Conspiracy theorists help 9-11 truth movement

>
> > No, retard, prove that my mind 'isn't comparable to a working
> > human mind'
>
> You prove that each time you post, puss brain.

Wow, "puss brain", how very kindergarten of you.
>
> > Or were you referring to the sarcasm of me saying "prove that something
> > DIDN'T happen"
>
> Now you're catching on. Do you still "think" WTC7
> was hit by a plane? <chuckle>
>
>
>

Err yes, why wouln't I, your pathetic ravings wouldn't sway a 6 year
old, though I'm sure you've tried.


>

--
"What's that got to do with my KNOB?"

Bedknobs and Broomsticks

fish. wrote:
>>> No, retard, prove that my mind 'isn't comparable to a working
>>> human mind'
>> You prove that each time you post, puss brain.
>
> Wow, "puss brain", how very kindergarten of you.
>>
>>> Or were you referring to the sarcasm of me saying "prove that something
>>> DIDN'T happen"
>> Now you're catching on. Do you still "think" WTC7
>> was hit by a plane? <chuckle>
>>
>>
>>
>
> Err yes, why wouln't I, your pathetic ravings wouldn't sway a 6 year
> old, though I'm sure you've tried.
>
>
>


Your'e walking into a 'Henry' minefield here 'fish'......

Henry will wind you up referring to the 'twin towers', pointing out how
jet fuel couldn't have done 'this', the real cause was 'that' etc. When
you question him re. the towers, he will change tack and slide across to
World Trade Centre 7 (WTC7), which wasn't hit by a plane, but sustained
damage from debris, caught fire, and collapsed (or in Henry's mind was
demolished using thermite cutting charges <g>).

He relies on ignorance of the little reported WTC7 collapse to suck you
into his conspiracy world......tread carefully.

fish. wrote:
>Henry wrote:

>> Now you're catching on. Do you still "think" WTC7
>> was hit by a plane? <chuckle>

> Err yes, why wouln't I

How about because WTC7 wasn't hit by a plane? Not only
that, but =no= =one= has been able to explain its free
fall speed and perfectly symmetric collapse except those
who correctly state that it was a controlled demolition.
I'd ask you to tell us what you "think" caused it, but
you already told us - a silent invisible plane hit it.
You gotta love these magic fire conspiracy kooks and
their wild imaginations... <g>

http://911research.wtc7.net/talks/wtc/videos.html


Here's what happens to steel framed buildings exposed
to raging infernos for hours on end.

http://davesweb.cnchost.com/nwsltr69c.html

On 9-11-01, WTC7, a 47 story steel framed building, which
had only small, random fires, dropped in perfect symmetry
at near free fall speed as in a perfectly executed controlled
demolition.

http://911research.wtc7.net/talks/wtc/videos.html

BrianNZ wrote:
> fish. wrote:
>> Henry wrote:

>>> Do you still "think" WTC7
>>> was hit by a plane? <chuckle>

>> Err yes, why wouln't I, your pathetic ravings wouldn't
>> sway a 6 year old, though I'm sure you've tried.

> Your'e walking into a 'Henry' minefield here 'fish'......

Only if you consider basic reading and comprehension
of English to be a minefield. Now that you mention it,
I suppose to a magic fire conspiracy kook, it probably
would be... <vbg>



--

http://911research.wtc7.net
http://www.st911.org



Here's what happens to steel framed buildings exposed
to raging infernos for hours on end.

http://davesweb.cnchost.com/nwsltr69c.html

On 9-11-01, WTC7, a 47 story steel framed building, which
had only small, random fires, dropped in perfect symmetry
at near free fall speed as in a perfectly executed controlled
demolition.

http://911research.wtc7.net/talks/wtc/videos.html