todd <janklowic...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> America's Next Top Model Winner Whitney Thompson...
>>>>>> http://www.nypost.com/tv/galleries/0...el/photo01.htm
>
> I would hit it.

You mean it like "what the hell, I don't care" or "OMG, right now!"?
For me she looks just about right (barring makeup or whatever makes any
models look a bit strange).

--
Andrzej Rosa 1127R

On Sun, 15 Jun 2008, Andrzej Rosa wrote:

> Dnia 2008-06-12 Tom Anderson napisa?(a):
>>>>>> In article
>>>>>> <bf446d4f-757c-4a0c-a68a-0e3569b50...@m36g2000hse.googlegroups.com>,
>>>>>> Jason Todd <janklowic...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> America's Next Top Model Winner Whitney Thompson...
>>>>>>> http://www.nypost.com/tv/galleries/0...el/photo01.htm
>>
>> I would hit it.
>
> You mean it like "what the hell, I don't care" or "OMG, right now!"? For
> me she looks just about right (barring makeup or whatever makes any
> models look a bit strange).

I mean i find her attractive and would have sex with her if i had the
chance. She's pretty, she has good breasts and nice legs; what's not to
like? She's a bit tall for me, but so what.

tom

--
That must be one of the best things you can possibly do with a piglet,
booze and a cannon. -- D

On 12 jun, 01:02, flower alicia
<tobloomasarosed...@theflowerofalicia.com> wrote:
> jenius wrote:
> > On Jun 7, 3:13 pm, Astaroth <a...@b.c> wrote:
> >> "Becoming something you're not [was LH]"
> >> <lfkkhjsssssssss...@lhhhhggd.com> wrote in news:lfkkhjssssssssssik-
> >> 93FC75.14545807062...@newsclstr02.news.prodigy.com :
>
> >>> In article
> >>> <bf446d4f-757c-4a0c-a68a-0e3569b50...@m36g2000hse.googlegroups.com>,
> >>> *Jason Todd <janklowic...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >>>> America's Next Top Model Winner Whitney Thompson...
> >>>>http://www.nypost.com/tv/galleries/0...el/photo01.htm
> >>> Conclusion: rubenesque
> >> Rubens' fatty paintings lend no more dignity to the not-quite-morbidly
> >> porky than the term "BBW" does.
>
> >> That the armies of the nigh-obese have co-opted the guy's name and
> >> career just to make themselves feel better about their flab is
> >> unforgivable.
>
> >>> but statuesque.
> >> Besides insane fetishists, no respectable sculptor would create a statue
> >> with those proportions.
>
> > this is not statuesque, rubenesque, or plus, this is what a woman
> > should be, not some stick figure. all this is pure crap. jenius
>
> YOU!!! are pure crap!!!
>
> you will find no tribesmen or nomads that look like her. she is a big
> fat fattypants.
>
> humans were not meant to look like that. so much fat is ONLY a sign of
> inaction and gluttony. those gut rolls and lipid-stuffed extremities are
> like a scarlet letter.
>
> there is no good reason for anyone to be so fat.
>
> humans were not meant to be fat, period.
>
> --
> the flower of alicia
> "accept everyone as they are." - guru myanwu- Tekst uit oorspronkelijk bericht niet weergeven -
>
> - Tekst uit oorspronkelijk bericht weergeven -

sure humans were not meant to be anything.

(which is the only fact that makes this silly post on topic for
alt.atheism)

On 12 jun, 01:02, flower alicia
<tobloomasarosed...@theflowerofalicia.com> wrote:
> jenius wrote:
> > On Jun 7, 3:13 pm, Astaroth <a...@b.c> wrote:
> >> "Becoming something you're not [was LH]"
> >> <lfkkhjsssssssss...@lhhhhggd.com> wrote in news:lfkkhjssssssssssik-
> >> 93FC75.14545807062...@newsclstr02.news.prodigy.com :
>
> >>> In article
> >>> <bf446d4f-757c-4a0c-a68a-0e3569b50...@m36g2000hse.googlegroups.com>,
> >>> *Jason Todd <janklowic...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >>>> America's Next Top Model Winner Whitney Thompson...
> >>>>http://www.nypost.com/tv/galleries/0...el/photo01.htm
> >>> Conclusion: rubenesque
> >> Rubens' fatty paintings lend no more dignity to the not-quite-morbidly
> >> porky than the term "BBW" does.
>
> >> That the armies of the nigh-obese have co-opted the guy's name and
> >> career just to make themselves feel better about their flab is
> >> unforgivable.
>
> >>> but statuesque.
> >> Besides insane fetishists, no respectable sculptor would create a statue
> >> with those proportions.
>
> > this is not statuesque, rubenesque, or plus, this is what a woman
> > should be, not some stick figure. all this is pure crap. jenius
>
> YOU!!! are pure crap!!!
>
> you will find no tribesmen or nomads that look like her. she is a big
> fat fattypants.
>
> humans were not meant to look like that. so much fat is ONLY a sign of
> inaction and gluttony. those gut rolls and lipid-stuffed extremities are
> like a scarlet letter.
>
> there is no good reason for anyone to be so fat.
>
> humans were not meant to be fat, period.
>
> --
> the flower of alicia
> "accept everyone as they are." - guru myanwu- Tekst uit oorspronkelijk bericht niet weergeven -
>
> - Tekst uit oorspronkelijk bericht weergeven -

PS the woman pictured looks about average to me,
maybe lighter than average as we seem to be too heavy overall.

In article
<95ee02cf-cfc3-4993-8840-ade3df0d6559@34g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>,
"pbamvv@worldonline.nl" <pbamvv@worldonline.nl> wrote:

> On 12 jun, 01:02, flower alicia
> <tobloomasarosed...@theflowerofalicia.com> wrote:
> > jenius wrote:
> > > On Jun 7, 3:13 pm, Astaroth <a...@b.c> wrote:
> > >> "Becoming something you're not [was LH]"
> > >> <lfkkhjsssssssss...@lhhhhggd.com> wrote in news:lfkkhjssssssssssik-
> > >> 93FC75.14545807062...@newsclstr02.news.prodigy.com :
> >
> > >>> In article
> > >>> <bf446d4f-757c-4a0c-a68a-0e3569b50...@m36g2000hse.googlegroups.com>,
> > >>> *Jason Todd <janklowic...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > >>>> America's Next Top Model Winner Whitney Thompson...
> > >>>>http://www.nypost.com/tv/galleries/05152008 top model/photo01.htm
> > >>> Conclusion: rubenesque
> > >> Rubens' fatty paintings lend no more dignity to the not-quite-morbidly
> > >> porky than the term "BBW" does.
> >
> > >> That the armies of the nigh-obese have co-opted the guy's name and
> > >> career just to make themselves feel better about their flab is
> > >> unforgivable.
> >
> > >>> but statuesque.
> > >> Besides insane fetishists, no respectable sculptor would create a statue
> > >> with those proportions.
> >
> > > this is not statuesque, rubenesque, or plus, this is what a woman
> > > should be, not some stick figure. all this is pure crap. jenius
> >
> > YOU!!! are pure crap!!!
> >
> > you will find no tribesmen or nomads that look like her. she is a big
> > fat fattypants.
> >
> > humans were not meant to look like that. so much fat is ONLY a sign of
> > inaction and gluttony. those gut rolls and lipid-stuffed extremities are
> > like a scarlet letter.
> >
> > there is no good reason for anyone to be so fat.
> >
> > humans were not meant to be fat, period.
> >
> > --
> > the flower of alicia
> > "accept everyone as they are." - guru myanwu- Tekst uit oorspronkelijk
> > bericht niet weergeven -
> >
> > - Tekst uit oorspronkelijk bericht weergeven -
>
> sure humans were not meant to be anything.
>
> (which is the only fact that makes this silly post on topic for
> alt.atheism)


False. An atheist would not argue against the biological structure on
the human body nor against what has been found optimal weight standards.

--
Emm Oh Oh En. That spells RSPW.

On Sun, 15 Jun 2008 02:07:56 +0200, Andrzej Rosa <bakters@yahoo.com>
wrote:

>Dnia 2008-06-12 Tom Anderson napisa?(a):
>>>>>> In article
>>>>>> <bf446d4f-757c-4a0c-a68a-0e3569b50...@m36g2000hse.googlegroups.com>,
>>>>>> Jason Todd <janklowic...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> America's Next Top Model Winner Whitney Thompson...
>>>>>>> http://www.nypost.com/tv/galleries/0...el/photo01.htm
>>
>> I would hit it.
>
>You mean it like "what the hell, I don't care" or "OMG, right now!"?

OMG right now!
and again, and again, and again, until comatose, then again.....then
again....

>For me she looks just about right (barring makeup or whatever makes any
>models look a bit strange).

mud, motor oil, makeup, it'll rub off, not a problem.
I never liked the waif look anyway.

On Sun, 15 Jun 2008, Becoming something you're not [was LH] wrote:

> In article
> <95ee02cf-cfc3-4993-8840-ade3df0d6559@34g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>,
> "pbamvv@worldonline.nl" <pbamvv@worldonline.nl> wrote:
>
>> On 12 jun, 01:02, flower alicia
>> <tobloomasarosed...@theflowerofalicia.com> wrote:
>>> jenius wrote:
>>>> On Jun 7, 3:13 pm, Astaroth <a...@b.c> wrote:
>>>>> "Becoming something you're not [was LH]"
>>>>> <lfkkhjsssssssss...@lhhhhggd.com> wrote in news:lfkkhjssssssssssik-
>>>>> 93FC75.14545807062...@newsclstr02.news.prodigy.com :
>>>>>
>>>>>> In article
>>>>>> <bf446d4f-757c-4a0c-a68a-0e3569b50...@m36g2000hse.googlegroups.com>,
>>>>>> *Jason Todd <janklowic...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> America's Next Top Model Winner Whitney Thompson...
>>>>>>> http://www.nypost.com/tv/galleries/05152008 top model/photo01.htm
>>>>>> Conclusion: rubenesque
>>>>> Rubens' fatty paintings lend no more dignity to the not-quite-morbidly
>>>>> porky than the term "BBW" does.
>>>>
>>>>> That the armies of the nigh-obese have co-opted the guy's name and
>>>>> career just to make themselves feel better about their flab is
>>>>> unforgivable.
>>>>>
>>>>>> but statuesque.
>>>>> Besides insane fetishists, no respectable sculptor would create a statue
>>>>> with those proportions.
>>>
>>>> this is not statuesque, rubenesque, or plus, this is what a woman
>>>> should be, not some stick figure. all this is pure crap. jenius
>>>
>>> YOU!!! are pure crap!!!
>>>
>>> you will find no tribesmen or nomads that look like her. she is a big
>>> fat fattypants.
>>>
>>> humans were not meant to look like that. so much fat is ONLY a sign of
>>> inaction and gluttony. those gut rolls and lipid-stuffed extremities are
>>> like a scarlet letter.
>>>
>>> there is no good reason for anyone to be so fat.
>>>
>>> humans were not meant to be fat, period.
>>
>> sure humans were not meant to be anything.
>>
>> (which is the only fact that makes this silly post on topic for
>> alt.atheism)
>
> False. An atheist would not argue against the biological structure on
> the human body nor against what has been found optimal weight standards.

I am an atheist, and i would hit it.

tom

--
That must be one of the best things you can possibly do with a piglet,
booze and a cannon. -- D

Dnia 2008-06-15 Tom Anderson napisa³(a):
[...]
>>> sure humans were not meant to be anything.
>>>
>>> (which is the only fact that makes this silly post on topic for
>>> alt.atheism)
>>
>> False. An atheist would not argue against the biological structure on
>> the human body nor against what has been found optimal weight standards.
>
> I am an atheist, and i would hit it.

You sure that you fulfill *all* the requirements of a true and faithful
atheist? Like not arguing against biological structures, for example?
I know that I'm a weak sinner, which will argue against anything when
I'm in the right mood, so I have to humbly confess, that I just happen
to not believe in God. One day maybe I'll earn the rights to call
myself an atheist... ;-)

--
Andrzej Rosa 1127R

On Jun 12, 9:22 am, Conspiracy of Doves <mark_d...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Jun 11, 7:02 pm, flower alicia
>
>
>
> <tobloomasarosed...@theflowerofalicia.com> wrote:
> > jenius wrote:
> > > On Jun 7, 3:13 pm, Astaroth <a...@b.c> wrote:
> > >> "Becoming something you're not [was LH]"
> > >> <lfkkhjsssssssss...@lhhhhggd.com> wrote in news:lfkkhjssssssssssik-
> > >> 93FC75.14545807062...@newsclstr02.news.prodigy.com :
>
> > >>> In article
> > >>> <bf446d4f-757c-4a0c-a68a-0e3569b50...@m36g2000hse.googlegroups.com>,
> > >>> Jason Todd <janklowic...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > >>>> America's Next Top Model Winner Whitney Thompson...
> > >>>>http://www.nypost.com/tv/galleries/0...el/photo01.htm
> > >>> Conclusion: rubenesque
> > >> Rubens' fatty paintings lend no more dignity to the not-quite-morbidly
> > >> porky than the term "BBW" does.
>
> > >> That the armies of the nigh-obese have co-opted the guy's name and
> > >> career just to make themselves feel better about their flab is
> > >> unforgivable.
>
> > >>> but statuesque.
> > >> Besides insane fetishists, no respectable sculptor would create a statue
> > >> with those proportions.
>
> > > this is not statuesque, rubenesque, or plus, this is what a woman
> > > should be, not some stick figure. all this is pure crap. jenius
>
> > YOU!!! are pure crap!!!
>
> > you will find no tribesmen or nomads that look like her. she is a big
> > fat fattypants.
>
> > humans were not meant to look like that. so much fat is ONLY a sign of
> > inaction and gluttony. those gut rolls and lipid-stuffed extremities are
> > like a scarlet letter.
>
> > there is no good reason for anyone to be so fat.
>
> > humans were not meant to be fat, period.
>
> > --
> > the flower of alicia
> > "accept everyone as they are." - guru myanwu
>
> Are you looking at the same picture as the rest of us?
>
> THIS
>
> http://www.nypost.com/tv/galleries/0...el/photo01.jpg
>
> is NOT fat.

It's hard to say, really. Her head seems a bit small for the rest of
her body... aside from the fact that it's eerily doll-like. She
doesn't have the long, thin legs of a run-of-the-mill model, that's
for sure.

And besides, it's all relative. I like thin women and am thin myself,
so I would see her as at least chubby

RS

On 15 jun, 17:08, "Becoming something you're not [was LH]"
<lfkkhjsssssssss...@lhhhhggd.com> wrote:
> In article
> <95ee02cf-cfc3-4993-8840-ade3df0d6...@34g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>,
>
>
>
>
>
> *"pba...@worldonline.nl" <pba...@worldonline.nl> wrote:
> > On 12 jun, 01:02, flower alicia
> > <tobloomasarosed...@theflowerofalicia.com> wrote:
> > > jenius wrote:
> > > > On Jun 7, 3:13 pm, Astaroth <a...@b.c> wrote:
> > > >> "Becoming something you're not [was LH]"
> > > >> <lfkkhjsssssssss...@lhhhhggd.com> wrote in news:lfkkhjssssssssssik-
> > > >> 93FC75.14545807062...@newsclstr02.news.prodigy.com :
>
> > > >>> In article
> > > >>> <bf446d4f-757c-4a0c-a68a-0e3569b50...@m36g2000hse.googlegroups.com>,
> > > >>> *Jason Todd <janklowic...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > >>>> America's Next Top Model Winner Whitney Thompson...
> > > >>>>http://www.nypost.com/tv/galleries/05152008top model/photo01.htm
> > > >>> Conclusion: rubenesque
> > > >> Rubens' fatty paintings lend no more dignity to the not-quite-morbidly
> > > >> porky than the term "BBW" does.
>
> > > >> That the armies of the nigh-obese have co-opted the guy's name and
> > > >> career just to make themselves feel better about their flab is
> > > >> unforgivable.
>
> > > >>> but statuesque.
> > > >> Besides insane fetishists, no respectable sculptor would create a statue
> > > >> with those proportions.
>
> > > > this is not statuesque, rubenesque, or plus, this is what a woman
> > > > should be, not some stick figure. all this is pure crap. jenius
>
> > > YOU!!! are pure crap!!!
>
> > > you will find no tribesmen or nomads that look like her. she is a big
> > > fat fattypants.
>
> > > humans were not meant to look like that. so much fat is ONLY a sign of
> > > inaction and gluttony. those gut rolls and lipid-stuffed extremities are
> > > like a scarlet letter.
>
> > > there is no good reason for anyone to be so fat.
>
> > > humans were not meant to be fat, period.
>
> > > --
> > > the flower of alicia
> > > "accept everyone as they are." - guru myanwu- Tekst uit oorspronkelijk
> > > bericht niet weergeven -
>
> > > - Tekst uit oorspronkelijk bericht weergeven -
>
> > sure humans were not meant to be anything.
>
> > (which is the only fact that makes this silly post on topic for
> > alt.atheism)
>
> * *False. An atheist would not argue against the biological structure on
> the human body nor against what has been found optimal weight standards.
>
> --
> Emm Oh Oh En. That spells RSPW.- Tekst uit oorspronkelijk bericht niet weergeven -
>
> - Tekst uit oorspronkelijk bericht weergeven -

An atheist would argue against "humans meant to be"
At least this atheist would!

In article
<f12744f0-33b9-46ea-9a42-1f9c01543bb5@d1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>,
"pbamvv@worldonline.nl" <pbamvv@worldonline.nl> wrote:

> On 15 jun, 17:08, "Becoming something you're not [was LH]"
> <lfkkhjsssssssss...@lhhhhggd.com> wrote:
> > In article
> > <95ee02cf-cfc3-4993-8840-ade3df0d6...@34g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>,
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > *"pba...@worldonline.nl" <pba...@worldonline.nl> wrote:
> > > On 12 jun, 01:02, flower alicia
> > > <tobloomasarosed...@theflowerofalicia.com> wrote:
> > > > jenius wrote:
> > > > > On Jun 7, 3:13 pm, Astaroth <a...@b.c> wrote:
> > > > >> "Becoming something you're not [was LH]"
> > > > >> <lfkkhjsssssssss...@lhhhhggd.com> wrote in news:lfkkhjssssssssssik-
> > > > >> 93FC75.14545807062...@newsclstr02.news.prodigy.com :
> >
> > > > >>> In article
> > > > >>> <bf446d4f-757c-4a0c-a68a-0e3569b50...@m36g2000hse.googlegroups.com>,
> > > > >>> *Jason Todd <janklowic...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > > >>>> America's Next Top Model Winner Whitney Thompson...
> > > > >>>>http://www.nypost.com/tv/galleries/05152008top model/photo01.htm
> > > > >>> Conclusion: rubenesque
> > > > >> Rubens' fatty paintings lend no more dignity to the
> > > > >> not-quite-morbidly
> > > > >> porky than the term "BBW" does.
> >
> > > > >> That the armies of the nigh-obese have co-opted the guy's name and
> > > > >> career just to make themselves feel better about their flab is
> > > > >> unforgivable.
> >
> > > > >>> but statuesque.
> > > > >> Besides insane fetishists, no respectable sculptor would create a
> > > > >> statue
> > > > >> with those proportions.
> >
> > > > > this is not statuesque, rubenesque, or plus, this is what a woman
> > > > > should be, not some stick figure. all this is pure crap. jenius
> >
> > > > YOU!!! are pure crap!!!
> >
> > > > you will find no tribesmen or nomads that look like her. she is a big
> > > > fat fattypants.
> >
> > > > humans were not meant to look like that. so much fat is ONLY a sign of
> > > > inaction and gluttony. those gut rolls and lipid-stuffed extremities
> > > > are
> > > > like a scarlet letter.
> >
> > > > there is no good reason for anyone to be so fat.
> >
> > > > humans were not meant to be fat, period.
> >
> > > > --
> > > > the flower of alicia
> > > > "accept everyone as they are." - guru myanwu- Tekst uit oorspronkelijk
> > > > bericht niet weergeven -
> >
> > > > - Tekst uit oorspronkelijk bericht weergeven -
> >
> > > sure humans were not meant to be anything.
> >
> > > (which is the only fact that makes this silly post on topic for
> > > alt.atheism)
> >
> > * *False. An atheist would not argue against the biological structure on
> > the human body nor against what has been found optimal weight standards.
> >
> > --
> > Emm Oh Oh En. That spells RSPW.- Tekst uit oorspronkelijk bericht niet
> > weergeven -
> >
> > - Tekst uit oorspronkelijk bericht weergeven -
>
> An atheist would argue against "humans meant to be"
> At least this atheist would!


You would argue that the human body does not have certain
requirements in which to live healthily? Good luck with that one.

--
Emm Oh Oh En. That spells RSPW.

On Sun, 15 Jun 2008, Andrzej Rosa wrote:

> Dnia 2008-06-15 Tom Anderson napisa?(a):
> [...]
>>>> sure humans were not meant to be anything.
>>>>
>>>> (which is the only fact that makes this silly post on topic for
>>>> alt.atheism)
>>>
>>> False. An atheist would not argue against the biological structure on
>>> the human body nor against what has been found optimal weight standards.
>>
>> I am an atheist, and i would hit it.
>
> You sure that you fulfill *all* the requirements of a true and faithful
> atheist? Like not arguing against biological structures, for example?

What? The only biological structures i argue against are humans, and i
insist on my right to do that.

tom

--
Argumentative and pedantic, oh, yes. Although it's properly called
"correct" -- Huge

On Mon, 16 Jun 2008, Becoming something you're not [was LH] wrote:

> You would argue that the human body does not have certain
> requirements in which to live healthily? Good luck with that one.

My reply:

"I like to think. I like to read. I'm into freedom of speech and freedom
of choice. I'm the kind of guy that could sit in a greasy spoon and
wonder, gee, should I have the T-bone steak or the jumbo rack of barbecue
ribs or the side order of gravy fries? I want high cholesterol. I would
eat bacon and butter and buckets of cheese. Okay? I want to smoke Cuban
cigars the size of Cincinnati in the nonsmoking section. I want to run
through the streets naked with green Jell-O all over my body reading
Playboy magazine. Why? Because I might suddenly feel the need to. Okay,
pal?"

In other words... It don't matter how you think I should live my life.
You live your own, and I'll do the same.

On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 22:05:10 +0000, The Master
<tardis@nospam.sdf.lonestar.org.nospam> wrote:

>On Mon, 16 Jun 2008, Becoming something you're not [was LH] wrote:
>
>> You would argue that the human body does not have certain
>> requirements in which to live healthily? Good luck with that one.
>
>My reply:
>
>"I like to think. I like to read. I'm into freedom of speech and freedom
>of choice. I'm the kind of guy that could sit in a greasy spoon and
>wonder, gee, should I have the T-bone steak or the jumbo rack of barbecue
>ribs or the side order of gravy fries? I want high cholesterol. I would
>eat bacon and butter and buckets of cheese. Okay? I want to smoke Cuban
>cigars the size of Cincinnati in the nonsmoking section. I want to run
>through the streets naked with green Jell-O all over my body reading
>Playboy magazine. Why? Because I might suddenly feel the need to. Okay,
>pal?"
>
>In other words... It don't matter how you think I should live my life.
>You live your own, and I'll do the same.

Some guy named Charlie Manson held the same or very similiar
philosophy.

Anarchy defined - a person who promotes disorder or excites
revolt against any established rule, law, or custom..


Alex

In article <Pine.NEB.4.64.0806162202550.20283@sdf.lonestar.or g>,
The Master <tardis@nospam.sdf.lonestar.org.nospam> wrote:

> On Mon, 16 Jun 2008, Becoming something you're not [was LH] wrote:
>
> > You would argue that the human body does not have certain
> > requirements in which to live healthily? Good luck with that one.
>
> My reply:
>
> "I like to think. I like to read. I'm into freedom of speech and freedom
> of choice. I'm the kind of guy that could sit in a greasy spoon and
> wonder, gee, should I have the T-bone steak or the jumbo rack of barbecue
> ribs or the side order of gravy fries? I want high cholesterol. I would
> eat bacon and butter and buckets of cheese. Okay? I want to smoke Cuban
> cigars the size of Cincinnati in the nonsmoking section. I want to run
> through the streets naked with green Jell-O all over my body reading
> Playboy magazine. Why? Because I might suddenly feel the need to. Okay,
> pal?"
>
> In other words... It don't matter how you think I should live my life.
> You live your own, and I'll do the same.


Non-sequitor.

--
Emm Oh Oh En. That spells RSPW.

On Mon, 16 Jun 2008, Becoming something you're not [was LH] wrote:

>> In other words... It don't matter how you think I should live my life.
>> You live your own, and I'll do the same.
>
> Non-sequitor.

Not any more then trying to pass off any sort of "healthy body
requirements" as rules everyone needs to follow, wouldn't you agree?

In article <Pine.NEB.4.64.0806162238130.20283@sdf.lonestar.or g>,
The Master <tardis@nospam.sdf.lonestar.org.nospam> wrote:

> On Mon, 16 Jun 2008, Becoming something you're not [was LH] wrote:
>
> >> In other words... It don't matter how you think I should live my life.
> >> You live your own, and I'll do the same.
> >
> > Non-sequitor.
>
> Not any more then trying to pass off any sort of "healthy body
> requirements" as rules everyone needs to follow, wouldn't you agree?


Re-read what the discussion was. You're way off-base.

--
Emm Oh Oh En. That spells RSPW.

Dnia 2008-06-16 Tom Anderson napisa³(a):
> On Sun, 15 Jun 2008, Andrzej Rosa wrote:
>
>> Dnia 2008-06-15 Tom Anderson napisa?(a):
>> [...]
>>>>> sure humans were not meant to be anything.
>>>>>
>>>>> (which is the only fact that makes this silly post on topic for
>>>>> alt.atheism)
>>>>
>>>> False. An atheist would not argue against the biological structure on
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>> the human body nor against what has been found optimal weight standards.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>
>>> I am an atheist, and i would hit it.
>>
>> You sure that you fulfill *all* the requirements of a true and faithful
>> atheist? Like not arguing against biological structures, for example?
>
> What?

You see, being an atheist isn't all roses. You need to make some
sacrifices. ;-)

> The only biological structures i argue against are humans, and i
> insist on my right to do that.

I'd argue against mosquitoes. Actually, I'm sure I will.

--
Andrzej Rosa 1127R